You pathetic little people of the blogosphere. You're nothing more than "nitwits at home with [your] computers" who've deluded yourselves into imagining you're "part of the news media." Just ask Mike Barnicle. The former Boston Globe columnist broke the tough truth to us on today's Morning Joe. WaPo editorial writer Jonathan Capehart was "so glad" to agree.
Capehart was in full courtier mode to Mika Brzezinski, anchoring the show during Joe Scarborough's extended absence awaiting the birth of a child home in Florida. When executive producer Chris Licht read a viewer email critical of Mika, Capehart leapt to her defense, and it was then that Barnicle and he sniffed at the pretenders of the pajamahadeen.
View video here.
CHRIS LICHT: This one is from John in Tampa: "It's shameful how Mika won't mention the Auschwitz gaffe by Obama, but she will mention everything bad about Bush and McCain. She's once again proven she is drinking the Obama Kool-Aid."
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: OK, my brother, who works for the McCain campaign, I don't think he feels that way. ['Scuse me? Mika likes to use her McCain-supporting brother as a shield against criticism of her liberal bias, but here it makes no sense. Is she saying that her brother tells her that she is not an Obama fan? Did Mika mean to cite her other brother, who works for Obama, and who perhaps claims that she is at times critical of Barack? In any case, Capehart then played the courtly gentleman.] Let's bring in Washington Post editorial writer Jonathan Capehart. He joins us live from Washington this morning. Jonathan, what is the Auschwitz gaffe, and does it merit prolonged discussion?
JONATHAN CAPEHART: N-o-o-o-o, it doesn't!
BRZEZINSKI: Well, but I'm in the tank apparently if I don't talk about it.
CAPEHART [chuckling]: Well look, he mentioned, I mean it's unfortunate he mentioned the wrong concentration camp, but to blow this up into some kind of scandal of huge proportions that somehow shows that Barack Obama is not prepared to be president is really stupid. It really is stupid.
BRZEZINSKI: Well, you've got to tell that to John in Tampa.
MIKE BARNICLE: What about this theory, Jonathan, about, you know, the Auschwitz-Buchenwald flap, whatever, John McCain's misspeaking in Iraq. Shiite, Sunni. What about the theory that we in the news media have taken ourselves so seriously, because of this 24-hour news cycle that we're all involved in, that we don't give enough credit for people being over-tired, exhausted, campaigning 20 hours a day, misspeaking—including Senator Clinton at times misspeaking—and then we jump all over them. And then these nitwits at home with their computers, these bloggers, who [snorts] think they're part of the news media, can then accuse us of being soft on this candidate or that candidate. Just a theory.
CAPEHART [who laughed heartily as Barnicle blasted "these nitwits"]: Well, you're right. Both sides of this argument are correct. Look: when Senator Clinton—if Senator Clinton had said that, there'd be breaking news, we'd be talking about it for days and days and days. I think that at some point, someone has to finally say alright, look, enough. The person, the person is tired, the person has made a mistake. Let's talk about the substance of what he or she is saying. And I think the substance of what Senator Obama was saying is right: you know, talking about I think it was post-traumatic stress disorder in his, I think it was his grandfather, who had come back from World War II, came home, went up into the attic, and never left the house for six months.
That's what he was talking about, and I think if we can just—you know, Barnicle you're right, sometimes we take ourselves way too seriously and react a little too quickly to, you know, bloggers who, and I'm so glad you said that, who think that they are part of the news media, having them whip us into a hysteria, thinking this is a big story, when it's not.
Ironic that both Barnicle and Capehart would chide the news media for taking itself "too seriously," then turn around and look down their news media noses at us schlubs of the blogosphere.
Note: It was the Purple Avenger at Ace of Spades who apparently broke the story of Obama's Auschwitz confusion and Michelle Malkin who helped get it out. Keep up the good work, and maybe someday you too can be members of the real news media. You know, the kind that work at papers like the Washington Post, so straitened even its most venerable columnist is accepting a buy-out.
