You wonder just how much is too much of "The View" on ABC. Justin McCarthy not only captured the Hugo Chavez part of yesterday's discussion, but transcribed a discussion of a topic Elisabeth Hasselbeck was allowed to bring up, teaching love of country to your children. She talked about teaching her daughter the Pledge of Allegiance, but allegiance wasn't Topic A.
Predictably, Joy Behar and Rosie O'Donnell quickly equated patriotism with protest. Rosie said: "I grew up watching sit-ins on television. I grew up feeling that if you were a real patriotic person you would protest and stand in the streets and yell and scream until the government which really works for you represents you." Behar oddly claimed that "to be totally patriotic is almost not being patriotic in a way." From there, Rosie complained the weekend's "peace" protests were "hardly even covered on the news," and Joy complained that nobody's asked Americans to sacrifice with gas rationing. When Hasselbeck discussed having soldiers on the show, Rosie recommended focusing on a New York Times story on a soldier who hung himself.
The story is apparently a Bob Herbert column, as the Huffington Post suggested.
Many people confuse patriotism ("love for or devotion to one's country," reads Webster's) with speaking out in dissent. Protest is inherently democratic -- a demonstration of our freedom to speak out -- but it's not inherently patriotic. To call the United States a cancer on the planet would be democratic, but certainly not patriotic. You can love your country and oppose military engagements. But many in the anti-war movement (especially protest organizers like the ANSWER Coalition) are explicitly anti-American in their arguments. Justin's transcript of this part of the discussion is below:
HASSELBECK: There was a book written it's called "How to Raise an American" and there was an article about it in the paper this weekend. And I found it interesting because I feel – and I agree the notion is that there is, there’s a patriotic gap. You know, that we're not teaching our kids just because, you know, there's so much out there against the president, against the war, are we really teaching our kids to be proud Americans? You know, and I've been trying to teach Grace the pledge of allegiance. Like we’ll do the ABC’s and then the pledge of allegiance. And I think that's important to do even at a very young age. And so I kind of thought this book was right on that, you know, how are we teaching kids? Because, number one they’re getting a lot of their information from the internet and there's a ton out there, I mean because that's what people are feeling. They’re feeling very negative sometimes about this country. I just wonder what, what kind of children are going to be brought up and how, how much will they love this country?
BEHAR: Well, one of the hallmarks of true patriotism is to question authority. And I think that a lot of kids these days are questioning. They’re not necessarily less patriotic. Although, you know, borders are blurring. There's no, there’s no black and white in the world any more, you know.
HASSELBECK: No, there’s not.
BEHAR: So to be totally patriotic is almost not being patriotic in a way.
HASSELBECK: Can't you see patriotism as being able to be free and see, see our Constitution and Declaration of Independence as the vehicles for which we have to speak about what we want?
BEHAR: That's why young people who question the way the administration is administering the Constitution are being very patriotic, because they’re being patriotic and, and faithful to the Constitution. [Applause]
WALTERS: Don't you think that, basically, that no matter how much you criticize or if you criticize the president now and some do and you don't, but don't you think --
HASSELBECK: I've criticized some things that he's done.
WALTERS: Don't you think there's just a basic love for this country?
HASSELBECK: I hope so.
WALTERS: I can't imagine that there are too many people who live here that would want to live somewhere else. And I mean whether it's learning how to pledge the allegiance to the flag, I think that, that no matter what it is, at least for me and for most of the people I know, we are so glad to be Americans, don't you think that's true? [Applause]
HASSELBECK: Of course. Absolutely. I think it's different now. Don't you remember being -- I remember being in school and whenever the president was on TV talking everything stopped and everyone would listen. You know? So I think how people view the president --
O’DONNELL: Who was the president then?
HASSELBECK: Reagan.
O’DONNELL: Reagan.
HASSELBECK: I remember, you know, how you see the president is essentially how a child sees -- that's the face of the country for many children.
O’DONNELL: Right and I grew up watching sit-ins on television. I grew up feeling that if you were a real patriotic person you would protest and stand in the streets and yell and scream until the government which really works for you represents you, you know, did what the mass of the people wanted and so I grew up believing that the most patriotic thing you could ever do was to question.
