NewsBusters
Published on NewsBusters (http://www.newsbusters.org)

Home > Donohue Column: Sorry, NY Times, Being Pro-Traditional Marriage Is Not 'Anti-Gay'

Donohue Column: Sorry, NY Times, Being Pro-Traditional Marriage Is Not 'Anti-Gay'

By Bill Donohue | July 31, 2012 | 3:11 PM EDT
Share it Tweet it
0
shares

Dan Cathy, president of Chick-fil-A, has said that we are “inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say, ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.’” How this unremarkable statement, which never mentions homosexuals, can be labeled anti-gay is astounding. But according to the editorial board of the New York Times, it can be. After quoting Cathy, the Times says, “Antigay remarks like these are offensive.”

It won’t work. According to this logic, almost everyone who ever walked the face of the earth has been an anti-homosexual bigot. Such hyperbole relegates real gay bashing to the trash bin, something to be discarded with alacrity.


Nature, and Nature’s God, has ordained that marriage is the exclusive province of a man and a woman; they are the only two people capable of naturally creating a family. But now, all of a sudden, we are expected to believe that such a pedestrian view is wrongheaded. Worse, there is a growing segment of the population, overwhelmingly white and well-educated, who want to punish those who hold to the traditional view. This is madness laced with fascistic elements.

Culture/Society
Economy
Business Coverage
Media Bias Debate
Labeling
Sexuality
Homosexuality
Media Business
New York Times
Dan Cathy

Source URL: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/bill-donohue/2012/07/31/donohue-column-sorry-ny-times-being-pro-traditional-marriage-not-anti-