Interesting take by Allah-the-P at HotAir:
Karl and the 'Busters are indignant, sufficiently so that I’m guessing this will be of some interest to our readers, but I honestly couldn’t care less. I don’t mind being reminded that I’m not part of the news media; I happily concede the point, if by “news media” he means reporters. (If he means we’re not part of the media at all, how’d the Obama/Auschwitz thing end up on MSNBC’s plate?) What he misunderstands is that blogger antagonism towards the press, at least among the blogs I read, has always been less about “elevating” blogs to parity with journalists than denying that most journalists operate on some elevated plain to begin with.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Hey Barnicle, at least we
May 28, 2008 - 07:16 ET by ThisnThatHey Barnicle, at least we don't make things up.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Thank you, TnT!!!
May 28, 2008 - 09:28 ET by motherbeltThank you, TnT!!!
My first thought was Wait a minute! Didn't Barnicle get fired for fabricating stuff and plagiarism????
And he has the stones to call bloggers nitwits?????
Hypocrisy, thy name is Liberal.
This is what happens in the MSM. They screw up, lie low for a while, and then get to come back when all is hopefully forgotten, and be an "expert" again.
Update: Come on, Mark, and Noel, and Tim, and the rest of you guys....Man up!! Fabricate some stories! Steal someone else's work! Be REAL journalists!!
Be like Mike!!!
MB, Barnicle was not a
May 28, 2008 - 11:29 ET by ThisnThatMB, Barnicle was not a newshound. He was a columnist. And a very biased, sarcastic one at that. He thought his wit was boundless and oh-so-clever, and most of the time he was taking pot-shots at polititians or New Hampshire residents (which he was famous for calling Cow Hampshire, as though anybody living in a rural area was beneath his contempt).
So, for him to cry about "real journalists", and how we (but not he) are just dim-witted fakes, is laughable. Once again, a MSM-type that doesn't believe we know any history.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
I know that, TnT. And no
May 28, 2008 - 11:46 ET by motherbeltI know that, TnT.
And no one expects a columnist to be non-partisan; they all flog their own opinions.
But I'm sure we agree that that doesn't give them carte blanche to make up stories and characters.
Also, Barnicle has been accused of plagiarism before. See my comment below with the link.
Wow he forgot the
May 28, 2008 - 07:22 ET by taterWow he forgot the obligatory..."they sit in their underwear in their mom's basement writing this stuff up" line.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather
(snort:) we took the evil
May 28, 2008 - 14:59 ET by TruthMonger(snort:)
we took the evil MSM down - while lounging here in our underwear - of course they're bitter about it!
Hey TM... LOL... That
May 28, 2008 - 15:03 ET by bigtimerHey TM...
LOL...
That is rich!!
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Mike Barnicle criticizing
May 28, 2008 - 07:22 ET by RJWallMike Barnicle criticizing people that "Think" they are part of the news media? Pot, meet kettle.
http://www.salon.com/media/1998/08/20media.html
Come to think of it
May 28, 2008 - 07:32 ET by ahusserBefore the internet and blogosphere. Just regular folks on both side of the aisle didn't have a voice except in letters to the editor with comments cherry picked by editors. These elitist holier than thou snobs want their monopoly back. We now have a true above ground underground news source.
journalism
May 28, 2008 - 07:41 ET by ThatDudeThe msm comes closer and closer daily to throwing out every principle of journalistic integrity. Not only is the bias so heavily evident, but they shun anyone who does their own research before breaking a story.
I also find it pretty funny that here they are trying to defend the position that they're still fair and balanced, yet continue to prove that the Obama koolaid is coursing through their veins. Why do they keep defending this man with the "tired" excuse? The GOP has a 70 year old candidate, yet he can get a pass for being tired and misspeaking while the young senator riding on a platform of youthfulness: hope and change.
Keep doing what you're doing here at NB. This may not be so much an established news source as the msm should be, but news is still released and we are granted a forum to review the facts as well as interact with others over the content.
