David Gregory Wrongly Says Media Have Not Questioned Palin as Unfit Mother

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

David Gregory, On Wednesday's "Today," NBC reporter David Gregory, against all evidence, suggested that the media have not questioned whether Sarah Palin will be able to balance being both vice president and a mother. Referencing a earlier interview in which McCain surrogate Rudy Giuliani attacked reporters for doing exactly that, Gregory huffed, "That question has not been brought up by the media." "Today" co-host Meredith Vieira parroted, "Exactly."

However, on August 30, "Good Morning America" weekend co-host Bill Weir challenged a McCain spokesman: "Adding to the brutality of a national campaign, the Palin family also has an infant with special needs. What leads you, the Senator, and the Governor to believe that one won't affect the other in the next couple of months?" On August 29, CNN "Newsroom" anchor John Roberts sniffed, "The role of Vice President, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child."

Also on August 29, the Washington Post's Sally Quinn whined in a column, "Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job?...Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?" Not only have members of the media discussed this subject, they've done so repeatedly and with great enthusiasm. So, is David Gregory somehow unaware of this fact or was he simply being disingenuous?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The segment which prompted Gregory's inaccuracy was a contentious interview with Rudy Giuliani. During that piece, the former New York mayor ripped into media coverage of Palin. After Vieira complained, "He [McCain] has always been known as a maverick, but also as somebody who can veer towards the reckless side. Some see this as a decision that was made in haste, I.E., reckless," Giuliani let loose on what he saw as sexism:

RUDY GIULIANI: I think that he selected a person who is one of our more distinguished governors. I think the fact that there is a woman on the Republican ticket has got the media in a- in a tizzy and they are asking questions they would never ask if there were a man there, including the question that I mentioned about whether, you know, she's going to have enough time to be- to be vice president and be a mother. Never asked a man that, ever. And I think the language they've pried into her personal life, honestly, my own opinion, it's indecent and disgusting and they should leave her daughter alone.

A transcript of the September 3 segment, which aired at 7:07am, and later Gregory exchange, follow:

MEREDITH VIEIRA: Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was Senator McCain's rival during the presidential primaries this year and he is scheduled to speak at the convention tonight. Good morning to you, Mr. Mayor. Nice to see you.

RUDY GIULIANI: Good morning, Meredith. How are you?

VIEIRA: Let's- I'm fine, thank you. Let's talk about the vetting process when it comes to Governor Palin. Because there have been so many questions raised. McCain camp says she was thoroughly scrutinized. Washington Post today is reporting that she wasn't, really throughly questioned until the day before she was selected. You've been in politics a long time. Does that sound like a thorough vetting to you?

GIULIANI: Well, how would I know? I mean, you'd have to know what the questions were before they were asked.

VIEIRA: But the day before, selected, is day they sat down with her? That's coming from the McCain camp. That isn't something we invented.

GIULIANI: Well, first of all, it really depends on how many questions she was asked. If you're asking me if what has come out indicates there wasn't a thorough vetting, I'd say, no. Everything that's come out is almost silly. I mean, the whole thing about her daughter should just be off limits in the first place. I mean, that's just absurd for that to be some kind of a major, major issue. Unfortunately --

VIEIRA: Well, I think it only became a major issue because of the way that it came out. It's not so much about the pregnancy.

GIULIANI: What are you supposed to do? Announce it on the day you become the candidate? You're supposed to say, my daughter is pregnant and is she is going to get married. I mean, it's absurd the way that's been painted. This is a non-issue. The idea that -- the question she's been asked, you should find totally offensive. Questions like, can you be a mother and a vice president? Do they ever ask Barack Obama can you be a father and a president?

VIEIRA: What about the questions whether you have enough experience to be vice president?

GIULIANI: Of course that's a valid question. I'm talking about the ones that aren't valid. Of course that's a valid question. Of course she has enough experience. She's been a mayor and a governor. The day she became mayor, the first day she severed in office, she had more experience than Joe Biden and Barack Obama combined. She has-

VIEIRA: And then Senator McCain as well. He has no executive experience.

GIULIANI Senator McCain ran a military unit. I remember the debates when he explained his responsibilities in the military. He's led men in battle. He's had the responsibility of the lives of men in his hands.

VIEIRA: Do you- Let me ask you-

GIULIANI: Joe Biden has never had that. Barack Obama has never had that. She's been a governor of a state. She's one of our most successful governors right now. She is the most popular governor in the United States.

VIEIRA: Mayor, give me an example that has laid it to rest for you, where you have seen her, some executive decision she has made that convinces you she should be a heart beat away from the presidency?

