Israeli Editors Gloat Over Media's Power to Push Anti-war Message

Publicly, American media elites often deny that they attempt to influence the national agenda. They're professionals, so the story goes, and completely capable of not letting their personal viewpoints intrude accidentally into their stories. It's laughable given the mountain of evidence to the contrary and the fact that journalists support affirmative action on the grounds that white reporters can't cover minority issues as fairly.

Every so often, however, you hear journalists privately say the complete opposite--that not only do they have the ability to influence news, they also choose to influence it. Such statements are usually more common among the non-American press where the sham of "objectivity" is not perpetrated on the public.

With that in mind, I was still quite surprised to see the following statements said at a panel discussion in Israel on the influence that country's media has had on its foreign policy:

A former Israel Broadcasting Authority news editor admits: "We slanted the news towards a withdrawal from Lebanon - because we had sons there."

Speaking at the Haifa Radio Conference on Monday, several former and
current news broadcasters on Voice of Israel and Army Radio discussed
the tremendous influence they nearly all agreed they had on Israel's
national agenda.

Dr. Chanan Naveh, who edited the Israel
Broadcasting Authority radio's news desk in late 1990's and early
2000's, was particularly bombastic about his pervasive reach: "The
morning audience, stuck in traffic jams or at work, is simply captive -
they're ours." He also mentioned, with no regrets, two examples in
which he and his colleagues made a concerted effort to change public

"Three broadcasters - Carmela Menashe, Shelly
Yechimovich [now a Labor party Knesset Member - ed.], and I - pushed in
every way possible the withdrawal from Lebanon towards 2000. In our
newsroom, three of the editors had sons in Lebanon, and we took it upon
ourselves as a mission - possibly not stated - to get the IDF out of
Lebanon... I have no doubt that we promoted an agenda of withdrawal
that was a matter of public dispute."

At this point, Army Radio broadcaster Golan Yochpaz interrupted, "In my opinion, that is just super-problematic - super-problematic."
Naveh did not miss a beat and said, "Correct, I'm admitting it, I'm not
apologizing, I'm just saying this is what happened. It came from our
guts because of the boys in Lebanon, this is what we did and I'm not
sorry... I am very proud that we had a part in getting of our sons out
of Lebanon."

It is widely accepted that the withdrawal from
Lebanon in May 2000 under then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak and the lack
of attention paid to the northern border since then led to the Second
Lebanon War of last summer and its accompanying 160 military and
civilian casualties.

Naveh's boast came towards the end of the
panel discussion and was not widely addressed. However, just seconds
later, retired Supreme Court Justice Dalia Dorner, the president of the
Israel Press Council, summed up and said that the journalists must show
courage and not allow outside influences to affect their ability to
influence public opinion:

"You determine the daily agenda
and you have the power; the problem is that in your profession, it
can't be dealt with properly and ethically without civil courage... You
have the power, so use it also to ensure that there is freedom of
speech - of course, with the limitation that you must act ethically and
not create hostile public opinion, because there is nothing that
affects freedom of speech more than hostile public opinion."
Foreign Policy Media Bias Debate Israel/Palestine Radio
Matthew Sheffield's picture