On Tuesday’s "Good Morning America," the ABC program devoted two segments to promoting the religiosity of the 2008 Democratic contenders. At the same time, a graphic hopefully asked, "Are evangelicals embracing Democrats? New party of God?"
Recapping a CNN sponsored event on Monday night where '08 contenders talked about their faith, ABC featured two liberals who were making the Democratic case for Christian voters. GMA co-host Robin Roberts interviewed Jim Wallis, the left-wing editor of Sojourners magazine. Neither Roberts, nor the ABC graphic made any mention of his liberal slant. Additionally, a segment hosted by reporter Dan Harris featured this quote from one Mara Vanderslice:
Mara Vanderslice (Sr. Partner, Common Good Strategies): "This year, I think the Democrats are more comfortable talking about religion and values."
Vanderslice just happens to have strong ties to the Democratic Party, is the former Director of Religion for the 2004 John Kerry campaign and had past associations to extreme left wing groups. Perhaps GMA viewers should have been apprised of those facts in relation to Vanderslice’s contention that Democrats are "more comfortable" with religion.
A few minutes earlier, co-host Roberts introduced the segment by noting that the Democrats hope to close, what she pointedly called the "so-called God gap." Dan Harris used his segment to prominently highlight just how Democrats are "comfortable" with religion:
Dan Harris: "John Edwards said he strayed from the church for many years but that his faith came roaring back during a personal crisis."
Edwards: "When Elizabeth and I lost our son, we were non-functional for some period of time and it was the Lord that got me through that. And the same is true when Elizabeth was diagnosed with cancer."
Harris: "Barack Obama talked about how his faith informs his policy views on helping prison inmates reintegrate into society–"
Illinois Senator Barack Obama: "There is a biblical injunction that I see to make sure that, to make sure that those young men and women have an opportunity to right their lives."
In a follow-up segment, Roberts interviewed Reverend Wallis. She also reiterated the point that Democrats are comfortable with religion by noting, "We should say Senator Obama out on the campaign trail has, has freely talked about his faith." Roberts then gave Hillary Clinton what amounted to an extended campaign spot by playing a longish clip of her talking about religion:
Clinton: "I've been tested in ways that are both publicly known and those that are not so well-known or not known at all. My faith and the support of any extended faith family, people whom I knew who were literally praying for me in prayer chains, who were prayer warriors for me, and people whom I didn't know, who I would meet or get a letter from, sustained me through a very difficult time."
Finally, Roberts closed by noting that Reverend Wallis had extended a similar invitation for Republicans to talk about climate change, poverty and AIDS at a Sojourners event. Now, if the Christian Coalition, at the height of its power, had invited Democrats to attend a meeting, wouldn’t it be likely for a media member to ask whether or not those liberal candidates would show up? Well, Roberts didn’t bother asking Wallis if he really expected the GOP contenders to appear.
Instead, she ended the segment by mentioning facts about the Republicans that would seemingly disappoint evangelical voters. Roberts noted that Rudy Giuliani is pro-choice and that Mitt Romney has changed his opinion on abortion:
Roberts: "Very free in talking about that. Reverend Wallis, I want to ask you, you have extended an invitation to the top three Republican candidates to have a similar forum to this, as this, and they have their own issues when you look at the top three. Rudy Giuliani has been married three times and has taken a pro-choice stance. We know about Mitt Romney, who has, when it comes to abortion, has changed his stance as well. McCain, in talking about stem cell research and being for that. So, what do you read into all that?
A transcript of Roberts’ interview with Reverend Wallis, which aired at 7:09am on June 5, follows:
Roberts: "And the reverend Jim Wallis organized that forum last night. He's the author of ‘God's Politics: Why The Right Gets It Wrong And The Left Doesn't Get It.’ He joins us now from Washington. Good morning, reverend. Thanks for joining us."
Jim Wallis: "Good morning, Robin. Thank you."
Robin Roberts: "So, after what you heard last night from the Democratic presidential candidates, the top three like that, do they now get it when it comes to trying to reach Christian voters?"
Reverend Jim Wallis (President, Sojourners/Call to Renewal): "Robin, what you saw last night was a connecting of faith to a much broader set of issues. Last night, poverty was a religious issue. HIV-AIDS, climate change, prisoners, war. So, we’re no longer going to have a two-issue conversation about faith and politics. I think it is a much better conversation. The agenda is wider and deeper. A whole new generation now sees poverty as a defining issue of faith for them. And you saw that last night."
Roberts: "But when you see all the polls the polls, Reverend, both from Democrats and Republicans that are going to be voting, they say the war in Iraq is number one, the economy, other things like that, health care, that those are the top priorities, that we don't see them talking about poverty and other things like that. Four years ago, as you know, of course, in the presidential election, the exit voting? Voters said the number one issue with them? Moral values. So, what do you think has changed?"