GIULIANI: Going after the sitting governor of Alaska who was a Republican, going after the Republican chairman and throwing him out, taking on corruption head-on. Something I did when I was a United States attorney. I know how tough it is. This woman has got what it takes. She took on corruption in the Republican Party not just in the Democratic Party. She stood up to big oil. She has got accomplishments in her years in office that match the accomplishments that some two-term governors have and sometimes exceeded.

VIEIRA: So, what do you say to the people who are questioning the judgment of McCain in selecting her? He has always been known as a maverick, but also as somebody who can veer towards the reckless side. Some see this as a decision that was made in haste, I.E., reckless.

GIULIANI: I think that he selected a person who is one of our more distinguished governors. I think the fact that there is a woman on the Republican ticket has got the media in a- in a tizzy and they are asking questions they would never ask if there were a man there, including the question that I mentioned about whether, you know, she's going to have enough time to be- to be vice president and be a mother. Never asked a man that, ever. And I think the language they've pried into her personal life, honestly, my own opinion, it's indecent and disgusting and they should leave her daughter alone.

VIEIRA: What does she have to say tonight to quiet the questions around her? What- This is the biggest speech of her lifetime, potentially.

GIULIANI: I'm not going to get to write her speech. If I were giving her speech I'd talk about what she's done as governor, as mayor, how she's taken on big oil and won, two battles and won them. Taken on Republican entrenched politicians who were unethical, or alleged to be unethical, turned that all around. How she's lowered the spending in Alaska by 15 to 20 percent already. I was a mayor, all the tough decisions I made were made in the first year I that I was in office. It's the key to being a good mayor, a good governor, a good president. She made all those tough decisions within the last year, year and a half.

VIEIRA: You're going to be speaking tonight as well. I don't know-- She'll probably get a little more attention, but -- That's okay's she's- she's- she's the vice presidential candidate of our party. My job is to just explain my friendship for John McCain and why I think he should be president of the United States.

GIULIANI: All right. Nice to see you.

7:22am

DAVID GREGORY: The issue has been for them changing the subject, getting it off the vetting and, frankly, going and taking on the media. Suggesting that it's their opponents in the Democratic Party and the media that are somehow panicked by her.

VIEIRA: Well, that's what Fred Thompson was sort of saying.

GREGORY: And, by the way, I mean, I think it's important to point out, Rudy Giuliani said questions have been asked about whether she can balance this with her kids. That question has not been brought up by the media.

VIEIRA: Oh, exactly. All right. David, thank you.

GREGORY: Yeah.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

lies

Since the line about her being unable to work and raise children fell flat, it's gone down the memory hole. Off to find more effective attacks.

and of course, no one ever

and of course, no one ever said that she was negligent even before the birth, by flying home, right?

This is like politicians when they change their minds and say "It's always been my position...."

They are just so cute, aren't they?

"So, is David Gregory

"So, is David Gregory somehow unaware of this fact or was he simply being disingenuous?"

No, more precisely, he knows and is now lying.

I'm sorry, is she actually running for President or VP, does Meredith Viera, the Mighty Marvelous Feminist know this.

SHE IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT YOU MORONS, HOWEVER, BARRY IS!

Has so much ink ever been spilled for a VP candidate? Am I missing something here?

LOL

benrand

When a presidential candidate waits until sub-90 days before the election to announce a vice presidential candidate, it's going to make news. Obama made news with Biden, however, we are familiar with Biden and his shortcomings/strengths through his 20 plus years of national representation. We know where he falls flat and we know where he is strong. However, it would be disingenuous for me to claim that I knew anything about Palin before last week. I have many questions about why my candidate overstepped clearly qualified individuals (Romney, Pawlenty, etc--names we are, and have had a chance to become familiar with) for a veritable unknown. This irritates me, and I want all questions answered.  I think that that's a fair position to hold.  If she lacks judgment, parenting initiative, or is not indeed a maverick (as it is becoming apparent that she is not), I want to know.  I'm not going to dive in quite yet.

EireNua, If, after

EireNua,

If, after becoming familiar with her strengths/shortcomings, you find her unacceptable, who will you vote for, if anyone?

Do our country's explicitly written qualifications to be elected President/Vice-President need to be updated in your opinion?

