Has David Brooks Been at the NY Times Too Long?

September 3rd, 2005 10:18 PM

When David Brooks first joined the NY Times in September 2003, it initially seemed that he was going to be able to keep his conservative leanings, and would be a fine replacement for William Safire once the latter had retired.  However, lately it seems that Mr. Brooks is being co-opted by others on the Times editorial staff.

In fact, his latest op-ed sounds like it could have been written by either Paul Krugman or Maureen Dowd:

The scrapbook of history accords but a few pages to each decade, and it is already clear that the pages devoted to this one will be grisly. There will be pictures of bodies falling from the twin towers, beheaded kidnapping victims in Iraq and corpses still floating in the waterways of New Orleans five days after the disaster that caused them.


Katrina means that the political culture, already sour and bloody-minded in many quarters, will shift. There will be a reaction. There will be more impatience for something new. There is going to be some sort of big bang as people respond to the cumulative blows of bad events and try to fundamentally change the way things are.

With all due respect, David, the economy is exploding, per capita net worth is at the highest point in history due to real estate appreciation, and the unemployment rate just dropped to its lowest level since before 9/11.  You need to either go back to the Weekly Standard to get your bearings realigned, or, at the very least, move a couple of offices further away from Krugman and Dowd.

And please open the blinds in your office to let a little sunshine in.