Jon Alter: Bill Clinton's 'Very, Very Positive' Global Work Shouldn't Raise Conflicts for Hillary

Photo of Tim Graham.

On Tuesday’s Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC, Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter couldn’t imagine why anyone would see conflict-of-interest troubles if Hillary Clinton becomes Secretary of State while her husband the ex-president has a sprawling international foundation with its mitts in a long list of countries. Alter insisted all of Clinton’s work is "very, very positive. It’s been for great causes around the world." Alison Stewart guest-hosted for Maddow, and pushed the button that started Alter’s Bill-burnishing remarks:

STEWART: Is Bill Clinton a stumbling block for Hillary Clinton getting the Secretary of State gig?

ALTER: You know, I don’t think he really is, unless, for some reason, they just refuse to disclose as much as the Obama people want them to. There’s nothing that's all that terrible here. Most of the money that Clinton has raised, in fact, it's very, very positive. It's been for great causes around the world. Fighting poverty. Fighting AIDS.

But he's got to disclose it because Obama’s made it very clear he wants a transparent administration and if, you know, the big dog thinks that the rules don't apply to him, then this nomination could get held up. Or it may be as Politico reports, she decides that is she’d rather stay in the senate. So we don't want to get ahead of ourselves on how this will play out, but I do think it's pretty likely that this thing will be fairly smooth sailing for Hillary Clinton becoming Secretary of State.

You can tell the administrations have shifted when MSNBC anchors start mocking people who are leaking information that the Obama team was keeping a lid on. Alter did admit the Obama folks are "control freaks when it comes to information." Not that it really bothers the team players at Newsweek:

STEWART: Another day, another leak out of the Obama camp. What do you think the purpose of today's leak was? I'm assuming it has a purpose somewhere, that eric holder has been tapped for attorney general?

ALTER: There are different motivations for leaks. Sometimes people just get their jollies by saying they leaked it in the press and they don't necessarily have any real reason to do it. But it is, I'm sure it's something that’s aggravating for the Obama people because they wanted to release these on their own time, and they're learning the lesson that every president learns.

Remember when Ronald Reagan said "I've had it up to my keister with these leaks," going all the way back to, presidents have really pulled their hair out over this, not all of them have responded like Nixon and get a "plumbers" unit to spy on the leakers, but it's something that the Obama people had to figure was going to start happening before long. But they are control freaks when it comes to information and I'm sure they're not happy at all that this was not done on their schedule.

STEWART: I got to tell you, if you get your jollies through leaks you need to get out more often. That's all I'm saying.

ALTER: You're in Washington, Allison. You know, there are people there who they'll really do. They love opening the paper the next day – "Ooh, I leaked that," and it makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

As if journalists don’t feel all warm and fuzzy inside for finding the leakers and spreading the insider word all around. Speaking of feeling warm and fuzzy inside, Stewart seemed to be aiming for warming up Alter in her introduction:

Joining us now is Newsweek Senior Editor Jonathan Alter. He’s of course an NBC news analyst and author of the new book The Defining Moment: FDR’s Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope, which is flying off the shelves after Barack Obama mentioned it on his interview on 60 Minutes as the book that he’s currently reading about FDR’s Hundred Days.

"New?" Even the paperback edition of Alter's book came out in May of 2007. When asked, Obama said he was referring to Alter's book, but also an FDR book by Jean Edward Smith. Touting the books of liberal journalists, padding their book royalties? Isn't that an ideological earmark of some kind? Obama touted a "new" book, no author attached, on CBS:

KROFT: Have you been reading anything about the Depression? Anything about FDR?
OBAMA: You know, I have actually. There's a new book out about FDR's first 100 days and what you see in FDR that I hope my team can -- emulate, is not always getting it right, but projecting a sense of confidence, and a willingness to try things. And experiment in order to get people working again.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OBAMA: You know, I have

OBAMA: You know, I have actually. There's a new book out about FDR's first 100 days and what you see in FDR that I hope my team can -- emulate, is not always getting it right, but projecting a sense of confidence, and a willingness to try things. And experiment in order to get people working again.

Oh isn't this rich...try new things...what is new Chosen One...eh...you are naming three quarters of the ex-Clinton Slime Machine, plus some of the old politicos, Daschle being the latest...

Give me a break!

As far as Alter goes...same old, same old, with the leftist talking heads, they don't care that he has gone back on his words....words don't matter if they come from their left leaders.

...so much for WORDS Matter.

Soros finally won..hope this country is ready for what they wished for.

Btw..I know he didn't use the word "new" but that is what he campaigned on, so it is the same difference to me.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Global Government

"And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy...and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?...And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months...and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb..." Rev. 13

ACLU/Muslim prayer

Please can anyone tell me:

 What California school was having Muslim prayer as curriculum some years back? This was around the time the ACLU was getting the cross off the flag of Los Angeles. Could really use help on this one. Please reply.