BEHAR: There's an article --
HASSELBECK: I think you should question, without a doubt, but I think you can do it also with the fever and fire for your own country.
BEHAR: But there's an argument right now that if you question this war for instance you’re going against the troops.
WALTERS: That’s changed though. That’s changed.
BEHAR: But the fact of the matter is that the troops understand the democratic process and they understand that there will be dissent and discussion in the country.
WALTERS: We have right now dissent in the Congress. I mean, you can't see it more clearly than those who feel we should bring the troops home or some like-- well, you saw it, someone like John McCain who feels that, that you need more troops. It was a very interesting article in the paper this week that showed the difference between Senator Chuck Hagel and Senator John McCain. Both of whom were in Vietnam and both of whom came out with different feelings. Hagel, who said he was a grunt, you know, on the lower level of the armed services, is that what it's called? I don’t mean to be insulting. And he feels that we’ve got to bring the troops home and the Vietnam, that was, that was his lesson. And McCain who was in a prison camp for five and a half years feels that the worst thing is to have an army in defeat and we have to have this surge. And, you know, we are now hearing dissent on both sides. We weren't up until really --
O’DONNELL: But you know what's very interesting is March 17th, which was this Saturday, there were protests all over the country and it was hardly even covered on the news. There were protests in every major city against the war for this anniversary that's coming up.
BEHAR: They’re busy with this Gonzales scandal right now that's why.
O’DONNELL: They’re very busy.
HASSELBECK: But I also, I also think there are troops too, I mean we have a friend, we were on the phone with his brother this weekend, who has been to Iraq this is his third tour there. And he’s there and he says, you know, that he wishes that people could really hear the stories that are actually happening, you know, that they are there, and that the Iraqi people do look at them like they are helping them.
WALTERS: Some. We also don't hear the stories of some of the misery.
BEHAR: A lot of the Iraqi soldiers are not showing up according to what I'm reading. They’re not even showing up.
HASSELBECK: What do you mean, they’re not showing up?
BEHAR: They’re not showing up for duty.
HASSELBECK: I think that’s, I think hat's almost irresponsible to say that a lot of them are not showing up.
BEHAR: That’s what I read. I read it in the paper. Whether it's true or not is another story.
HASSELBECK: I would like to investigate the that because I know that, I know- speaking from a friend who’s, who has been there, I mean they show up. I mean, they’re fighting an enemy, an enemy that-
WALTERS: Well, we keep waiting for the Iraqis to take over so we can leave. We're waiting for the security forces to be strong enough so we can leave. We’re waiting for the sec – we hear it again and again. So far it hasn't happened.
HASSELBECK: Right. They need to. They need to step it up, and, you know--
O’DONNELL: But what does your friend feel about his third tour? I mean, does he feel that that’s justified or fair? I mean, you know, you're not really allowed to speak out against the government or military if you are a serving member of it. But, you know, on the whole these people who are being asked to go back and back again these families it's a lot to ask.
BEHAR: America is not at war. These guys are at war. These girls and boys are at war. The country is not. We have not done anything to indicate that we are at war.
HASSELBECK: What do you mean by that?
WALTERS: We are not sacrificing.
BEHAR: Gas consumption, coupons, you know, stuff like that, volunteering, all that stuff. No one has asked us to do anything. So how can we even say that we are at war? These kids are at war.
HASSELBECK: Well, I think you ask anyone who knows someone there and you definitely feel as though you were at war--
WALTERS: It is, it is since we don't have a draft if you do have someone there, when you see these young people coming back, your hearts go out to them. But, again, most of us are not touched in a personal way. And that’s what Joy has said. You know, we can feel for them and we ache for them.
HASSELBECK: Maybe we need to hear more of their stories.
O’DONNELL: There's a great one in the “Times” today. In the “Times” today, there was a story of a young man who went over there, he came back and he had post traumatic stress and he went to get help and there wasn't enough help and he hung himself in the basement. And the mother and father are talking and the “New York Times” and they want to talk about the effect that this war has had on the returning soldiers. I would love to have that family as a guest.