Wallis: "Well, that's the question: What are the moral values. All the issues you just talked about have moral dimensions. Last night, these Democrats were talking about the moral dimensions to those issues, and that's a critical thing. We've had a very narrow conversation. I think the era of the religious right is over. It’s really finished. A new conversation has begun. It will be a better conversation in 2008 than it was in 2004. God is not a Republican or a Democrat and people of faith shouldn't be in any party's political pocket. We should hold them accountable to our moral compass. And last night, that's what we tried to do."
Roberts: "Well, last night we heard a lot from the top three and we should say Senator Obama out on the campaign trail has, has freely talked about his faith. We haven't heard as much from Senator Clinton until last night. I want to play a little more of what she said."
Clinton: "I've been tested in ways that are both publicly known and those that are not so well-known or not known at all. My faith and the support of any extended faith family, people whom I knew who were literally praying for me in prayer chains, who were prayer warriors for me, and people whom I didn't know, who I would meet or get a letter from, sustained me through a very difficult time."
Roberts: "Very free in talking about that. Reverend Wallis, I want to ask you, you have extended an invitation to the top three Republican candidates to have a similar forum to this, as this, and they have their own issues when you look at the top three. Rudy Giuliani has been married three times and has taken a pro-choice stance. We know about Mitt Romney, who has, when it comes to abortion, has changed his stance as well. McCain, in talking about stem cell research and being for that. So, what do you read into all that?"
Wallis: "Well, as you say, last night there were tough questions and it showed these candidates, faith for them is very personal and very real. And I think that's good for American politics and the churches to see that faith isn't on one side or the other. The Republicans this time have some difficulties with those issues on their side. And so, there is going to be a whole new conversation, I think, about the relation of faith and politics. I think it's a good thing that we don't see God on one side of the aisle or the other. Faith is personal and real and it must connect to the leading moral issues of the day and we should hold both sides accountable for that. The Republican side now is going to have to deal with the same set of questions and we're going to have a forum for them hopefully in the fall. I'm looking forward to the same conversation, not just whether a candidate has faith. We shouldn't have religious litmus tests in politics. It is important to know what a candidate's moral compass is. So we'll ask them, too, how their faith connects to the biggest moral issues of our time. Three billion people living on $2 a day is religious issue, and it's time we address that as people of faith around the world."
Roberts: "As you said, the conversation will continue. Reverend Jim Wallis, thank you very much."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Hillary continued addressing
June 5, 2007 - 17:15 ET by Mica the MagnificentHillary continued addressing the congregation:
It was my faith that got me through the tough times. I prayed using those round thingys on a chain, 'rosebuds' I think you call them, and I prayed before the cross with the guy on it. I read the bible over and over, every chapter of it, and memorized the pictures.
This is more "push-repor
June 5, 2007 - 17:15 ET by mattmThis is more "push-reporting" (as in push-polling), i.e. they report as fact what they want reality to be, not what it is, in the hope creating reality.
The entertainment medium - especially TV - has been doing this for decades... and they have succeeded in producing at least one generation of people who think the prevailing opinions on any subject are the Left Wing opinions...
Well I'm an evangelical and I
June 5, 2007 - 17:59 ET by TruthMongerWell I'm an evangelical and I'm switching over to the Dems...
I've come to really embrace their Biblical stances on killing unborn children, gay and ped marriage, supporting Islamic terrorists, discouraging and endangering our troops in Iraq, messianic hubris of global-warming-cooling-whatever, keeping Christianity out of America...
They care about the things that really matter to people like me...
preach it
June 5, 2007 - 18:01 ET by LionKingAll I can say is AMEN !!!
New party of Baal maybe. La
June 5, 2007 - 17:57 ET by vrwc13New party of Baal maybe. Last I knew God still hates abortion, gay lifestyle (note I did not say gays), divorce, hypocrisy. Links to each of the preceeding upon request.
Yeah, logic, reason, facts play less of a role now in the way we make decisions in America. – Al Gore
"Thou shalt not take the
June 5, 2007 - 18:06 ET by QueenMum"Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain."
We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria
I noticed a couple of thing
June 5, 2007 - 18:22 ET by motherbeltI noticed a couple of things in that story:
First, Mara Vanderslice says Democrats are "more comfortable talking about religion and values." But she doesn't say more comfortable than what. More comfortable than they used to be? More comfortable than Republicans? The difference is important.
Second, that Democrats get praised when they talk religion. The author(s) of the article are so impressed that Obama's "faith informs his policy views on helping prison inmates reintegrate into society–" ooooooh, he's so pious!
But let a Republican or a conservative say that the Lord or his faith informs his views on abortion, or gay marriage, or something a little more controversial than prison inmates, and the fertilizer hits the Mixmaster......
