Larry King to Brokaw: Does Rush Support McCain Because He's White?

Photo of Tim Graham.

NBC’s Tom Brokaw, CBS’s Bob Schieffer, and former NBC reporter Maria Shriver were all on CNN’s Larry King Live on Monday night. Shriver effusively described her support for Obama: "I think he'd be great not just for this country, but I think for the whole world and for America's standing in the world. I think he is a thoughtful man, a deeply reflective man, smart, inclusive." But the stand-out moment of the hour came in the first segment, when King underlined Rush Limbaugh’s assertion that Colin Powell’s endorsement of Obama was all about race. King asked Brokaw in response: "Does that mean, Tom, that Limbaugh's endorsement of McCain was because he was white?" Brokaw snapped: "No. I don't want to go there. But what I would say is that Rush Limbaugh is going to match his credibility up against Barack Obama and a lot of people would like to have money in that pool."

Brokaw added:

If he didn't listen carefully to what Colin Powell had to say as he ticked off the many reasons that he was supporting Barack Obama and his concern about what's happening to the Republican Party, in which he has always been a stalwart member -- we even played some of the tapes from the 2000 convention, in which Colin Powell said that President Bush and Vice President Cheney would heal the racial divide in this country.

Was race an element? It could have been in some small fashion. But I think anyone who has watched Colin Powell over the years and talked to him about his concerns or heard him at conferences or heard him speak knows that there are so many issues out there that he thinks that need to be addressed. And he feels that they're not being addressed adequately on the Republican side in this campaign.

Brokaw made no attempt to explain what precisely the McCain-Palin campaign has done that is harshly forcing apart the racial divide in America, except perhaps daring to oppose Obama, or mocking community organizers, or calling Obama "that one." CNN also failed to question how precisely Powell fits the definition of "always" being a "stalwart member" of the Republican Party.

Brokaw and Schieffer also repeated talking points from earlier interviews. Brokaw praised the powerful eloquence of Powell: "In the midst of that long windup to what he had to say, which many people found very powerful and very eloquent -- even Republicans, by the way -- I didn't know whether, at the end of it, he would say I'm going to vote for Barack Obama or whether he would say, so I do believe that he's qualified to be president. I was prepared to try to pull it out of him, but he volunteered it on his own."

Schieffer repeated that Powell speaks for many Republicans: "I think this is -- this was a very important thing. I think, when you stop and think about it, what Colin Powell did on Sunday was he said aloud what I have heard a lot of Republicans tell me privately. He expressed their frustrations."

Powell also came up in the Maria Shriver interview at the end of the show:

KING: Colin Powell used the Palin nomination as an example of why he is opposed. What do you make of this?

SHRIVER: I thought his statement was obviously very thoughtful, very careful, and he had done a lot of soul searching. I think this has been a year where people have done so much soul searching to come to the conclusions that they came to. Women, I think in particular, during the primary and now I think there's been much debate about Sarah Palin by women and by men. But I think, overall, it's been an extraordinary political career -- political year.

KING: Does Colin help a lot, do you think?

SHRIVER: I think he does. I think he's certainly well respected, and I certainly think he gets rid of that argument whether he's ready to lead or not.

KING: As a woman, what did you think of the Palin nomination?

SHRIVER: I wasn't surprised that John McCain picked a woman, but I thought it might be a different woman. I think it'll be up to men and women whether they think she is capable of being in the second most powerful position in the United States of America.

KING: Even though you're a liberal Democrat, is there some appeal to you having a woman on the ticket?

SHRIVER: Well, I think it's been, you know, interesting all year long to watch Hillary Clinton, who I think was extraordinary. And I think it's been very interesting to talk to other women about Sarah Palin. It's not a woman I would support, but I think it's good for women to have women out there, whether it's on the Republican ticket or the Democratic ticket.

KING: Do you think Senator Obama will win?

SHRIVER: I do. Absolutely, I do.

KING: Are you out campaigning for him?