WALTERS: Bob Woodruff was on with us last week with his wife. And he not only talked about his own experience, because it was so unfortunate that he was wounded as deeply as he was, but fortunate that he’s recovered. He had a lot of care. He talked about the neglect and the fact that we are just beginning to hear those stories.
O’DONNELL: Maybe we can have some of them on. I think it would be very eye opening.
HASSELBECK: We’ve never been in a war like this because of IED’s.
BEHAR: Tomorrow is the fourth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq. So, we should probably deal with it.
O’DONNELL: And just two weeks after that was, two months after that was “mission accomplished.” Right?
BEHAR: Yeah.
O’DONNELL: Yeah. Four years ago, “mission accomplished.”
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Behar oddly claimed that &quo
March 20, 2007 - 08:04 ET by Cool ArrowBehar oddly claimed that "to be totally patriotic is almost not being patriotic in a way."
I'm reminded of a Monte Python skit.
"I love animals...That's why I kill them"
Following that logic, if &quo
March 20, 2007 - 10:07 ET by Hero SquadFollowing that logic, if "not being patriotic" is the new "patriotic", and vice versa, wouldn't that mean that once your non-patriotism makes you patriotic, you become non-patriotic again? And vice versa?
*****
"Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine no possessions?'" - Elvis Costello
These girls sure gave it thei
March 20, 2007 - 11:06 ET by TruthMongerThese girls sure gave it their all trying to spin the treason of the left into patriotism...but the fact remains...they're still traitors : ) . . .
Tim, as one carbon based life form to another - how can you
March 20, 2007 - 08:09 ET by acaiguanaTim, as one carbon based life form to another - how can you watch this stuff?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
Oh! the intangible glue that
March 20, 2007 - 08:14 ET by ucOh! the intangible glue that holds "with liberty and justice for all" America together.
Do NOT put soldiers on "
March 20, 2007 - 08:18 ET by HelenSDo NOT put soldiers on "The View"! They've sacrificed enough already!!!
"Governments ought not to be empowered to decide the validity of scientific theories, that is a ridiculous thing for them to try to do" - Richard Feynman
"I grew up..." No R
March 20, 2007 - 08:22 ET by bassndude"I grew up..." No Rosie, you dident. Neither did you IQ. You think that way because your an idiot.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
today's edition of sarcasmo's politically-incorrect history...
March 20, 2007 - 08:25 ET by sarcasmoWouldn't true patriots -- especially the folks here who are perpetually incensed about the socialist/communist origins of the ACLU -- want to teach their kids about the similar origins of the pledge of allegiance? Especially since the news media and public schools universally-seem, for some strange reason, to want to keep said origins totally quiet??
JMR
I think I just got dubbed a &
March 20, 2007 - 08:37 ET by Cool ArrowI think I just got dubbed a "true patriot"
I'm honored you noticed
Thanks. History can be fun,
March 20, 2007 - 08:42 ET by sarcasmoThanks. History can be fun, and if you took the time to teach kids the whole truth about anything, you're certainly honorable in my history-book!
JMR
sarc,As a libertarian, I am n
March 20, 2007 - 09:04 ET by Dave Rsarc,
As a libertarian, I am not at all comfortable with The Pledge of Allegiance, as I have difficulty throwing my allegience to any government.
I have told many people about the true origins of The Pledge, and I get some very interesting responses.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Imagine a public school whi
March 20, 2007 - 09:19 ET by sarcasmoImagine a public school which instead of the pledge substituted forced-reciting of the Bill of Rights, one after another, simply repeating from #1 every 10 days. I know, I can't, either...That's one of the many reasons I don't like public schools, which would probably be better named as socialized education.
JMR
Don't you just hate semanti
March 20, 2007 - 10:06 ET by liberal_bug_zapperDon't you just hate semantics?
The professor was very skillful at playing with words, trying to paint people into a picture of being against our bill of rights and our country if they don't accept the premise of total equality.
He uses a play on words after he plucks these statements from the Declaration of Independence -- "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..." and the Gettysburg address -- "a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal..."
And then proceeds to admonish Americans as being uncomfortable with the word "equality" as a patriotic theme.