Karma

I see your point. For me, national security is my number one issue. I agree with both Biden and McCain on many of the issues. For instance, Biden has accurately asserted that Iraq can no longer exist as Iraq. There was no Iraq before British colonialism and there can be no Iraq after Saddam Hussein. I agree with the proposal of a three state system, but there are MAJOR problems with this proposal (namely, ensuring access to enough resources as to provide stability in the region). I'm not sure how feasible this plan is, but at least it's a directions. I also agree with McCain in that to achieve any type of objective in Iraq, we cannot leave now. It breaks my heart, but it is absolutely true. The only reason I take issue with Palin is that moreso than in past elections, there is a chance that Palin could very well become president. McCain is old, and has suffered from cancer twice. So moreso than Biden, I worry about the logistics of her taking charge...you're right though. I do not have much of a choice.

Feels Good But Not Good

Biden and you are dangerously wrong.  The oil is in one section of the country.  That means one of your new "states" will have all the wealth while the other (excluding the Kurds in this equation for heightened effect) will wither, leading to one conclusion always borne out by history:  war and increased prominence of Iran in the region.

By keeping Iraq stabilized, the oil wealth can be shared by all citizens.  Exactly the same as trade between nations helps to prevent war, so will oil profit sharing help keep shiites and sunnis from war.

Biden was and still is dangerously wrong.

My post below responds to your comments/questions about Biden and Palin.

RRAM Tough! 

Karma

Karma,

Do you see where I'm coming from?

Yes, EireNua.

I see where you're coming from.

I am both socially and fiscally conservative. Not being socially conservative normaly requires a larger government, and taxes, to feed the beast and it's programs. I just find it hard to understand those who are for one without the other. That is just one of the reasons I support Palin.

I love it

"This irritates me, and I want all questions answered."

If it irritates you, just think how irritated the Democrats are since they, like you, assumed they knew whom McCain would pick. All the senseless questions they are asking (who's the daddy? How can she care for her, and her daughter's, baby? Is she qualified to be CinC?) proves just how unprepared they, and you, really were. By picking a relative "unknown" (although I don’t know how anyone can call a Governor an unknown, other than the fact that her name was never mentioned in the press) McCain has tossed a wrench into the Democratic attack machine and they are now exposing themselves to be what they really are; a bunch of ill prepared, under qualified, incessant whiners and bigots.

Three cheers to McCain with his pick, it's tossed everyone's expectations of him out of the preverbal window and show us all who will REALLY bring Change to America! Well played, Mr. McCain, well played indeed!

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

First, Biden has been in

First, Biden has been in the Senate for 35 years, since 1973 when Nixon was president.

Second, what are Biden's accomplisments for a 35 year history of governance?

Third, over Biden's career, what accolades and positions of power and honor have his fellow Democrats bequeathed to Joe?  Pelosi, Murtha and Reid have advanced further, why?

Fourth, presidential candidates choose VP candidates to obtain votes primarily and someone they can work in tandem secondarily.  For instance, Kennedy felt compelled to choose LBJ to get the Southern vote, though they truly did not like one another.  PopTech has talked about "demographics" and "accomplishment" and completely misses the point in choosing a VP - to get votes.  Palin secures the Republican base.  She also will help with a few Independent votes, though McCain works that angle already.

Fifth, the other folks you mention for VP were obviously discussed and found not as helpful in getting McCain elected.  It would be foolish to assume otherwise.  I doubt McCain's plan is to lose the election.  Bottomline, the most "qualified" (in each of our opinion's) do not always advance.  (see point above about Pelosi, Reid and Murtha as well as Obama)

Sixth, which among us have not had family or relatives that have not had Palin family occurences?  I wish certain things had not happened in my own family, but we all learn to adjust and live on.  Because Palin and her family are human does not lower my opinion of her well established accomplishments made all the more spectactular in the shorter time she has been an executive.  The woman is sane political action embodied.  She walks the talk.  I have no doubt she will continue to champion smart and honest governance as Vice President.

Nicely stated, strat

Spot on. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Gregory is right. They haven't directly asked the question.

They have gone out of their way, though, to insinuate it and imply it, but haven't directly asked it. Of course that is the standard of cowards. never ever confront directly when you can start rumors and innuendos.

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Right, c5...it all depends

Right, c5...it all depends on what the meaning of "ask" is.....

The "media"

Last night I saw that the McCain camp cancelled an interview with CNN's Larry King after one of its "jounalists" had attacked with innuendo a McCain representative the night before. The girl simply wouldn't accept that Sarah Palin was in charge of the National Guard. She tried so hard for a "gotcha" moment. CNN aired the interview again, then all the talking heads bobbed up and down as the reporter played innocent. "I was just trying to get information", she whined with a sickening smile. This is the "liberal" in action--do the dirty deed, then smile and deny. Shakespeare said it best, "Smile and smile and be a VILLAIN!". The left-wing media has an Constitutional obligation not to do this. The question must be asked: Why are they doing this? America desrves so much better than having belly crawling snakes run the "media".

