.

Well Limbaugh said it....

Anyone that dares say that Obama or Hillary can't be good Presidents will need to apologize all the time until election day.

How dare anyone claim that a woman or a black man can't make good Presidents?  how dare he?

Of course, it is not about the color of their skin or what's between the legs, rather that Obama and Hillary are super, duper Liberals, socialists and communists.  But leave it to CNN to allow their pro-communist guest to rant and rave and say stupid things.

I believe it escapes CNN and its guests that it was them that made the un-American comments and who made stupid assumptions.

but Limbaugh said, Republicans need to be ready to apologize every other day for making any type of political attack on a woman and a black man. 

Of course, I suspect that McCain will now go out and apologize for Rush Limbaugh's comments and agree with CNN. 

I am sick and tired of Republicans not having a back bone!
I suspect that Limbaugh will have a field day tomorrow with this.

If Limbaugh is so irrelavent, why is CNN talking about him and having two Democrats talk about him.  The moron that claimed he was irrelavent should have refused to get on CNN to talk about Limbaugh, right? 

Liberals=dumb.

"He is so irrelevant, and he only says stuff to be inflammatory." If he's so irrelevant, why are they talking about him? People are beginning to see what both these folks "stand" for, and they won't vote (to elect) for either, seperatly or together. This years' election, however, will truly be "voting for the least common denominator"., when it comes to libs or rinos, however, a 50% solution is better than a socialist solution.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

I forgive Rush for just about any mistakes he *might* have made in the past (not that I can think of any).  I am SO PROUD OF RUSH right now I am speechless.  Thank Goodness there is one sane man left in broadcasting.

I don't know what preceeded the comment that has "Bobo" Brazile so up in arms, so I won't comment until I know more.

I will say, though, that Bobo Brazile is the ultimate party hack.  I have heard James "Snake" Carville be candid on occasion concerning Republicans.  I have NEVER heard similar candor from the lips of Bobo.  Whatever she says is pure partisan politics.

(Apologies to Big Time Wrestlers and their fans) 

RRAM Tough! 

Well that's the big fat elephant in the room isn't it? Rush's guest host alluded to the fact yesterday. The United States hasn't yet passed the mile stone where its ready to elect an African-American or female President. When that time comes, we will know months if not years in advance. It won't be a close poll. It will be a 80% - 20% poll. The Wilder factor won't even enter into the picture.

Its quite typical of the loony left to stone a heretic for simply stating the truth.

How long will it take for John McCain to condemn and disassociate himself from Limbaugh's remarks?

I was listening to Rush today -- again, liberal dunces distort the context.  Rush is very much relevant, so much so, he tilted the outcome of a tight race by pointing out how keeping the wife/chief apologist of a disgraced, disbarred, impeached serial rapist/molester on the Democratic ticket would confound the pandering and political slight of hand offered by an unabashed socialist and rank amateur.

Only a complete idiot would give (re: Democrat) a Clinton/Obama - Obama/Clinton a snowball's chance to succeed.  Of course, lots of Democrats can't spell snowball anymore -- global warming has melted their brains. 

I neither like/dislike Rush.I dont listen to his show.I just dont understand the problem with what he said.So what was so god awful terrible about what he said?Must of been a slow day in the newsroom.

gee Donna.  That's not "American"   But Keith Olberloon calling the President Bush a "fascist" "engaging in terrorism," a "liar" and "idiot in chief."   Is Jusssssssssssssssssssst fine.

Now these are just my thoughts, I’m not implying anything, but.. Obama would never take the VP position because he would look like the “token” ahhhhh black and Clinton would never take the VP position unless she had something up her sleeve. And Obama would never let Clinton take the VP spot because he knows how the Clinton’s “handle” some situations. Charles Ruff, Mary Mahoney, Vincent Foster, Ed Willey,, Etc…..It sounds way out there but I’m sorry, I think about it.

Good for Rush.  Voicing an opinion on how that ticket would fair in the general election.  And here's Donna Brazille, calling it un-American?  And did Rush say "they are not capable of serving the country in the capacity of Commander-in-Chief," as Brazille has said he said?  Nope, he said the ticket wouldn't win.  He didn't say, in what's written in this thread, anything about their ability to do a job.  But leave it to a liberal to twist the comment to make it appear racist or sexist, which it was neither.

Then Ron Kirk calling Rush "irrelevant?"  Poll the nation on relevancy......Ron Kirk vs Rush Limbaugh.  Most would ask "who's Ron Kirk?".  LOL

Let them waste their time talking about Rush..you think he cares?  He's got 'em just where he wants 'em.  If they're talking about Rush, they're not focusing on the things that could really harm our country.  Let 'em run with it. The blithering idiots in the MSM do not have a lick of sense between them.