Um, professor, equality isn't a patriotic theme. The idea that all men are 'created' equal is a patriotic theme. There is a HUGE difference between the two. But leave it to a socialist who understands the stupidity and ignorance of his students to not teach, but indoctrinate.
I have a few words for all you socialists here... we may start off equal, but we never end up that way. What is so terrible about you people is the fact you are trying to force equality on us all when that isn't possible... and the failure of all socialist states proves that.
____________________________________________________
"Character is much easier kept than recovered." ~ Thomas Paine
Sarc,One of the reasons, as
March 20, 2007 - 10:08 ET by Dave RSarc,
One of the reasons, aside from the obvious one, that I do not support prayer in government schools is because I would not want my child being taught/encouraged/coerced to pray by a person who is, in effect, a government agent. (Ooh, I've really stepped in it now.)
Then again, I consider the act of sending a child to a government school to be a flagrant act of child-abuse.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Hi Dave R, I know libertarian
March 20, 2007 - 10:31 ET by Darth DutchHi Dave R,
I know libertarians generally believe that the government should be as uninstrusive in personal matters as possible, but you're the first libertarian I've heard to say that they you have difficulty vowing allegiance to any government. Why is that? And, if you do feel that way, then why not revoke your citizenship?
(By the way, I'm genuinely curious; not trying to be a pain in the neck)
Take care!
Dutch
As a libertarian, I recogni
March 20, 2007 - 11:51 ET by Dave RAs a libertarian, I recognize the fact that government is inherently evil. It just is. It has been that way since mankind first began. It will be that way even if there are only two living human beings left alive on this planet. One will seek dominance over the other. It is just human nature.
The founders of this country recognized this, also. This was one of the reasons the 2nd Amendment was included in its founding document, The Constitution of the United States of America. My loyalty, as it relates to this country, is to that document, and that document alone.
I don't know if you have ever noticed, but the loyalty oath taken by newly-elected presidents, as well as the one cited by our servicemen and women in the armed forces requires the speaker to pledge to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Notice they don't say "preserve, protect and defend the government of the United States." If I were required to recite it this way, I would refuse.
Free republics historically have an average life-span of around two-hundred years. We are now at year two-hundred and thirty-one. As I see it, we are living on borrowed time. At the rate our freedoms are eroding, the term "free country" is quickly becoming a misnomer. Eventually, as all free republics usually do, this country will be a dictatorship. The only thing in question is how long before that happens.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
Agreed. I think it's been y
March 20, 2007 - 12:01 ET by sarcasmoAgreed. I think it's been years since any friend has dared-utter the formerly-common saying, "It's a free country" around me. Too many busybodies and too much big government to let that one pass my ears anymore without at least a giggle...
JMR
Dave -- I missed the part i
March 20, 2007 - 12:07 ET by Jack BauerDave -- I missed the part in the Pledge of Allegiance where it mentions a "government."
I can find reference to the flag, the nation, the republic, and liberty for all (the people).
It seems to me that the PoA explicity rejects a pledge to any transitory "government."
But maybe I'm missing a subtle distinction here?
Jack, As I read recent
March 20, 2007 - 12:24 ET by Dave RJack,
As I read recently, the person who wrote the Pledge of Allegiance (cannot think of his name at the moment) was, in fact, a socialist and used the flag in the pledge to represent government. Had it said Constitution of the United States of America, I would have no problem with it. Our, sadly, now dwindling rights came from the Constitution, not the government.
I know, short answer, but I have to get back to the war, as they say. I'll look it up tonight and pass along the source.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
okay dave -- thanks. If you
March 20, 2007 - 12:38 ET by Jack Bauerokay dave -- thanks. If you get any more info please post.
sarc
March 20, 2007 - 08:55 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsWouldn't today's socialists be a little perturbed that Francis Bellamy considered himself to be a 'Christian socialist'. That is verboten today.
D
A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.
I suspect the word 'Christi
March 20, 2007 - 09:13 ET by sarcasmoI suspect the word 'Christian' for Christians is about like the word 'libertarian' for me today. ANYONE can use it to describe 'most everything, so it can mean anything. But I don't think Christianity is the whole story. I reference again the link, which includes fun inconvenient stuff like the original stiff-armed salute...And for me, the major problem isn't the pledge's inconvenient origins, but public schooling -- which was also catching-on back then and which features the same post-Napoleonic-defeat Germanic-statist origins. Notice how automatically unpopular it is to question anything about the pledge or public schooling? That's not an accident...
