A night after NBC White House reporter Chuck Todd predicted Sarah Palin will now make fundraising appearances for GOP candidates where she'll draw in “car-wreck watchers,” Todd's colleague, NBC's Mike Viqueira, after relaying how Alaska's Lieutenant Governor “says the decision was vintage Palin,” asserted over video of Ross Perot dancing: “Others describe her performance yesterday as erratic, comparing it to Ross Perot's on-again/off-again presidential run in 1992.” Unlike Palin, Perot did leave and enter the presidential race months before the election date.
Viqueira, Capitol Hill producer for NBC News who regularly appears on MSNBC, earned rare air time on the real network's NBC Nightly News because of the holiday, and proceeded to highlight how “Democrats, meanwhile, are questioning Palin's motives.” So who are these “others”? Viqueira's press corps colleagues? After all, as Rich Noyes reminded us in “Notable Quotables Flashback: Ten Months of Media Scorn for Sarah Palin,” when John McCain named Palin last year Newsweek's Eleanor Clift revealed the media reaction: “It’s been literally laughter...in very, very many newsrooms.”
From the second half of Viqueira's piece on the Saturday, July 4 NBC Nightly News:
MIKE VIQUEIRA: ...The man who will now inherit the governor's office in three weeks says the decision was vintage Palin.ALASKA LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SEAN PARNELL: She's independent, she's bold and she looks out for Alaska. And that's what I saw happening yesterday.
VIQUEIRA: Others describe her performance yesterday as erratic, comparing it to Ross Perot's on-again/off-again presidential run in 1992. Democrats, meanwhile, are questioning Palin's motives.
JULIAN EPSTEIN, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: I think most people will conclude that she either can't take the heat in Alaska or that she is leaving so that she can make money.
VIQUEIRA: Sarah Palin is keeping a low profile this Fourth of July, but national Republicans are already looking forward to her help in tight governor's races next year in New Jersey and Virginia. Mike vicara, NBC News, Washington.
Of course, those two elections will be held in November of this year, not next year.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





VIQUEIRA: Others describe her performance yesterday as erratic, comparing it to Ross Perot's on-again/off-again presidential run in 1992. Democrats, meanwhile, are questioning Palin's motives.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The fear is evident...
July 4, 2009 - 22:54 ET by AgentAmericanYou can cut the fear with a knife. Palin is only getting more popular and more confident...
2010: A GOP Hill
I just love it when the
July 4, 2009 - 23:06 ET by msh1973I just love it when the "Democratic Strategist" think they have it all figured out...what a joke these people have become. I could care less what they think!
This is what is all comes down to
July 4, 2009 - 23:43 ET by DoktorFrankenThe discussing and reporting of pure speculation, opinion, and utter falsehoods. That's the media for the most part but what they are doing to Governor Palin (and have done) is extreme². And relentless, like with no other person except for perhaps Hitler in the early 40s.
This went beyond obsession and, as many others have noted, has the stank of 'The Chicago Way'. Consider, who has beaten Hussein at his game of politics? And how many bodies are beneath the bus?
Tactics like these are usually attributed to evil dictators that take over a country by eliminating their enemies and controlling the media. Hmm.
Honestly, if I had my way
July 4, 2009 - 23:42 ET by lsudolemiteI'd make it illegal for any story or interview to contain the words "some say..." or "others say..." I can manufacture any kind of phony dissent or point of view imaginable with those phrases. For example:
"The theory of a round Earth has been gaining steady credibility over the years, with scientists citing satellite images as concrete, irrefutable proof. But some say if you venture too far out into the ocean you can fall off the edge of the earth, while others further claim that the earth is also the center of the universe."
I second that notion
July 4, 2009 - 23:54 ET by BlondeExcellent point.
Any sentence on a news report that begins with those words, or actually contain those words "some say"....or words to that effect, should be either (a) summarily blasted off the air or (b) outlawed.
I hope he fails, too.
