MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry this afternoon took to her blog on the network's website to "double down" on her recent "Lean Forward" spot in which she lamented that we as Americans don't have a view of our "collective" responsibility to the nation's children.
From start to finish, the Tulane professor played the victim of right-wing persecution, even closing with a link to Matthew 5:44, where Jesus commands his followers to "love [their] enemies and pray for those who persecute [them]." Here's how Harris-Perry opened her April 9 blog (emphasis mine):
My inbox began filling with hateful, personal attacks on Monday, apparently as a result of conservative reactions to a recent “Lean Forward” advertisement now airing on MSNBC, which you can view above. What I thought was an uncontroversial comment on my desire for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility has created a bit of a tempest in the right’s teapot. Allow me to double down.
One thing is for sure: I have no intention of apologizing for saying that our children, all of our children, are part of more than our households, they are part of our communities and deserve to have the care, attention, resources, respect and opportunities of those communities.
When the flood of vitriolic responses to the ad began, my first reaction was relief. I had spent the entire day grading papers and was relieved that since these children were not my responsibility, I could simply mail the students’ papers to their moms and dads to grade! But of course, that is a ridiculous notion. As a teacher, I have unique responsibilities to the students in my classroom at Tulane University, and I embrace those responsibilities. It is why I love my job.
No one doubts that children are "part of our communities," but being children, they need the loving guidance and protection that their parents are best suited to provide. Minor children cannot and should not engage in the "resources" and "opportunities" of the community without the guidance and discretion of their parents, nor should it be society's job to override parental judgment on those matters.
[I know, it's a strange concept for the network that thinks 11-year-old girls should have access to emergency contraception without parental knowledge, much less consent. Hey, it's a community "resource," Plan B.]
What's more, Harris-Perry's use of her job as a college professor to illustrate her point is patently absurd, a "ridiculous notion" to borrow her words. For one, she's teaching grown, not minor children. They are adults, even if mom and dad are paying tuition and room & board. Harris-Perry's primary responsibility as a college professor is to her customers, the students, to provide them instruction. She is paid to come up with a syllabus, assign readings, teach lectures, grade papers and projects, and otherwise advise her students as they grapple with the material she teaches.
But wait, more inanity followed as Harris-Perry turned to laudable examples of folks she knows doing their part in their personal capacities to improve their communities:
Then I started asking myself where did I learn this lesson about our collective responsibility to children. So many answers quickly became evident.
I learned it from my mother who, long after her own kids were teens, volunteered on the non profit boards of day care centers that served under-resourced children.
I learned it from my father who, despite a demanding career and a large family of his own, always coached boys’ basketball teams in our town.
I learned it from my third-grade public school teacher, who gave me creative extra work and opened up her classroom to me after school so that I wouldn’t get bored and get in trouble.
I learned it from the men who volunteered as crossing guards in my neighborhood even if they don’t have kids in the schools.
I learned it from the conservative, Republican moms at my daughter’s elementary school, who gave her a ride home every day while I was recovering from surgery.
That's great, it truly is, but those things have nothing to do with her Lean Forward ad, which lamented that we "have never invested as much in public education as we should have." By invest, of course, Harris-Perry means through spending of the public's tax dollars.
Harris-Perry then found a way to shoe-horn in a shout-out for gun control and to work in a defense of her hard-core stance as an abortion rights apologist:
I learned it watching the parents of Newtown and Chicago as they call for gun control legislation to protect all the children of our communities.
I learn it from my elderly neighbors who never complain about paying property taxes that support our schools, even if they have no children in the schools today.
And I have learned it from other, more surprising sources as well. I find very little common ground with former President George W. Bush, but I certainly agree that no child should be left behind. And while I disagree with the policies he implemented under that banner, I wholeheartedly support his belief that we have a collective national interest in all children doing well.
I’ll even admit that despite being an unwavering advocate for women’s reproductive rights, I have learned this lesson from some of my most sincere, ethically motivated, pro-life colleagues. Those people who truly believe that the potential life inherent in a fetus is equivalent to the actualized life of an infant have argued that the community has a distinct interest in children no matter what the mother’s and father’s interests or needs. So while we come down on different sides of the choice issue, we agree that kids are not the property of their parents. Their lives matter to all of us.
I believe wholeheartedly, and without apology, that we have a collective responsibility to the children of our communities even if we did not conceive and bear them. Of course, parents can and should raise their children with their own values. But they should be able to do so in a community that provides safe places to play, quality food to eat, terrific schools to attend, and economic opportunities to support them. No individual household can do that alone. We have to build that world together.
Of course "we... build[ing] that world together," in Harris-Perry's mind, is done through greater involvement by the state at greater expense of the taxpayer. She said as much on her network ad, but now she's insisting that her real goal is greater personal, voluntary involvement to make our communities better.
But Harris-Perry wasn't content to stop there. No, the same leftist academic who used Independence Day as an occasion to slam the Founding Fathers returned to that well again in her closing argument:
So those of you who were alarmed by the ad can relax. I have no designs on taking your children. Please keep your kids! But I understand the fear.
We do live in a nation where slaveholders took the infants from the arms of my foremothers and sold them for their own profit. We do live in a nation where the government snatched American Indian children from their families and “re-educated” them by forbidding them to speak their language and practice their traditions.
But that is not what I was talking about, and you know it.
I venture to say that anyone and everyone should know full well that my message in that ad was a call to see ourselves as connected to a larger whole. I don’t want your kids, but I want them to live in safe neighborhoods. I want them to learn in enriching and dynamic classrooms. I want them to be healthy and well and free from fear. I want them to grow up to agree or disagree with me or with you and to have all the freedom and tools they need to express what they believe.
And no hateful thing that you say to me or about me will ever change that I want those things for your children.