Today's Highlights: What MRC's Media Watchdogs Are Saying

January 14th, 2026 12:01 AM

MRC Watchdogs churn out breaking news on a daily basis. Don't miss Today's Highlights, where you can keep up with the top MRC content, whether it's the latest study on media bias, a glaring omission from the elitist media, or how the Big Tech companies are serving up the same leftist spin as the media. 

Top Stories:

  1. Networks Play Games on ICE Coverage, Tout MN ‘Fighting Back’ Against ‘Chaotic’ Agents
  2. Shameless Ilhan Omar Accuses Trump Of Wasting Taxpayer Dollars
  3. Big Four News Apps Push Elitist Media Narrative on Minn ICE Shooting
  4. MS NOW: Observing Biological Sex Differences Is a Right-Wing Fear Campaign

 

  1. Networks Play Games on ICE Coverage, Tout MN ‘Fighting Back’ Against ‘Chaotic’ Agents

Broadcast networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC sensationalize ICE operations in Minnesota as "chaotic" and "violent," framing them as unconstitutional federal overreach that instills fear in communities, while completely omitting or downplaying the serious criminal records (including child sexual assault, rape, homicide, and manslaughter) of the over 2,000 arrested illegal immigrants.

Media coverage heavily favors far-left protesters and Democrat officials, portraying states like Minnesota as heroically "fighting back" against a "federal invasion," with soundbites from figures like Attorney General Keith Ellison and Mayor Jacob Frey dominating reports, but offering only token or no mention of the Trump administration's goal to protect Americans by removing dangerous criminals.

Networks engage in deceptive editing and omissions to skew narratives, such as CBS changing "murder" to "the killing" in reference to a protester's death, NBC ignoring arrestees' criminal histories in follow-up stories, and all three outlets inciting unrest by prioritizing anti-ICE perspectives over balanced reporting on the operations' public safety benefits.

  1. Shameless Ilhan Omar Accuses Trump Of Wasting Taxpayer Dollars

Identity Politics as a Media Shield Rep. Omar’s identity as a Black, Muslim refugee creates a "DEI shield" that protects her from objective scrutiny. This "born-on-third-base" status allegedly leads to media coddling, where journalists prioritize her demographic profile over a rigorous evaluation of her political merits or performance.

Enabling Disinformation and Conspiracy Theories Liberal networks act as a megaphone for Omar’s inflammatory rhetoric by refusing to challenge her even when she contradicts video evidence. By allowing her to claim the administration is manufacturing "deadly encounters" to trigger martial law without pushback, the media is validating dangerous conspiracy theories.

Selective Accountability on Fraud and Ethics A  double standard exists where the media ignores Omar’s alleged ties to welfare fraud schemes and her unexplained increase in net worth. Instead of investigating these taxpayer-funded scandals, journalists actively "polish and defuse" her record while dismissing legitimate investigations as partisan attacks.

 

       3. Big Four News Apps Push Elitist Media Narrative on Minn ICE Shooting

The Dominance of Left-Leaning News Aggregation The Big 4 News Apps — Apple News, Google News, MSN, and Yahoo News—utilize their massive reach to disproportionately promote left-leaning media outlets. In covering the MN ICE shooting, these "Big Four" apps featured 20 left-leaning articles compared to only three from right-leaning sources, effectively creating a "news vacuum" that excludes conservative viewpoints from the primary public square.

Narrative Framing Through Selective Story Placement Beyond just the quantity of articles, news aggregators exert influence by consistently pinning left-leaning coverage to the top of their apps and featuring emotionally charged imagery, these platforms pre-condition how the public interprets an event before they have even read the facts. This editorial control allows aggregators to frame government actions and law enforcement incidents through a partisan lens, often ignoring conflicting evidence or official statements that don't fit the preferred storyline.

Highlighting Radical Outlets Over Mainstream Balance News apps are increasingly elevating content from radical, highly partisan outlets like Salon and The New Republic while simultaneously suppressing or ignoring established right-of-center publications. This shift transforms "news apps" into tools for activism, where headlines focus on "conspiracy theories" and "chilling warnings" rather than objective reporting. When platforms prioritize sensationalist, radical content over balanced journalism, they contribute to a fractured information environment where millions of Americans are only presented with one side of the national conversation.

  1. MS NOW: Observing Biological Sex Differences Is a Right-Wing Fear Campaign

Media Erasure of Biological Reality In covering the Supreme Court hearing on transgender athletes, MSNBC is framing the recognition of biological sex differences as a manufactured "right-wing fear campaign." By dismissing concerns over muscle mass and lung capacity as politically driven, the network is prioritizing ideology over the observable physical realities that have historically defined fair competition in women’s sports.

Normalization of Early Medical Intervention Mainstream media segments are normalizing extreme medical transitions for children, such as hormone use in primary school, while attacking opponents of these practices. This coverage treats controversial interventions as routine and uncontroversial, while simultaneously labeling the defense of sex-based categories as discriminatory "sex stereotyping."

The Deconstruction of Title IX Protections Legal commentators are attempting to redefine sex discrimination in a way that risks dismantling foundational protections for female athletes. By arguing that acknowledging male biological advantages is "impermissible stereotyping," this perspective threatens to undermine the original purpose of Title IX, which was created specifically to account for biological differences.