When Karl Rove went on Fox and suggested former White House press secretary Scott McClellan sounded like a left-wing blogger in his book, he was hardly alone. Reporter Mike Allen of the Politico completely endorsed that view on a giddy Wednesday night "special edition"of MSNBC’s "Hardball" exploiting the McClellan book, even though he thought the valiant David Gregory yelling at a series of press secretaries proved them wrong. MRC’s Geoff Dickens sent me the transcript:
MIKE ALLEN, POLITICO: The other great power of this book is that it validates, as David [Gregory] said, these criticisms that have come from the liberal and left wing bloggers.
MATTHEWS: Right.
ALLEN: Most especially his point that the White House press corps was too deferential to this administration. David and I have fought back about those charges over the years. Largely because of the work of people like David Gregory it just wasn’t true. But now the left can say, "Even Scott McClellan says you guys were too easy on the Bushies."
MATTHEWS: Well let’s go right--
DAVID GREGORY: Yeah...
MATTHEWS: Go ahead David.
GREGORY: ...I mean this notion that somehow we were, we were too easy on him or in the run up to war, I mean it just doesn’t jibe with the kinds of things he was saying at the time--
MATTHEWS: Yeah.
GREGORY: –or, or, or, you know, it’s the idea that he’s, you know, was on a, a completely different plane during that whole time when you got, you got no sense of it. I think that’s a separate discussion but I don’t think that’s a, that’s a credible charge.
Matthews began the show with a long, enthusiastic summary of how much McClellan is endorsing the Chris Matthews viewpoint of the war in Iraq and the lying weals of the Bush team:
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Finally the whole dishonest case for war in Iraq and the Cheney-led cover-up. Can we handle the truth? Let’s play Hardball! Good evening, I’m Chris Matthews. Welcome to a "Hardball" special report, the selling of a war and the attack on its critics.
When I first heard the disclosures in Scott McClellan's new book, I thought of the scene in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington," when that corrupt senior senator runs on to the Senate floor yelling, "Everything he says is true!" For months and years now, "Hardball" told the two-part story of how the Iraq war was sold under the false pretense that Saddam Hussein posed a nuclear threat to the United States and that people in the Bush administration sought to destroy those who unmasked the plotting.
Here is Scott McClellan writing in, What Happened about Bush's quote, "Lack of candor and honesty in selling the Iraq war." Quote: "What drove Bush toward military confrontation more than anything else was an ambitious and idealistic post 9/11 vision of transforming the Middle East through the spread of freedom. This view was grounded in a philosophy of," catch this phrase, "coercive democracy." A belief that Iraq was ripe for conversion from a dictatorship into a beacon of liberty through the use of force. And a conviction that this could be achieved at nominal cost." McClellan said Bush and his neoconservative supporters in and out of the administration downplayed this motive and instead emphasized the threat of WMD and the possible link between Iraq and terrorism.
Quote, "The decision to downplay the democratic vision as a motive for war was basically a marketing choice. Bush and his advisers knew that the American people would almost certainly not support a war launched primarily for the ambitious purpose of transforming the Middle East."
Quote: "Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were evidently pursuing their own agendas. President Bush," however, "bears ultimate responsibility for the invasion of Iraq. He made the decision to invade and he signed off on a strategy for selling the war that was less than candid and honest."
Having described how the Bush administration sold the Iraq war on a dishonest basis, that Iraq posed a nuclear threat to the U.S., Scott McClellan describes how the administration then acted to protect the dishonest argument. He tells how top White House officials including Karl Rove and Scooter Libby leaked the CIA role of Joe Wilson’s wife Valerie, then how both men denied their action to his face, that’s Scott McClellan’s face, allowing him to tell that lie to the press and the public.
McClellan writes that the worst aspect of the whole story was the failure of the press to see through to the real horror of the Iraq war and the CIA leak case. So that’s the real horror exposed by Scott McClellan in the new book today. That an American aversion to foreign entanglements, passed down from George Washington himself, was so easily and tragically overturned by George W. Bush.
Later in the show, Newsweek’s Howard Fineman pleased Matthews by explaining how the McClellan book will help Obama against McCain, even though McClellan has no real connection to McCain. It undercuts McCain’s attack on Obama’s lack of foreign-policy experience:
Obama can answer back, as he did yesterday and today, "Hey don’t lecture me about foreign policy experience and defense experience. You were sold this war and you bought it hook, line and sinker on propagandist, misleading arguments." And that’s exactly what, that’s exactly what Obama is saying.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The most laughable charge by Mclellan
June 1, 2008 - 08:04 ET by Dee Bunkis that the media were to easy on Bush. That is what proves that he is in with the left wing nut jobs.
Has anyone ever said what questions they should have asked that they didn't? No - they just repeat this nonsensical blather over and over.
