The Media Are Covering Up the Mass Rape of Thousands of British Girls

The American news media are covering up one of the most horrific cases of mass-sexual abuse and violence perpetrated against young girls in recent history.

On Tuesday, an independent initiative in the UK, chaired by Reform MP Rupert Lowe, released a 219-page report documenting decades of rampant sexual abuse, torture, and trafficking perpetrated against as many as 250,000 underage British girls, primarily by Pakistani Muslims. The report details numerous cases of horrific gang rape and sexual torture — some of it too graphic to describe here — which, perhaps most alarmingly, were covered up or even partly facilitated by the British government.

Despite the notoriously leftist British media’s desire to avoid the story, news of the report circulated widely throughout the UK populace. The story was just too big for the media to suppress.

In America, however, where the average person is unlikely to have heard much (if anything) about MP Rupert Lowe and his Rape Gang Inquiry, media censorship is far more likely to succeed at keeping the public in the dark about this modern atrocity. 

And censor they have. MRC analysts who examined all coverage on left-leaning cable (CNN and MS NOW) and broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS) could not find a single on-air mention of the report as of 4:00 p.m. on June 18, more than two full days after it was published.

It’s not as though these networks are unconcerned with British politics; both CBS and NBC have mentioned UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on-air as recently as Wednesday, June 17. That same day, PBS aired a nearly 12-minute interview with British Bloomberg reporter Stephanie Flanders, which focused entirely on the dynamics currently at play in UK politics. 

Flanders even mentioned Lowe specifically, but only in the context of the “far right” rising to prominence in her country.

The reason for the corporate media’s silence is as familiar as it is predictable: they fear that covering the Rape Inquiry would further fuel anti-immigration sentiment in the U.S., which in turn might cause problems for their favorite pro-open borders political party. Given almost every left-wing journalist in the country voted for a President who spent four years literally flying illegal immigrants into the country on the taxpayer’s dime, it’s no surprise they see this story as too politically dangerous to cover.

The American news media are going beyond abdicating their journalistic duty in refusing to cover so monumental an atrocity, especially one involving one of America’s closest and oldest allies. In refusing even to acknowledge the indescribable suffering inflicted on untold thousands of innocent British girls — some as young as four years old — the corporate media are prioritizing the political prospects of the Democratic party above the well-being of a quarter of a million children.