Washington Post

Recently, Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson was celebrated on Morning Joe for writing a column which complained the media was rougher on Kamala Harris than Donald Trump. “Somehow, it is apparently baked into this campaign that Trump is allowed to talk and act like a complete lunatic while Harris has to be perfect in every way.”

Aaron Blake is a "senior political reporter" at The Washington Post, for a section they call "The Fix." Well, this pathetic attempt to help Joe Biden paper over what he quite obviously said is an attempt at "the fix," but it doesn't work.

It’s deliriously funny that The Washington Post jumped into a cauldron of boiling angst by refusing to endorse Kamala Harris for president. The decision is deeply weird. It’s like McDonald’s declining to advocate for hamburgers.

CNN’s very own Anderson Cooper and newly-rehired Brian Stelter got together and, in an exchange devoid of fundamental self-awareness, chided Jeff Bezos for pulling the plug on endorsements at The Washington Post. The two went right to the line of accusing Bezos of improprieties, with a hysterical Stelter suggesting that this is the beginning of autocracy.

CBS’s Stephen Colbert did not appreciate the Washington Post’s “extra sinister" decision to refrain from endorsing Kamala Harris. On Monday’s edition of The Late Show, Colbert railed against the paper and declared it is failing to uphold its stated commitment to democracy and warn “about a looming fascist regime.”

Amazon founder and owner Jeff Bezos may have tipped his hand on who he believes will be the next president of the United States.

You can tell Donald Trump is winning and Kamala Harris is losing when Washington Post columnists like Eugene Robinson are lashing out at the liberal media, like they have failed to cover Donald Trump viciously enough! They are somehow rougher on Kamala! 

Los Angeles Times columnist LZ Granderson joined PBS News Hour on Friday to attack his paper’s “extremely frustrating” decision not to endorse Kamala Harris in the presidential election. New York Times counterpart and alleged conservative counterweight David Brooks agreed, saying the Times and Washington Post’s similar decision “hurt the integrity of the paper.”

First came the internal freakout when the Los Angeles Times decided not to endorse their home-state Democrat Kamala Harris. Now The Washington Post has followed suit. NPR's David Folkenflik reported “Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement." They were said to be "shocked" and uniformly…

Under a week after the New York Times dismissed Kamala Harris’s book plagiarism by attacking the “seizing” investigator Christopher Rufo as possibly racist for bringing it to light, the Times has gotten tough on a writer guilty of a very similar offense. It turns out that sometimes borrowing material verbatim is objectionable to the Times -- at least when…

Liberal journalists love to paint the Republicans as opposed to facts – which implies that liberal journalists own the facts and determine who is actually using them properly. The Washington Post put this aggressive headline on the front of the October 15 edition: “Campaign takes stand against fact checks: In live settings, Trump aims to let his falsehoods go unchallenged.”

With only three weeks remaining before the election, Google continues to heavily push leftist media coverage of Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump in search results.

The following are just a few examples of journalists making a pre-election loss case that it wasn’t Harris’s incompetence or leftist policies that the country rejected - rather it’s because  America is too “misogynistic” to vote for a woman.

Both CBS Mornings and NBC's Today pounced on a Washington Post story which promoted an email alleging there was an "armed militia" speaking darkly of "hunting FEMA." Both CBS and NBC connected this alleged threat to clips of Donald Trump speeches.