SHRIVER: I haven't been. I was when he was here in California. If he asked me to join him, I'd be happy to. I think he'd be great not just for this country, but I think for the whole world and for America's standing in the world. I think he is a thoughtful man, a deeply reflective man, smart, inclusive. I think a lot of what Colin Powell said is what a lot of people believe. And I think he's hopeful. I looked at the picture of 100,000 people coming out for him in St. Louis the other day. And I just sat at my kitchen table and looked at that picture, and thought, I was so grateful to be alive to see that, and I'm so proud that I have a child who is going to vote for him in this election. I think it's an incredible thing to be able to witness.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Tom, excuse me a moment while I groom my mandibles"

No Larry, Rush supports McCain because he likes old guys that look like a praying mantis in suspenders as you do.

Nov. 5 can't come fast enough. 

Larry is a Bonehead

Obviously he has dug into the polls very deeply....calling Rush a racist is beyond nasty...take a look at the polls Larry, 93 percent of the blacks polled are voting for Owama...the white vote is split...brings the question, is Colin Powell racist for backing Owama....why not talk about Colins son...created a big riff in the family.....

Who's a racist? Was race

Who's a racist?

Was race an element? It could have been in some small fashion. But I
think anyone who has watched Colin Powell over the years and talked to
him about his concerns or heard him at conferences or heard him speak
knows that there are so many issues out there that he thinks that need
to be addressed. And he feels that they're not being addressed
adequately on the Republican side in this campaign.

Rush hit the nail on the head:

"Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race.... OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all the inexperienced, very liberal, white candidates he has endorsed. 

But it's not about race.....

 

Rush supports McCain because he is a better candidate.

allow me to love America -no Rush supports McCain because of his abilities to lead, his Love for America-he does not want to take and share the wealth. he has never  hung out with- al Monsour/Bill Ayers/Rev Wright types.

First off King has always

First off King has always been envious of Rush, it has been a long standing thing...second off...the msm talking heads have made race the issue, the do all the time even before the election, third, the political talking heads have made race big issue, some that are supposedly conservatives too...I call them RINOs anyway...finally fourth adn the most important is Obama and his crew themselves are the ones who have made sure to insert race in their race for the Presidency...

I will be glad when this is over....it is all getting past tiring, police are already getting ready for riots whether Obama wins or loses....sad what this country has come to...

Btw...Obamatons had better get a grip...latest AP Poll...plus I just heard that a Rasmussen/Fox poll has McC up in Ohio and Fla. now too.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Rioting

Getting ready for riots? That report has been going around for a couple days, but I'm a little suspicious. You know why? Because I'm a white guy, and you can't get much more against Obama than I am, but I have no plans to riot, should he win. If Obama wins, I may have an extra Guinness, but that's about it.

Who's kidding who? If Obama wins, nobody will riot. Maybe four people will gather in the park and spit, but nothing more than that.

Now if McCain wins, that might be a different story. Not the blacks so much, but MSNBC. I can just see Olbermann and Matthews tossing chairs and chanting protests. I'd love to see the SWAT team drag Olbermann away, frothing and screaming, weeping at the injustice of it all. Hey, that might get good ratings, because I know a lot of people who want to see the same thing.

KC... I'm laughing out

KC...

I'm laughing out loud with your last paragraph...you know I'll be watching the network, especially Olbie/Matthews... plus CNN too.

As to the rioting, I think they are expecting the likes of this comparable to what happens after a team wins a Super Bowl or such...seems they riot no matter win or loss any more...it is pathetic, let alone disgraceful to-boot.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I had hinted at a mass

I had hinted at a mass on-air suicide. Figuratively speaking of course.

Oh, the wailing and gnashing of teeth!

As to the Rush question, this is what they consider a "cutting edge" discussion?  More like they've beaten everything else into the ground.

Of course Rush is supporting McCain because he's white.  He agrees with Obama on lots of things, but just can't vote for guy who's only half white.

<sarc>

Hi motherbelt, I am

Hi motherbelt,

I am wondering what the msm is going to talk about if Obama wins? I mean really...life will be wonderful, puppy dogs, kittens, and candy for everyone...not a cloud in the sky. There will be no need to do a news cast because there will be no bad news. What a bunch of bull dung.

No. He supports McCain

No. He supports McCain because he's almost a conservative.

Hey Larry, did any of your wives marry you because you're rich? 

BHO is for choice except for when he is against it.

Why McCain doesn't beat him over the head with this.......