He Wrote from The Left Because he had to
June 1, 2008 - 08:21 ET by bias-fighterSoros Publisher 'Shaped' McClellan's Hit Job: Other publishers don't recognize it as the same book
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/soros_publisher_shaped_mcclell.html
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30118_The_Soros-McClellan_Connection
McClellan's Publisher (tied to Soros) Required 'Integrity & Candor,' Not Bush Defense
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2008/05/30/mcclellans-publisher-required-integrity-candor-not-bush-defense
McCain Responds, "Obama, you bought defeat hook line and sinker"
June 1, 2008 - 08:19 ET by bias-fighter"You were sold this war and you bought it hook, line and sinker on propagandist, misleading arguments"
McCain wins. So did 70% of Congress. So did Bill Clinton when he bombed Iraq in 1999. Dems went around saying the same things Bush did from 1998-2003. Moreover, Obama has a credibility issue on this anyway, he has statements from back in the say suggesting he would've went along with it.
Nonetheless, McCain retorts, well, you bought Al Qeada's propaganda and bought defeat hook, line and sinker. You said the surge would not reduce the violence no matter how many troops we added. You were wrong. I was right. I'd rather be on the right side of victory than on the wrong side of defeat. Now go back to your racist church, the gig is up kid.
I think the MSM just figured something out
June 1, 2008 - 08:50 ET by WingletDriverIf the MSM wants to tout McClellan's book as the gospel truth (even though they don't belive in the Gospel or truth), then they are indicted as unprofessional fools. The folks who have read the book don't really seem that impressed with it. I'll bet you anything that Chris Matthews has not read the book--just the excerpts from WaPo.
"That an American aversion to foreign entanglements, passed down from George Washington himself, was so easily and tragically overturned by George W. Bush" - Chris Matthews
Maybe somebody should hand Chris Matthews a history book. Although it is true that Washington didn't want entaglements with France, he wasn't averse to "foreign entanglements" per se. If Matthews was using this term as a euphemism for foreign war, then he is ignoring Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe.
In fact Matthews assertion that Bush somehow ignored American tradition by fighting a foreign war ignores Democrat icons like FDR (Germany did not attack the US, but we declared war on them), Harry Truman (Korean War), JFK (Bay of Pigs, Vietnam), Jimmy Carter (sent aid to anti-USSR Afghanis), and Bill Clinton (Yugoslvia, Persian Gulf).
Will McLellan Testify?
June 1, 2008 - 09:19 ET by pbthinkerI think it's going to be funny, if Scotty boy has to testify before Congress. Talk about tap-dancing around a perjury charge, Scotty will have to justify what's in his book vs. the truth.
Somehow I picture another group of "deer in the headlights" looks from Scotty. Funny thing is, I doubt anyone will say the words Executive Priviledge to stop him from testifying. If only Bush had supported his mommy for governor!
Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.
Pelosi: Mr. McClellan, you
June 1, 2008 - 09:32 ET by FoolicanPelosi: Mr. McClellan, you do admit that Bush did willfully commit war crimes against humanity?
Scotty: I admit that he did make some mistakes.
Pelosi: That's not the question. We all know he made mistakes. Do you admit, under oath, that the president committed war crimes?
Scotty: If evidence were to rise that Bush had committed war crimes, I would not in any way be surprised.
Pelosi: Okay, let me put it this way - is President Bush still committing war crimes against the Iraqis and the Palestinians?
Scotty: Not to my knowledge, no.
Pelosi: Meeting adjourned.
Anyone wanna Compare MSM coverage of McClellan vs McCain?
June 1, 2008 - 12:51 ET by JayTeeI think it's an Embarrassment for the MSM to be (to my knowledge) Giving More coverage/face time, to McClellan, than to the Republican Presidential Candidate.
It's embarassing......certainly the BOOK HAS to sell with all this Free coverage.
Problem is, anyone watching the MSM the last few Years, will Feel they've been Had by the current MSM Hype...as there is nothing new within the covers, only an Instant Replay of old news, and exposing the Lie that McClellan lived in the Whitehouse. . . which means, the Book is NOT new News. A waste of Money.
Frankly the less coverage
June 1, 2008 - 13:03 ET by fitzfongFrankly the less coverage McCain gets, the better his chances are in November.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
Scott McClellan must be
June 1, 2008 - 12:59 ET by fitzfongScott McClellan must be some kind of masochist. For all the demeaning public floggings he was subjected to, he still suggests that the media was too easy on him? Wow. Better check his credit card statements, we might have another Elliot Spitzer on our hands.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
Revisionism
June 1, 2008 - 13:24 ET by usinkoreaIt is a sad commentary on where American society is at that the media could even begin to make this glaring example of revisionist history-making: that they were "soft" on Bush before and in the early stages of the war.
Next, they will be telling us they were soft on Newt Gingrich when he and the Republicans regained control of the House.
If God does a redo, he needs to include in human DNA a code that causes the head to pop when the mind rebells so far against reason...