In advertising they call
July 4, 2009 - 23:57 ET by DoktorFrankenIn advertising they call them weasel words.
lsudolemite
July 4, 2009 - 23:55 ET by DoktorFranken'' . . . while others further claim that the earth is also the center of the universe.''
Exactly. Pseudo people. Pure cloth. Moonbeams (how apropos) and butterflies. This enrages me to no end. How anyone can watch, read, or listen to people like this, and believe it, amazes me.
"Eleanor Clift revealed the
July 5, 2009 - 10:49 ET by kg"Eleanor Clift revealed the media reaction: “It’s been literally laughter...in very, very many newsrooms. "
In reality this should real:
Eleanor Clift, herself, has been literally laughing while visiting many, many news rooms telling them Palin resigned.
CLIFT WISHED ON NATIONAL TV
July 5, 2009 - 11:00 ET by nadadhimmiCLIFT WISHED ON NATIONAL TV THAT MORE AMERICAN SOLDIERS WOULD DIE IN IRAQ TO HASTEN THE PULL OUT. This was when Bush was prez of course. Clift is a traitorous GHOUL and should be denigrated as such. Hoping for the deaths of our soldier protectors to further her political goals indicates the sickness that permeates the presstitutes. THE PRESS IS EXCREABLE!!!!
I haven't been able to
July 4, 2009 - 23:54 ET by mostlymoderateI haven't been able to figure out why liberals hate Palin with such vehement passion. What the hell are they afraid of?
She Can Win.
July 5, 2009 - 00:00 ET by DoktorFrankenShe Can Win.
Almost
July 5, 2009 - 14:13 ET by JDWThey fear her
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
That is actually an interesting comparison
July 5, 2009 - 00:03 ET by shawn228Hear me out. You know how many folks on this site complain about RINO"s and about the Republican party moving to the left?
She stands for most of the issues that are important to Conservatives. What if she started a new party called the "Conservative Party?" A party that
I personally do not think she would win, but many here are interested in starting a new conservative grass roots party. Would Sarah Palin be the right one to foot the bill if a new party rises?
e had my vote
That Would Be
July 5, 2009 - 07:11 ET by kilrodHey 228, that list would read Pro God, Pro Life, Pro America, Pro Gun, which pretty well covers your list. And yep Palin are Cheny could lead a viable third party and they would get my support. I'd rather step out of a stock tank buck naked and piss on an electric fence as have to choose between the lesser of the 2 evils we have now.!!~~!! Interesting to note both strong conservative leaders are women. And hey, Thanks for the post.
(GRINS) kilrod
Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
Add these
July 5, 2009 - 07:43 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsYou should add to your list
D
Write Congress and Senate and tell them what YOU think!
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
I'll go to my grave believing that Ross Perot was a DNC plant
July 5, 2009 - 00:25 ET by R D HelmLOL-Anybody wish to challenge me on that?
-Dave
"Obama's health care 'reform' plan is to blow up the building in order to fix a leak in the roof." - Herman Cain
Hmmm, may as well have
July 5, 2009 - 00:46 ET by RR GOPHmmm, may as well have been.
But does that include Senator Dole in the next election?
I'm still trying to figure out how Clinton got re-elected.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
RR... I will never
July 5, 2009 - 01:01 ET by bigtimerRR...
I will never understand how Clintoon was reelected...we never thought it possible around these parts.
Motor Voter/ACORN groups....
Who knows...after-all, we know the dems are clean as a whistle when it comes to voter fraud.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
BT-Reflecting back on those
July 5, 2009 - 01:17 ET by RR GOPBT-Reflecting back on those times, I remember that Howard Stern was quite popular and that the average Joe was like, "Hell yeah! The Prez is gettin' some on the sly! He's all right with me."
Also I believe Married With Children, Roseanne, and The Simpsons were popular on the tele...more than enough cynicism and moral decay to go around.
Dole was lampooned heavily especially on the Saturday Night Live MTV Real World skits (which I still think were hilarious...'That's Bob Dole's chair. Get out of Bob Dole's chair'...LOL). Dole was constantly portrayed as old, decrepit and out of it. Clinton was always shown as being hip and with it.