JMR
And so can the word "socialst"
March 20, 2007 - 09:27 ET by RJ"...the word 'Christian' for Christians is about like the word 'libertarian" for me today. ANYONE can use it to describe most everything, so it can mean anything."
And so can the word "socialist"...as I said below.
Well, RJ, in this case we s
March 20, 2007 - 10:42 ET by sarcasmoWell, RJ, in this case we see that: "he lectured and preached on the virtues of socialism and the evils of capitalism. He gave a speech on "Jesus the Socialist" and a series of sermons on "The Socialism of the Primitive Church." In 1891, he was forced to resign from his Boston church, the Bethany Baptist church, because of his socialist activities." Wanting a financial profit -- especially from government schools -- isn't the same as being a capitalist.
JMR
Just an interesting aside, sarky
March 20, 2007 - 11:35 ET by RJYes, but it doesn't give us his views of what "capitalism" or "socialism." Capitalism, for example was much more brutal at the time and workers had fewer protections. That COULD have been his point of view...we just don't know.
That's not my main point, though. My point is that the origins of the Pledge, like the origins of Yankee Doodle or the melody of the national anthem aren't really relevant...other than as an interesting aside.
The author of the piece you linked to obviously has a brief against the Pledge, but what was done with it is the important thing.Unless those words have someh
March 20, 2007 - 11:53 ET by sarcasmoUnless those words have somehow "evolved" even more than the word 'liberal' has turned into modern NewSpeak, I'd say my point about his socialism stands. Of course, I'm one of those nuts who thinks that some things the ACLU does are important and worthwhile, and that its dead founders' political view isn't relevant other than as an interesting aside. See how it works when you've got two agendas in play, but either side only wants to notice one of them?? And IMO the author at that link has a brief all right, but it's a brief against crappy and inadequate history-teaching...And a good one!
JMR
sarky
March 20, 2007 - 12:44 ET by RJIf you can't see that capitalism and socialism had very different real and social connotations back then, we'll just have to disagree.
As for the author's real briefs, one became obvious with his need to claim that Bush had to "learn" the Pledge in order to attack his opponent. Pro-socialism disguised as pro-libertarianism, was another. A web search turns up a number of leftist-sociaist groups using his piece.
Funny that you want the history of the origins of the Pledge taught but call the origins of the ACLU "irrelevant."
As for the ACLU, I knew you'd drag that into the discussion. That's why I said earlier that the most important thing is not the origins of the idea, but what is done with the idea.
I'm talkin' definitions, RJ
March 21, 2007 - 05:05 ET by sarcasmoI'm talkin' definitions, RJ. Unlike the much-abused word that graces the very title bar of this site, "liberal," neither capitalism nor socialism has "evolved" into newspeak with time. They both mean now what they meant back then, even if you flail and claim that it might not be so, until you can prove otherwise. And Bush's school really didn't teach the pledge, like it or not, as if that non-issue matters in the choice voters make. And calling the origins of the ACLU exactly what you called the origins of the pledge was, as everyone-else probably saw, mocking what you'd just said. I stand by my words: the origins of the pledge go back to a blatant socialist, who at least had the redeeming-for-me characteristic of being greedy to sell flags.
JMR
Hey sarc,It seems that Franci
March 20, 2007 - 08:56 ET by saw the lightHey sarc,
It seems that Francis Bellamy may not have been a socialist after all. To devise a plan that promotes patriotism to enable him to sell American flags to the schools of the United States smacks of an enterprising capitalist to me!
"People everywhere confuse what they read in newspapers with news." - A.J. Liebling
You're right, STL
March 20, 2007 - 09:16 ET by RJHa. You're right, STL. When those events took place, socialism was new, evolving, and had many versions. In addition to being a capitalist and a Christian, do we know which version Bellamy followed?
