On Friday’s "Good Morning America," co-anchor Chris Cuomo, the son of former Democratic Governor Mario Cuomo, slammed conservative immigration hawk Tom Tancredo for using "scary" words and wondered why he chose to "rip" down the Senate’s immigration bill. The GMA anchor slyly asked if the Congressman was "driving anti-immigrant sentiment."
Cuomo’s overall tone fit the very definition of loaded questions and a liberal agenda. The ABC anchor, whose brother is the Democratic Attorney General of New York, began the segment by aggressively inquiring, "Why did you feel the need to rip a bill like this down?"
He continued with a query about why Tancredo, who is also running for president, opposed a "humane" solution:
Chris Cuomo: "A majority of Americans want a humane solution. The numbers are in favor of giving some type of amnesty to these people. Isn't that the humane solution? Why are you so adamantly opposed to it?"
Tom Tancredo: "Here is how you handle it. It's called, it’s called attrition through enforcement. If we actually begin to enforce the laws, secure our border and enforce the law against people hiring people who are here illegally, you will see attrition. People go home if they cannot get the thing for which they came. And then they get in line and they come in the same way anybody else does."
Of course, Cuomo only presented half the story. Yes, a majority of Americans do support some type of guest worker plan. But most polls find agreement on enforcing existing immigration laws. Additionally, as the MRC’s Tim Graham pointed out, a New York Times poll found that 69 percent of Americans said illegal aliens should be prosecuted and deported. (Of course, the Times included this only in a PDF file online and not in their May 25 article.)
Cuomo continued with his hostile questions. He lectured the Congressman with this observation about Tancredo’s use of "scary" words:
Cuomo: "You're in favor of the 700-mile fence. You use, frankly, a scary word like balkanization as a result of what could have come about from a bill like this. Do you think you're driving anti-immigrant sentiment?"
It should be pointed out that wondering if Tancredo is "driving anti immigrant sentiment" is desperately close to accusing the Colorado legislator of inciting bigotry. Finally, the anchor from the well connected liberal family closed the piece by asking the 2008 presidential candidate, "...Do you think if your mentality that you have right now existed when your ancestors were trying to get into this country, do think you would even be here right now?"
Of course, Tancredo responded by pointing out that past waves of immigrants felt the need to assimilate into America.
A complete transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:10am on June 8, follows:
ABC Graphic: "Why was Immigration Bill Killed? Major Defeat For White House"
Cuomo: "Let's get back to our top story of the morning, the death of the immigration reform bill. This was a big deal in the Senate. It was lauded as a major compromise to solve a major national problem. But a two-week campaign against the bill paid off last night when it was pulled for consideration. Now, one of the leading critics of the bill is Colorado GOP Congressman Tom Tancredo, who is running for president. I spoke to him about it this morning from Ames, Iowa. Good morning, Congressman. And thank you for joining us. And let's set the stage here. You have the President and Ted Kennedy on the same side trying to compromise on this bill. You have the polls showing early on that people were behind what it was fundamentally about. Why did you feel the need to rip a bill like this down?"
Congressman Tom Tancredo: "Well, because, of course, the whole idea of this bill was to provide amnesty for 12 to 20 million people working here. They started out with that as their goal and then began to build on it certain things that they thought would attract other people, and they put in triggers to say that, you know, we will eventually get some sort of border security. But all of the triggers were, well, out our way we call it all hat and no cattle. There was nothing that would do anything about security."
Cuomo: "A majority of Americans want a humane solution. The numbers are in favor of giving some type of amnesty to these people. Isn't that the humane solution? Why are you so adamantly opposed to it?"
Tancredo: "Here is how you handle it. It's called, it’s called attrition through enforcement. If we actually begin to enforce the laws, secure our border and enforce the law against people hiring people who are here illegally, you will see attrition. People go home if they cannot get the thing for which they came. And then they get in line and they come in the same way anybody else does."
Cuomo: "You're in favor of the 700-mile fence. You use, frankly, a scary word like balkanization as a result of what could have come about from a bill like this? Do you think you're driving anti-immigrant sentiment?"
Tancredo: "A lot of people who come have no desire to assimilate and, and the government itself, here, our society, has no desire to force them to, kind of, assimilate. We will teach them in a language other than English. We will encourage them to stay separate. That is balkanization and it is a scary thing. And I don't want it in America."