But to this day even though Slick Willy is made fun of it always has the good-natured 'Oh, that Bill. What's he up to now for heaven's sake' tone.
To this day I'm not even sure what Bob Dole's message was...hardly ever saw him, but tons of Willy courtesy of the MSM.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
RR GOP
July 5, 2009 - 01:23 ET by MrShy"Dole was constantly portrayed as old, decrepit and out of it."
I was not quite converted to the "right" side back in the mid 90's, but as I recall... he was.... old, pretty decrepit (although not a great word -- he was physically impaired, as we know) and did sort of convey an "out of it" vibe in his stiffness.
Of course, like last year, he was the darling pick of the leftoids, I'm sure, as he was really beatable. They wanted the oldest, slowest, most out-of-touch-esque person to rise in the GOP ranks. 1996 and 2008 are pretty much the same:
Hip but incompetent vs. Old but wise/marginally competent.
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
True, but remember FDR was
July 5, 2009 - 01:28 ET by RR GOPTrue, but remember FDR was in a friggin' wheelchair.
Kemp was probably the best choice for frontrunner, but as you seem to point out, the elitist/RINO led GOP does push the weaker candidates.
I have to shake my head when these GOPers and so-called conservatives slobber all over Romney, Huckabee and several others.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
RR
July 5, 2009 - 01:34 ET by RESTLESS 1Ya gotta remember that Perot supported Romney this past cycle. 'Nuff said.
Disclaimer: I voted for perot both times. I was young and stupid, the stupid in spades, back then.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Romney & Huck
July 5, 2009 - 01:36 ET by MrShyI don't like either of them. I really do wonder who's actually pulling the GOP strings these days. I almost think the "real" party doesn't exist, and we're left with a paper tiger.
That's sort of where Palin or any true outsider comes in. I think she's got some major maverick card up her sleeve, to totally take the conservative/real-Republican bull by the horns, her way, and without apologies.
That said, Palin is not my top pick, either, but the authentic non-DC/politician element is really appealing. What's Liz Cheney's plan, btw?
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
Shy,
July 5, 2009 - 01:40 ET by RESTLESS 1Liz is definitely the real deal. I would vote for her twice in a second. I don't know if a run for her is feasible, but she is one of, if not the best, voices for us out there right now. The msm fear her more than Sarah or Ann, or...hell anyone I can think of.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
hey Restless
July 5, 2009 - 01:44 ET by MrShy"I don't know if a run for her is feasible..."
Why do you think that? The Cheney name? Again, we have to come at the Dems and the far-left hard, and shape our image... ourselves! (this time :))
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
Shy, by "feasible"
July 5, 2009 - 01:53 ET by RESTLESS 1I mean that I'm not sure she wants to. The Cheney name gives her more strength in my book. She obviously takes no prisoners.
I would love to see her run. The Cheney name would have nothing to do with it if the msm would let her be heard.
I can see her making a Reaganesque run, outside the confines of the msm, and as I said, she could count on my vote at least twice. :)
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
MrS... You really should
July 5, 2009 - 01:55 ET by bigtimerMrS...
You really should see Liz take on the msm...all of them, on all networks....they cannot handle her wit, wisdom, class and swiftness....it's awesome to watch.
Google it if you get any down time....you may change your tune.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
BT
July 5, 2009 - 02:53 ET by MrShyI think you misread. I like Liz, a lot. I've seen her handle herself with the media and talking heads. She's incredibly smooth.
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
Shy
July 5, 2009 - 01:44 ET by SvenI would love to see a Palin/Cheney ticket! Hey, I can dream!
I simply DO NOT TRUST: Huck or Newt! Everytime you think Newt's got his mind right on conservative principles, he sits down on couch with Pelosi talking about Global Warming, or bashes Rush while singing the praises of Powell. I think what Huck did to Romney last election in the primaries was underhanded and just plain mean!
Sorry, but we don't need Republicans (so called conservatives) who've been drinking the "Big Tent" Kool-Aid that Mr. Rove has been serving.
