We've seen it reflected in nearly every poll over the last 10 years or so and here is another one that confirms the downward spiral in trust of the media. In a press release for a Sacred Heart University poll, those respondents who said they believe all or most of what the media has to tell them fell 8% since 2003. In 2003 27.4% of the poll's respondents said that they trusted all or most of what the MSM reports. In 2007 that number plummeted to just 19.6%. 23.9% said they believe little or nothing that comes out of the MSM with 55.3% saying they believe some of what the media churns out.
Ouch.
Things are are increasingly looking bad for the MSM.
"The fact that an astonishing percentage of Americans see biases and partisanship in their mainstream news sources suggests an active and critical consumer of information in the U.S.," stated James Castonguay, Ph.D., associate professor and chair of SHU's Department of Media Studies & Digital Culture. "The availability of alternative viewpoints and news sources through the Internet no doubt contributes to the increased skepticism about the objectivity of profit-driven news outlets owned by large conglomerates," he continued.
Americans are increasingly assuming that the "news" isn't being "reported" but that what they are being fed is meant to influence public opinion as opposed to serving to inform it. In 2003 this poll showed that 79.3% felt the MSM was attempting to promulgate a particular point of view and in the 2007 poll that climbed to 87.6%. The poll also shows that "86.0% agreed (strongly or somewhat) that the news media attempts to influence public policies -- up from 76.7% in 2003."
The MSM faired poorly in many areas.
Americans surveyed provided poor ratings for the national news media on six different characteristics measured. The average overall positive rating across all six characteristics measured was 33.4%. The highest positive rating, 40.7%, was recorded for quality of reporting followed by accuracy of reporting at 36.9% and keeping any personal bias out of stories (33.3%).
Other low positive ratings included: fairness (31.3%), presenting an even balance of views (30.4%) and presenting negative and positive news equally (27.5%).
The Poll found many more interesting results. Many of our supposedly most trusted news sources are considered left leaning and not balanced.
- 41.9% felt the The New York Times was left leaning
- 40.3% felt that NPR was left leaning
- 11.9% felt CNN was left leaning
- 38.8% felt MSNBC had a leftward tilt
- 45.4% felt that journalists and broadcasters in general were lefties, too
As to Fox News, 48.7% felt it was right leaning, but the cable newser got the highest vote for accuracy in reporting. Fox News got 27% of the poll for accuracy, while CNN received 14.6%, NBC got 10.9%, ABC 7%, local news 6.9%, CBS News 6.8%, MSNBC 4%, PBS News 3%, and CNBC .6%.
In any case, this report is terrible news for the "news" and it pans out in their falling stock shares and in customer dissatisfaction.
(H/T NewsBuster StewartIII)



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
It's easy to see why.
January 9, 2008 - 10:43 ET by OldSailor88When you have articles like this showing up that blatantly admit bias, it's hard to expect people to believe you. Until the media starts reporting the news instead of making it up, they'll continue to lose readers and interest.
"All we are asking..........is give truth a chance."
Faciem durum cacantis habes
Now THAT'S a
January 9, 2008 - 10:45 ET by taterNow THAT'S a recession...
Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could afford. -Montgomery Burns
I am surprised, 19.6% seems
January 9, 2008 - 10:49 ET by ConservativeRexI am surprised, 19.6% seems kind of high to me. And only 41.9% thought the NYT was left leaning? MSNBC got 4 times the amount I would have thought they'd get.
Mostly this just reaffirms that the MSM keeps adding nails to it's own coffin. Yet they don't see any problems. Wasn't there an old saying about those "being so blind that they refuse to see"?
They must have rigged the
January 9, 2008 - 12:48 ET by mattmThey must have rigged the poll...
"If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the paper, you are misinformed." - Mark Twain
I think it's heartening...
January 9, 2008 - 10:51 ET by heldmyw...That my fellow Americans are not being hoodwinked.
Now, if we can just get the MSM to get over themselves, get out of social engineering and go back to just plain ol' reporting the news, without agenda, bias or 'color', we will all benefit.
reporting the news?,
January 9, 2008 - 11:41 ET by RackieHardly. "Reporting" is what reporters used to do. The MSM is invested with "journalists" now.
I agree
January 9, 2008 - 11:53 ET by SouthJersey1953This is good news! I was afraid that most Americans were blindly following the garbage put out by the MSM. This is good news....maybe we aren't in as much trouble as I thought.
It's not Right vs. Left; it is Right vs. Wrong
Only 19% of Americans
January 9, 2008 - 11:14 ET by RackieOnly 19% of Americans Implicitly Trust Media
And what % of the MSM implicitly trust Americans?
My question...
January 9, 2008 - 11:32 ET by MassConserv... is what percentage of those respondent’s distrust is based on the belief that the bias is coming from the right, simply because the nets and papers are owned by “big corporations”?
Your question is answered in
January 9, 2008 - 11:36 ET by Warner Todd HustonYour question is answered in the link provided, but the percentages that felt the MSM was too far to the right were much, much smaller.
Thanks WTH.
January 9, 2008 - 11:42 ET by MassConservI admit, I'm to lazy to view most links. I trust NB's analysis.
Notice something interesting....
January 9, 2008 - 11:55 ET by JeffWeimerAbout this quote:
"The availability of alternative viewpoints and news sources through the Internet no doubt contributes to the increased skepticism about the objectivity of profit-driven news outlets owned by large conglomerates."
They seem assuming a stand from a further left viewpoint than their data even suggests! They would have better served the truth by saying the MSM is not in line with the public it serves - that's a much more neutral (and TRUE) statement of the facts. Instead, they say the MSM is not left ENOUGH and too driven by the profit motive. If the MSM were more concerned, then those numbers would not be NEARLY as bad as they are.
The MSM are there to serve
January 9, 2008 - 12:11 ET by pocomocoThe MSM are there to serve themselves NOT the public interest, and should be taken to court for collusion.
Denial is not a river in Egypt!
January 9, 2008 - 12:03 ET by pocomocoAnd the MSM will go down biasing to their last agenda.
MSM is never news. It's
January 9, 2008 - 12:24 ET by wiwfMSM is never news. It's yellow journalism. But CYJN doesn't have the same ring to it as CNN. Plus they're not going to be explicit about it.
At least there's Drudge!
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
MSM is becoming like Access
January 9, 2008 - 12:25 ET by ForeverOnTheRightMSM is becoming like Access Hollywood ir Entertainment Tonight, just another TV tabloid show. If they continue to pander to the left, they deserve to be canceled all together. That would be embarassing to the MSM!
I wonder what the poll numbers are for FOX? They are most likely to be higher!
Those darn bloggers again... darn it!
January 9, 2008 - 13:27 ET by wizardjrYeah, if the bloggers would all just dry up and blow away the _real_ journalists could get this country back on the right track </ channelling Helen Thomas >
My conclusion
January 9, 2008 - 13:31 ET by oregon_jiimMy conclusion is that an astounding 19% of Americans are employed by the media.
"an endorsement of communism is an endorsement of slavery"
“Also in Washington
January 9, 2008 - 14:33 ET by rbosque“Also in Washington today, a
lot of excitement on Capitol Hill. A movie star showed up to testify before
Congress — a movie star named Al Gore.”
— Katie Couric on the March 21 CBS Evening News.
Nope no bias there.