Cheers!
So ...
May 28, 2008 - 07:41 ET by 10ksnookerIs this what happens to journalists as their career ends? I can't remember the last time I sought out a Mike Barnicle story. I wonder why?
Mike Barnicle...
May 28, 2008 - 07:43 ET by on-the-rockswasn't he a Sponge Bob character? Or maybe he should be.
Just another elitist that can't stand the thought of common citizens involving themselves in the news & editorial process. I guess he is afraid that too much information from too many sources will confuse the poor, great unwashed peons that only he and his brethren are qualified to reach (and teach).
And (gasp!) we don't have Journalism degrees. Oh, the humanity! We barbarians have stormed his gates.
how does mika get to keep
May 28, 2008 - 07:43 ET by seaniephow does mika get to keep this job? the most basic skill that this job would require, it seems to me, besides being her dad's daughter and easy on the eyes . . . would be to shut up while your guest is talking
sometimes it is considered appropriate to interrupt when you have a conflicting view, but as the guy is talking you can hear her saying "yes, right, uh-hu, correct"
LET THE GUY FINISH BIMBO!!!!!
elite news media, a journalism degree does not make you an expert on election laws, oil production, mortgage/lien laws, stem cells, OR ANYTHING other than how to write a story and maybe just maybe hopefully spell all the words correctly
these idiots probably play scarbble instead of scrabble
Journalism degree = toliet
May 28, 2008 - 07:51 ET by taterJournalism degree = toliet paper for most of these people
Trust me...I've worked in news media as a weatherman and I had to report a little. I didn't take a lick of journy classes in college and I learned everything I needed to know by going out and reporting the story like it is. Granted they weren't hard hitting stories but you get the idea.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather
The person, the person is tired, the person has made a mistake
May 28, 2008 - 07:56 ET by PamYet the job of POTUS does not make one tired and therefore every mis-speak makes that person an idiot..
"does this merit
May 28, 2008 - 15:07 ET by TruthMonger"does this merit discussion?"
"nooooooooooooooooooooooo - it doesn't (waaah)!!!!!"
"the guy is just tired"
i love it
can it possibly get any more pathetic for obama fans?
hey DNC - both your top candidates are making Dan Quayle look like a genius again - after all your damn hard work, too:(!
I wouldn't worry to much
May 28, 2008 - 07:58 ET by RMRI wouldn't worry to much about Barnicle and Capehart. They are just auditioning for starring roles in the old media version of "when we were kings".
Nitwits
May 28, 2008 - 08:06 ET by pbanks7And then these nitwits at home with their computers, these bloggers, who [snorts] think they're part of the news media, can then accuse us of being soft on this candidate or that candidate. Just a theory.
Nitwits that broke the "official news reporter" Dan Rather's phony Bush/Guard/AWOL story? What a bunch of Moe-Rons. Keep up the [snort] good work you rubes!
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe.
Last time I checked,
May 28, 2008 - 08:08 ET by James MurrayLast time I checked, Michelle Malkin was also a national syndicated columnist, who, unlike Barnicle, hasn't been fired for plagiarism.
They always get high and mighty when the Gaffes are against
May 28, 2008 - 08:12 ET by Dee BunkThey always get high and mighty when the Gaffes are against Obama. Their defense is simply - It's all wrong and it's time to stop this nitpicking on all of them. Until of course the next Clinton or McCain Gaffe happens.
Hillary and McCain don't even have to make an actual Gaffe. McCain can correct his own mistake in the same speech (Shiite/Sunni thing) and Hillary can give examples of campaigns that went into June and they are called Gaffes.
When will the next Hillary or McCain non Gaffe be mentioned? Simple answer - No later than the day after the Obama Camp decides one has occurred.
Right on as usual
May 28, 2008 - 09:10 ET by exLibRight on as usual Dee.
Here's a guy who had a radio show in boston and spent an entire Bush speech, which was broadcast live, heckling Bush and making cynical and snide comment along with his equally appalling side-kick Bob Lobel.