Cuomo: "Let me just make a point to you and tell me how you respond to it. When you say we need something to bring us together, isn't what brings us together in this country, this sense of interconnectedness of everyone? Don't you and I share similar ancestry? Do you think if your mentality that you have right now existed when your ancestors were trying to get into this country, do think you would even be here right now?"
Tancredo: "Let me tell you– My ancestors, the mentality that existed when they came and I think a bulk of the people who came. They wanted, of course, the same thing people who are coming today want and that's a job, a better life. That's true. That's the thing they had in common. But there was something else. They wanted desperately to cut from the past and connect to the new. And one of the ways that they showed they wanted to do that was to immediately accept the idea that they needed to learn English. And, and that is the common bond that I was talking about. That is the thing that does hold us together. We need something like that. We need to be able to communicate with each other."
Cuomo: "Senator Reid says he's hoping to reintroduce the bill, that while it may be procedurally dead now, it will come back in some incarnation soon. What will you do if a bill is reintroduced?"
Tancredo: "Well, the same thing I did when this one was introduced. I worked as hard as I possibly could to defeat it, because his issue is huge. The stakes are enormous. I'm not doing this simply because I like to, to debate these issues early in the morning, although it is pleasant enough. The fact is I'm doing it because I believe with all my heart that the nation is at risk and that this is an important, an enormously important topic and we have to get it right."
Cuomo: "Congressman, I appreciate you coming on to talk through this issue as well. Hopefully, you’ll come again."
Tancredo: "I hope so to."
Robin Roberts: "Because the immigration debate will continue."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
frankly, we dodged a bullet
June 8, 2007 - 12:41 ET by LionKing"...wondered why he chose to 'rip' down the Senate’s immigration bill. "
Well, thanks to Tom Tancredo and other TRUE conservatives, we dodged a bullet.
Personally, I think a fence is a less expensive option for starters.
Toe poppers? Might those repl
June 8, 2007 - 12:49 ET by bassndudeToe poppers? Might those replace a bit of the fence?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
As a former New Yorker, trust
June 8, 2007 - 12:53 ET by Mica the MagnificentAs a former New Yorker, trust me, the scariest words you could have used were "Governor Cuomo."
"Bull****! You're not a virgin! You are assigned to the kitchen! - - Gatekeeper at Islamofacist heaven disappointing another successful female suicide bomber.
As a former New Yorker myself
June 8, 2007 - 16:20 ET by iveseenitallAs a former New Yorker myself, I say, "Hear! Hear!" Mica. Governor Cuomo was the worst.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
As another former New Yorker
June 8, 2007 - 20:17 ET by RayRioAs another former New Yorker just the name Cuomo sends shivers down my spine. It doesn't matter Mario, Chris or Andrew Cuomo all are no good.
RR
Evening Rio...I could not agr
June 8, 2007 - 20:23 ET by bigtimerEvening Rio...
I could not agree with you more....
You do not even have to be from NY to know that.
I do understand you getting the shivers though if you had to personally live through their leftist regimes.
Hey Ray,You swimming out in P
June 8, 2007 - 20:25 ET by BlondeHey Ray,
You swimming out in Plantation?
Seriously, this is New York south....and the politics resound here.
Do me a favor, make sure the Cuomo's stay there? Please? What idjits!
I hink that the MSm are driving anti law sentiment
June 8, 2007 - 12:52 ET by c5thenWhen they so obviously intermix the issue of immigration with the illegal immigration issue and constantly imply that beaking the law to get into the country is "no big deal" and should not be punished, they are driving an over all sentiment that following the law is optional as long as your needs and desires line up.
There is a HUGE difference between immigration and Illegal immigration. I would bet that over 70% are in favor of immigration and even allowing many more immigrants per year into the country. I also would bet that 75%+ are against allowing or rewarding illegal immigration. I would aslo bet that sentiments against illegal immigration run in the 80%+ range among legal immigrants.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
First, we need to stop callin
June 8, 2007 - 13:43 ET by BeowulfFirst, we need to stop calling it immigration. Immigrants are the people filling out the paperwork, paying the fees, adhering to the rules, and then coming to this country in accordance with our laws. What we're talking about with this bill isn't immigration. Call it what you will - invasion, infection, whatever. It isn't immigration. and it isn't legal.
This dancing around the real issue is the first thing we need to get rid of to begin to address the problem and sort it out.
The PCers have gone so far as to try and get it called "undocumented persons" or some such BS, to make it seem less threatening.
The correct term, people, is ILLEGAL ALIEN. Doesn't sound so nice, does it? But that's what the whole issue is about. and it's NOT being addressed.