Obama Sends His Kids to Private School But Opposes School Choice Vouchers

Despite his work to improve Chicago’s public schools (???!!!), the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee sends his two daughters to the University of Chicago’s Laboratory School, a prestigious private school in Chicago – and he opposes school vouchers, which would allow parents to send their kids to the school of their choice.

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=37851

Why am I not surprised?

Or McCain could mention that

Or McCain could mention that over 70% of black parents support school vouchers, but Obama and the Democrats care more about the Teachers' union, which opposes them.

»→ Be serious mb

An educated public is more inclined to find dignity in gainful employment.

Public Schools provide a steady stream of Democrats looking for handouts.  It encompasses all races.  Obama rightly surmises it is better to be the leader of a banana republic than a Senator in the greatest country on earth.

Have a fine Havana cigar. I hear they're rolled on the thigh of Chris Matthews.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

An educated public is also

An educated public is also more inclined to ask questions, and what would any politician stand to gain from something like that?

It's a wonder

Ya know, commenting about media giants like brokaw and king and their conversations, especially like this one, can be somewhat a waste of time.

We already know where their philosophies are, and what they believe needs to happen in our country.

I highly doubt either person has to fix their sink, clean their carpets, or wait in a line. Why would I think they know best.

Brokaw alleges (with no

Brokaw alleges (with no evidence): "In the midst of that long windup to what he had to say, which many people found very powerful and very eloquent -- even Republicans, by the way ...."  "[M]any people found very powerful and very eloquent"?  "[E]ven Republicans"? 

Schieffer alleges (with no evidence): "I think this is -- this was a very important thing. I think, when you stop and think about it, what Colin Powell did on Sunday was he said aloud what I have heard a lot of Republicans tell me privately. He expressed their frustrations."  Schieffer "heard a lot of Republicans tell [him] privately"?

Never, never, never, never believe any useful idiot of the Washington press corps like Brokaw or Schieffer when they allege that unnamed, so-called "Republicans say ...."

I disagree.  I'm reading

I disagree.  I'm reading the book Breaking Ranks that deals with the ebb and flow of the intellectual community - primarily on the left - between liberalism, radicalism, socialism, communism, and so on --- and it talks A LOT about parties and all kinds of such things held in Manhattan which people were cutting each other up over political differences.   Add to this what Bernard Goldberg has said about the fish bowl mentality of the Manhattan elites in the media:

And I can see some Republicans - who want to continue to be invited to "all the right parties", and not be ridiculed at them - would be saying to the liberal establishment off air that they really agree more with them on such things.

 It's like middle school...

Larry King ... Chicken Sh&t

Why doesn't Larry ask Rush that question?

I can tell you why. Larry is afraid of how Rush would verbally embarrass him. Logic and facts would prevail and the Liberal King could not deal  with it. 

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.

If Sarah Palin

If Sarah Palin was pro-choice and had a (D) after her name this same bunch of nitwits (including Larry King) would be falling all over themselves singing her praises.

Kings silly question about race shows that he knows nothing about Rush Limbaugh, and he's getting too senile to be on television. TV has too many bad comedy shows already!  

Ok... here we go again.

"If he didn't listen carefully to what Colin Powell had to say as he ticked off the many reasons that he was supporting Barack Obama..."

Like:

liberal surpreme court justices

redistribution of wealth through taxation

delivering our military to be used by the UN at will

appeasing terrorist nations

government controlled healthcare

strict gun control including bans on many types of firearms

post-birth abortion

selection of the a VP candidate with more experience and credentials than anyone on the opposing ticket

Sure, a few of these were listed by Powell, but they are all things that a "real republican" would not and could not support.

How committed to

How committed to intellectual dishonesty does a person have to be to ignore the fact that man who endorsed both Dole and Bush would have to have some significant reason for deciding to endorse a far left even radical candidate - and the fact that Obama is black is the most likely reason for such a sharp turn on Powell's part?

Anyway, Powell's endorsement made me think - Where the hell is George Will?

I have the index page for his work at the Washington Post, and I noticed the day Powell told the world the sky isn't blue -- that there are hardly any mentions of Obama in Will's recent work.

He has gone after McCain, and that makes sense given Will's intellectual committment to conservatism --- but why in the world is he so silent in his column on Obama?

