NewsBusters
Published on NewsBusters (http://www.newsbusters.org)

Home > Pro-Amnesty New York Times Upset Over Trump and Jeb's 'Offensive...Anchor Baby...Slur'

Pro-Amnesty New York Times Upset Over Trump and Jeb's 'Offensive...Anchor Baby...Slur'

By Clay Waters | August 20, 2015 | 11:24 PM EDT
Share it Tweet it
0
shares

Jeb Bush and Donald Trump faced off 20 miles apart in separate town meetings in New Hampshire, New York Times' Ashley Parker and Jeremy Peters reported Thursday in "Dueling Town Hall Meetings Add Distance to the Bush-Trump Gulf." The reporters also demonstrated that the pro-amnesty NYT would use the illegal immigration issue to harass the Republican Party all the way to November 2016. In this instance, by ginning up mock outrage against the "slur" of "anchor babies," used by Trump and later the more moderate Bush to describe children born in the United States to people here illegally, thus providing an advantage to parents seeking citizenship.

The Times followed the lead of an ultra-sensitive ABC News reporter in getting riled up over what the liberal paper also decided was a heinously offensive term: "anchor babies."

At a serious and sober town hall meeting here Wednesday night, Jeb Bush dropped statistics like New Year’s Eve confetti.

“A third at best, a third of our kids are college and/or career ready,” Mr. Bush said when asked if the Islamic State or “K-through-12” education posed the bigger threat to the United States. “We spend more per student than any country in the world other than Belgium and Luxembourg.”

But the real party, complete with a blaring Aerosmith soundtrack for fans while they waited, was just a short drive to the east, where Donald J. Trump was speaking at a school auditorium in Derry. He never saw Mr. Bush or his audience. But he said he could channel how they were probably feeling.

“You know what’s happening to Jeb’s crowd right down the street?” he asked his overflowing crowd. “They’re sleeping.”

....

But the dueling town hall events here by Mr. Trump and Mr. Bush, who are polling at No. 1 and No. 2 in the state’s crucial Republican primary, highlighted just how wide a gulf exists between the two men -- in substance, style, experience and temperament.

....

Mr. Bush, taking a different tack, was measured and thoughtful, even in his attacks on Mr. Trump, choosing to focus on a record that he warned was insufficiently conservative. “I have a proven conservative record, a consistent, proven conservative record when no one was watching,” Mr. Bush said. “Mr. Trump doesn’t have a proven conservative record. He was a Democrat longer in the last decade than he was a Republican.”

....

On immigration, he said, “Look, the language is pretty vitriolic, for sure, but the hundreds of millions it costs to implement his plans is not a conservative plan.”

....

Mr. Trump plunged into the divisive debate -- no prompts necessary -- using the inflammatory term “anchor babies” to describe children who are born in the United States to people here illegally. He said he wondered whether the 14th Amendment really granted them citizenship.

“There’s a very big question as to the anchor babies,” he said.

When a reporter asked him if he knew how offensive some people found that term, he was incredulous. “What else do you want me to say?” he said. “I’ll use the word anchor babies.”

Alan Rappeport's online story on Thursday also fretted: "Discussing Immigration, Donald Trump and Jeb Bush Use an Offensive Term." Check out that awkward lede:

Donald J. Trump continues to overheat the Republican Party’s speech on immigration.

What is his latest protest against political correctness? “Anchor babies.”

Explaining his logic as to why birthright citizens should be deported from the United States, Mr. Trump told Fox News on Tuesday night that they might not have a legal right to live in the country.

“I’d much rather find out whether or not ‘anchor babies’ are citizens because a lot of people don’t think they are,” Mr. Trump said.

The phrase is as offensive as the word “illegals” for many immigrants who come to America.

And as accurate, though the Times discourages the use of both in its "news" reporting.

In 2011, it was defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as, “A child born to a noncitizen mother in a country that grants automatic citizenship to children born on its soil, especially such a child born to parents seeking to secure eventual citizenship for themselves and often other members of their family.”

But after protests from immigration advocacy groups who complained that the language is a demeaning slur, the dictionary labeled it as “offensive.”

....

“Greater enforcement so that you don’t have, you know, ‘anchor babies,’ as they’re described, coming into the country,” Mr. Bush said on Hugh Hewitt’s radio program.

Notice that Rappeport and the Times are on the same side as those left-wing "immigration advocacy groups" on the offensiveness of the term, both calling it a "slur":

Democrats pounced on Mr. Bush for using the term, suggesting that he was lurching to the right as his poll numbers have sagged. One potential opponent did not let the slur slide.

“They’re called babies,” Hillary Rodham Clinton posted on Twitter.

A Twitchy headline summed up Hillary's hypocrisy: "Planned Parenthood superfan Hillary Clinton scolds Jeb Bush: ‘They’re called babies.’"

Rappeport fired at Trump in another Thursday morning story, blaming his rhetoric for a killing: "A Beating in Boston, Said to Be Inspired by Donald Trump’s Immigrant Comments."

CyberAlerts
2016 Presidential
Immigration
Labeling
New York Times
Ashley Parker
Jeremy Peters
Donald Trump
Jeb Bush

Source URL: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/clay-waters/2015/08/20/pro-amnesty-new-york-times-upset-over-trump-and-jebs-anchor-baby