RR
July 5, 2009 - 01:37 ET by RESTLESS 1The damnable thing about is that Mitt is a capable speaker. I just don't know that I can trust him. He has been back and forth on too many subjects over the past 2-4 years or so. And the public health in Mass. just scared the sh$t out of me.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
MrShy finally wounds me.
July 5, 2009 - 16:00 ET by JWFbut as I recall... he was.... old, pretty decrepit (although not a great word -- he was physically impaired, as we know) and did sort of convey an "out of it" vibe in his stiffness.
He was an honest to God War Hero my friend. Like John McCain, a lot of that stiffness came from war wounds. His one arm was pretty much useless, wasn't even too much muscle left, most of it was cut out. He carried the pen so people would not be tempted to try and shake his hand, which would be very painful. I think the image you remember was a result of the MSM full bore bias then.
The image of him falling off the stage that was replayed over and over again. What do we do when we lose our balance? We throw out our arms. BZZZT. Not available to him. Republicans have had 2 fights in every election for a long time. The one against the Democrat and the other against the media.
The image you remember was the image spoon fed to you by the media.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
JWF~
July 5, 2009 - 16:08 ET by Georgia GirlHere's the other thing that some may not be considering. I think the youngest among us would have a mighty tough time on the campaign circuit. Lack of sleep, jet lag/bus trips, etc. And with John McCain, he is a man who could have been sick with flu or in terrible pain from an ear infection -- who knows, because he would not be the type to complain at all or make excuses for himself. Unlike somebody else who complains when he isn't fed every 2 hours or if a reporter asks him a question while he's eating. Another thing -- Obama said some gosh darn dippy things when he was on the trail. At least McCain knows how many states we have!
Thanks Georgia Girl
July 5, 2009 - 16:19 ET by JWFYes. Don't forget Obama started naming the extra states too. Anyone remember New Pennsylvania?
JWF~
July 5, 2009 - 16:34 ET by Georgia GirlYes, lol. And I really don't mean to be petty, but there are just a few big, foundational things I kind of expect people to remember if they are leading the country. People ramble -- get off track -- forget what the heck they were saying (what was my point?^_^ ) -- but it did seem much more freaky to me that he couldn't nail down the states. It made me feel like "gosh, does he even know what country he's in?" Ohhhhh ... ironic. I guess he didn't quite know what country he was in, hence all the new policies. ;)
JWF
July 5, 2009 - 16:23 ET by MrShyOh, I agree, the media certainly did not shy (oops :)) away from reinforcing and accentuating the less-attractive physical aspects of both candidates -- and, predictably, from hating Republicans, the military, and war (well, at least the ones that happen under a Republican's watch), did not do any heavy lifting to remind people WHY they were this way.
I was not much into politics in 1996, and while I think I voted for the womanizer (I was still a programmed NYC Democrat for the most part), I do recall thinking, "Gore's a good man, I could vote for him."
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
oh, and he rubs salt in it.
July 5, 2009 - 16:27 ET by JWF...and while I think I voted for the womanizer...
To think I would be done in by friendly fire...
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1001 psychic wars finally done in by one of his own.
JWF
July 5, 2009 - 16:29 ET by MrShyYeah, I was one of the morons up until this decade. 9/11 was the major turning-point, but even before that I was wondering what's so dandy about this DemocRAT party...
That was close.
July 5, 2009 - 16:33 ET by JWFIt is a 5 second fuse MrShy. Pull the pin and throw. It is not a baseball dammit. Put an arc on that thing next time.
JWF
July 5, 2009 - 16:36 ET by MrShy:p
BT happy 4th to you
July 5, 2009 - 01:26 ET by RESTLESS 1My personal opinion is that with Newt and his gang garnering control of Congress, coupled with the fact that the country was doing well, led to a bit of apathy among voters, thus the status quo.
Too late, and I'm too tired to go into Perot's effect, or lack thereof, in both elections right now.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
R1.... You aren't
July 5, 2009 - 01:50 ET by bigtimerR1....
You aren't alone...we made the same mistake of being fooled too and voting Perot...we also carried Pitchforks too for Pat.
