I disagree with FOX on this one.

They should have left the video up. We should be able to see this creature in action. The bad behavior of journalist is as much news as many videos they leave up.

Secondly they should have fired her. Not suspended her.

I'm sure this poor man went through hell. And hope he's doing well. 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

I find it highly ironic this broad was doing an ambush of her own with shots to the gut.

Words can cause real harm, too, correct? Isn't this what these whiners say all the time?

I like Fox news, but I hate it when guys like O'Reilly send their attack dogs out to harass people, even if they have done something wrong. This, IMHO, is not the function of a news organization. What's the difference between this and having your government harass you? Is privacy not a right? This stinks. I'd know they'd be arrested , but I'd love to see someone turn around and deck one of these creeps. There needs to be a check on "journalists"; it's out of hand.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

 This guy is my 2nd Amendment hero for the week.  The reporterette is the 1st Amendment LOSER of the week.  JERK!

"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."  Hillary Clinton, 6-28-04 San Francisco

This is a shameless, disgraceful attack and FOX 4 News should fire Aguilar and the producer who approved this ambush piece.

To answer one question, no, the burglars were both white.

And who wants to take bets on how long it takes the Hispanic community to protest her suspension, because the station is racist?

Reporters seem to think they are special and should be treated as special protected species. Since they love transparency what we need to do to hold them accountable is publish their addresses, license plates/etc. Should that happen, all of a sudden reporters will realize that actions have consequences.

Understanding that Ms. Aguilar has an obvious anti-gun agenda, I still find it hard to comprehend why it's so difficult for these incredible nincompoops to grasp that if these two losers (and the 38 other ones who got away) didn't violate another person's property in commission of a crime, they wouldn't have been shot. And if the cops could function in other than a reactive mode, people wouldn't have to defend themselves. Unfortunately, people DO break into other people's property, and cops generally can't do anything until a crime has already been committed. Until both of these situations change, home/property owners will (rightly) shoot and kill criminals. 

"Are you a trigger happy person? Is that what you wanted to do; shoot to kill?" It is kind of difficult to "wound" with a shotgun. And someone breaking into a 70 year-old's home/business in the middle of the night isn't there for tea and biscuits. Makes me wonder how many of the previous 38 break-ins were committed by these same two thugs?

As for myself, I grew up being taught that "if you're going to pull a gun on someone, you'd better be willing to shoot them. And if you're willing to shoot them, you'd better be willing to kill them" (and I am) - my father. 

Anyone who is willing to put their own lives at risk to steal what I worked for, and possibly willing to hurt or kill me or mine, had BETTER understand that their life expectency is extremely low when they break in to my property. If someone wants what I have, they have two choices:

1. WORK FOR IT!

or,

2. Pay me for it.

Try to take it, the question that begs asking - Is it worth your life?

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

The lasted news report that I heard was that Rebbecca was suspended indefinitely. No news on if the person that decided it should be aired is also suspended or not.

Ever since Texas got the castle doctrine, the local media has been trying their best to make anyone that defends themselves out to be trigger happy killers.

The man did not want to be interviewed or to be on camera, just defend himself and his business from criminals. It's a shame that the media does not care to respect his privacy.

This interview reminds me of O'Reilly sending out his nitwit producer to accost people...

I have already sent a comment to iteam@kdfwfox4.com. Glad to see this covered here on NewsBusters! My 1st post here from a long time reader!

On the news every week you see someone missing or dead by the hands of criminals. Not their fault, but due to timing, police can only take reports most of the time. Very little justice and a little too late to make that critical difference: Surviving. The system is NOT working.

Walton did us all a favor by reducing the dangerous criminal population. In this case, dangerous meaning someone willing to break in to an occupied property. Otherwise, it could have been our family NEXT.

Criminals choose not to work for a living; they don't need OSHA protection, but some buckshot. Make that a short lived career; not a lifestyle.

In all probability, based on her biased reporting angle (vs. being factual), Rebecca Aguilar may well be Pro-Abortion. If so, I guess it is OK to kill babies but not career criminals? Would she like someone blocking her door asking her that?

Why are minority females so nasty to European-American males? Is it because they know that, unlike their own men, European-American pansies are unlikely to give them the beating that they so richly deserve? Or are they angry because European-American men know better than to hit on them?

Bee Blogger
Ten Reforms That Will Save America