Also, a guy who along with the rest of the media has spent the last 7 years basically ignoring everything Bush has said and instead focusing on every gaff he makes and NOT focusing on the substance of what he says and then comes along and says "we really need to 'listen' to what Obama is saying".
Barnicle did the same apologizing for Obama clone Deval Patrick when he bought a Cadallic Deville, outfitted his office on the most expensive furniture he could find and gives "his people" cushy-high-paying jobs in his administration. While again, for the past 7 years decrying the same behavior from Republicans.
exlib -- Barnicle is one of the most unprofessional people
May 28, 2008 - 14:59 ET by Dee Bunkout there. Thank goodness I've never heard his radio show - sorry you had to hear it.
What a joke that these people turn around and say - lets stop pointing out gaffs. We've wished that for years. I'm fine if they stop pointing out ALL gaffs - they should. The campaigns can do that but they should ALWAYS be taking the other side. They only do that when it's Republicans pointing out the Gaffes.
Barnicle can't see his own hypocrisy dee
May 28, 2008 - 15:10 ET by exLibIt was a sad time, although a great day when I tuned in and he was not only gone but replaced but a very sane individual named Michael Graham. He's been hounded by CAiR as well as other PC minded groups.
Barnicle is a classic elitist liberal in that he can always find the fault with the Conservative but is always willing to be charitable and forgiving on the Democrat side.
The truly confusing thing with people like Barnicle is that they come across for the most part as caring parents. He always talked about being a comitted Catholic but then acts like a complete pagan and supports all the things that the Catholic Church would never condone as public policy.
So the guy has a standard for the unwashed masses that he would never hold his own family to, let alone himself.
I Think You Missed Something
May 28, 2008 - 08:19 ET by dwillmoreIn a race to defend the bloggers I think we missed something more damning. Did you notice this?
Don't pick on Obama because McCain and Clinton do the same thing. Of course they fail to address the question. Why did the media jump all over McCain and Clinton but fail to jump all over Obama!
The Jackals of the Press
June 10, 2008 - 09:46 ET by dios PrometheusThe jackals of the press, like Mike Barnacle, were not so merciful when a former Veep said a certain common vegetable was spelled with an e on the end. The fact is that they didn't report the full story of that infamous gaffe or point out the British spell it with an e on the end didn't lessen their delight to ridicule the man.
His most famous blunder occurred when he corrected a student's correct spelling of "potato" to "potatoe" at anelementary school spelling bee in Trenton, New Jersey, on June 15, 1992.[11] According to his memoirs, Quayle was uncomfortable with the version he gave, but did so because he decided to trust what he described as incorrect written materials provided by the school. He informed student William Figueroa that he had misspelled the word "potato", when in fact Figueroa had spelled it correctly. Quayle then had Figueroa add an "e", which is correct according to his British education (i.e color and colour), but once again making himself a target with this alternative spelling. Quayle was widely lambasted for his apparent inability to spell the word "potato." Figueroa was a guest on Late Night with David Letterman and was asked to lead the pledge of allegiance at the 1992 Democratic National Convention. The event became a lasting part of Quayle's reputation.
Better than You!
May 28, 2008 - 08:26 ET by King of the BritonsIt is no wonder that most of these enlightened, brilliant people prefer socialism to a free market. They feel that anyone who isn't part of the intelligentsia is a "nitwit" who should know their role and stick to playing it. Of course, they are all part of the special people and don't like it when they aren't part of the rules committee (Bloggers / loss of the power of the MSM). If you want to see the definition of a bunch of nitwits, there is no need to look any further than the 535 nitwits in Washington D.C. or the talking heads on the 24-hour News.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!´´
--Patrick Henry
Gosh, if only we were
May 28, 2008 - 08:52 ET by JerryGosh, if only we were intellectual giants like Mr. Barnacle. Then we too could report our opinions as "news".
