Update I & II at bottom:
In this June 4 article, the AP worked hard to leave out something very important but very basic in an article about Democratic US Representative William Jefferson’s 16-count bribery indictment. What the AP left out was any identification of Jefferson’s party affiliation. In almost 30 paragraphs, no where is there any hint of what party Jefferson belongs to, not even a “(D-LA).”
When a politician is in trouble and the party is not identified, it a safe bet to assume that the missing letter is a Big “D,” as in this AP piece.
How were other politicians identified? Nancy Pelosi is identified as “Pelosi, D-Calif.” John Boehner is identified as “House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio.” But Jefferson is not a Democrat, just “Louisiana congressman William Jefferson.” Strange how that works, huh?
Since party is usually identified in the first paragraphs, the AP had many opportunities to note that Jefferson is a Democrat and simply did not (emphasis mine):
Louisiana congressman William Jefferson received more than $500,000 in bribes and sought millions more in nearly a dozen separate schemes to enrich himself by using his office to broker business deals in Africa, according to a federal indictment Monday.
The charges came almost two years after investigators raided Jefferson's home in Washington and found $90,000 in cash stuffed in his freezer.
The indictment lists 16 counts, including racketeering, soliciting bribes, wire fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice and conspiracy. He faces a possible maximum sentence of 235 years.
He is the first U.S. official to face charges under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits corporate bribery ovdrseas.
Jefferson, through his lawyer, claimed innocence. He will be arraigned Friday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria.
Not only did the AP leave out the embarrassing fact that a group that is touted as the most ethical Congress ever just had a Democrat indicted for bribing foreign governmental officials, the AP also failed to mention that even as recently as February 17 of this year, long after the investigation was made public, Pelosi appointed Jefferson to the security-sensitive House Homeland Security Committee, where members have access to vital national secrets and make policy for national defense.
The AP is supposed to be the objective wire service that just dishes out the facts. Are they so biased that the AP can’t even include party affiliation when it makes the Democratic party look bad? Shouldn’t the AP be above this kind of partisan reporting?
Update 06/05 12:55
*One of the reporters who wrote the article, Lara Jakes Jordan is married to Jim Jordan, long-time Democratic operative. Jordan is a former John Kerry presidential campaign manager, former executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, a former John Kerry presidential campaign manager and staffer of America Coming Together, a 527 funded by George Soros and labor unions which was a pro-Kerry organization which focused on defeating Bush.
*CNN no longer has this on the front page and has moved it to the politics section. Some current front page stories: “Libby to find out soon if he’ll go to jail,” “Sen. Clinton: God got me through marital strife” and “How Paris Hilton spent last hours of freedom.”
In the politics section, Jefferson’s indictment is not displayed at the top with the important stories like, “Libby gets 30 months in CIA leak case.” It is at the bottom in the “In Other News” section.
Update II 06/05 16:10 EST:
Interestingly, Lara Jakes Jordan wrote an earlier AP article where she clearly identified Jefferson as a Democrat within the first three words (thnx Jim Miller):
Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., was indicted Monday on federal charges of racketeering, soliciting bribes and money-laundering in a long- running bribery investigation into business deals he tried to broker in Africa.
Potentially, portions of her earlier article were used to compile the second one that has both Jordan's name and Matthew Barakat's. In Jordan’s first article, she followed the AP’s guidelines of identifying political affiliation, although that was the only mention of his party. Too bad that whoever was involved in compiling the later article did not follow that precedent.
Contact Lynn with tips or complaints at: tvisgoodforyou2 AT yahoo DOT com



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
William Jefferson
June 5, 2007 - 07:10 ET by Cool ArrowNancy should be proud of her choice for Homeland Security. Democrats have long been proud of the corruption of Democrat politics in Louisana. While Jefferson was busy shaking down lobbyists and businesses for personal goodies, he should have been busy trying to shore up the levees. But he would have walked off with that money too.
Lynn, one of the AP reporters
June 5, 2007 - 07:42 ET by Tim GrahamLynn, one of the AP reporters on this story (Lara Jakes Jordan) is married to a former Kerry campaign chief and staffer for the Democrats' Senate campaign committee (Jim Jordan).
Now, compare this story to AP
June 5, 2007 - 07:50 ET by Sergeant ROCKNow, compare this story to AP's coverage of REPUBLICAN Duke Cunningham of CA.
Reminiscent of Gary Condidit
June 5, 2007 - 07:57 ET by Dad GummitReminiscent of Gary Condidit when miss Levy was murdered. Although there were many stories about it, they seemed happy to just say "Rep. Gary Conditt...." as if hoping the word "Rep" would lead the dumb-masses to think something other than "Representative."
"If you don't read a newspaper, you are uninformed. If you do read a newspaper, you are mis-informed."-Mark Twain
And yet, people like the AP t
June 5, 2007 - 08:01 ET by Sergeant ROCKAnd yet, people like the AP think that they're really foolin' somebody.
You people are just not fair.
June 5, 2007 - 10:54 ET by TruthMongerYou people are just not fair...
This phenomenon has ONLY BEEN AN INNOCENT MISTAKE the last several thousand times...the "news" people at AP are just trying their best and sometimes they just forget all the time that someone is a Democrat...
The "news" people at AP are important people to us with a lot of pressure on them to keep us accurately informed in an UNBIASED AND CONSISTENT MANNER - totally regardless of political parties - and your cheap shots about their constant and ceaseless mistakes IN FAVOR OF THE DEMOCRATS AND AGAINST REPUBLICANS are not helping at all...
What would Bernie Shaw think of you...for shame:(
You people?
June 5, 2007 - 11:02 ET by Cool ArrowWhat do you mean "you people"? Sounds racist to me. LOL
For all you AP employees or
June 5, 2007 - 07:55 ET by BenderFor all you AP employees or professional media types reading this blog, we have a clue for you.
