When the party which set up the KKK as their terror wing, pushed segregation and wrote the Jim Crow laws lectures others about being racists.

And now we have Harry Reid in the tradition of the segregation Democrats going to use the armed law to block the Senate doors to prevent seating a duly appointed black Senator.

Life truly is a sitcom.

Mental disorder where projection is one of the symptoms.

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

Krugman, Krugman...isn't he some economics expert who was supposed to see trends in er...total world financial ruin coming?

Same guy?

Didn't this guy just get a Nobel prize for economics?  Why is he talking about social and political issues?  The only thing in here that regards his supposed expertise is his mention of taxes, but that was really just a racial comment.  Also, am I wrong or do the lefties seem to use alot of generalities and "some say" in order to defend their position?  Facts seem to be avoided as many (see, I can do it too!) may run contrary to the agenda.

HA!  Thank you Mr. Krugman for telling us exactly what we need to be doing, (that you are so afraid of) to undermine your liberal agenda!  Typical liberal tactic of accusing people of doing what "they" don't want them to do!  The fact he has to reach back almost 30 years and then spin it says they are artifully trying to tell the GOP that it would be mature of them to let the past be the past and not do what the Dems have done for 8 years in undermining George W Bush. 

Excellent, we shall be pointing out your failures and proposed failures at every opportunity.  We shall expose your agenda and tactics and then say I told you so when you inevitably screw up because Socialism ALWAYS end in FAILURE, it's a historical given. 

Oh yes, you want the country to be united behind you completely unlike what you formented the last 8 years.  NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.  It's pay back time.  We will point out how you are costing the poor jobs and causing their falling standard of living due to your taxes and policies.  And we will point out every failure, continue to expose the MSM as the lib Dem mouth pieces and when the MSM gets their bailout from the government, we will be pointing out they are beholding to the Dem political party as their propaganda outlet, count on it.

Just click the link below, see how the poor are being screwed by the Dems.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

Yeah, I saw this one this morning and had to grip the sides of the chair. This is the core whacko liberal worldview. He says that the Republicans are against Those People, and yet his entire argument rests on prejudices against Republicans who are, to him, Those People. He does what he accuses his opponents of doing. This is pure stereotype. This is a classic picture of prejudice - it carries no thinking, instead it just propels itself along on its own self-serving assumptions. 

• The mark of great thinkers is their ability to transcend the shackles of cozy and self-serving assumptions. Tossing out these tired and frequently-disproved liberal stereotypes (conservatives are racist, conservatives hate government, Bush is the conservative "champion," etc.), Krugman doesn't challenge assumptions ... he reinforces them.
• He wants approval from fellow liberals, and to get it, he'll offer them exactly what they want. What else can explain his choice to publish these liberal farts?
• He bought the liberal worldview, and now he has no choice but to come up with justifications (paper thin if necessary) for it. He can't re-examine the assumptions of his group without threatening the bonds that hold them together.

By publishing these obvious cliches as his "opinion," he revealed how trapped he is by slogans and cliches, and how trapped he is by the worldview of the liberals who created them.

Can anyone hope that his professional economic analysis is any more free or creative than spouting such "group-think" nonsense? To put it in perspective, the same hacks who gave him his award gave Al Gore an award. Hacks honoring hacks.

"Has Paul Krugman become print's version of Keith Olbermann?"

Become? 

He was Keith Olbermann before Keith Olbermann was cool.

The more I read from this arrogant snob and economic illiterate, the more I realize how worthless an Ivy League "education" and the Nobel Prize are.  Ponzi Schemes have more substance behind them than a policy argument from this clown has. 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

Caption for Krugman photo:

"Mr. Krugman pisses in his Depends for the first time."

The Republicans want everyone to succeed, the Democrats want to keep certain groups in their place. I've said for some time that liberals, white and black are racists.
http://tsfprotests.b...

Wow, the Krugslimester had to ignore about fifteen decades of American history to come up with that load of Bull Squeeze.

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.”

Kruggie is such a small, little man....

Guess he never heard of the Dixiecrats.

Besides, he's confusing Democrats with Communists.  Just because the Communists have taken over, doesn't mean that we're still talking about traditional Democrats.

When black Americans finally got together and said they had enough, that's when change came about.  It wasn't mandates from the government, the NAACP, the Socialists, etc....it was Americans finally exercising their rights as Americans. 

Also, the blacks were/are a minority.  If the vast majority of whites didn't want them to have equal rights, they wouldn't.  The whites, especially in the deep South, did come around and rather quickly.  Most realized that Jim Crow was wrong.  When blacks remained silent, the whites figured they were OK.  Also, what idiot believes that the average white Southerner had all that many more advantages than the black Southerners?  It was always a matter of a power elite (the same one as before the Civil War) running the show.  It was class-based economics and politics more than race.  The millions of Roman slaves were mostly white...so, what was the difference?  How on earth did they know who was a slave and who wasn't? They were slaves just because the PTB said they were.  Skin color isn't the ultimate Human method of explotation.

Also, I can counter that the Democratic Party has become the party of historical revisionism, Marxism, voter fraud and recounts.

So there...nyaaaah! 

One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.