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

iveseenitall

Could you cite the constitutional obligation?

This matter has it's own

This matter has it's own thread- our dutiful editors have noticed.  There's not much that they miss!

These clowns must really

These clowns must really think the public is stupid.  I will bet that after this election that the MSM media will pay a heavy price.  I know how about the Fairness Doctrine for Public and Cable TV! 

Is anyone else not irritated

Is anyone else not irritated that McCain did this? I get the feeling that McCain thinks WE are stupid...why do Palin's credentials when compared to other viable options not irritate anyone else?! I want my darn party back!

Not irritated

Rather, I'm proud McCain made the right choice. 

Rocky & Bullwinkle '08

Cool Arrow

Well, you are most certainly entitled to your opinion and I'm happy in your (qualified?) confidence in Palin, however, she does nothing for my state of PA (a MUST win for McCain), a state where both Romney and Pawlenty had high approval ratings in opinion polls. So, to me, it seems as though McCain did very little research and was merely reacting to an impulse to court Shrillary's jilted constituents...this move could very well cost McCain an election he should win, and that irritates me. You saying you are proud he made the right decision shows that you do not understand the dynamic of my state, a state we must win.

Eire

I wouldn't surrender your State at all.

We are invested into McCain.  That's not going to change.  I don't think Romney brings in Pennsylvania either. 

But you're right.  Texas doesn't know that much about Pennsylvania except it is the birthplace of the Oil business. 

Rocky & Bullwinkle '08

I think Palin has a good

I think Palin has a good chance to draw Pennsylvanians...you know, those pro-life, pro-gun, blue-collar folks. The Pennsylvanians I talk to are not swayed by Biden's "I was born in Scranton!" scam.

motherbelt

I hear what you're saying, but proportionately speaking that is not Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is not a party-line conservative state. Conservatives where I live are largely pro-gun control because of violence in our cities. Pro-life is fifty fifty between moderate conservatives, and the blue collar folks loved Hillary because she was pro-union, pro-universal healthcare (or whatever she wanted to call it). Furthermore, Palin has a huge weakness in her anti-evolution/pro-intelligent design in public schools stance which was thoroughly put down in PA by conservative intellectuals. We boast some of the strongest public schools in the nation and we do not want their reputation compromised. I am a states rights person, and I first and foremost care about my state. Palin is going to have difficulty fitting our mold. The population you described takes up alot of surface area, but is numerically small in PA.

 ...pro-gun control

 ...pro-gun control because of violence in our cities.

Well, then your folks learn real slow. Gun control causes an increase in gun violence. Ask Washington DC. The more gun control they had, the higher the murder rate went.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

motherbelt

We would have loved to see Tom Ridge. He was a great governor who was an effective bi-partisan moderate with fiscally conservative sensibilities. He would have been great.

Eire...I am not suprised at

Eire...I am not suprised at all at the Palin pick. I was saying before her name ever came up that she should be the one picked. I dont think there is anyone here at NB's that was completely unfamiliar with Palin. Palin has demonstrated at a state level, her leadership abilities. She should well be afforded the time to demonstrate her national leadership abilities. Her state borders Russia and Canada. Alaska is a state that is surrounded by other nations, other peoples. She has dealt with these neighbors. This is more than Obama has done, in its self. This is a woman that is the chief executive of a state, some 20 miles from Russia. She has to have something on the ball to win a majority of votes in the entire state. Obama won a majority of votes in one district in one state. She is already ahead of Obama in experience.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Me too!

I want my party back too!

Mrs. Palin is a step in that direction. None of the other names on the list were.

MSM Reasons why Palin shouldn't be VP

She has too many children
She does not have enough children
She has a downs syndrome child
She did not abort the downs syndrome child
She has a daughter who is pregnant
She's not pretty enough
She's too pretty
She too much of a woman
She's not woman enough
She's too much of a mom
She's not enough of a mother

Tell ya what, folks, I'm just going to step back and let these fools figure out how to attack her because just having them try to figure this out has been a great comic relief from everyday life.  I'll tune in when they actually have something they can teach me about the candidate.

A very wise individual once

A very wise individual once told me that when you get attacked by both ends of the argument (e.g. "too much" AND "too little"), it means that you are perfectly positioned.

Hillary's Village is the Answer

If Hillary can just establish her village, all children, even the VP's disabled child, can be indoctrinated, errr, cared for.

What do you expect.....?