The American public is not stupid.
When you fail to identify the political party of a politician who has been arrested, we can fairly assume that it was a "Democrat" with 100% certainty.
Your internal bias is so extreme and universal that the lack of a political moniker in a story is a clear sign of damage control.
When a Republican or conservative politician is indicted or arrested, the party is clearly designated and repeated.
This is reason #543 why the American public puts little trust in journalists. You simply won't report the news, you must add your political bias to the news which changes the truth.
Being from Louisiana I am jus
June 5, 2007 - 08:23 ET by general companyBeing from Louisiana I am just thankful they have finally indicted him. I was starting to think they wouldn't. This state has been working very hard to find honest and reliable Representatives, and it is very embarrassing when another one cashes in that trust for financial gain. We probably have more elected officials in jail then any 10 state combined. Just for the record though, Jindal is my congressman, and one of the better folks anywhere.
It's very curious that DEMOCR
June 5, 2007 - 10:59 ET by TruthMongerIt's very curious that DEMOCRAT congressman Jefferson is being bothered at all about this - the MSM buried the story effectively enough when it broke...so what gives here? Very strange...
Meanwhile, AP reports on the
June 5, 2007 - 08:23 ET by Roger the ShrubberMeanwhile, AP reports on the Wyoming senator who passed away last night:
Wyoming Sen. Craig Thomas, a three-term conservative Republican who stayed clear of the Washington limelight and political catfights, died Monday. He was 74.
Looks like standard reporting, right? Then why didn't AP ever mention Jefferson's party affiliation in this 915-word article? I mean, it only took nine words before Mr. Thomas' party was noted, right? Great find, Lynn.
It was indeed a great find,
June 5, 2007 - 08:40 ET by sarcasmoIt was indeed a great find, but I neglected to predict it yesterday, and this is one of those easy ones to predict. The "why does a mediabias group like NewsBusters exist and persist" kind of mediabias.
JMR
Not only Republican, but cons
June 5, 2007 - 18:00 ET by ThisnThatNot only Republican, but conservative Republican. AP can't resist that label, can it? It's as though conservative is the lowest of the low, something to be avoided at all costs.
Will AP state that Jefferson is a liberal democrat? Not in my lifetime, I'll bet.
Surprise!!
June 5, 2007 - 08:33 ET by OldSailor88The story has also disappeared from the front page of CNN. You have to dig into the politics section and get to the "In Other News" section. As if this doesn't even pertain to Politics.
Why only in "In Other Ne
June 6, 2007 - 06:29 ET by Senior ChiefWhy only in "In Other News" section though? This is big news, since Democrack Jefferson, if convicted will be in the slammer for 236 long years. Could his children and grandchildren continue his "tenured" service in the slammer. Ah, I'm so cruel. No, just got into the back of my noggin, and somewhat tells me they also benefited Jefferson's criminal activites...
How about those companies who offered the bribes...Guilty. Jail time!
Unless some renegade prosecut
June 6, 2007 - 06:36 ET by Sergeant ROCKUnless some renegade prosecutor is involved, I suspect he'll get the same treatment that Sandy Burglar got.
Was this story changed at some point?
June 5, 2007 - 09:24 ET by cjbreischWas this story changed at some point?
The CNN version does correctly identify the party, right up front:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/04/jefferson.probe.ap/index.html
Not Changed
June 5, 2007 - 09:45 ET by OldSailor88CJ, The converstation started with the AP, who didn't mention political affiliation. I only brought up the point that CNN buried it deep in their Politics section of the website. Sorry about the confusion.
I think you misunderstand m
June 5, 2007 - 11:40 ET by cjbreischI think you misunderstand my confusion. I had previously read the article from a link to the CNN site, and I knew that I had read his party affiliation there. So, I was suprised when I saw this pop up on NewsBusters today.
I was just wondering if CNN changed the article to add it, or if it had been there to begin with and the AP later removed it.
This is one of the reasons
June 5, 2007 - 09:40 ET by motherbeltThis is one of the reasons I love Rush Limbaugh. Every single time he mentions this man, he calls him "William Jefferson, Democrat, Louisiana."
And don't forget the standard for Democrats: Innocent until an admission of guilt.
"And don't forget the st
June 5, 2007 - 10:48 ET by I-Burn"And don't forget the standard for Democrats: Innocent until an admission of guilt."
Hey MB, shouldn't that actually read:
And don't forget the standard for Democrats: Innocent even if caught red-handed, or on tape, until an admission of guilt. ;)
Hey come on now...be real...C
June 5, 2007 - 11:51 ET by TruthMongerHey come on now...be real...CLINTON IS STILL INNOCENT...!!!
Where are all the trolls defe
June 5, 2007 - 11:45 ET by mattmWhere are all the trolls defending this, or trying to say that this is not proof of MSM liberal bias? It's undeniable.
One thing's for sure...
June 5, 2007 - 13:05 ET by goldenthroatOne thing's for sure - this whole episode with William Jefferson, DEMONCRAT, gives added meaning to the term "cold, hard cash"!
How original! How long did
June 5, 2007 - 16:02 ET by j. frank wilsonHow original! How long did it take you to think that one up?
Is it true Fox News reported
June 5, 2007 - 16:02 ET by j. frank wilsonIs it true Fox News reported this story about Rep. Jefferson while showing a photo of John Conyers?
frankie...I already answered
June 5, 2007 - 16:09 ET by bigtimerfrankie...
I already answered you earlier.
Try to retain information if possible.
Gee, j. faux, did you think the second time would
June 5, 2007 - 16:11 ET by RJGee, j. faux, did you think a second posting would miraculously make it humorous?