I truly believe this behavior will backfire on the media and on Obama.  And I can't wait to see it happen.  They should be ashamed of themselves, they really should.

over the top, it may spell the end of the MSM as we know it.....there is going to be a back lash.  Decent americans have had enough of this propaganda, along with the Josef Georbells Daily Kos, and Media Morons.  This crap plays on both coasts, but not with the rest of America, they have had it with the lies. 

"If a man does his best, what else is there"?

General George S. Patton Jr.

Come to think of it, with all this content, you could have your own show....the unfairness is so egregious it's funny. 

Where do i send my Check for NBTV?

What you hear is fear. Fear in the leftist media and on the MSM. There is much they have invested in Obama. There is much they have overlooked and gone out of their way to avoid reporting. And now, with the nomination of Sara Palin, they voice there fear in the form of attacks. On both her and her family. Funny thing about fear. Your enemy can smell it, even through all the vitriolic.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Eleanor Clift brings zero intelligence to any debate.

Clift was a secretary without a formal education when her boss decided she'd make a good reporter.

Male boss giving his unqualified secretary a promotion?

My goodness! I wonder what her colleagues thought of that back in the '30s?

Now she's passing judgement on a 16-year old girl?

Eleanor -- you need to shut up and quickly sit down!

I hereby unilaterally rename the Dems, the Abortionist Party. 

In scurrilously attacking Gov. Palin and her daughter, the Abortionist Party has demonstrated they are not at all interested in Choice.

The Abortionist Party's stated "right" to abortion is squarely challenged by two pregnancies that represent textbook definitions of the need for abortion on demand; teen pregnancy and impairment.

The choice of Palin fits perfectly into the real choice placed before America today, and I know I've said it before.

And the people said "Give us Barabas Obama!  Let this choice be upon us and our children!  Crucify Him (the innocents)!" 

And it is no accident Obama quoted Matthew.  "If you did it to the least of these, you have done it to Me"

God, forgive me for inserting what I see as a very clear comparison into Your Word.  I mean no disrespect.

Rocky & Bullwinkle '08

The newsrooms are in full panic mode, air head. Governor Palin makes all you liberated women and metrosexual "men" look like the pale panty waists that you really are.

This mental midget will be raving about voting machines and stolen ballot boxes and hanging chads for years after Barry gets his ass kicked in November. She'll never understand why the 'laughable' Governor Palin gave the GOP ticket the push it needed to get to the Whitehouse.

They called the baby a "skeleton in the closet," a strange term for an unborn child, ...

That's an interesting phrase. We've all heard "bun in the oven" but never "skeleton in the closet" in this context. It's probably just a slip up, albeit a completely appropriate one for people who desire death sentences for the innocent.

Are there any more biased and despicable reporters and commentators out there? These people can'thave any friends other than other hate filled leftists.

...by the level of attention and scrutiny that Palin is currently undergoing? The media wants to make money. Things like teen pregnancy and ethics scandals will get coverage (whether deserved or not).

Viewers eat this stuff up. I don't see any maliciousness in the coverage, just overkill. This insane amount of attention will backfire, but for now it's getting ratings.

Furthermore, this blind love of an unknown like Palin is bordering on the insane. I have many issues with this choice. All McCain had to do was pick Romney and he would have won hands down. Now, b/c of Palin's glaring weaknesses, he's in a real gun fight. It was unnecssary and a transparent case of pandering.

Palin was clearly not vetted properly and as a result, the Republicans are now forced to backpeddle ferouciously.

There are several issues of significance that should have been examined more closely before she was selected. I see the following problems with this choice.

1) McCain only talked to her twice before choosing her. Twice? That seems a bit thin considering the importance of the decision and seemingly validates the charge that she was a simple case of political pandering.

2) She's Pro-Creationism. This is a tough stance to swallow. While not an issue to decide an election on, it does raise some red flags with regard to judgment considering Creationism has no place with legitimate science.

3) A major plus for her was her supposed opposition to the Bridge To Nowhere. This is patently false. Palin was all about the Bridge to Nowhere until 2007 when everyone found out what a joke of a project it was. At that point, she had no choice but to rescind her support or get laughed out of town on the rails. So, I'm not sure where this idea that she fought against it came from, but it's a lie.

4) She has strongly supported Ted Stevens and even supports him now while he is under indictment. He's not guilty yet, but it's not looking good for him. Granted, Obama has some terrible friends (i.e. Ayers, Rezko), but there's no reason to choose someone who has the same problem, esp. when her claim to fame is fighting the old boys network. It's just another negative angle that people can manipulate. Couple this with the story about the her sister's divorce and you're looking at a major problem for a Vice Presidential candidate.

5) She lacks experience. Mayor of a tiny town is not significant. Governor is a bit more important, but there are only 600,000 people in the state, so...The National Guard slant is clearly a stretch with regard to Foreign Policy experience. In fact, they should have never brought this up as an example.

I don't see the pregnancy thing as an issue, but the fact is, I understand why it's getting top billing. If McCain had vetted her properly, he would have known all of this and realized there was going to be tremendous scrutiny and attention.

I don't think the lack of Edwards coverage was that strange given all of the mistakes by the media in recent years. Rathergate, et al. has neutered the nets. They won't print anything until they are 100% certain, ESPECIALLY when the potential for a libel suit is so high in our litigious society. They covered Edwards once it was confirmed.

Palin is the VP nom, Edwards is not. The media's obsession is not surprising, nor do I find it that offensive.