In the week since South Carolina’s Republican Governor announced he had flown to Argentina to carry on an extra-marital affair, the broadcast morning and evening news shows have gone full bore on the scandal, cranking out 49 stories even in the midst of other major stories like Michael Jackson’s death and the continuing repression in Iran.
The morning after Sanford announced his affair, on the June 25 Good Morning America, longtime correspondent Sam Donaldson used the scandal to broadly charge Republicans with being “sanctimonious. They thump the Bible. They condemn everyone else, and when they [act] human, they don’t have much credit in the bank for forgiveness.” Unlike when New York Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer was caught consorting with a prostitute in March 2008, all three broadcast networks immediately identified Sanford’s party ID.
A number of top Democrats are enmeshed in embarrassment or facing allegations of wrongdoing, but the networks have far less interest in publicizing those cases. A rundown of ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening coverage so far this year:
■ Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY): The Chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, Rangel coughed up $75,000 in unpaid back taxes on rental income last year. The House ethics committee is investigating whether Rangel fulfilled all of his disclosure requirements related to that property, among other issues. In June, the panel launched another investigation of whether a Caribbean trip Rangel and four other Democrats took amounted to an improper gift.
None of these issues were mentioned on ABC, CBS or NBC this year, although Rangel was featured as a talking head in a number of morning and evening news stories. On March 19, the CBS Evening News included a Rangel soundbite in a story on congressional outrage over the AIG bonuses: “Stop the thievery at taxpayers’ expense!” The next night, CBS had another clip of Rangel railing, “Stop the thievery!,” but no mention of the chairman’s ethics problems.
■ Rep. John Murtha (D-PA), Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-IN) and Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA): Three top Democrats are linked to the scandal surrounding the PMA Group, a lobbying group that closed its doors earlier this year after being raided by the FBI in February. The New York Times reported then that top lobbyist Paul Magliocchetti was suspected of funneling “bogus” campaign contributions to Murtha, Visclosky and Moran, in exchange for directing more than $100 million to PMA clients. Rep. Visclosky had admitted being subpoenaed in May by a federal grand jury, and temporarily stepped down as Chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on energy and water development.
None of the broadcast networks have mentioned Visclosky and Moran’s potential role in the scandal. ABC and NBC have been similarly quiet about Murtha, whom the networks elevated to folk-hero status for his condemnations of the Iraq war in 2005. CBS’s Sharyl Attkisson, however, has produced three investigative pieces digging into Murtha’s ethics, the most recent airing on the June 2 Evening News.
■ Ex-Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA): Jefferson lost a run-off election late last year after investigators found $90,000 in cash stuffed in the congressman’s freezer. In January, NBC made brief references to the charges against Jefferson in a profile of his successor, Republican Joseph Cao. Jefferson’s bribery trial — prosecutors say he received $400,000 in bribes to help orchestrate business deals in Africa — began on June 9, but the networks have yet to mention the case.
Mark Sanford’s trouble is of his own making, of course. But the liberal networks seem a lot more excited about airing his dirty laundry than exposing the problems of top Democrats.
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Rug pull
July 2, 2009 - 11:27 ET by SeftonNot to defend Sanford, but when he had the 'confession' news conference he should've announced he was also switching parties to lessen the coverage he's about to get.
Maybe...
July 2, 2009 - 13:47 ET by Jen7your boy should SHUTUP then. He keeps yammering about his 'soul mate'.
As you may presently yourself be fully made aware of, my grammar sucks.
Family Guy
Yammer man
July 2, 2009 - 14:00 ET by Sefton"your boy"? Like I said, I'm not defending the man...in case you missed that.
But I agree he's only making it worse for himself by throwing all his continued chum to the sharks.
Sorry Sefton
July 2, 2009 - 14:03 ET by Jen7I replied to your post, but this was more directed at the thread. So, again, sorry. I often reply to the top post because I'm usually in a hurry. I'll stop doing that. :)
As you may presently yourself be fully made aware of, my grammar sucks.
Family Guy
Then maybe you should
July 2, 2009 - 14:18 ET by motherbeltThen maybe you should explain who you mean when you say "your boy."
Are you implying that everyone at this site claims Sanford as a pal, or supports him?
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Dodge!
July 2, 2009 - 14:29 ET by RukusDodge! Parry! Sidestep! Uh, uh, did ya know Michael Jackson died, yeah, that's the ticket!
Yeah, I'm a stinker! ; )
Gary
I want my country back!
Presstitutes
July 4, 2009 - 08:29 ET by nadadhimmiThe presstitutes will not stop with their biased reportage. They will SOON, however, be out of business. Until Lord Barack puts them on the puplic tit too.
Wouldn't it be intesting if
July 2, 2009 - 11:49 ET by redmikeWouldn't it be intesting if everybody change to the democratic party. It would drive the left nuts and put an end to the silly interparty dynamics. Each member of Congress would have to be judged on their record instead of their party. The media would have to actually look at individuals more closely and it would be harder to sumarily dismiss wrongdoing simply because of party affiliation.
Wouldn't work. It would
July 2, 2009 - 12:05 ET by motherbeltWouldn't work. It would be like those soccer games where they don't keep score.
The kids all know which team has how many goals.
The media would still know who the "good guys" are and would write accordingly.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
There is no scandal where
July 2, 2009 - 11:54 ET by mattmThere is no scandal where there is no ethic.
When I saw the names
July 2, 2009 - 12:02 ET by motherbeltWhen I saw the names Visclosky and Moran, I had no idea what they had done.
Big surprise, huh?
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
What Democrat scandals?
July 2, 2009 - 12:06 ET by DJEddleAre you referring to Feinstein, Reid, Dodd, Frank, Rangel, Patterson, Pelosi, etc...or perhaps the alleged "president" himself? The entire Democrat Party is one big scandal.
Yes, there are Republicans who find themselves in trouble. After all, they are politicians - it's what they do.
But the media is sitting on one of the greatest scandals in history, yet nobody wants to talk about it. Not even most of the "alternative media." What am I referring to? It's currently on the front page of my website...you just have to know how to read.
Rational Liberty: Where Reason and Government Collide - The best website ever!
Yes it's unbalanced but...
July 2, 2009 - 12:06 ET by AMR1960...Sanford still must go! Said he was hiking the Appalachian Trail but was really out chasing Argentinian Tail...
________________________
Long Live...THE REPUBLIC !
Sanfords BIG mistake was
July 4, 2009 - 08:37 ET by nadadhimmiSanfords BIG mistake was identifying his lover as a women. His best bet would have been to confess to a homosexual affair. Then "agonize" over his decision in a homophobic environment. The presstitutes would have lapped it up. Commented on his "courage and conviction", his "capacity for love", and urged support for him and his lover against prejudice, homophobia and small minded, provincial thinking. After all, can it be "wrong to love?". Hey, it worked for Greavey in Jersey.
The msm has been absolutely
July 2, 2009 - 12:44 ET by bigtimerThe msm has been absolutely appalling when it comes to the lack of coverage on the dems scandals...they figure if they don't report, we will never know...they count on it.
Hypocrisy and bias runs deep.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
No fairness and balance here...
July 2, 2009 - 12:44 ET by PrairieSkyRepublican scandals are always screamed from the rooftops, while the Dem scandals are hushed up and under-reported, if they are reported at all.
As far as Sanford is concerned, he is certainly not helping the situation, first because he wouldn't shut up, and now because it appears he won't resign and just go away.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1124550.html
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
You missed Dem Rep Conyers
July 2, 2009 - 12:50 ET by buddycYou missed Dem Rep Conyers and his inovlvement the events that caused his wife to be indicted and plead guilty to crimes.
jessieH
July 2, 2009 - 13:00 ET by jessieHjessieH Corruption is rampant in washington. The scandals are just now comming to the surface. They are all crooks. The only question is-who will be exposed next.
Pitiful
July 2, 2009 - 13:22 ET by general companyThe only news we get on the Jefferson trial localy is from radio. Dems continue to steal from us, but the sorry ass media doesnt care. I have called most of our local stations, and e-mailed some others.
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
The Jefferson scandal is
July 2, 2009 - 14:14 ET by goldbarThe Jefferson scandal is more than two years old, so we might as well be talking about Newt's confession of infidelity.
The thing with the 'pubs is they seem to like the gay sex:
Bob Allen
Larry Craig
Ted Haggard
Mark Foley
Glenn Murphy, Jr.
gb.... ...and the trial
July 2, 2009 - 14:27 ET by bigtimergb....
...and the trial finally started about two weeks ago and nary a word in the msm about the testimony etc.
If this had been any repub in the same situation you can bet this would be getting coverage all over the place.
It's blatant hypocrisy, blatant bias....and outrageous with the silence....along with what is being uncovered about Murtha and friend....not a word in the msm.
No gb...just these two examples are infuriating.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Larry Craig....Aug. 2007.
July 2, 2009 - 14:32 ET by motherbeltLarry Craig....Aug. 2007. Disregard
Ted Haggard: 2006. Disregard
Mark Foley: 2006. Disregard
Bob Allen: 2007. Disregard
Glenn Murphy: 2007; Disregard
Next?
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
William Jefferson...May 2006
July 2, 2009 - 15:10 ET by goldbarWilliam Jefferson...May 2006 Disregard (no gay sex involved)
goldbar... What part of
July 2, 2009 - 15:19 ET by bigtimergoldbar...
What part of the trial just started and isn't being reported on do you not comprehend?
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Good evening Pyrite
July 2, 2009 - 15:22 ET by cocodrieYou illustrate how the Old Media publicised Republican wrongs but cover up for democrats.
You sure are interested in homosexual sex. Did you work for bbbawney Fffuwank out of his apartment some time back?
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
The real point is that
July 2, 2009 - 16:03 ET by goldbarThe real point is that Sandford deserted his state to LEAVE THE COUNTRY and go CHEAT ON HIS WIFE. He left South Carolina vulnerable for almost a week and then lied about what he'd done. Then the guy won't shut up about it and starts going into the lurid details and his mental state is questioned. You don't think this is worthy of media coverage. Spitzer came out, admitted his indescretion, apologized to his family and resigned. He didn't keep feeding the media at every turn. Sandford apologized to the "other woman" first and all but disregarded his wife and children.
The other part of the problem is that the republican party espouses to be the party of family values, but they don't practice what they preach and tap their feet and get caught with their pants down and then REFUSE TO RESIGN. They are the epitome of hypocrosy.
How right you are Pyrite
July 2, 2009 - 18:05 ET by cocodrieThe Republicans expose their wrongdoers and remove them from leadership because of their transgressions. The democrats have no lawbreakers in their party. I stumbled across their commandments they kive by.
1- You shall serve any god but Jehovah.
2- You shall make idols of all your liberal leaders and all dictators.
3- You shall bow down and worship Present Hussein and all dictators.
4- You shall curse Jehovah and ban Him from all schools and public places.
5-Dishonor your father and mother, they know nothing. Follow the teachings of your communist profesors.
6-Kill anyone you want especially the helpless and the unborn. DO NOT TOUCH ABORTIONISTS. We will appoint judges to set you free.
7- Steal all you want especially from the government. We will raise taxes to pay for it.
8- Commit all the adultery you want, any sex anytine anywhere is OK, we will cover for you.
9- Lie all that is necessary especially to stay in office and to succeed in your stealing.
10-Covet your neighbors house, wife, employees and strangers. If you need advice contact Bill Clinton.
You see, we break the commandments of Jehovah but they have never broken any of their commandments.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
goldbar, YOU are the one
July 2, 2009 - 16:27 ET by motherbeltgoldbar, YOU are the one who said that after a certain time things don't count; not me.
I'm just applying your own stated standard. You say that the Jefferson scandal is too old to worry about, then bring up Republican scandals just as old to show that more Republicans than Democrats are guilty.
Nice try, but you got caught. Didn't think anyone would check, did you? Typical liberal tactic. Throw out names, numbers, whatever; hopefully you won't get caught. If you do, fudge.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Ted Haggard
July 2, 2009 - 17:03 ET by GeneralAlTed Haggard was an evangelist, not a Republican official! If you're going to throw him into the mix, we can throw the whole Communist Hollywood crowd! Talk about moral failure, Hollywood makes Sodom and Gomorra look like Heaven!
Haggard was a frequent
July 2, 2009 - 17:35 ET by goldbarHaggard was a frequent visitor to the Bush White House, as was Jeff Gannon the male hooker who masqueraded as a reporter in the Bush White House press corps who would toss softballs to Bush.
What the heck GB?
July 2, 2009 - 18:03 ET by general companyObama stacks EVERY townhall, every presser with questions screened before hand. Now your worried that the very same press that brutulized Bush threw him a softball question, how many times was Bush asked what his favorite ice cream was? Goldbar or leadbrick, both are just as thick
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
HMMMM
July 2, 2009 - 15:02 ET by rick007Well you see it's like this.