Besides, it's not only the origins, but the use made of the idea. The melody of the Star Spangled Banner was from a British drinking song, and Yankee Doodle was a derisive song sung by British Troops and taken by the Revolutionaries for their own.
sit in
March 20, 2007 - 08:45 ET by conantRosie said"I grew large watching sit-ins on TV with a giant soda in one hand, a twinkie in the other hand and a huge bowl of chips in my lap."
That dialogue is so full of n
March 20, 2007 - 08:52 ET by GalvanicThat dialogue is so full of nonsense, I don't know where to begin to correct it, so I'll just make a few points.
1. Hasselbeck seemed to come off as the voice of reason, and held her own fairly well.
2. Behar once again demonstrates an unintelligible train of thought. Her statement -- . . . to be totally patriotic is almost not being patriotic in a way. --- would be truly Orwellian, if we didn't already know she's incapable of being that clever.
3. Self-indulgent O'Donnell's idea of patriotism is scream louder and louder til the government gives you something you want just to shut you up. She's a liberal icon.
4. Walters seems to be missing the whole debate on illegal immigrants and assimilation (or lack thereof).
5. I really get annoyed when celebrities, politicians, and such, refer to our men and women in uniform as "boys and girls." It's really demeaning.
That dialogue is so full of n
March 20, 2007 - 08:52 ET by Galvanic(dupe posting)
Your assessment is impeccably
March 20, 2007 - 08:57 ET by Cool ArrowYour assessment is impeccably on point.
How can you not love these ar
March 20, 2007 - 09:07 ET by BruzillaHow can you not love these arguments? What I find really amazing is that Walters, O'Donnell, and Bahar all stress the correct point, that being that we are not at war, but completely misunderstand it. To listen to most of the people who have this mindset, you would thing that it was the winter of 1944 and massed Panzer forces and infantry were pouring through the Ardennes on their way to Paris. What our 150,000+ troops are facing is a bunch of miscreants with pretty much squat for weapons. They can harass our forces, but not defeat them. They can be an annoyance, but they are not a threat. Yet to listen to Liberals is to believe that our military is on the brink of being over-run, collapsing, and being soundly defeated!
We've lost 3,000+ troops in Iraq in four years. During the Battle of the Bulge we had 81,000 troops killed in a matter of days... that's a war. That same battle involved 500,000 Germans... that's an Army and a formidable enemy. Liberals want us to leave Iraq because we're "losing" to a little more than a thousand insurgents who can do little more than stage harassing attacks? Thank God these folks weren't around during the Battle of the Bulge.
So I would agree that we're not at war, and haven't been since the fall of Baghdad. There's no need for gas coupons or food rationing when you're not trying to keep about a million guys in continuous combat on a global basis. And a lion shouldn't surrender to a mouse, it should kill it and eat it.
Well said!Not likely you woul
March 20, 2007 - 09:18 ET by Cool ArrowWell said!
Not likely you would have heard the American people asking our troops "Would you like spinach with those bullets?"
Good point, Bruzilla. They
March 20, 2007 - 09:28 ET by GalvanicGood point, Bruzilla. They talk about not being called upon to volunteer and sacrifice, and of course that's not true. They could be donating money to support the families of killed and wounded servicemembers. They could raise cash for the American Red Cross. They could collect school supplies for children in Iraq and Afghanistan. They could stop by and visit a military or VA hospital to talk to the wounded.
In fact, thousands, if not millions, of Americans are already doing things like this. They didn't wait for Bush to call on them; they just do it.
So, what are they waiting for?
Great Point Galvanic!
March 20, 2007 - 12:31 ET by exLibWhoa is them, The President hasn't asked us to do anything.
Are they like my 3 year old twins who can't do any thinking, reasoning or acting on their own?
Wait, I take that back, my 3 year olds ocassionally think, reason and do things on their own.
So maybe they are like 2 or 1 year olds.
What morons. There's a war, pleople are dying so they can be "patriotically unpatriotic" and what do they want? The Governement to hold their hands and tell them what to do, how to do it.
The View... sophomoric, inane
March 20, 2007 - 09:24 ET by i was just thinkingThe View... sophomoric, inane, drivel, twaddle. Not one damn logical thought to be found in that entire conversation.