I agree with you about Newt...I think...we'll catch up later.
...as to your earlier comments, which you may or may not know, I have posted this below with conviction...and to piss off the leftists/trolls. (I've posted about Liz from hour one here) ;-)
Cheney/Cheney '12!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
BT, re Newt
July 5, 2009 - 02:06 ET by RESTLESS 1I just meant that with Newt effectively driving the Congress at that time, the electorate saw adequate checks on Clinton. The economy was good, and tech bubble had not yet become a worry, (I'm sure someone can provide the nubers that prove that we should have been worried at that time, but hindsight is 20/20 and perception is the key).
Perot garnered 8.9% of the vote, and no elctoral votes, so even if every Perot vote had gone to Dole, he would have been .1% short in the popular vote, and I doubt would have been able to make up the differenct with the electoral vote.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
R1... I realized that
July 5, 2009 - 02:12 ET by bigtimerR1...
I realized that after I posted that, went back and reread again (had to get the animals taken care of in the meantime)....
Just wanted you to know I totally agree with your sentiments too regarding Newt and those days.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Perot was a factor, but Bush didn't fight for re-election
July 5, 2009 - 08:37 ET by nkviking75Perot may have been a DNC plant, but what was mystifying was the extremely laid back campaign of Bush 41. Clinton should have been blown out and back to obscurity, but Bush did little to fight back against the whoppers Bubba told. Clinton only got the nomination as a sacrificial lamb against Bush, whose popularity soared after Desert Storm.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Let the massacre of the
July 5, 2009 - 01:25 ET by Gary P JacksonLet the massacre of the democrats begin!
This from Palin's attorney:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 4, 2009
On July 3rd, 2009, Governor Sarah Palin announced her intent to resign her gubernatorial duties and transfer the powers of Governor to Lt. Governor Sean Parnell.
Almost immediately afterwards, several unscrupulous people have asserted false and defamatory allegations that the “real” reasons for Governor Palin’s resignation stem from an alleged criminal investigation pertaining to the construction of the Wasilla Sports Complex. This canard was first floated by Democrat operatives in September 2008 during the national campaign and followed up by sympathetic Democratic writers.
It was easily rebutted then as one of many fabrications about Sarah Palin.
Just as power abhors a vacuum, modern journalism apparently abhors any type of due diligence and fact checking before scurrilous allegations are repeated as fact.
The history of the Wasilla Sports Complex is publicly known. Contrary to the insinuation that as Mayor of Wasilla, Sarah Palin “personally” oversaw bidding, construction, funding and accounting for the project (and thus, the allegation goes, “embezzled” from the project), the truth is far more mundane, and publicly available:
Curtis D. Menard was instrumental in spearheading the effort from
conception to realization of the Wasilla Sports Complex. He directed the steering committee that was responsible for placing the issue before the voters of Wasilla and subsequently passed. He remained chairman of that committee through the design and construction of the facility. He was an ardent supporter and leader of civic, educational and athletic endeavors within the community as well as an advocate of the continued success of the Sports Center.
http://www.cityofwas....
Thus, as any basic fact checker would learn, the Mayor of Wasilla is not listed as “chair” of the Steering Committee. As Mayor, Governor Palin did appoint the committee, another fact readily verifiable, and she was publicly on record supporting the need for such a facility—as was most of Wasilla.
“Wasilla weighs sports facility” published December 6, 2001 and
available at
http://www.adn.com/s....
While her public support of this project was deemed pivotal by many, the actual construction, bidding, financing and other day-to-day management of the project was not in her scope of authority as Mayor.
In addition, Sarah Palin was then criticized by some of not showing enoughinterest in the project. The Frontiersman reported that at a public meeting with the Chamber of Commerce, an opponent of the project “accused Wasilla Mayor Sarah Palin of staying quiet about the arena because of her campaign for Lieutenant Governor.”
“Sports Arena Campaign gets
Rolling”
http://www.frontiers...
(February 22, 2002).
