The hypersensitive leftists who screamed in social media at The New York Times over using the term “no angel” to describe Michael Brown after he was shot dead in Ferguson ought to read Washington Post media blogger Erik Wemple.
Wemple took the “no angel” term into a Nexis search of the Times archives and found that somehow black columnist Charles Blow wasn’t Twitter-harassed when he described convicted killer Clayton Lockett (also black) as “no angel,” underlining that the term can be a way of clearing the throat on the way to sympathy, a "yes, but" and not a vicious insult:
Paul Robeson

Leftists Who Trashed 'No Angel' Term In NY Times for Michael Brown Should Have Trashed Columnist Charles Blow?
By Tim Graham | August 28, 2014 | 7:00 AM EDT 