I am 100% for immigration. Controlled, legal immigration. And I believe the vast majority of Americans agree. Unfortunately, our elected officials, those who are supposed to reflect our will, aren't listening.
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
I saw part of this story this
June 8, 2007 - 12:53 ET by Sorceress17I saw part of this story this morning, but I missed the "humane solution" part. Cuomo's use of the phrase implies Tancredo wants to round up illegals and gas them like stray dogs.
How about being "humane" to the thousands of Americans who have been victims of crimes perpetrated by illegals? Oh, I forgot! Liberals don't care about Americans.
If the influx of illegals continues, maybe I should move to South America. In a few years, there won't be anyone else living there!
Illegals vs Legals
June 8, 2007 - 12:59 ET by Cool ArrowLately MSM has been pushing the story that Illegal Immigration isn't even a crime since it is a civil thing like parking tickets.
Are our houses next? As long as the Joe Schmoe slips into bed with our kids (civil like, of course) we can only escort them out the door and tell them to kindly come again.
What no love fest full of hap
June 8, 2007 - 13:07 ET by jdhawkWhat no love fest full of happy thoughts like GMA gave Insane Obama and Billary Clintoon? I can't believe it.
Scott. Tancredo should quote Harry Reid !
June 8, 2007 - 13:18 ET by Gary HallScott. Tancredo should have quoted Harry Reid, then asked Cuomo to respond ! (;~> gh
(My bold added)
Senate minority leader Harry Reid (D)Nevada August 15th 1993 [with more "fear and 'hate' mongering"]
I'm really confused here... W
June 8, 2007 - 13:48 ET by BeowulfI'm really confused here... Who exactly was the president during this time frame? And what political party was in the majority? And who is pushing this new, improved bill which is diametrically opposite what good ole' Harry was proposing then?
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
Wulf you're not confused
June 8, 2007 - 13:58 ET by Cool ArrowWe're being lied to. And it has nothing to do with 'evolving' ideology either.
Our representatives maintain no sense of statesmanship. Sure, some once had a measure of it, but being right gets damned lonely in Washington.
And they shouldn't stay in Washington long enough to get lonely. They should be more like George Washington. Or Fred Thompson.
Ba-ZINGGGGGGG! Nice one, Ga
June 8, 2007 - 15:04 ET by GalvanicBa-ZINGGGGGGG! Nice one, Gary! I'd forgotten about Reid's 1993 anti-immigration/anti-alien bill. A honest journalist would confront Reid and ask him, "If you thought that your bill was necessary in '93, and conditions have worsened many times over since, then why do you abandon your earlier bill and support an amnesty bill now?"
galvanzinggggggg
June 8, 2007 - 17:47 ET by Gary HallYou proposed question for the media to ask Reid is right on. If Reid was a Republican, most probalby every time the media had him in their sights they would pound him on the issue. In fact it, coming from our media, it might have gone like, "Senator Reid, in the past you were such a hate monger. You just blamed everything bad on them. In fact, Senator, you sounded down-right like a racist. How could we trust you ever again?" (;~> gh
Wow, you're right, Gary. Thos
June 8, 2007 - 15:39 ET by Scott WhitlockWow, you're right, Gary. Those are some nice quotes to zing liberals with. Good find!
Scott. As in..
June 8, 2007 - 16:56 ET by Gary HallThanks Scott. As in..zinging the media.
If I were Tancredo, the next time (national Pres debate would be perfect) that anyone in the media pulls these stunts on him, especially invoking the name of Harry Reid, I'd pull out the little piece of paper with Reid's old sentiment(and, willing to put into law) and read it word for word back to the reporter - on air - and tell him/her, "Listen, why don't you guys go to Harry Reid and get him to explain how he's gone from being on the side of what the vast majority of Americans want to being agaist them?"
1986: "This amnesty wi
June 8, 2007 - 13:26 ET by Sergeant ROCK1986: "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal
aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward
another amnesty bill like this."
Ted Kennedy on Immigration
Immigration bill "adjustments"
June 8, 2007 - 13:30 ET by RJAfter that bill was passed, there were six or seven "adjustments" that increased chain migration and opened the door to various prohibited groups.
As bad as this current attempt a amnesty was, you can bet any safeguards put in would also be "adjusted" out in short order.