The media has spent years earning the title 'Lame Stream Media' and it fits more today than ever. This time the slander and slime is backfiring big time. McCain/Palin are gaining millions of votes from people who have never voted republican and from those of  'us' who had planned to sit out this election cycle. I won't be voting for McCain but I will be voting for Palin because she has to be something to scare the left wing anti-americans so bad.

Her ten years of executive experience pales when compared to Hussein O's '0' days in an executive position. (sarc) He has been a resident of the dog pound all of his life and never the lead dog.

 

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Constitutional rights...

The constitution gives the media the right to publish the 'News'. Court decisions have held them responsible for the slime and slander when they lose they're way and resort to outright lies. Politicians don't normally file lawsuits against the media but this is one case that will be a sure winner in any court of law, other than a left wing liberal court which seldom obeys the law, but violates the constitution by 'making law'.  Liberal anti-american 9th Circus court anyone. They lose more appeals than all the other courts combined because they think it is they're right to make law which is a congressional right only.

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

scrapiron

I don't know if you're analysis is true at all. Name a single constitutional decision that held a news outlet responsible for reporting the 'news' as you put it....especially private media outlets like CNN or FOX. And, regardless, news organizations are protected by the First Amendment as applied by the states to the Fourteenth Amendment...see Duncan v. Louisiana and the principle of total incorporation.

It's only been five days!

With the incessant barrage of insults dropped on Governor Palin, as Barack Hussein Obama remains untouchable, I know that McCain made the right choice for VP.

When the MSM is more interested in Governor Palin than with people who thought a natural disaster was a blessing ... then I know that the left is damned and destined to lose. 

 

So the liberals are

So the liberals are labeling as 'unfit' any mother who isn't available 24/7 for the care of their child.  I wonder how women like Amy Klobuchar, with a child who was three when she was elected to public office the first time and will be going to the Senate as her daughter enters her teen years, feels about being associated with a party and belief system that thinks she is second class at best.

Ha! Ha!  Just kidding.  The flagship of modern liberalism, the NYT, has no problem with Ms. Klobuchar, labeling her one of the 17 women most likey to be the first female president.

But seriously, all the Hollywood mothers campaigning for the Dems this year should realize how they are viewed behind the scenes.   

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

Sarah

Sarah can handle a moose so I am sure she can handle the jackasses at the DNC, the networks, and the MSM.  Advice to them all "hang on, it's going to be a bumpy ride"- Jimmy Neutron.

Handling the jackass will be

Handling the jackass will be easier- no antlers to worry about.

I don''t remember the

I don''t remember the liberal media asking Nancy Pelosi if she could handle her job while taking care of five children.  If she was a Dim, they would love her.  Because she is a Republican they want to destroy her.   The liberal media has gone beyond disgusting and it's going to backfire.  I am looking forward to hearing Ms. Palin tonight and I'm sure she will be wonderful.  No matter what she says expect the liberal media to get down in the gutter.

Two Words

I can sum up the Main Stream media in two words.

Scum Bags

And for those not familiar with the word:

scum bag

noun

a person who is deemed to be despicable or contemptible; "only a rotter would do that"; "kill the rat"; "throw the bum out"; "you cowardly little pukes!"; "the British call a contemptible person a 'git'" 

WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.

It's literal meaning is far

It's literal meaning is far nastier- thanks for not publishing it!

Sally Quinn v/s Peggy Noonan

Sally, "Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at
three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice
will she make?"

Peggy, "And leave her kid alone, bitch."

Damn! That KO had to be a record! Peggy beat her down in like, 23 seconds. Gosh, is there any woman that can dethrone the Champ? What's that? Noonan couldn't beat a man? Well, we will just have to see about that, won't we?

4-0

Up next.....

If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love youBut if you really make them think, they'll hate you.

Don Marquis 1878-1937

How does this reasoning affect the women in combat issue?

Mothers are away from their children more months, if not years at a time when they are deployed.

Since the left now cares so much, I guess they will be prohibiting all women from serving in the military?

Hey CPTClaw... Excellent

Hey CPTClaw...

Excellent crucial POINT!

I hope some on the right in the msm whether it is congress critters or some others that can get on with the talking heads that read NBs take your talking point cue here and run with it..it is a great ONE!

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I'm with ya, bt.

Well done CPT!

Start the countdown now to see how long before that talking point is picked up. Not long at all, I'm guessin.

 

If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love youBut if you really make them think, they'll hate you.

Don Marquis 1878-1937

McCain certainly has thrown

McCain certainly has thrown a monkey wrench into the MSM worship and adoration service of Hussein. Ever seen a henhouse when a fox gets in?