Let's see, you make up stories, bury legitimate stories, report opinions as news, and fact check nothing. You present everything within the framework of a liberal bias, openly campaign for liberal candidates, and try to alter public opinion and perception to match your own. And who's the "nitwit"??
Stories on blogs are open to scrutiny from all political viewpoints, and are usually "fact checked" and "cross checked" on the spot, not by a ideologically friendly editor, but by hostile counterpoints.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any\ President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
A Scarlet Letter
June 10, 2008 - 09:28 ET by dios PrometheusBarnacle is an ignorant bully and D-Party hatchet man. He committed crimes against journalism. He wears a Scarlet letter. He is unfit to comment on anything. He is unfit for newspapers and for TV news. Any organization that hires this piece of filth is as corrupt as he is.
Pure arrogance
May 28, 2008 - 09:16 ET by KC MulvilleWhat gets me is the arrogance that only journalists have the right to comment on matters of public importance. They think the news media are the "bishops" of current affairs, and that only they have the authority to manage the public's business. But it's a hilarious assumption that only journalists are informed enough about the issues to make worthwhile comments. Journalists are people who make their living by "informing" others, but that doesn't prove they understand things themselves. When reporters report events, that's legitimate, but when they condescend to "explain the meaning" of those events, they're way out of their league.
Journalists aren't military experts, yet they have the arrogance to speculate about what troop levels should be. The average reporter wouldn't know a balance sheet from a balance beam, yet they have no shame in "explaining" the state of the economy. And yet, these self-serving dolts set themselves up as authorities over current events. We are flooded by talk shows, Sunday morning roundtables, and cable shoutfests where journalists interview ... each other! The only opinions these journalists present is their own. Sure, some journalists who have covered a beat for twenty years may have acquired some experience in a particular field. But it's pure arrogance to assume (as this fool Barnicle does) that the opinions of non-journalists are worthless.
Journalists have created a myth that only they are qualified to discuss topics of national importance. But it's a myth only they believe.
Five retired colonels who
May 28, 2008 - 09:24 ET by motherbeltFive retired colonels who served in Iraq are infinitely more qualified
to discuss Iraq strategy than are any of the reporters. So why do
journalists get to pop off about how the war is going, and not colonels? -KC Mulville
KC, you forget, they were allowed to "pop off" when they disagreed with what was going on. Then, the cry from the MSM was "Listen to the Generals!!"
Now, it's What do they know? They're all Bush's lackeys.
Which proves my point
May 28, 2008 - 10:14 ET by KC MulvilleExactly, mb. The media went to them precisely because they carried more authority than common reporters, and the reporters knew it themselves. But then, why don't we hear more from real experts when it's time to discuss those topics?
In fact, it creates an authority-by-absence vicious circle. If reporters only interview experts when the experts agree, then we can deduce that the experts don't agree when the reporters refuse to interview any.
I Saw This Too
May 28, 2008 - 09:20 ET by SAM-OHScarborough better return soon, or he won't have a show to return to. Mika B. has completely hijacked the show.
Capehart is better than the Temple or George Mason professor (Lamont Hill?) that Fox often contacts for left-wing reaction, but he's still tiresome.
I used to like Barnicle, but he's showing evidence that he's been hanging around Mika too long. As far as Mika is concerned, she's worse than Alan Colmes with all the off-camera grunts, groans, pshaws, pfftts, and talking over guests. She was okay when Scarborough was present to keep her in the corner. The show ain't worth watching anymore.
HEY GANG - LET'S LOOK UP "PLAGIARIST" IN THE DICTIONARY!!
May 28, 2008 - 09:28 ET by SgthulkaWhy look - There's Mike Carbuncle's picture.
Granted, he resigned after the second allegation, and it was only a few old George Carlin jokes that he stole. But that's all it takes to get you on MessNBC as an "analyst".
It was more than that, and
May 28, 2008 - 09:32 ET by motherbeltIt was more than that, and went back years.