Further, this was a highly public project, approved by the voters, andsubject to public bid requirements. As described by the City of Wasilla itself:
The city uses competitive means for the purchase of all goods and services as required by Wasilla Municipal Code 5.08. The city also utilizes contracts and price agreements established by the State of Alaska, the Western States Contracting Alliance and other cooperatives or agencies when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City. The city believes in open, fair competition and strives to ensure that all vendors have equal opportunity to compete for city business.
The City of Wasilla operates under a decentralized purchasing system. This means purchasing decision up to $5,000 is made independently by the departments in the city (with the exception of Management Information System purchases). When the estimated amount for goods or services is between $5,000 and $9,999, departments are required to obtain three quotes prior to purchase.
The departments may utilize the services of the
Purchasing/Contracting Officer (PCO) for this process or may do it
themselves; however, when this processed is selected, the PCO must sign off on the final product prior to purchasing or contracting.
For purchases beyond $10,000, the city requires all departments to contact the PCO who will utilize the city's bid process according to Wasilla Municipal Code 5.08. The bid process is initiated through either an Invitation to Bid (ITB), utilized when the city knows the specifications for the purchase; or a Request for Proposal (RFP), utilized when the exact specifications or process is unknown.
http://www.cityofwas....
Accordingly, the Sports Complex was publicly bid, in accordance with City and state law, and was accounted for in the time and manner all public projects are handled. The Mayor of Wasilla, be it Sarah Palin, or her successor, did not handle the funds, or the materials, for this project. To thus suggest she
“embezzled” is as false as it is impossible.
The additional claim of “proof” of wrongdoing is the allegation that
the Palins purchased building materials from Spenard Builders Supply—and that this company may have provided supplies for the Sports Complex. Prior to the construction of Lowe’s and Home Depot within the last few years in Wasilla, Spenard Builders Supply was the primary building supply company in Wasilla. It can hardly come as a surprise that it would sell materials to small homeowners or that it would also bid to supply commercial contracts. One would be hard pressed to find a home, cabin or outbuilding in the Mat-Su Valley in which Spenard Builders Supply did not sell at least some of the materials.
The Palins built their Lake Lucille house using Todd as the general
contractor. Todd’s family owns a hardware and building supply business in Dillingham. He is no stranger to construction, or to rolling up his sleeves and doing work. The Palins used a combination of personal savings, equity from the sale of their prior home, and conventional bank financing to build the house—like millions of American families. The deeds of trust are recordable public records. Basic journalism and fact checking would confirm this.
The Sports Complex was built in 2002. It is now 2009. While the Federal Government has a process to follow, and that process sometimes takes time,we can categorically state that we are not aware of any “federal investigation” that has been “pending” for the last seven years.
We are aware of no subpoenas on SBS regarding the Palins. We are aware that the Federal Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation have been helpful, responsive and diligent in prosecuting the email hacker and in cleaning up Alaska’s corrupt legislators. To be blunt—this“story” was alleged during the campaign, evaluated then by nationalmedia and deemed meritless. Nothing has changed.
To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as “fact” that Governor Palin resigned because she is “under federal investigation” for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation.
This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who
re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law.
The Alaska Constitution protects the right of free speech, while
simultaneously holding those “responsible for the abuse of that right.”
Alaska Constitution Art. I, Sec. 5.
http://ltgov.state.a....
These falsehoods abuse the right to free speech; continuing to publish these falsehoods of criminal activity is reckless, done without any regard for the truth, and is actionable.
Thomas Van Flein, for
Governor Sarah Palin
Gary
July 5, 2009 - 01:34 ET by SvenThanks for posting this!
These Leftists just can't seem to get one of their "scandals" to stick to the Palins! What are we at now...16 or seventeen scandal attempts by the Left? Sorry Libs, life can be so unfair at times!
Maybe she had a scandal back in High School...or Junior High?? Hey, it's worth a try!
Fear makes the Libs do crazy things...and I love it! ;-)
Thanks G.P.J.
