More Than Half of Analyzed Weather Stations Don’t Meet Federal Guidelines

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

As members of Congress debate sweeping legislation to address climate change, shouldn't it be newsworthy that of the roughly 25 percent of the weather stations analyzed by independent, non-government volunteers, more than half appear to not meet federal guidelines involving their placement?

Well, meteorologist Anthony Watts, the owner of Watts Up With That, speaking at a climate conference in Boulder, Colorado, on Tuesday, presented his findings concerning the examination of some of the weather stations across America that monitor the nation's temperatures. The news was quite disturbing.

Yet, from what I can tell, outside of a newspaper in Northern California, even as global warming matters are highlighted on a daily basis by a sycophantic press, not one major media outlet thought this was newsworthy.

As reported by the Chico Enterprise Record Thursday (emphasis added, h/t Marc Morano):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The preliminary results show Watts and his volunteers have surveyed about a quarter of the 1,221 stations making up the U.S. Historical Climatology Network. Of those, more than half appear to fall short of federal guidelines for optimum placement.

Some examples include weather stations placed near sewage treatment plants, parking lots, and near cars, buildings and air-conditioners - all artificial heat sources which could affect temperature records.

[...]

Watts said his findings show there are potential problems with the placement of many weather stations. Although it's not conclusive, temperature records from many stations, reposted on Watts' blog, showed notable increases after being moved closer to heat sources.

Now, if Watts's findings showed that temperatures measured by these stations were actually understating reality, and that global warming is really worse than is being reported, do you think the press would have been all over this story?

Like white on rice, right?

How disgraceful!

Post facto questions and opinion: What's happened to investigative journalism in this country? Wouldn't this be a perfect story for "60 Minutes" or "20/20"? Do news outlets today only investigate that which supports and/or advances their agenda? How can't this number of weather stations not meeting federal guidelines be something that virtually every press outlet would find newsworthy?

Honestly, this matter being totally buried should make it easy for Americans to conclude not just how biased the media are, but also that they are complicit in a fraud being perpetrated on this nation with grave present and future implications.

Be afraid. Be VERY afraid! 

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

GIGO

Garbage in, garbage out.

There not going to report

There not going to report it. These weather stations are worth stories and are critical to Algores income. 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

You'd be surprised

"What's happened to investigative journalism in this country? Wouldn't
this be a perfect story for "60 Minutes" or "20/20"? Do news outlets
today only investigate that which supports and/or advances their
agenda? How can't this number of weather stations not meeting federal
guidelines be something that virtually every press outlet would find
newsworthy?"

I have time on my hands and I am taking the training to go and document the condition of "official" reporting stations. It's not that hard and there are many in my local area. I found it hard to believe they "actually" put a station to record the temps ON TOP of a building next to a blacktopped parking lot at the Mall. That just shows micro climate changes due to development (paving heats up longer than dirt or "grass"). Yea, summers are HOTTER after all.

One has to wonder who these

One has to wonder who these "scientists" are that positioned these temperature sensor shelters in the first place.  

This would be amusing if there weren't for profiteers like AlBore, et al around preaching BS. 

Meanwhile, when I was just a kid, my parents bought me a "weather" center.  I think I did a better job of positioning the weather vane, etc. 

 

Umm, I don't see what the

Umm, I don't see what the big deal is. I mean, obviously the planet is heating up. So these artificially heated areas that have temp sensors will still show heat increases. They will just be a higher total number, the percent should be about the same. No wonder the MSM isn't reporting it. Its a non issue. We should focus much harder on things like Leonardo Di Caprio's film which is in need of increased awareness because apparently not too many people are aware he has a movie out judging by his numbers! :D

 

 

The earth is on fire and it is YOUR fault for owning a car...

yes, it is a big deal...

The problem is that many of these temp sensors get relocated over the years. Many of them are located on the property of volunteer observers. These observers move, die, or sometimes just don't want to take observations any more. So the equipment is relocated. The users of the data have no easy way to account for that fact. Considering the global warming issue concerns temperature changes on the scale of fractions of a degree, this shouldn't be ignored as a possible contribution to the cause.

What's wrong? Don't you

What's wrong? Don't you accept data from San Juan International going back to 1885? 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

I agree that if the

I agree that if the environment surrounding the instruments does not change that the trend is more relevant than the accuracy of the instruments. But the problem is that Watts and company are finding temperature sensors that are very obviously in different environments than they were 70 years ago. The appearance of parking lots, buildings, air conditioners, etc. over the decades will affect the temperatures reported.