Interesting MB
May 28, 2008 - 09:52 ET by RESTLESS 1So, people with talent in the blogosphere are "nitwits", but this guy, who has never had an original thought, is this msm gem? No wonder the msm is so highly regarded.
Nitwits?
May 28, 2008 - 09:38 ET by mattmLike the geniuses at ABC who put Laura Bush's head on Godzilla's body, or that venerable "journalist" Dan Fake-but Accurate- Rather, or the countless other certified journalists who constantly get it wrong?
I bet they feel better now after that homo-erotic journalistic orgy...
BTW - here's a little clue: we don't think we're the 'news media', it's the NEW media, and you're the OLD media...and getting older by the second.
Actually, I would say it is
May 28, 2008 - 09:41 ET by RESTLESS 1Actually, I would say it is Barnicle and Capeheart who are the nitwits who THINK they are part of the news media. Before this, I had never heard of either one.
And, someone should explain to these guys that Obama's lies are not occurring in a vaccuum. One incident, probably not a story,but we are seeing multiple attempts to revise facts with this guy. He is a liar, and he is tying to mislead us. He is using deceit in an attempt to lead us into socialism. Obama the liar! Obama the liar! Obama the liar!!
Hey, if I say it enough, maybe the msm will actually report it.
(Damn!!! I just made myself laugh and nearly ruined a perfectly good laptop.) :)
Glad to see that more and
May 28, 2008 - 09:51 ET by ErnestGlad to see that more and more folks are getting tired of drinking the MSM kool-aid. They have been force feeding us crap for years. Unbiased and independent my rear.
Mika's Brother
May 28, 2008 - 10:26 ET by viluzionThat caught my attention as well, Mark. I have a sister who is an atheist, but that certainly doesn't mean I'm not in the tank for Jesus. In fact, I have literally been in the tank for Jesus and actively campaign for Him.
Silly little MSNBC they
May 28, 2008 - 10:29 ET by RbastidSilly little MSNBC they think they are a news outfit.
The bloggers need to do all the medias fact checking and do what we can to get stories right.
Without Bloggers we'd think,
Obama is someone a being born before his parents met. (He really thinks he's Jesus?)
US liberated Auschwitz.
Memorial Day is to honor living soldiers and/or Obama sees dead people.
We have 58 states.
We screwed up the tornado body count last week.
This can go on a long time. But if the media doesn't do their job, well some people are going to have to.
Barnicle lost his job at the Globe
May 28, 2008 - 10:58 ET by sara123Barnicle would have some resentments about the internet's pj reporters and editoralists since he was caught publishing false information and fired from his Boston Globe job. He was caught lying and making up interviews on multiple occasions by readers. Like Dan Rather, the internet folks checking reporter "facts" are his nightmare. As a liberal, Barnicle resents the unwashed masses having the power to interfere with the media "mainstream" running the election coverage without interference.
Well, Barnicle is considered unfit to work for a newspaper, but he apparently meets the journalistic standards of MSNBC just fine.
Didn't Barncile work for the "Boston Globe"
May 28, 2008 - 11:17 ET by Carl KolchakDidn't Barnicle work for the truth and justice publication called "Boston Globe"? Here are some stories about fabrications coming from the "Boston Globe."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38464
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57908-2005Apr15.html
http://www.cnn.com/US/9806/19/globe.columnist.resigns/
"Well I got nothing against the press. They wouldn't print it if it wasn't true" 'Sunday Papers'
Who would want to be what they've become?
May 28, 2008 - 12:09 ET by ThalpyWho would want to be what they've become? No one I know! " A man's got to know his limitations." The truth of the matter is that the MSM, from on-air personalities to their editors, are not as intelligent as they think they are, and we are not as dumb as they think we are. Most of the nitwits participating in the blogs don't seem to take themselves too seriously. For me, the blogs serve a cathartic function: they give me an opportunity to vent.
Most of the nitwits do not set out to produce a self-serving fiction called news. Given that the MSM are professional, we should expect better, and they should provide better.
