The Boston Globe successfully organized a campaign to get nearly 350 newspapers, large and small, to publish an editorial on August 16 “on the dangers of the administration's assault on the press.” They laughably claimed "This whole project is not anti-Trump. It's really pro-press.”
This was the Globe’s summation: “The greatness of America is dependent on the role of the free press to speak the truth, to the powerful. To label the press ‘the enemy of the people’ is as un-American as it is dangerous to the civil compact we have shared for more than two centuries.”
It’s easy (and obvious) for any newspaper to write purple prose about the glories of the First Amendment and the crucial role the press plays in keeping governments accountable. The rebuttal is just as easy: many liberal media outlets stink at holding liberal politicians accountable. Instead, they gush over them and defend them at every turn, refusing to advance stories that could damage their reputations. Let’s do a quick review of the Globe “holding liberals accountable.”
— Just a few weeks ago, the Globe’s deputy Washington bureau chief Matt Viser wrote a gushy valentine to Ted Cruz’s ultraliberal opponent Beto O’Rourke in Town & Country magazine, naturally comparing him and his “inspiring message” to “Bobby Kennedy in 1968.”
— When the movie Chappaquiddick came out in April, Globe film critic Ty Burr touted Ted Kennedy’s “endless accomplishments” in the Senate and added the Kennedys “remain royalty in a country of grudging commoners.” Was the movie true? The critic concluded: “I’ll never know, and neither will you.”
— In January, the Globe topped a Sunday paper with the headline oozing over Barack Obama: “Gone But Still Growing On Us.” It began: “His poll numbers look great, his Twitter posts are often among the most read in the world, and with every utterance, his impassioned base of supporters reacts with a fervor more typical for celebrities than former civil servants. Meet Barack Obama.” Can you smell them holding presidents accountable?
— Last September, the Globe’s front page carried a story implausibly promoting ultraliberal Sen. Elizabeth Warren as a Bible-thumping Christian. “Warren is well known for her acrid take on” Wall Street and Donald Trump, but “religious leaders who have known her since her first run for public office say her Christian faith is a constant, if quiet, presence in her life, that it is deep and authentic, and informs her work as a senator.” That echoes the way liberals promoted Hillary Clinton, and skips over their hard-core defense of abortion on demand.
By contrast, the Globe’s ardor against Trump caused them to create literal “Fake News.” On April 9, 2016, the Boston Globe published an entirely fake front page, imagining the nightmare of a President Trump on April 9, 2017 such as: “U.S. soldiers refuse orders to kill ISIS families.” The orders never came. In another fake story, Trump offended the Chinese first lady by naming his new dog after her. Trump didn’t get a new dog. Another predicted, “Markets sink as trade war looms,” with the Dow Jones at 9,912. On the actual date in 2017, it was over 20,000.
The Globe describes this anti-Trump jihad as "promoting the freedom of the press, in light of President Trump's frequent attacks on the media." The Globe chooses to ignore that the media's documented network evening-news coverage of the Trump campaign in 2016 was over 90% negative. It chooses to ignore that this 90% negative coverage has been the norm every single month since then. His attacks on them may be frequent, but theirs on him are almost universal. There are many things the press ignores these days, including their rampant hypocrisy.