July 5, 2009 - 07:20 ET by kilrodThanks for the post, i'm glad to see somebody finally makeing a stand and fighting back. And decent people aint gonna win this war untill they force the media to pay a personal price for the bias they use to promote the socialist/communist agenda.
kilrod
Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
Hey Gary
July 5, 2009 - 09:23 ET by RukusMe thinks you just gave Chachi (cacc) a black eye. Thank you! : )
Gary
I want my country back!
Where did you find this?
July 5, 2009 - 09:30 ET by redmikeWhere did you find this? You can't point a liberal to Newsbusters and have them believe anything here is real. Can it be found online?
→ Thanks, Gary
July 5, 2009 - 09:34 ET by Cool ArrowBut Cacciato promised Palin was going to jail.
He wouldn't lie to us, would he?
LOL!
July 5, 2009 - 10:38 ET by RukusOh chachi, come out and plaaaay-yay! ; )
Gary
I want my country back!
→ Chewcaca said it
July 5, 2009 - 15:28 ET by Cool ArrowChewcaca even went so far as to say NB needs to face reality. Said Sarah was going to jail.
I just can't believe Chewcaca would lie to us, can you?
Chewy Lie, Oh No!! So The Question is will he apologize
July 5, 2009 - 17:05 ET by upcountrywaterWaiting.... still...... we will remember...
Reagan VS Liberalism
→ I'm crushed UCW
July 5, 2009 - 17:12 ET by Cool ArrowI've definitely got Chewcaca's promise of jail time for Palin bookmarked.
He must be real smart to know these things, huh?
Politico has a copy here:
July 5, 2009 - 09:50 ET by redmikePolitico has a copy here: http://www.politico....
If I was Palin I would take
July 5, 2009 - 10:54 ET by kgIf I was Palin I would take every cent she earns from her book and hire a string of lawyers and sue every reporter, TV station, politician, and blog site that knowingly told or repeated a lie about her.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
Questioning Palin's Motives
July 5, 2009 - 06:45 ET by ThisnThatNo one is suppose to have motives? Is that what they are saying?
What was Hillary's motive in running for Senate in NY -- where she had never lived? Wouln't be as a stepping stone to President, would it?
How about Obama's motive? Didn't even finish 1/2 of a term before running for President. And then he resigned early "so as to not deal with lame duck session" -- isn't that what Palin said, not to be a lame duck? What's the difference?
Finally, take a close look at Colin Powell's resignation. Here's how the Washington Post put it: "Secretary of State Colin L. Powell announced his resignation yesterday, ending four years of battles with Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld over the course of U.S. foreign policy." WaPo editors asked themselves "How can we paint this so as to not make Powell look like a quitter?" The answer -- the WaPo painted his resignation as the end of a heroic effort battling the evil administration. But isn't that what Palin is now doing -- battling frivolous and expensive lawsuits from radical democrats? Why is it that WaPo painted Powell so sympathetically, yet the MSM is questioning the motives of Sarah Palin? And why the hell aren't we yelling about this discrimination from the rooftops?
___________________________________
An optimist thinks that the glass is 1/2 full; a pessimist 1/2 empty; a realist thinks the glass is twice a big as it needs to be
TnT: Liked the Powell
July 5, 2009 - 07:16 ET by stratmanTnT:
Liked the Powell reference. There are so many that could be branded as quitters but are not because of media sympathy.
Well, gotta go. It's almost time to watch George Stephanopoulos on ABC's This Week. Heh, didn't Staphylococcus quit his job with the Clinton Administration?
If you can tolerate
July 5, 2009 - 08:22 ET by motherbeltIf you can tolerate watching Steffie, you have a much stronger stomach than I do!
My favorite is the Obama reference. He quits as a State Senator to run for US Senate; quits US Senate to run for President.
But that's just peachy AND keen!
Good thing he doesn't have to quit as President to run for "King of the World"! Fortunately, he can be both!
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Good point. I have no
July 5, 2009 - 08:32 ET by stratmanGood point.
I have no deire to watch Steffie interview VP Joe Bidet.
I do like hearing the opening salvo from George Will.