I'd have to guess that he is not repeatedly turning his sharp, intellectual knife on Obama - because he doesn't want to be considered a racist????

Then I listened yesterday to witness Hannity even refuse to point out the obvious with Powell's choice.  He highlighted how supporting Dole and Bush and then Obama did not make sense, but he said he'd let listeners make up their own minds on why the contradiction.

Have we become this cowed?  That intellectual dishonesty is the only honorable way? 

George Will

I suspect that George Will is so exasperated by the whole thing that he's working on the theory that if you have nothing positive to say, don't say anything. Will's most recent columns are more about individual human beings than events of the day. If this wasn't the two-minute warning time of the election season, you'd read his columns and be intrigued by them. But Will is likely echoing what Rush said after 2006: he's tired of carrying the water for these guys.

He's got to be feeling like a lot of us are feeling, summed up by the famous Casey Stengel remark: "Can't anyone here play this game?"

I can't buy that.  It's

I can't buy that.  It's possible, but doesn't seem to add up.

He has knocked McCain good and hard with his columns the last several weeks, but nothing (unless I missed it) on Obama.

Scanning his index, the articles are either about where McCain is wrong or those focuses on individuals or events far from the election issues.

Why?

It adds to Will's integrity that he has used his sharp knives to carve up McCain.  Will is consistently conservative even when that means going after Bush or going after McCain when McCain is behind in a close race.

But, it is utterly incomprehensible why he has not attacked Obama sharply and frequently.

Obama is Will's worst nightmare.  His policies make what Will hates about McCain look like selling points.

But why has Will held back?

I have to give serious consideration that he is afraid to be called a racist no matter how absurd that would be.  I have to believe he is holding back out of some form of political correctness - which I'd never thought I'd see out of Will.

George Will has gone after McCain because McCain's non-conservative policies.  How can he not continually go after Obama for his policies and his associations with radicals George Will would clearly detest.....???.... 

I support McCain because I'm from Mars--------

Does it occur to these people that maybe Rush supports McCain because he's better prepared for what it takes to be president. McCain's economic policies are in line with Rush's, along with his ideas on terrorism and how to fight the war without surrendering. Now tell me is Rush suppose to support Obama just because he's black, a lot of Americans do, are they racist? Has Barack done enough to prepare himself for the job of president? Barack comes across as one cool-cat-daddy, he's smooth, is that a qualification? Where did Obama in 47yrs. obtain his cred, hanging out with his motley group of friends? Again, tell me which of the most prominent of  his friends aren't anti-American, socialists, Marxist? You would think Colin Powell would be an excellent judge of character, right? Well, in this case it appears to Mr. Mendago, the good General is committed to his "black brother" without any thought to qualifications.
"Well I do declare Mr. Mendago you must be a racist".

And one more thing...

No one really knows Powell's politics.  However, claiming to be republican does imply a conservative inclination.  No one with ANY conservative inclination could vote for Obama based on who he is and what he believes in (except the most psycho "pro-choice" nazis).  So, it's fair to conclude that it's at least likely that there is a racial reason. 

Everyone knows exactly where Rush stands, he tells us every single weekday.

So, asking if Rush was voting for McCain because he is white is to either deny knowledge of Rush's politics, or to falsely and divisively introduce race as a factor.  i propose this was the latter.

 

Will Larry ever be so bold

Will Larry ever be so bold as to claim that most blacks are voting for Obama because he was raised (in order) by muslims, marxists, typical white people, illegal drugs, affirmative action, community organizers, Michelle, Reverend Wright, christianity, and the Chicago way (organized corruption)?

For Larry's comparison to

For Larry's comparison to have any validity, the Republican candidate would have to be black, and the Democrat white, and Rush would have to switch and support a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT over a black Republican.

But don't let that stand in the way of bashing a conservative.  

When asked if he went to war with Iraq  to derail the impeachment vote:  “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

 "Does that mean, Tom,

 "Does that mean, Tom, that Limbaugh's endorsement of McCain was because he was white?"

The better question is, would this make Rush a racist if it were true? 

 

Obama's Economic plan: more taxes, more spending, more regulation. Prosperity here we come.