I've looked at the temperature trends on some of the sensors reported at Watt's site. The average trend will be upward. But if you look at the high temperature trend, it will be flat. The low temperature trend will be upward, which is what makes the average trend upward as well. This is what I would expect from the urban heat island effect as the population around a sensor increases over the years.

I don't dispute anything you

I don't dispute anything you just said. The urban heat island effect is a result of more concrete...not more CO2.

Noel...what's the problem

The other 50% are accurately measuring asphalt surface temperatures, heat pump radation, and charcoal grill heat.

You have to do better than that.

[ I think the cultish bombardment of AGW propaganda is working...I am starting to believe....JK...I am OK!!! ]

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.
Thompson/Rice

Despite assurances

Despite assurances at the end of the article, the locations of weather data collection stations are affecting the data. Nobody seems to know how the data from these "problematic" collection sites is being "normalized".

I liked the station that

I liked the station that was declaired as good and rural by Hanson; as there were no lights there at night, as seen by satellite. Well it was a forest service office. Had a large parking lot near it, had a lawn sprinker next to it and was surrounded by, was it 23 air conditioners.

Needless to say this pure rural settings showed some extremes. 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

truth

As Tina Turner might have plaintively asked: "what's truth got to do, got to do with it?"

Curt

Ah - a real scientist.

While reflecting on albore in today's "Gaggle," I found Watts' open and working scientific mind quite refreshing.

"If I'm proven wrong, so be it — that's the way of science," Watts said.

Noel:  Honestly, this

Noel:  Honestly, this matter being totally buried should make it easy for Americans to conclude not just how biased the media are, but also that they are complicit in a fraud being perpetrated on this nation with grave present and future implications. 

Every time I read one of your excellent articles, that is what makes me concerned.  We joke that you are in danger of becoming a thug because you keep hammering away at this (I love it), but your last line has a lot of truth to it.  This is a power grab of unprecedented proportions, both economically and politically, involving Gore, Soros, Hillary and the whole web of sycophants that unfortunately, like the communists or fascists, have a lot, and I mean a LOT of both money and power at their disposal in the form of uncounted lawyers and rich corporate backers taking advantage of every loophole, creating loopholes in the laws they write, and then funding webs of orginizations to bureaucratically enforce their version of the loopholed laws.  When Rush says that when they start complaining about us doing something, it is really them trying to deflect what they are doing, he is not kidding at all.  This is no joke.  Your closing is only too true. 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

All it takes

All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing  

"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war"  - Shakespeare

You should read Anthony

You should read Anthony Watts blog on this,  http://www.norcalblo... look at comments for day 2 conference ....


"My only worry is that the observers at the various locations will get self conscious about their sites if your work gets too much publicity and will start doing housekeeping before all the sites are surveyed. While they can't do much for the big things like asphalt parking lots, they can certainly move burn barrels, bbq pits, and ore carts full of rocks away from the sensor. While doing so will be an improvement in the long run, it is important for them to document such things if they do it, so the potential impact to the historical data can be evaluated. The last thing we need is to start a "global cooling" panic if too many bbq pits get moved in a short period of time." 

 

LMAO, ROFL

 

dscott's postulate:  The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.

Dan

Dan,

Marvelous! :-) ns

Noel, thanks for this

Noel, thanks for this article.  I just e-mailed the gist of this article and Mr. Watts' blogsite address and surfacestations.org to Senator Inhofe, suggesting he can use the information in an upcoming session of the environment committee.  I certainly hope he uses the information and, perhaps it'll get some MSM publicity then. 

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Mike

Mike,

Take a look at the hat tip. This came from Marc Morano, Inhofe's communications director. :-) ns

Congress

Does Inhoffe have any other vocal allies in the Senate regarding this issue or is he the lone maverick?  Don't tell me Sen. Craig was a vocal proponent....please don't.

We are all on the same page

We are all on the same page MikeB.  The suggestion has been made by yours truly as well.  

 

You can also count on the ramp up of the spin regarding this, don't be surprised if Hansen comes out with some more mental gymnastics to explain away the problems as he did with the Y2K error removing 1998 as the hottest year.  Take careful note of the words "normalizing" and "adjusting" the raw data. If you will remember Noel's thread on the 15 year old girl, there was a quote from some AGW cultist telling a panel the methods of adjusting and why, it's worth a 2nd look.   Look at Yahoo news, there are two articles spinning away 1998 and not even mentioning 1934 being the hottest year in the US. 

 

At this point I'm waiting on Climate Change to refer not to Global Warming but Global Cooling.  It will be interesting to see the rhetorical summersault to tell the public we aren't at war with Eastasia but Eurasia (1984 reference).