And yet, we're suppose to a
June 8, 2007 - 13:34 ET by Sergeant ROCKAnd yet, we're suppose to all jump on board with MORE legislation that will again fail!
redundancy
June 8, 2007 - 13:31 ET by LionKingAt cost of being redundant and repetitive, Ted Kennedy is a LIAR.
But that bill was bipartisa
June 8, 2007 - 13:37 ET by sarcasmoBut that bill was bipartisan. I was very disappointed with Alan Simpson at the time, and still, because what's happened since was entirely predictable IMO.
JMR
LionKing, you go right ahead
June 8, 2007 - 13:52 ET by BeowulfLionKing, you go right ahead and be as redundant and repetitive as you need to be...
Let me help - TED KENNEDY IS, and HAS ALWAYS BEEN, A LIAR.
Does that make you feel any better? I sure do...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
It was repugnant listening to
June 8, 2007 - 14:20 ET by bigtimerIt was repugnant listening to Kennedy's lying spewing blather at the top of his voice this week when it came to the Amendments....
Atrocious liar describes Ted Kennedy...his BS was so completely unbelievable.
The Senators still did not get a clue even after the defeat....thanks to the American voices sounding out loud and clear!
Reid still had the audacity to say it is just a small group of people here in this chamber that is against this....the outside world is for this....
Somebody needs to tell him to snap out of it...
Oh wait a minute...ten dems voted against it...he still did not want to face that reality.
bt, don't be a hypocrite
June 8, 2007 - 15:50 ET by tumblerbigtimer; why are you spouting things out of context ?
Not to defend Reid, whom I detest; but he's nearer the truth than you ever will be.
He's talking about a bill, not about the illegal entry situation. The bill may be hotly contested. But overall, in the country itself, MANY more Americans favor doing what's right about the 12 million illegals already here; giving them some manner of coping with these new problems. MORE than the Americans you assume are YOUR majority, and agreeing with your lockstep hatred. YOU are not in the majority overall; and you won't be able to affect any lasting change. You're a dinosaur, Lady !
Huh? Tumbler, are you that di
June 8, 2007 - 16:05 ET by SouthJersey1953Huh? Tumbler, are you that dillusional? The public was screaming against this bill. Just because you don't think it is a bad bill does not mean "the majority" of the country thinks it is the right thing to do. And why do you think you get to decide "what is right" on this? The majority of Americans think "what is right" is securing the border and ENFORCING the existing laws.
No RINOs in '08 - Thompson/Hunter would be a good ticket; Thompson/Steele would be a great ticket
sorry, south jersey --you're wrong
June 8, 2007 - 16:17 ET by tumblerI don't decide, I observe. What you call "the public" is just the vocal assembly of extremists on our Right; almost all registered Republicans. If they aren't such, why're they emailing & phoning their congressmen ?
Yes, there's a substantial number here. It's not to be discounted;
Yet there's a counter-balancing center. And the obviously humongous counter-balance on the left. Making those who played their cards yesterday seem not so numerous as you think. --Just VOCIFEROUS. (A fifty-cent word describing football nuts, not voters.)
Eugene..tomas...tumbler...You
June 8, 2007 - 16:08 ET by bigtimerEugene..tomas...tumbler...
You lost...the American People Won....big time!
Get over it.
Troll.
Btw...your phony BS the last few days with your phony posts, as if you have turned over a new leaf is just that...phony.... since you came out of nowhere attacking me when I was posting to Ray Rio late the night of the repub's debate will not be forgotten by me.
You filthy filthy Troll.
I see a lot of anger there, bt
June 8, 2007 - 16:32 ET by tumblerRipped from another website:B
June 8, 2007 - 14:07 ET by stratmanRipped from another website:
Back in 1965, (The Immigration and Nationality Act amendments of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act, INS Act of 1965, Pub.L. 89-236) during the debate on the senate floor, Kennedy said: "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs."
In 1986, During the debate of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Kennedy said: "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." (~3 million given amnesty in actuality)
Now, in 2007 Ted Kennedy says: "Now it is time for action. 2007 is the year we must fix our broken system."
How in the world can the people of Mass. keep electing this serial liar?
Great re-cap, stratman! Ken
June 8, 2007 - 15:43 ET by GalvanicGreat re-cap, stratman! Kennedy has had his mitts in this debacle for 40 years, issuing lots of promises and delivering on none of them. We need to shove this immigration bill back in his face!
You're using scary words...An
June 8, 2007 - 13:42 ET by PeskyDaneYou're using scary words...
