USA Today: Did Sandy Berger 'Steal' Secret Docs? We're Debating That Still

You know, it seems pretty cut-and-dried to me. Stuffing secret documents down your pants and removing them from a secure room in a federal facility, that constitutes stealing.

USA Today's "On Deadline" blog isn't sure, though. (bold/italics are USA Today's):

Sandy Berger, the national security adviser under former President Clinton, was disbarred yesterday in the District of Columbia.

The Washington Post says Berger agreed last month to give up his law license in order to avoid a prolonged investigation that grew out of his conviction in 2005 of removing classified documents from the National Archives.

"While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession," Berger said in a statement. "I am very sorry for what I did, and deeply apologize."

We debated whether to characterize Berger's actions as "stealing." What do you think?

Media Bias Debate Labeling USA Today Online Media

Sponsored Links