A serial plagiarist
May 28, 2008 - 12:22 ET by fitzfongA serial plagiarist questioning the integrity of another medium? Well, if that doesn't take the cake...
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
What Mika didn't tell you...
May 28, 2008 - 13:22 ET by SupermanMika's father and brother are advisors to Barrack Obama. Furthermore, Mika's bias for Obama can be proven every day. When someone says something that's not favorable towards Obama, you can hear Mika give out a loud groan. Or you will see Mika try to change the subject. When Joe Scarborough talked about Obama's bowling, Mika was seething with anger. In some instances, Mika actually walked off the set.
So is Mika Brzezinski drinking the Obama Kool-Aid? I think if her brother gave his honest opinion, he would say yes.
Oh great... the leftist
May 28, 2008 - 13:25 ET by bigtimerOh great... the leftist twits come to defense of poor little misunderstood Mika for NOT reporting the gaffes by Obama, especially his latest one, I myself call them lies by Obama, we all know they are all in the tank for Obama, msnbc is the extended arm of the leftist party, it's their free voice to get projected out there everyday...
Mika can't handle the truth, heck all leftists can't handle the truth...if they are faced with the truth they will deny, spin, or blame someone or something else..or outright lie!
Mike Barnicle wouldn't even be back on the air and the leftists newest speaking work of so-called wisdom after he was fired for his outrageous plagiarism if Don Imus hadn't started putting him on his show once a week or so because he felt sorry for him, or he said himself one morning when he first had him on as a guest...and the lying leftist has never left.
Bloggers do the work they won't, bloggers expose them immediately, Dan Rather ring a bell for just one example.
By the way, if Joe doesn't come back soon, I won't watch very much of this show anymore anyway....I'm already only watching some of it now because I can't stand the complete bias of all the guests on, and I have come to totally seethe with Mika...she is infuriating...plus so blatantly in the tank for Obama it is pathetic.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
This is an OUTRAGE!
May 28, 2008 - 14:42 ET by BritcomThese people think they are better than us because they work for a dead tree processor, or sit their fat asses in front of a camera all day wearing too much garish make-up on their spotty faces and bulbous noses?
They are going to starve to death without us reading, or listening to their tripe. And that is what it is... Tripe with a capital 'T'. They are not professional at all. They are overpaid ass kissing whores who do the bidding of corrupt leftist traitors who hate America, hate God, and ignore everyone whom they consider less "enlightened" than themselves. Which would be everyone who is not a Communist.
Note: I am really not "outraged", but I thought it would be funny to react like a leftist knee-jerk liberal and make an emotional splash in the pool like they so often do and call it "journalism". :0p
---
Communist vs. Statist '08
Q. Is Panamanian born John McCain a "Natural Born Citizen"
Fairness Doctrine will fix it
May 28, 2008 - 15:39 ET by wizardjrSo don't be surprised when they knock on your door and demand 'equal time' on your computer. After all, it's only fair.
When they come a knockin'
May 29, 2008 - 01:25 ET by BritcomMy buddies Smith & Wesson would be happy to entertain them.
---
Communist vs. Statist '08
Q. Is Panamanian born John McCain a "Natural Born Citizen"
The Official Nitwit Website
May 28, 2008 - 13:59 ET by BarkerMike Barnicle's blog. Stop by and leave a comment, though you'll have to dumb it down a bit to make sure Barnicle gets it.
First Amendment on Liberal World
May 28, 2008 - 15:43 ET by nkviking75In Liberal World, the First Amendment allows me to write or say anything I want. If you criticize me, you're trying to deny me my First Amendment rights. Your First Amendment rights? Well, that never comes up.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
The Bill of Rights
May 29, 2008 - 01:33 ET by BritcomI think all of the first ten amendments should end with,"In the event that the government tries to infringe upon any of these rights, see Amendment 2."
---
Communist vs. Statist '08
Q. Is Panamanian born John McCain a "Natural Born Citizen"