Right
March 20, 2007 - 09:30 ET by iveseenitallRight on, i was just thinking. Rosie's Pig Pen (a.k.a. The View)---ignorance on parade, every day.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Right
March 20, 2007 - 09:30 ET by iveseenitallAlways wondered why Walters put up with this. After her interview with the "dignified" murderer Chavez, it's no longer a mystery to me.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
i, you are being too kind and
March 20, 2007 - 09:31 ET by JABi, you are being too kind and giving it legitimacy to refer to that crapfest as a "conversation".
"To bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
I agree. It was the only wor
March 20, 2007 - 10:26 ET by i was just thinkingI agree. It was the only word I could think of at the time.
I don't know what I find more incomprehensible - that these low-grade morons actually believe and spout this bilge on a daily basis, or the low-grade morons who sit in front of their televisions, soaking it up as if it were gospel truth.
What's worse is that this crap is on AFN (Armed Forces Network)! We get AFN here in Riyadh, and I've actually seen this garbage on it. I don't know how our troops can stand it.
i, me thinks their ratings in
March 20, 2007 - 11:09 ET by JABi, me thinks their ratings in conjuction with the Military (knowing the intelligence level of our troops) is more dismal than their civilian ratings.
BTW, thanks for your service and sacrifice, it is GREATLY appreciated on this Americans part and in his heart.
"To bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
I must apologize, and I mean
March 20, 2007 - 11:20 ET by i was just thinkingI must apologize, and I mean that sincerely. I didn't intend to give the impression that I am serving in our armed forces. I am U.S. citizen, and a teacher at an international school here in Riyadh. You paid such a kind compliment to our soldiers in your closing line, and I wanted to make sure that it was said to someone in our armed forces who is deserving of it.
i, maybe it was my fault for
March 20, 2007 - 11:38 ET by JABi, maybe it was my fault for "assuming" you were in the Military. I sometimes forget to think of or mention the civilians serving in the battle zones -- my bad.
Anyway, no harm, no foul on your part in my eyes.
"To bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
ROSIE IS RIGHT!!! They should show more protests
March 20, 2007 - 09:44 ET by blackrain4xmashttp://www.floppinga...
http://www.zombietim...
http://www.floppinga...
according to Rosie, a story a
March 20, 2007 - 10:02 ET by Mivvisaccording to Rosie, a story about a soldier hanging himself is a great one?
What a sick B**ch
rosie, behar and babs are per
March 20, 2007 - 10:09 ET by FastEdrosie, behar and babs are perfect examples of the waste of three dimensional space, carbon and water. And in roseblubs case lots and lots of space. behar, not so much, head holds enough "dead" air already. babs - what kind of tree whould she rather be?
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
E'Beth no more
March 20, 2007 - 10:34 ET by foolnomoreCome on Miss Hasselbeck you don't need the money ? why do you lower yourself to be with this type of "low life"/"fool",just,stand up tell them to "stuff it" ,Please,they will never, ever wake up to what is truly going "on",they don't Care, Bless and support all the troops-Liberalism is mental disorder
Behar said there was no black
March 20, 2007 - 20:09 ET by NonanonBehar said there was no black and white anymore. I think there is a lot of black and white but liberals keep trying to make things gray and blurry to somehow excuse them from being wrong on many items. But at the same time, they sure never acknowledge that there is any validity in those who disagree with their liberal positions, indicating that they must feel things are black and white, thus revealing another hypocritical streak in them. I get dizzy trying to follow their statements. They shoot off in so many different directions at the same time, like being unpatriotic is being patriotic! How can that be?
No,In answer to your last que
March 20, 2007 - 20:18 ET by bigtimerNo,
In answer to your last question...
They can't.
Period.
Protests are not inherently patriotic
March 20, 2007 - 21:53 ET by nkviking75Protests are not inherently patriotic nor unpatriotic. It all depends on what message is being sent. I have yet to see an antiwar protest in this war that is anything but unpatriotic. But I think it is possible to protest in a patriotic way. Pro-life demonstrations effectively demand that the courts remove that most unconstitutional of court rulings, Roe v. Wade.