And once again, the libtards demonstrate why we should have left the adults in charge back in November. [Heavy sigh]
I once took a Sacramento Bee
June 8, 2007 - 13:51 ET by Chris NormanI once took a Sacramento Bee reporter to task, in an e-mail exchange, for using the term "illegal immigration" and "immigration" interchangeably. He had written that some politician (who was known to oppose illegal immigration), "opposed immigration". This blurring of terms must be in their style books.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
As you noted, Chris, that blu
June 8, 2007 - 15:52 ET by GalvanicAs you noted, Chris, that blurring of terms is quite intentional. It faciltiates their rhetoric about "Our Nation of Immigrants," and "Immigration is the life blood of American prosperity," and "We're all the descendents of immigrants."
They --- and "they" includes a number of big Republicans --- hope that by blurring the truth, enough Americans will feel guilty enough to sway to their side. The guilt hammer --- usually wielded by liberals to persuade independents --- is now also being swung by Reps who claim to be conservatives.
It's up to us to keep the pressure on our elected representatives, and if they should fail us, to replace them with people who will protect our borders.
Attention all of you talking
June 8, 2007 - 13:52 ET by bigtimerAttention all of you talking head clueless spin-meisters...
The American People rose up and spoke out in unison....
You may try getting your heads out of the dark cavity you have kept if most of your elitist life and smell the real roses you simpletons.
Tancredo is right.
Hunter is right.
Sessions, Vitter and Demint are right...to name a few.
Illegal Aliens
June 8, 2007 - 14:28 ET by River CityHere Here and Amen!
Why can't we pull it together on other issues like we did on this one? We had some help from some lefties because of the union angle but I believe conservatives were the driving force.
The RNC needs to wake up. Their party position on some issues is not supported by those in the party. Money will follow to those that have like positions and the RNC will not get the little guy's cash. We saw that in the layoffs, but I think it will get worse as the election gets closer.
The RNC is useless. Togeth
June 8, 2007 - 15:55 ET by GalvanicThe RNC is useless. Together with Bush, they failed to curb wasteful Federal spending since 2000; the pork-barreling by Reps was an outrageous affrontary to conservative values, and has contributed to their dwonfall.
The Dems are dangerous and the Reps are impotent. Time for a new party to represent basic American values.
http://www.constitutionparty.
June 8, 2007 - 17:15 ET by Prester Johnhttp://www.constitut...
The Conservative Party
June 9, 2007 - 09:59 ET by LionKingPrester John is right. Time to consider the Constitution Party.
I couldn't tbelieve the unaba
June 8, 2007 - 14:20 ET by SouthJersey1953I couldn't tbelieve the unabashed, slamming liberal questions Tancredo faced. I thought he did a very good job rebutting every one of them. The tone of Cuomo's voice is what drove me mad......
And I agree with previous posters.....they are illegal aliens, not illegal immigrants.
No RINOs in '08 - Thompson/Hunter would be a good ticket; Thompson/Steele would be a great ticket
Cuomo is his daddy's son. H
June 8, 2007 - 15:57 ET by GalvanicCuomo is his daddy's son. He wouldn't know how to do a proper interview.
OMG!!!-Looks like the scamnesty screw isn't over yet.
June 8, 2007 - 15:52 ET by Dave RMr. Bush apparently isn't through with this scamnesty BS just yet.
And I'm all out of KY, too. Now I am beyond PO'd!
(h/t Matt Drudge)
Where's XXXXXXX, your brain, George?
Tancredo should have flat o
June 8, 2007 - 15:54 ET by FlashmanTancredo should have flat out asked Cuomo, "Why do you support criminals from other countries Chris?"
Why was Immigration Bill Ki
June 8, 2007 - 17:38 ET by JDWWhy was Immigration Bill Killed? Major Defeat For White House
Grass roots America killed it. Scary?
Amnesty was not good legislation and in the end conservatives did not support Bush. Some of the dems voted in similar manner for the same reasons yet hard core leftists held together to endorse it, obviously not on Bush's behalf.
Our largest local radio station interviewed a supported today as if it had not been lost.
In the end, the most interesting aspect I find is the fact that Bush was not the loser, presidents never get everything they request. Consider what became of Ms Meyers. This has the same opportunities.
The defeat here lies with Mr Soros, Moveon, MediaMatters...
Hopefully the general public, Mr Soros, as well as the dems, will now realize the power of a Constitutional Republic.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
JDW....Beautiful.That was bea
June 8, 2007 - 20:45 ET by bigtimerJDW....
Beautiful.
That was beautiful.