NBC Meteorologist: Earth Would ‘Just Be Fine’ if Humans ‘All Disappeared’

February 7th, 2019 1:21 PM

Swept up in the hysteria of the latest government report on climate change, during the third hour of NBC’s Today show on Thursday, meteorologist Dylan Dreyer suggested that if humanity simply “disappeared” the planet “would go back and just be fine.” Fellow forecaster Al Roker defensively lectured that the new climate findings were “not from some conspiracy group.”

Earlier that morning, during a 7:30 a.m. ET half hour weather report, Roker proclaimed to viewers: “Hey guys, we just got in the 2018 climate report from NASA and NOAA....This is not some fly-by-night organization or conspiracy theory, this is the government telling you, telling us, it’s the fourth warmest year globally on record.” Later, at the top of the 9:00 a.m. ET hour, the weatherman reintroduced the topic:

So we just got it in and it is somewhat disturbing. 2018 was the fourth warmest year on record. And that means that we’re talking about, for the last five years, the five warmest years have been the last five years. And this is not from some conspiracy group or anything like this. This is from NASA and NOAA. You know, these are government organizations tasked with keeping track of this.

 

 

Co-host Craig Melvin replied with “Wow,” asking moments later: “What’s the practical effect?...The practical effect of this warming planet?” Dreyer fielded the question and stumbled into imagining the nonexistence of the human race:

Well, I think a lot of it has to do with how we are impacted by it. Not just we, I mean all living lifeforms on the planet....I think if we all disappeared like this, the Earth would go back and just be fine, you know. Whatever cycle it’s on, whatever – if it’s warm, if it’s cold, I think it just goes back to doing its thing. But we all live here and we are all impacted by this.

The rest of the panel just nodded along with her remarks.

Dreyer’s comments actually echoed a 2007 discussion on the NBC morning show between then-co-hosts Matt Lauer and Meredith Vieira. Promoting a new book entitled The Earth Without Us, Lauer declared: “We’re gonna talk to the author about that. And really it’s all about trying to figure out how long it would take nature to reclaim what we’ve created.” Vieira chimed in: “The mess.” Lauer accepted her term: “How long it would take nature to fix the mess we’ve made?”

In a more graphic example, back in 1991, Newsweek Senior Writer Jerry Adler offered this disturbing solution: “It’s a morbid observation, but if everyone on Earth just stopped breathing for an hour, the greenhouse effect would no longer be a problem.”

Following Dreyer’s statement on Thursday’s Today show, Sunday Today host Willie Geist wrapped up the discussion by arguing: “...you have to work pretty hard at this point to deny this is happening.” Roker lamented: “But there are those who will.” Geist acknowledged: “There are, there are. And there are people who say on a cold day like we had last week, where’s it 77 below in Minnesota, ‘Where’s global warming?’” Melvin sneered: “Social media kooks.”

Lately, NBC has shown an almost religious devotion to promoting the climate change agenda and slamming skeptics. In January, Roker actually thanked America as he reported on a new poll showing a majority of people were concerned by climate change. In December, Meet the Press host Chuck Todd introduced a special edition of the Sunday show by touting how he intentionally excluded “climate deniers” from the program. Just before Christmas, Roker claimed it was a “sin” not to take action on climate change.

Here is a full transcript of the February 7 panel discussion on Today:

9:01 AM ET

AL ROKER: So one of the byproducts of the government shutdown, we normally get, a little earlier than this, the climate report from the previous year, but it’s been late because the scientists who put that together were furloughed. So we just got it in and it is somewhat disturbing. 2018 was the fourth warmest year on record.

CRAIG MELVIN: Wow.

ROKER: And that means that we’re talking about, for the last five years, the five warmest years have been the last five years. And this is not from some conspiracy group or anything like this. This is from NASA and NOAA. You know, these are government organizations tasked with keeping track of this. And in the last 42 years consecutively, we’ve had – each year has gotten warmer than the year before globally.

SHEINELLE JONES: I think sometimes you lose perspective. One, let’s say here on the east coast it’s freezing outside, so you know, you lose that. But sometimes when I see reports, you’ve done them, or we talk about, you know, global warming or, you know, climate change, and you see these videos, you know, extremes in parts of the country, where, you know, polar bears or you see the ice melting. That’s, for me, when it sinks in.

MELVIN: What’s the practical effect?

JONES: That’s a good question.

MELVIN: And I guess one of you guys would probably be best to answer this. The practical effect of this warming planet?  

DYLAN DREYER: Well, I think a lot of it has to do with how we are impacted by it. Not just we, I mean all living lifeforms on the planet.

ROKER: Sure.

DREYER: And I think, you know, throughout all of history, there’s been these changes, you know, coastlines change, animals adapt and, you know, humans adapt, depending on what the climate is as we go forward. So I think it’s really just impactful for us.

I think if we all disappeared like this, the Earth would go back and just be fine, you know. Whatever cycle it’s on, whatever – if it’s warm, if it’s cold, I think it just goes back to doing its thing. But we all live here and we are all impacted by this.

ROKER: And what’s happening now, because of this warming, you have icecaps melting, more warmer water in the ocean. That is evaporated into the atmosphere. That provides more energy, and that creates greater storms and greater, more impactful hurricanes and storms.

JONES: That’s another piece.

ROKER: And snowstorms. And we start to see greater, not just hurricanes, but greater – the number of 3-inch rainfalls or more than that have increased by 40% in the last 30 years.

JONES: Wow.

DREYER: I think it’s so important to like – we’re talking about climate here, you know? It’s not the day-to-day. You know, you could have a day where it’s 20 degrees above average. And the next day, you could have a day where it’s 40 degrees below average. You know, like we’ve seen within the last two weeks. Those are just moments in time. This looks at the climate and over periods of time.

ROKER: Right.

DREYER: And the trend is that the temperatures are warming.

ROKER: And globally.

DREYER: Right.

WILLIE GEIST: I was just gonna say, Craig, you have to work pretty hard at this point to deny this is happening.

MELVIN: Yes.

GEIST: When you have NASA –  

ROKER: But there are those who will.

GEIST: There are, there are. And there are people who say on a cold day like we had last week, where’s it 77 below in Minnesota, “Where’s global warming?” Well, as you both point out, it’s climate change, it’s not global warming.     

ROKER: Yes.

DREYER: Exactly.

MELVIN: Social media kooks.

ROKER: And climate change creates the opportunity for greater temperature extremes, which is
what we’ve been expecting.

GEIST: Right, extreme weather.

DREYER: And it impacts all of us.