I will say it every time....liberals are OK with faith when it comes to promoting "social justice", but don't want anyone's religion affecting their views on abortion or sodomy, among other things.....
They are the new party of God, all right. But theirs is also a new God, who doesn't mind abortion, divorce, adultery, fornication, or euthanasia, because He is more concerned with whether there is "affordable housing" or "health care for all.."
How come Hillary doesn't ment
June 5, 2007 - 20:02 ET by GothampcHow come Hillary doesn't mention her southern church solo: I've come so far but I'm no ways tired?
the parital birth verse
June 5, 2007 - 20:45 ET by Pragmatic-ManStill looking... for the past hour I have been searching for the Bible verse where God calls upon us to suck the brains of the fetus from the skull BEFORE the head passes from the womb. This way, the abortionist doctors get to brutally murder the fetus AND be free from any criminal charges. And to condone, promote, and profligate this method of infanticide is every member of the democrap ticket, including especially Mrs. Bill Clinton, Hussein Obama, and Breck Edwards.
Hmm, just not quite having any luck finding this one... maybe because it is competely morally detached from humanity to condone such a barbaric act!?!?
Religion to these complicit socialists is nothing but a tool.
Prag-man Search 'Molech' in
June 5, 2007 - 20:55 ET byPrag-man
Search 'Molech' in your Strongs
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Abraham put his son on the altar too...
June 5, 2007 - 21:15 ET by Pragmatic-ManYes, botg, and Abraham was going to sacrifice his son for God. But alas, God said no.
And besides, Christians embrace the New Testament as their gospel. To begin (not implying that you are) a comparison of Biblical sacrifice (which is deemed wholly wrong and inappropriate in today's Christian culture) to abortion is warped and calls for a delamination of humanity.
Bear in mind that I am not implying your views are oriented such. The reference was googled and the data quickly digested.
Actually Prag-man as i rememb
June 5, 2007 - 21:24 ET byActually Prag-man as i remember correctly Molech was a baal represented by a metal statue with arms out which was heated to red-hot and babies were placed in the arms as attonement to the baal. This was one of the reasons YHWH called for the elimination of the nation which worshipped the baal. Today's baal is self.
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Someone get planned parenthoo
June 5, 2007 - 21:32 ET by TruthMongerSomeone get planned parenthood on the phone! What a great concept...
baal
June 5, 2007 - 21:39 ET by Pragmatic-ManYes, that is what I found at Wikipedia. But baal is self? Not quite there on that one. Beside the point, though.
The matter is that persons who proport a Christian faith (as the major dem candidates do) cannot stand on their support of abortion while thumping the Bible. Well, at least not without completely ignoring some of the basic tenets of Christianity.
But baal is self? Not quite t
June 5, 2007 - 21:44 ET byBut baal is self? Not quite there on that one.
Simply saying that the babies are sacrificed today to indulge selfish people.
And there is way too much dissonence for most of the Dem candidates to claim Biblical faith.
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
got it this time
June 5, 2007 - 21:49 ET by Pragmatic-Manbotg, me a bit slow but I got it this time. Good point with the dissonance.
Don't tell that to a lib...
June 5, 2007 - 21:15 ET by motherbeltDon't tell that to a lib....that will just prove his/her point. They always say that Jesus never mentioned homosexuality, (so that proves He had nothing against it, I guess), but that he mentioned the poor X times. So they will say He never mentioned abortion, (so it must be OK, or at least not too important.)
He also never said the Roman governor should increase taxes to take care of "the poor", and He did say "What God has joined together, let no man put asunder." But what the heck do I know?
The Democrats are the "
June 5, 2007 - 21:22 ET by c5thenThe Democrats are the "new party of GOD" just like Islam is a religion of peace.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
says it all
June 5, 2007 - 21:44 ET by Pragmatic-Manc5then, that says it all.
Dems and Religion
June 6, 2007 - 09:45 ET by River CityI was surprised when I heard the code words Hillary was using. She has been coached. This has not been an over-night coaching. She has been working on this a while and just rolled it out for the debate. The language and terminology she used are words someone has taught her. The reason I think she has been working with them for a while is because she didn't sound as forced as she usually does when she is doing something new and unfamiliar.
Obama's church is a notorious liberal group and is looked at as more liberal than Christian in church circles. I am VERY familiar with it. The UCC does a lot of new age and other non-Christian teachings combined with their pseudo Christian teaching.
It's all for show. I don't buy it for a minute. What is Hillary's faith? What does she believe? What does she believe in? She doesn't say.
Ugh! This turns my stomach
June 6, 2007 - 10:03 ET by The Wicked ConservativeUgh! This turns my stomach. I'm going to lay this right out there on the line. You can not be a Christian and vote liberal...PERIOD! You may create yourself a god in your head that fits your moral relativism, but it sure won't be God.
The man with an experience is not at the mercy of a man with an argument.