Otherwise, I watch Fox News Sunday, and it has been good so far. Seems that Karl Rove is either commited traditionalist or he is clueless about Palin and her potential bold, groundbreaking approach with today's politics. Time will tell.
Also, too bad Brit Hume is not on the panel today. Sundays are one of the few times I get to hear him since I do not have cable or satellite TV service.
Question: Why does it seem like Admiral Mike Mullen, just interviewed on Fox, has been in Washington, DC too long?
Can't blame Bush for the Obama train wreck.
July 5, 2009 - 08:26 ET by CrashSo ... how exactly is she "Crazy", "Erratic", "Bull Goose Looney"? The MSM picked a dog of a candidate (Obama) and they're trying to cover their tracks. Palin will crucify the MSM for their infatuation over the messiah ... she won't forget. A media blitzkrieg on Sarah is nothing more than preemptive act of desperation which will make them look like thugs. At least Helen Thomas is getting tired of the changeling in chief.
By the way, where's Carl Rove?
There are many other
July 5, 2009 - 08:49 ET by Right2thePointThere are many other examples out there right now of this type of characterization of Sara becoming standard across both the MSM and left side blogs.
Guess the all finally got their talking points together.
Not a valid comparison
July 5, 2009 - 09:17 ET by JWFRoss Perot did not spend a massive amount of his time, money and the government's money fighting frivolous ethics charges.
Don't believe me, listen to Sarah Palin.
Sorry guys, she did not resign, she was chased from office by hyper-partisan Democrats.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
→ Tru Dat JWF
July 5, 2009 - 09:31 ET by Cool ArrowIf all my money was going into auto repairs, I think I'd get me a different vehicle.
Dems knew her weak spot was her personal fortune. All it took was a few lawsuits to deplete her savings.
Fundraising Appearances
July 5, 2009 - 14:49 ET by JDWHidden behind the news media snake eye are facts which do not receive public attention, they get buried. Even so, many of you may well know Biden was in PA last week to speak to a community which did not show-up. Staff removed chairs to create the illusion that this event was a sellout. No doubt news clips from selected angles were distributed to the big 3 for national evening news yet the damn thing was a miserable embarrassment.
As VP elect, Palin drew enormous crowds, not to mention state events when governor. Even so, the mighty news media is forecasting her appearances to exclude the common people. How many opulent voters are registered in AK?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
As VP elect, she also sent
July 5, 2009 - 15:20 ET by CacciatoAs VP elect, she also sent emails requesting that the McCain campaign lie about Todd's heavy involvement in a seccessionist party for 7 years. Ouch!
What is going to take for all of you to realize that she is full of hot air. She lies consistently - didn't support the bridge to nowhere, suffered an injury while jogging in Arizona that was kept top secret, she claimed she campaigned for governor for 4 years when she only ran for 3, etc etc
VP Elect
July 5, 2009 - 15:23 ET by Cool ArrowShe was never VP elect.
Tell that to JDW
July 5, 2009 - 15:26 ET by CacciatoTell that to JDW
Cacciato~
July 5, 2009 - 15:52 ET by Georgia GirlI think I overlooked something. Remember when you asked if you could tell me "I told you so!" if Palin lands in jail? And remember when I said that of course you could? Did I neglect to mention that I then assumed you would stop projecting criminality onto her now? ((^_^))
I think you would agree that if she has not been convicted of anything (let alone being tried for anything), that it would be unfair to continue to ascribe criminality to her -- I know you are a good American who would assume her innocence, until proven guilty of something by a court of law. Because continuing to project that she is a criminal would just be like slander -- damaging her reputation. I assume you are hoping that something bad goes down, but I know you get that is not the same as being accusing. Right? That wouldn't be fair now, would it? ^_^
GG
July 5, 2009 - 15:58 ET by botgyou are just so much sweeter than i
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts
botg~
July 5, 2009 - 17:53 ET by Georgia GirlNot at all. ;)
I' rather Todd
July 5, 2009 - 15:37 ET by BO STINKSwas a Seccessionnist than a Comm(unist) Organizer like stinky BO.