This one is a hoot. The L.A.Times has posted a piece in their politics section about the supposed revelations of Drew Westen, a psychologist who is advising Democrats that they are too logical and rely on "facts" too much in their campaigns. Westen is warning Democrats that they need to be more "emotional" in their appeals to the voters because, according to his "research", Democrat and independent voters are just too darn stupid to understand logic and facts. And Westen makes this claim as if Democrats don't already campaign almost strictly on pure emotion with little appeal to intellect now!
WASHINGTON — Drew Westen, a genial 48-year-old psychologist and brain researcher, was talking to a rapt liberal audience about the role of emotion in politics, how to talk back aggressively to Republicans, and why going negative is not to be feared.
One wonders when, exactly, Democrats didn't follow this path toward using overly emotional campaign methods? Have we so soon forgotten the James Byrd ad where then Governor Bush was accused of agreeing with the racist dragging death of a black Texas man? How about LBJ's famous Daisy ad where Democrats accused Barry Goldwater of wanting to start a nuclear war? How about today where John Edwards is campaigning on "two America's" or his 2004 claims that Democrats would make sure the crippled could walk if America elected he and John Kerry to office? And how often are Republicans cast by Democrats as those evil people who want to poison the water, keep blacks from voting, take away women's rights, and starve the children?
...only EVERY election!
Yet, here is the L.A.Times trying to convince us that it is the Democrats who are just too darn logical, even tempered and fact based in their campaigning for their own good! And their new "rock star" professor Westen is happy to give them what they want.
Westen writes that it doesn't make sense to argue an issue using facts and figures and to count on voters -- particularly the swing voters who decide national elections -- to make choices based on sophisticated understandings of policy differences or procedures. He says Democratic candidates must learn to do what Republicans have understood for many years -- they must appeal to emotions. And (talking to you, Mr. Gore) stay away from numbing statistics.
The Times' article presents this "academic" Westen as a "rock star" professor for his idea and his appearance at the recent far left "Take Back America" convention where he spoke about his turn away from facts for an appeal to emotions. He has even appeared in the homes of the denizens of Hollywood and anti-American George Sorros' lair. So, he is for sure a hit with the activist, left wing, jet set.
But it is amusing that neither the extremists at the "Take Back America" conference, nor the supposed intellectuals at American Prospect Magazine, nor Westen's academic colleagues have noticed that this so-called professor's ideas are actually anti-intellectualism at its most obvious.
This man is advocating to jettison facts and serious debate and for them to be replaced by naked emotionalism. Not very "academic" of him, is it?
Worse, this whole episode shows how little the left respects the American people. I repeat a key part of the Times' piece:
...it doesn't make sense to argue an issue using facts and figures and to count on voters ... to make choices based on sophisticated understandings...
In essence they are saying that people are too stupid to understand how smart and sophisticated their betters on the left are, so ginning up the voters' emotions is the only way to win. Amazing for its arrogance, isn't it?
But, overt emotionalism and arrogance has been the left's calling card since Marxism's birth. So, it's no wonder that they love this anti-intellectual "academic." After all, he's telling them exactly what they want to hear to "validate" their "feelings."


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
as if Democrats don't alrea
July 11, 2007 - 07:13 ET by motherbeltBurning churches, beaten up blacks, starving children, poisoned air and water, senior citizens eating dog food and dying in the streets for lack of food, medicine and housing, soldiers dying for Haliburton, advocating blowing up government buildings and beating up gays.....
Yea, come on, Democrats, quit holding back! Get emotional!!
I personally like the shirt.
July 11, 2007 - 07:29 ET by USA4freedomI personally like the shirt. Is that pick one or the other? For them I pick Die.
Wow, if you vote for Republicans you will die. Well, that did not work out too well for the people in S.E. Asia, Democrats got the vote and 2 million die.
http://downtheroad.o...
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
If they're looking to up the
July 11, 2007 - 07:59 ET by Hero SquadIf they're looking to up the emotional ante in this election, perhaps the t-shirt should now read "Vote or I Will Kill You."
*****
"I'm sorry, you must have mistaken me for a clown that gives a damn!" - Sticky the Clown
I've wanted to market one t
July 11, 2007 - 08:04 ET by sarcasmoI've wanted to market one that just says: "Cease Thy Criminality!" I don't think it would sell too well in the music world these days, but I want one for myself just to see peoples' reactions...
JMR
You really have to wonder, fr
July 11, 2007 - 07:39 ET by PeskyDaneYou really have to wonder, from what planet do these libtards hail?
Talk about a diagnosis divorced from reality!
July 11, 2007 - 07:48 ET by sarcasmoTalk about a diagnosis divorced from reality! Warner, this might be awards-ceremony material of some sort, especially if introduced by the proper personality (I'd go with Dennis Miller, not Ann Coulter, here). These days, happily, one very logical campaign seems to have a revolutionary quantity of emotion behind it, anyway, and I happen to know that little fact scares the LA Times at least as much as it scares some statist-Republicans who saw it in Iowa.
JMR
talking to a rapt liberal aud
July 11, 2007 - 08:11 ET by Jack BauerHe went on the explain to rapt liberals other mind-boggling secrets only understood by those "in the know," such as:
Water is "wet." Fire "burns." Death "sucks."
You know, I actually agree wi
July 11, 2007 - 09:43 ET by Ruths husband BenYou know, I actually agree with him. It doesn't make sense for the left to use facts and logic to press their case. It would be like going to a gun fight armed with a pocket knife.
Ben, for the lib/left to use
July 11, 2007 - 10:37 ET by RackieBen, for the lib/left to use facts would be suicide. Like in ready, aim, fire.
Best Regards to Ruth.
Or to put it more bluntly, ra
July 11, 2007 - 10:49 ET by Ten7sOr to put it more bluntly, rationality and the facts do not support their policies and initiatives. This is the case with many politicans, but more often with Democrats and almost always with those on the Left.
LA Times and white brain matter
July 11, 2007 - 10:51 ET by Gary HallGoodness. They are already hysterically emotional.
Look. Before I start, we already know that, generically speaking, it is the liberals who are emotional. They're the ones calling everyone names, marching in the streets, with the emotional bumper stickers, being actors and singers and playwrights. And likewise, when they enter the field of journalism, they are empowered to do what they do best - be emotional.
Not that any elitist liberal writers have sensed an urgent need to connect the dots and write the story, but there have been recent scientific studies which suggest that the amount of white matter in the brain has a lot to do with truth telling and the excess of emotions.
How's that? Allow me:
From researchers from the University of California, Irvine and the University of New Mexico:
Bottom line: Liberals lie more than conservatives - because they simply have a more difficult time making a decision. I expect the examples should not be too difficult to locate.
Emotion? Can we draw a connection to those irrational emotional teenage years and liberals?
White matter and impulsivity (That teenage feeling):
As far as Drew Weston goes - the confusion may lie within.
Pardon the language, but I th
July 11, 2007 - 17:51 ET by Roger the ShrubberPardon the language, but I think this is appropriate.