 

dscott's postulate:  The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.

Somewhat on topic

This may be a little off topic and if it's way over there in left field, mea culpa.  However, I found some information when reading "Unstoppable Global Warming..." that I hadn't heard of before.  Basically there appears to be a Pacific heat vent that takes care of regulating the earth's temperature.

p. 183:  "The tropical Pacific Ocean may be able to open a 'vent' in its heat-trapping cirrus cloud cover and release enough energy into space to significantly diminish the projected climate warming caused by a buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.  If confirmed by further research, this newly discovered effect - which is not seen in current climate prediction models - could significantly reduce estimates of future climate warming." (from Meterological Society news release, 28 Feb 2001)

p. 184: "After the NASA studies revealed the massive planetary heat vent over the Pacific, the agency threw the "heat vent" anomaly into the laps of the global climate modeling community.  NASA asked the climate modelers to reconfigure their models to account for this previously unknown and newly observed reality.  They were unable to do so."  

Interesting food for thought.

"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war"  - Shakespeare

Actually Dr. Pielke

Actually Dr. Pielke has this on his website Climate Science:   http://climatesci.colorado.edu/2007/08/23/part-2-feedbacks-the-infrared-iris-and-the-role-of-precipitation-processes-by-roy-spencer/

In something of a “fishing expedition” we examined a variety of satellite observations that could be related to the tropical tropospheric heat budget. For the 15 largest intraseasonal oscillations between 2000 and 2005, we averaged TRMM TMI rainfall and SST, Terra MODIS cloud fractions, CERES reflected SW and emitted LW fields, and AMSU-A tropospheric temperature data to daily time scales, over tropical average space scales. The result was clear evidence in support of Lindzen’s “Infrared Iris” hypothesis, at least on the intraseasonal time scales we examined. (Unpublished was an analysis of the 15 next-largest ISOs, which revealed very similar signatures.)

We demonstrated though that composite analysis of 15 ISOs that enhanced rainfall activity and warming of the tropical troposphere leads to enhanced loss of LW radiation to space in the cloudy areas, as measured by the CERES instrument on Terra (see figure below). When the LW flux anomaly was normalized by the latent heat release anomaly (panel D), a linear increase in LW loss with time is seen during the period of above-average rainfall. This change is dominated by the cloudy areas (compare “all-sky” to “clear sky”).

dscott's postulate:  The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.

The Infra-Red Iris

That's Lindzen's Infra-Red Iris at work. A recent study apears to bear it out.

 

Move the temperature gauges. out of town?

 No way can't do that, can't interfere with:

Entitlement over infrastructure every SINGLE time.

 

What has not been mentioned

What has not been mentioned are the weather stations that have been moved to a different location but still reported as the same station location.

kg; Now that would be a nice list, what one or two?

 Denver has a new airport (10 years old) and a new weather station to go with it.. The temperatures there are lower than the old location, So the  TV news reports both locations. Of course the new airport is higher and more exposed to weather, than the original location.

Entitlement over infrastructure every SINGLE time.

 

The old New Orleans records

The old New Orleans records were taken at Audubon Park. The local weather always gives bioth locations. Audubon park is consistently a few degrees lower. 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

What's happened to

What's happened to investigative journalism in this country? Wouldn't this be a perfect story for "60 Minutes" or "20/20"?

Exactly. We've got multi-million - if not billion - dollar media organizations employing thousands of people. What do they do when these reports on global warming are issued? Do they read them and challenge them?

Or just repeat the claims?

The US, from what I've read, has the most advanced and accurate weather stations in the world. If our own stations are providing inaccurate readings, what does that say about the other stations around the world?

This is a perfect story for the press.

Unfortunately, not our press.

As the old saw goes, the problem with the press is not that they tell you want to think; the problem is that they tell you want to think about.

Or in this case, what not to think about. 

 

SMG 

 

Global Warming Controversy

Now a day global
warming controversy
is very hype. NASA sciencetists completely work on global warming research. According the sciencetists after 30 year
earth is completely effected by global warming.

Temperature stations

JerryG

As a scientist I think this gives a very interesting opportunity to investigate the data.  Separate the temperature stations into different categories based upon their location and surroundings and then check the temperature data against the category.  It may also be possible to test data against when changes were made to the surroundings, such as when a parking lot was built.  It may be that the quidelines (since they are probably best quesses and not based on  a great deal of data) are either too stringent or not stingent enough. Usually when data are confounded (you know there are problems with how it was collected) you do not use it for your calculations.