I'm not much help

But I seem to recall that it was in one of San Francisco's suburbs.

Chai

“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”

George Costanza

As Alter has become more and more tendentious over the years, I just can't help but thinking of Seinfeld's George Constanza (Jason Alexander) every time I see him.

similar

At least in the photo at the top, if that's him, than yes he looks very similar. 

 

"Thoroughly worldly people never understand even the world; they rely altogether on a few cynical maxims which are not true."

Chesterton, Orthodoxy 

Talk about damning by faint

Talk about damning by faint praise!  "it's really not that terrible" and "MOST of the money...is very, very positive."

Leaving some back doors open, eh?

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

"Nothing terrible here..?" about Clinton? is Alter kidding?

Alter: ..There’s nothing that's all that terrible here. Most of the money that Clinton has raised, in fact, it's very, very positive. It's been for great causes around the world. Fighting poverty. Fighting AIDS.

Really? Well, that's after Bill Clinton left the white house and started on his mission to make amends (to create a legacy) for what he turned his back on while president. I tend to always trust the left side of the isle here, as they are watching their own, on the issues they really do care about. So, hat's off to "The Nation's" David Corn for telling it like it was (my bold):

 Too little, too late - How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa?

During the Clinton years... In other words, the prevailing view was, these people should die quietly.

 [..]

Back to Clinton. When he had the chance -- and the power -- to address the devastation in Africa, he took a pass. Why didn’t he figure out the U.S. share for an anti-AIDS crusade and add it to his budget? It would surely be illuminating and instructive if he explained this. Might he claim that, as with the Rwanda genocide, he was not fully informed of the horror? A cynical guess might be this: AIDS in Africa, it doesn’t poll well.

Responding to Clinton’s profession of regret, a friend of mine who works for a church organization in Washington that lobbies for more foreign aid says that "from a religious perspective, contrition is positive and can be useful." Perhaps. I’m waiting to see how much time Clinton actually devotes to the AIDS nightmare in Africa. Will he spend his days delivering $250,000-a-pop speeches, or use them to cajole leaders of the industrialized nations to kick in more money? In and of itself, his contrition means little. It is easy to be sorry once you’re out of office.

Of course it's even easier not to have to say your sorry - and that would be because the MSM gave him a pass - and did not and will not ever present a solid serious and probing question to the man about his failings. (;~/ gary

 

"Fighting poverty. Fighting

"Fighting poverty. Fighting AIDS."

The poverty Bill is fighting is his own, $131 Million out of  Kazakhstan alone.  His fight against AIDS must devolve to his chosen preference of sex being less likely to transmit the disease.  President Bush did more in his tenure to combat AIDS than Clinton even considered.

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

But you will not hear a

But you will not hear a single peep out of the MSM about Pres. Bush combating AIDS.  Can't have that, he's a Republican so therefore he does not care.

Facists bastards the MSM is.

It would probably be

It would probably be fascinating to ask people what year the events in the movie "Hotel Rwanda" took place.  I would just about bet most people would say after 2001. 

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

Always fighting, never results

It's been for great causes around the world. Fighting poverty. Fighting AIDS.

That's the Clintons for you.

Always fighting for something. Their work is called 'very very positive.' Kudos up the wazoo.

Hillary fights for children, the poor. Bill fights against poverty and aids.

In the real world the last thing I'd want to hear from my sales people is that they're fighting to reach their quotas, fighting for leads, etc.

How about some freakin' results?

 

Refuse to see evil, report no evil

“Jon Alter: Bill Clinton's 'Very, Very Positive' Global Work Shouldn't Raise Conflicts for Hillary”

For those who get their news from the MSM this statement might as well read: Bill’s … Global Work Will Not Raise Conflicts for Hillary.  What they are signaling here that they are not going to see any evil, so they are certainly not going to report it.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

The Vet

I think it is hilarious about who gets to vet whom. Obama's team vets Hill and Bill. If she had won, she would get to vet Obama. Imagine the fun with this guy's past. Because he has won his last political office, nobody will ever dig up his real past. It went Phuuff!

Another reason for "leaks"

Another reason for "leaks" is deniability in case the president elect thinks his nomination might raise a real stink. For example, Eric Holder may be one of those given his jobs in the Clinton administration.

The FLN, and Marc Rich pardons, his anti-gun beliefs and anti death penalty statements were bound to raise questions if the publics memory went back more than 8 years but it doesn't seem to.

 

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
Thomas Jefferson 
 

 

IaT... Plus I have herd

IaT...

Plus I have herd here and there Jamie Gorelick may being places somewhere in his administration too...she along with him and others if my memory serves me correctly loved that wall they built between the intelligence being able to be shared with the FBI/CIA others...

Guess they want another 9/11...maybe if they time it just right, they can have this done once again when a repub gets in so they can blame him via the msm as their bull-horn...as thousands if not more die.

...and of course her involvement with Fred/Fannie and the $$$ she made is nada.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh