"Good Morning America" co-host Chris Cuomo used an interview with Geraldo Rivera on Tuesday to once again showcase his liberal views on illegal immigration. Touting the Fox News host's new book "His Panic," Cuomo gushed over the "beautiful" title and immediately accepted the premise of the book by stating, "But it is about why Americans fear Hispanics in the U.S.--You believe to be the case."
Later in the segment, he again dropped any objectivity and opined, "There is a lot of history, a lot of fact in this book. Interesting in a discussion that's usually fueled by passion--" In comparison, the host offered no such accolades to Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo, a foe of illegal immigration. During a June 2007 interview with the then-presidential candidate, Cuomo asked if Tancredo, who fought for tough border security bills, was "driving anti-immigrant sentiment?" He also chided Tancredo for using "scary" words in regard to the contentious subject.
During the February 26 segment with Rivera, Cuomo asked a single question from the conservative perspective. (He pointed out to the FNC host that previous waves of immigrants came to the America legally.) However, the GMA anchor never seriously discussed negative aspects to illegal immigration, such as the national security threat that comes with an open border. (The only mention of terrorism came in a derisive comment about baseless fear. On opposition to such immigration, Cuomo dismissively wondered, "Is it fear? Is it fear of terrorism, fear of the unknown?")
Instead, Cuomo provided leading queries, such as when he played a clip of Rivera's famous April 2007 immigration debate with FNC anchor Bill O'Reilly. Cuomo followed up by asking, in a completely perplexed tone, "Why the passion? Why the paradox here?" Returning to his editorialist mode, the ABC host expounded, "America is about who is in it more than any other country in the world, about the diversity. But so much anger and passion on this issue. Why?"
Cuomo also allowed Rivera to take a shot at CNN host Lou Dobbs, who he insisted, "has resurrected a failed career on the backs of [immigrants.]" The GMA anchor closed the segment with the kind of comment that could end up as a blurb on the book's dust jacket: "The book is called 'His Panic.' A lot in here of fact and history in here. Takes the argument forward."
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 8:33am on February 26, follows:
CHRIS CUOMO: We're going to talk today about one of the most pressing issues that's going on in this election. It's the debate over immigration. Who's coming into this country? Who do we allow? Who do we want to be? Geraldo Rivera, we know he's won a lot of awards, but this may be his most ambitious project. The book is called "His Panic," Hispanic. A beautiful play on words. But it is about why Americans fear Hispanics in the U.S. --You believe to be the case. Geraldo, a pleasure as always to have you here.
GERALDO RIVERA: Chris.
ABC GRAPHIC: Flash point: Immigration: Are Immigrant Fears Being Stoked?
CUOMO: Let us set the context. Where do you think we are vis-a-vis this issue? What is the atmosphere right now?
RIVERA: I think we're back where we always are when a different wave of immigrants comes into the country. You know, the Irish, the Italians, the Germans, the European Jews. If you read the news accounts from those days back to the 19th century, you see that he immigrants come, there's a nativist reaction to them. They get blamed from everything from crime to disease, to terror. And then they become assimilated and the next group comes. And there's a maddening tendency, I think, from the group that's in to burn the bridge behind them. And I think that's what is happening with Hispanics now.
CUOMO: Deal with the obvious counter point, which is the difference is, when the Italians came over, my grandparents came here, they did it legally. A lot of this Immigration is happening illegally, puts them on different footing from the beginning. They should be dealt differently. They are not supposed to be here.
RIVERA: The fact of the matter is, Chris, when the Irish came there was no immigration law. So, everybody was legal. When they established Ellis Island, after they excluded the Chinese, and they established Ellis Island for European immigrants, you had a golden period of immigration. The last 25 years of the 19th century, the first 25 years of the 20th century, basically anybody could come as long as they were not a convict, prostitute or had infectious diseases. That's when the Italians came. That's when the Germans came. That's when you had this massive immigration. But, then they passed these laws, the National Origin Act of 1924 that gave all of the visas to, basically, the people of United Kingdom and Scandinavia. The Italians then were reduced to three percent of all the visas, Mexicans and other Latin Americans got zero. That's when they cut off legal immigration there. It's unfair to say that your forbearers were legal while mine were not, because, now, there is no system. There was never an Ellis Island for the Mexicans.
CUOMO: The rules change. There is a lot of history, a lot of fact in this book. Interesting in a discussion that's usually fueled by passion-- To look at it this way, Geraldo versus O'Reilly on this issue. Ordinarily colleagues in balance. But this got to be a hot moment. Let's look at where this book came from.
[Brief clip of famous O'Reilly/Rivera debate.]
CUOMO: [Off of the clip] "I want to take you out and do something to you." I've had that said to me by Geraldo before and it's not pleasant. Why the passion? Why the paradox here? America is about who is in it more than any other country in the world. About the diversity. But so much anger and passion on this issue. Why?
RIVERA: Well, what got me going there is this tendency to blame -- to highlight every illegal act done by any person here without, without documentation. An illegal alien ran over a girl. An illegal alien killed someone. An illegal alien ate my sandwich. You know, the problem with doing that is you stereotype them, you paint them in a corner. You portray them-- Here's a story in the Wall Street Journal today, Chris, today's story, tiny story, immigrants on average are far less likely than U.S.-born citizens to commit crime in California, a study found. You'll never see this story on cable TV.
CUOMO: Is it fear? Is it fear of terrorism, fear of the unknown?
RIVERA: I think what you have is you have commentator playing on that fear. People like Lou Dobbs at CNN who has resurrected a failed career on the backs of these people. And you have no one speaking up for the underdog. That's what I'm trying to do here. To tell people slow down. This is part of the same process that made the country unique in the world. Let's harness this hybrid vigor. This is the country for the 21st century. We're all in this together. Be compassionate. Of course you need regulation, of course you need control. But I think what you can't do is scapegoat.
CUOMO: Well, certainly the reality, that the Latino presence, the Hispanic presence in this country is here to stay. It's growing all of the time. Thank you for getting me in trouble with Lou Dobbs, Appreciate that, Geraldo.
RIVERA [Laughs]: Send him my way.
CUOMO: The book is called "His Panic." A lot in here of fact and history in here. Takes the argument forward. Also the little known truth behind Geraldo Rivera's name. People talk about that all the time. You'll learn what the real story is. You can go to ABC News.com to read an excerpt of this book.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





CHRIS CUOMO: We're going to talk today about one of the most pressing issues that's going on in this election. It's the debate over immigration. Who's coming into this country? Who do we allow? Who do we want to be? Geraldo Rivera, we know he's won a lot of awards, but this may be his most ambitious project. The book is called "His Panic," Hispanic. A beautiful play on words. But it is about why Americans fear Hispanics in the U.S. --You believe to be the case. Geraldo, a pleasure as always to have you here. 









Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Dead Children = Geraldo's sandwich
February 26, 2008 - 14:30 ET by V the KAn illegal alien ran over a girl. An illegal alien killed someone. An illegal alien ate my sandwich.
So, to Geraldo Rivera, there's no difference between murdering four children and eating someone else's sandwich. What a callous a-hole.
Chris/Geraldo
February 26, 2008 - 14:35 ET by okiehawk44It's the staggering numbers. Numbers this large in such a small amount of time can't be assimilated. Long-time latino-americans feel the same "panic" and "fear" -- limit the numbers coming into this country and the friction will ease greatly.
BTW Geraldo - Lew Dobbs' wife is Hispanic. Me thinks you are the racist here.
No mention of the illegal that just killed
February 26, 2008 - 14:41 ET by YahooWatcherfour kids in that Minnesota school bus wreck?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
And then Geraldo says that Dobbs had a failed career?
Pot, kettle, black.
»→ Just disgusting
February 26, 2008 - 14:45 ET by Cool ArrowWhy FOX feels the need to carry a token buffoon to match Olberloon at PeeCock is beyond me.
♣ a seal
THE ILLEGALITY OF ILLEGALS...
February 26, 2008 - 16:22 ET by danybhoyThis story is a textbook example of most of the things people who want us to turn a blind eye to ILLEGALS want us to ignore.
You have an ILLEGAL, she has a no driver's license, she cannot speak english, she runs a stop sign & hits a school bus, she kills 4 & injures over a dozen more, she gives police a false ID, & she won't cooperate with police in this matter. So we have a "hard working" immigrant doing a job Americans won't do, following almost none of our laws. People who want us to ignore all of that are now getting pissed off that we are pissed that this selfish woman broke several laws & then killed 4 kids in rural Minnesota?
To those people, GO TO HELL. Hunter & Jesse Javens were 2 of the 4 killed that day, Hunter's twin sister, Sasha "celebrated" her 10th birthday by going to her brothers memorial service. Hunter Javens should have been at a birthday party for himself & his twin sister, he should NOT BE IN A CASKET.
I'm happy the debate on ILLEGALS has been so intense, because it has exposed those who don't give a damn about our nation's borders & laws. I know how to proccess what these people say in the future, & I have lost respect for most of those who pimp open borders & attack those who support border security by calling them racist or nativist. I don't care if they are in gov't, buisiness, or the MSM, I've lost respect for them.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
CUOMO: Is it fear? Is it
February 26, 2008 - 14:42 ET by bigtimerCUOMO: Is it fear? Is it fear of terrorism, fear of the unknown?
No you simpleton...illegal aliens are just that illegal, what part of that do you not understand.
This is twice I have heard Jerry Rivers act like a big tough guy who could take anybody on (meaning physically) in two days...I heard him last night tell Bill O that he would like to take him outside after the segment/show on this same subject....now this to Cuomo to send Dobb's his way...how impressive...he couldn't even dodge a chair and took pride in that with his nose broke...what a little man syndrome wanting to be a big one.
He makes me ill, but then again he has for years.
it's fear of anarchy
February 26, 2008 - 15:34 ET by TruthMongerit's fear of anarchy (also why we must fear liberals, incidentally)
the left knows why MASSIVE ILLEGAL ACTIVITY OF ANY SORT must rightly be feared by any civilization
(insert MSM crickets here)
but political opportunism must come first, Democrat survival is at stake
but just wait until the MSM finds out these migrating hispanics are ALL DEVOUT CATHOLICS!!!
You know the drill - all of the hispanic priests flooding in are peds, all hispanics want to ban abortion and gay marriage, set up PRIVATE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS!!!
fear ain't so bad after all is it libs:)?
Ten cuidado con lo que deseas
BT, to us this is obvious,
February 26, 2008 - 17:22 ET by dscottBT, to us this is obvious, but the tactic both Cuomo and Rivera are using is obfuscation by asking such an obtuse question as though any intelligent person could not see the issues. By taking this deceptive tactic they attempt to disqualify all legitimate concerns or objections to illegal immigration to the point of attempting equate illegal and legal immigration as one and the same by claiming the rules have changed.
First, the rules always change over time to fit the needs of country. Immigration is not some nebulous feel good policy, it always was based on practicality. We needed people to build the railroads, we allowed people of many ethinic backgrounds to come here.
Secondly, But so much anger and passion on this issue. Why?
There shouldn't be concern/fear? Let's see, Social Security is going bust, we have moron politicians wanting to give illegals Social Security, we are spending billions upon billions of dollars on social programs because of so called poverty, we have 7.5 million unemployed people who needs jobs, illegals skip on hospital bills leaving us to pay, illegals are in our schools forcing up our property taxes to pay for their schooling, they commit significant amounts of crime and cost us billions to incarcerate them, on and on and I haven't even touched all those other issues such as terrorism from a porous border. But we are being xenophobic because we don't want people who break the rules or stick us with the bill to be here????
I'll tell you what Rivera and Cuomo, you and all your buddies should be handed the bill that we the taxpayers are being forced to pay against our wills. It's time for a tax revolt! I think we should drive home the point to both of these clowns, someone needs to break into their house and plop themselves on the couch eating food from their refrigerator when they come home from work. They have no right to object since they insist that we have to put up with the same behavior. In fact you two morons should hand over your credit card to me so I can buy some stuff at your expense. Fair is Fair.
It's called Taxation without Representation! Certain politicians are insisting on us, the Taxpayer, to pay the bills of those who are NOT citizens and NOT playing by the rules. And you dare talk to us about a TAX INCREASE when you morons are the ones who made the decisions to spend OUR money in a manner AGAINST OUR WISHES?
Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008 Long Live the Empire! Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.
dscott... I agree with
February 26, 2008 - 17:29 ET by bigtimerdscott...
I agree with every single word of yours.
I have fought in my own small way against the Senate ect regarding this all...looks like we may not have a choice after Nov. unless we get quite a few conservatives added in congress...which is looking pretty dim so far...I know Nov. is a long way off yet...time will tell.
We need are going to need revolution of some kind it seems...they will cram this too down our throats if they are able, they are not listening to the people....despicable.
Being the devious fellow
February 26, 2008 - 18:20 ET by dscottBeing the devious fellow that I am, I'm mulling over various means to make a nice sharp point. One of those more over the top ideas would be to encourage everyone to file W-4 forms for withholding with their employers to up their deductions to 12 to take the minimum amount of tax out of their paychecks. If millions of people did it, there would be a major hiccup in the cash flow to the treasury. It would scare the crap out of the politicians. After a couple of months you file another W-4 for ZERO deductions to make up for the withholding. The approach is perfectly legal and there is no IRS issue of fines as long as you don't owe too much when you file your income tax next year. I forget the figure, I believe if you owe more than a $1,000 on your tax bill there is a nominal fine, nothing huge. I call it Tax Revolt light.
Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008 Long Live the Empire! Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.
There was never an Ellis Island for the Mexicans
February 26, 2008 - 14:51 ET by YahooWatcherMaybe we should build one, with the same rules as back in the early 1900's like if your vision was bad, back you go. Have some disease like TB? Back you go. Can't show that you have work lined up? Back you go. Can't or won't speak English? Back you go.
Well, what got me going there
February 26, 2008 - 14:52 ET by fonzie2178is this tendency to blame -- to highlight every illegal act done by any person here without, without documentation.
Yes, that tendency is spurred by the fact that they're not supposed to be here in the first place. The point is that if we actually took the steps necessary to keep the thugs out, these illegal acts wouldn't be happening in our country. Those who break the law to enter the country have no problem breaking other laws too. Those who care enough to follow the necessary immigration steps and gain citizenship are the honest, hard working people to which the US extends open arms. PLEASE STOP DEFENDING THE ILLEGALS!!
→ Geraldo
February 26, 2008 - 14:57 ET by Cool ArrowI think what Geraldo is saying is simple. Strangers who walk into your home to watch your television, use your bathroom, and have their way with your spouse, have a higher authority to do so than any silly laws the government might try to pass (much less enforce).
♣ a seal
Wow, great timing.This
February 26, 2008 - 14:55 ET by LeonWow, great timing.
This piece lined up perfectly with the Public Policy Institute of California's recent study that found illegal immigrants have lower rates of criminal activity than the rest of the American population.
"Starting with the fact that immigrants make up 35 percent of the state’s adult population but only 17 percent of its prisoners, researchers said they discovered several “striking” findings. "
Interesting. Looks like you're all scared of nothing...again.
Then, by all means, let's
February 26, 2008 - 15:00 ET by Chris NormanThen, by all means, let's replace our current population with illegal aliens to reduce crime.
Right Chris, b/c that's
February 26, 2008 - 15:05 ET by LeonRight Chris, b/c that's what I'm arguing. Haha. What a silly comment.
The point is your favorite lie about the danger of illegals is false.
Don't get the wrong impression, I'm anti-illegal and I support enforcing the rules we already have on the books.
I just love when your talking point myths are busted, aka that illegals have higher rates of criminal activity. FALSE!
Interesting finding from study #2: "We find that on average, between 2000 and 2005, cities that had a higher share of recent immigrants saw their crime rates fall further than cities with a lower share," the authors wrote. "This finding is especially strong when it comes to violent crime"
You're comment was
February 26, 2008 - 15:11 ET by Chris NormanYou're comment was irrelevant and obnoxious to begin with - what a surprise. I'm just replying to it's silliness.
Leon.... Public Policy
February 26, 2008 - 15:02 ET by bigtimerLeon....
Public Policy Institute of California.
That says it all.
BT, The report's
February 26, 2008 - 15:05 ET by LeonBT,
The report's researchers said their results are corroborated by national studies, and that no contradicting claims have been reported in available academic research.
Find some contradictory evidence or move on.
Leon
February 26, 2008 - 15:09 ET by well99Does that include those using forged or stolen SSNs?
Little one... Oh I feel
February 26, 2008 - 15:11 ET by bigtimerLittle one...
Oh I feel so much better...they are corroborated by national studies...
Wow, just wow.
I really could care less one way or the other...illegal aliens are killing this nation slowly but surely, and the majority of people on both sides of the aisle know it, unfortunately we have nobody running now that wants that changed ASAP...of course that is the plan Stan...on both sides of the aisle.
Here is a stat. 100% of
February 26, 2008 - 17:02 ET by SemperrightHere is a stat. 100% of illegals have broken the law. A law that if enforced means deportation and/or jail time. So if the immigration laws were enforced what would that do to thus bogus study?
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference.
The MARINES don't have that problem."
President Ronald Reagan - 1985
I was
February 26, 2008 - 16:11 ET by voodoodaddythinking the same thing. In addition, it came out of Kalifornika. I wouldn't place any credibility to this study.
Starting with the fact that
February 26, 2008 - 15:10 ET by general companyStarting with the fact that immigrants make up 35 percent of the state’s adult population but only 17 percent of its prisoners,
What does this have to do with illeagal immigrants? Most would agree that legal immigrants are very good citizens, kinda required to be one ya know.
How about forwarding those crime statistics from Cali to us conserning illeagals.
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
Well Leon
February 26, 2008 - 16:35 ET by well99Lets look at this study
"For most of its findings, the study did not distinguish between immigrants who are citizens, permanent legal residents or those who entered the U.S. illegally. Instead, it looked all immigrants, defined as people born in another country. Because the undocumented make up an estimated 28 percent of the state's immigrants, the authors indicated that the results are nearly the same for that group, too."
"The report did not investigate visa and other immigration violations, but looked at crimes most likely to affect public safety, such as property crimes and violent offenses."
"As far as criminal activity among children of immigrants, the reports' authors said data was harder to come by. But the researchers did cite other studies around the country that suggest children of immigrants also have lower violence and incarceration rates than the native-born, "although perhaps not as low as the foreign-born themselves."
What is wrong with this picture.
"This piece lined up
February 26, 2008 - 17:17 ET by ckc1227"This piece lined up perfectly with the Public Policy Institute of
California's recent study that found illegal immigrants have lower
rates of criminal activity than the rest of the American population."
Not sure how that can be when 100% of illegals here have engaged in criminal activity just by being here.
Ignoring that point though, I don't get how an unnecessary increase in crime, no matter how illegals measure up to legals statistically, is somehow a defense for illegal immigration. Who knew that the 25 deaths a day that occur because of illegals in this country(that wouldn't have occured if they weren't here) was a good thing?
If anything, this lame attempt at defending illegal immigration is an argument against it, not for it. But that's me. I don't tend to do well with liberal math.
I don't tend to do well
February 26, 2008 - 20:53 ET by general companyI don't tend to do well with liberal math.
Me either, I think folks like Leon will defend any stupid liberal idea that one of their Country hating leaders suggest. The proof is easily obtained. Leon would be the first to complain if the Media was claiming it was Bush's fault, right Leon? Defending these people whom Broke into our Country and depress our wages and steal our resources is ridiculous. Considering we allow more legal immigrants into this counrty every year then any other Country in the world, but some just feel it is not enough? Guess they are trying to make the Dems doom and gloom prophecy come true
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
gc, We only have
February 27, 2008 - 13:56 ET by Leongc,
We only have ourselves to blame.
Who is employing illegal immigrants?
Americans.
I agree, we should enforce the laws vigilantly. If you're here illegally, get the heck out. Time to go home. Come the right way.
But the right constantly tries to paint illegals as being violent criminals. I merely pointed out that the evidence doesn't support this. My overall point being, we should kick them out for one reason and one reason only - their illegal status.
Leon
February 27, 2008 - 14:20 ET by well99I agree with you on the fact if they didnt have jobs they would leave.The goverment is too soft on buisnesses that employ illegals.The bottom line is that it isnt the illegals I hate it is their actions.No not all illegals are violent criminals but this country doesnt need to import crime.It is job Americans will do.
Well99, I hear you, but I
February 27, 2008 - 14:23 ET by LeonWell99,
I hear you, but I go one step further.
I don't hate the illegals or their actions. Put yourself in their shoes for a minute. If you grew up poor in Mexico, wouldn't you try to come to America? I know I would, whether I could do it legally or not.
I genuinely believe the only people to blame are ourselves. We employ them and then try to hate them. It makes no sense. No jobs = no illegals. It's a simple mathematical equation.
So I have nothing against illegals, and in fact, the ones I've worked with at golf courses and contracting in the past were all hard-working, family-oriented, religious, and, all around good people.
No point trying to blame them b/c we'd all do the same thing if we got unlucky and were born in Mexico.
Leon
February 27, 2008 - 15:13 ET by well99It isnt the actually person that I hate.When I say actions I am talking about wages kept down.Cost for heath,education that gets passed on to Americans.I not talking about the people themselves.It is the effect which ticks me off.The buisnesses that employ them and politicians that cater to those buisnesses I have no use for.Hopefully the Save Act will be put up for vote one day and something will be done.
Leon they are here "illegally".
February 27, 2008 - 15:18 ET by vrwc13Leon they are here "illegally". What other lawbreakers to you side with?
Let them get in line like everyone else.
v
Men stumble over the truth from time to time, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing happened. -Winston Churchill.
What a racist
February 26, 2008 - 15:05 ET by well99Geraldo only needs to look in the mirror to find a racist.This is not just about illegals from Mexico.It is about all the illegals here whether they are coming from China,Ireland, or the Syria.We have the right to control the rate of immigration.Gelraldo has already shown he is liar.Riveria why dont you come my way.Little drama queen.
I am telling you there is
February 26, 2008 - 15:08 ET by ConservativeRexI am telling you there is something sinister in how the media portrays this. What could possibly be in it for them? Cuomo has never even been around any illegals in his life. He wouldn't dirty himself to be around any, the fact his folks like him HATE illegals, for fear they may end up living close to where they do.
As far has having fear of illegals, far from it. I have been around them all my life, I don't fear 'em, I just don't want them here. About like I'd like to be rid of Cuomo.
Let's face it, the Republicans are afraid to do anything about them because they don't want to be called racist, or anti-immigrant, which is foolish because by speaking out against them they would be neither. The Democrats don't want to do anything about them because they need cheap labor and a voting base.
So here we are, we need politicians with balls to tell the dictators in Mexico and Central America that we are no longer going to accept ANY of the people they no longer can house/feed or want. Get that fence built, arm it with more guards, immediately deport any illegal breaking even the slightest law in our country. Except for those on death row (which we need to expedite) deport all prisoners/illegals. Fine (a great deal) any employer of illegals to the point of putting them out of business. Our strawberries will still get picked. But, Democrats have always wanted a free or almost free peonage work force, and this is not me saying it, history speaks to that.
Mainly, we have to take away the magnets that draw them here, we have to pressure their corrupt governments to keep them home, and enforce all of our laws. We make it more difficult, the one's that don't want to stay, because of criminal backgrounds or whatever, will go. Those that want to work hard and assimilate with our culture and language can stay and become citizens.
We're not stoking fear
February 26, 2008 - 15:09 ET by mattmWe're not stoking fear enough.
This illegal alien just killed four kids in Minnesota.
Does someone have Geraldo and Mario's e-mail addresses so I can send them picture of the four murdered kids?
Won't do any good,
February 26, 2008 - 15:19 ET by fonzie2178They'll probably blame the parents who endagered their children by putting them on this bus that got in the way of someone who is "just trying to seek a better life."
It's not "anti-illegal
February 26, 2008 - 16:52 ET by radiofitz34It's not "anti-illegal fear" when the reality hits that we are being ever-so-slowly invaded by people who have no interest in becoming Americans and will not learn english.
Not to mention that liberals support defacto slavery.
Gerlado and Cuomo are assholes
February 26, 2008 - 19:27 ET by c5thenThey keep trying to turn it into a racial issue, when it's all about control of the borders and lawbreakers getting justice.
Illegal aliens can be from any country and any race, color religion, etc. To imply that only Hispanics are illegal is in itself racist.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Roger that
February 26, 2008 - 21:11 ET by well99It about all those here whether they slip across the border,overstay a visa or come over by ship.If they are here illegally they have violated the law.Legal immigrants are welcome.They put the effort out to come here and to put people who violated our law ahead of the them is bs.
Fear? My Rear!
February 26, 2008 - 19:36 ET by nalaexsciAm I afraid of drunk drivers? No
Do I want them on the road? No
Am I afraid of child molesters? No
Do I want one living in my neighborhood? No
Am I afraid of immigrants? No
Do I want immigrants entering the country at will - without government sanction? No
Do I want the country's laws followed?
Damn right I do.
Cuomo - you are truly a MORON!
If either of these people ever studied demography
February 26, 2008 - 21:27 ET by ThalpyIf either of these people ever studied demography they would be aware of "fact and history." The United States is NOT a nation of immigrants in the sense they suggest. There have been times when large numbers of immigrants came here, but for the most part, there was time for assimilation. Many of the new immigrants don't want assimilation, period. So, therefore, they should remain guests of OUR country. It's either or.