<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The On Point radio show on <a href="http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2006/06/20060629_a_main.asp" target="_self">WBUR public radio </a>in <city w:st="on" /><place w:st="on" />Boston (no liberal leaning there!) featured host </place /></city />Anthony Brooks and several panelists chewing over the NYT's bank spy story, including reporter Eric Lichtblau, the reporter responsible (or should we say irresponsible) for coauthoring the piece.<img hspace="0" src="media/2006-06-27-ABCGMALitchblau.jpg" align="right" border="0" /></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" /><p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Joining Brooks by phone, Lichtblau offered this lame defense in response to a question from fellow guest Heather Mac Donald, who wrote critically about the Times' report for the <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/386syq... target="_self">Weekly Standard</a>: “The idea that we’re alerting terrorist to the idea that their finances may be tracked I think is misguided. I think they’ve been alerted to that for the last four-and-a-half years by President Bush and by numerous aides, including former Treasury Secretary Snow and others. That drumbeat has been constant from the administration, and it’s such a poorly kept secret, if you can call it even that.”</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font> <font face="Times New Roman" size="3">In other words, his big scoop? Old news.</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" /><p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Mac Donald challenged Lichtblau’s central premise: “If it’s so universally known, why is this a front-page story that the Times was proud to publish? You can’t have it both ways….How do you explain the Hambali [the <place w:st="on" />Bali</place /> bomber caught as a result of the SWIFT surveillance] case? If everybody knew this was going on, then either you don’t need to run the story or you can’t explain how you were able to catch terrorists through this program.”</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" /><p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Lichtblau avoids the question: “The value of running the story seems clear to me from the debate that we’d had for over the last year with the NSA story and others, is how you go about prosecuting the war on terrorism, checks and balances in government that speaks to a broad reading of presidential authority. The question of how long we will be using extraordinary emergency measures to fight the war on terrorism. These are all critical questions for public debate, and I think the paper decided that those were issues that outweighed what seemed like a tough-to-follow argument that the terrorists are not already aware of this.”</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">For more on this story and other examples of New York Times bias, visit <a href="http://www.timeswatch.org/">TimesWatch</a>.</font></p>