Did anyone notice Hillary's comment to Rush today when asked by some MSM drone?

"Careful what you wish for Rush"...was her reply, and it was kind of a chilling way she said it to. When asked if there was anything else she kind of hesitated and said "No... That's All".

Well, I wonder what type of threats were insuated there.... "Fairness Doctrine" taking Rush out, IRS audits galore making Rush's life hell, planting info (or drugs) about Rush, or just plain 'ol doing a "Vince Foster" or "James McDougal" on him? Well, I'd have a chill up my spine with that *itch saying stuff like that to me...

It's funny, I seem to always be listening to Rush when these so-called "controversial" statements are made, and I never hear anything controversial at the time he makes the statements.  I hear a man who is well-versed in making very subtle, but strong, points in his monologue and in his response to callers.  Often, these are points which will shoot right by anyone who is not really listening or does not care to understand them.  This is what makes Limbaugh so successful; he does not feel the need to beat his audience over the head with his message, like so many others in the media feel the need to do.  The media, either intentionally or through its own ignorance, does not convey most of what Rush says in a fair manner.  Very little of Rush's program would make much sense in short soundbites; yet, this is usually how he is presented by the msm.  I've been listening to Rush for years, and he rarely, if ever, says anything simply for its shock value.  Other pundits do this all the time (hello Keith Olbermann), but Rush simply does not operate in this fashion.  Unfortunately, Rush's enemies just do not really get him, so they apply characteristics they believe he possesses and draw erroneous conclusions from those assumptions.

BUT they cannot. They trash him because he is so profound.

I too heard his show while at my office today and he spoke the truth about a ticket with clinton/obama.

I do not think it will ever happen because she will never agree to the second spot and he is will be owed the top spot because of popular votes and the amount of delegates, minus super delegates, he has won fair and square.

 So the MSM is way out on this one.

Rush is RIGHT and the MSM is LEFT and wrong.

I don't think that it was very smart for Rush to say this. It's going to feed the left like crazy, I can just see it as more fodder that they can use to "show those unwitting folks that the conservatives/GOP really are racists and/or do think in racist ways." He should have just maintained his objections to their policies and how several are turned off by them. He simply should not have said that. Pure mistake on his part. Way to feed the fire, Rush. More liberal crap we have to deal with now.

And of course, how typical of CNN to take a trip into the bias blatancy zone by inviting along 4 'crats and one Republican to give a totally needed </sarcasm> assessment of a fragment of Rush's words.

------------------------------------------------------------

Grizzly Bear '08

Ron Kirk wishes Rush Limbaugh were irrelevant. Sorry, Ron, the people at large decide who and what is relevant, not some pissant former Dallas mayor. And, yes, Ms. Brazille, neither Obama nor Hillary are capable of serving the country as Commander-In-Chief, as they are too far to the Left. Jimmy Carter redux, at best.

Wow! So now Rush Limbaugh isn't entitled to voice his opinion without being attacked?

Donna Brazile is no stranger to, "conversial," remarks herself.  She recently alluded to Bill Clinton making, "racist," remarks. Disagree with his opinion, fine. Don't accuse him of all kinds of baseless BS.

 Ridiculous.

ozonecharlie

I love Donna Brazile. Isn't she just so cuddily and sincere?

The trouble with the Democratic pundits is that they don't really listen to what their critics say, especially someone like Rush.

Rush said it like it was. 

Now will we see Mr. O and Mrs. C as running mates?

The Democrats know that Rush is right. They get sooo excited when they are criticized. There is no humility in that party. 

Good night. 

Rush's comment: "Let’s say put Hillary on top, that’s a position she is familiar with. Therefore you’ve got a woman and a black, first time ever on the Democrat ticket. They don’t have a prayer."

 Brazille's: "I think that comment is, as far as I can tell, a very un-American conversation.... [A]nd to suggest somehow or another that we are not capable of serving this country in the capacity of Commander-in-Chief is just, in my mind, mind-boggling."

First, ummm since when is free speech un-American?  Read Kos, DU, and HuffPo and see some of the things they say.

 But mainly, Rush says the ticket doesn't have a prayer, referring to being elected.  Brazille says Rush says they are not capable of serving as CiC.  Where in Rush's comment is the word capable or the implication of incapability of serving office?  THIS IS ALWAYS MY BIGGEST PROBLEM WITH LIBERALS...THEY LACK BASIC READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS!!!

I thought the really "controversial" (i.e. funny) part of Rush's quote was how he said that being "on top" was a position Hillary was "familiar with".

Hee-hee-hee...