They all get together and prepare their talking points as to how long they will keep it going. The longer you run the stories the more sticks in peoples minds.
They are still on Palin about things that mean nothing but you never hear about B Frank and the whore house that was run from his house.
You don't hear much of the beached whale in the tropics while cheating on his taxes.
Dodds special treatment from Country Wide.
Talk raido has to throw away the notion of not using GOP talking points. If they don't then the Dems and the MSM will always hold the upper hand.
You have to get down in the mud instead of playing the game while trying to keep your uniforms clean.
Hitler and Gobels would love the MSM.
And for God's sake pay for Savages suit against the Brits. I'm tired of hearing the Millionair beg for money. My thoughts realy. Screw him.
rick007 Here is example
July 2, 2009 - 15:32 ET by bigtimerrick007
Here is example of another scandal put under the table and completely ignored.
Senate Leader no less.
Here is DiFi....and Durbin along with some some more dems and their dealings that have been quieted.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Not a lot report on this
July 2, 2009 - 16:11 ET by goldbarNot a lot of reporting on this Dennis Hastert scandal:
On June 14, 2006, Bill Allison of the Sunlight Foundation reported that Hastert used an Illinois trust to invest in real estate near the proposed route of the Prairie Parkway, a highway project in Illinois. In Congress, Hastert was then able to secure $207 million in earmarked appropriations for the project, which includes an exit near his land. According to the report, the trust has now transferred 138 acres of the land to a real estate development firm that plans to build a 1,600-home community, located just a few miles from the north-south connector Hastert has championed in the House.
Weren't you saying earlier
July 3, 2009 - 20:36 ET by G. MayWeren't you saying earlier on this very page how something 2 years old is irrelevant in the context of this discussion?
Your ability to troll is mediocre at best.
→ Goldbar
July 3, 2009 - 20:41 ET by Cool ArrowI'm aware of this alleged land-grab by Hastert, and saw interviews with people who claim to have been screwed by him. The insider buying is a hard thing to ignore.
It looks and smells dirty. And I hate the kind of corruption politicians are engaging in these days. It looks like he's as much the thief as Nancy Pelosi.
That Is Because....
July 2, 2009 - 16:58 ET by GeneralAlThe Democrats don't get labeled because they have no moral guidelines to start out with. Th Republicans have a moral compass to guide them. We should be bent on keeping them out of trouble by holding their feet to the moral fire!
CNN is guilty too
July 2, 2009 - 17:23 ET by GaiusBaltarOn CNN, there are over 40 articles dedicated to Sanford (R). There are less than 20 articles on Spitzer, and far far far far far less on Rangel and Murtha.
CNN Report: http://www.firesusan.com/THE_CNN_REPORT.pdf
http://www.firesusan.com/THE_CNN_REPORT.pdf
NewsBusters.org | IHateTheMedia.com |
Two reasons...
July 2, 2009 - 20:51 ET by the curatorFirst - Senators are much higher profile than representatives (unless you have a spotlight job like speaker, min. leader, etc).
Second - Every time a Dem is seen in a sex scandal it doesn't always get as much news because Dems don't claim the high moral ground like the GOP does. So, there's no implied hypocricy.
I'll give you a third - This is the second back-to-back sex scandal for a Repub hopeful for the White House. Momentum builds a story. (throw in the need to improve the GOP brand while these two are further tarnishing it, and that's another storyline. Even MN GOP Gov. Pawlenty says so)
Lastly - Dem sex scandals have gotten coverage in the last year. See Spitzer.
Where's the hypocrisy?
July 3, 2009 - 20:40 ET by G. MayWhere's the hypocrisy? Republicans/conservatives never claim to be beyond such behavior. The difference is that they consider it to be wrong and will hold themselves accountable. It's called having moral and ethical standards.
Breaches of integrity, lapses in judgment, and poor ethics are considered badegs of honor among liberals and democrats and they will not be held accountable, they will be cheered.
Sanford was the biggest
July 3, 2009 - 00:01 ET by 24enakSanford was the biggest fish in the pond of disgraced politicians. Of course he will get more attention. Micheal Jackson death is getting way more coverage than Ed McMahon, Farrah Fawcett, Billy Mays death because his name is the biggest.
Sanford was hyped, by Hannity, as a contender for a presidential run in the next election. He has been in the news more than the others even before his scandal when he refused stimulus money.
And to me Sanford's scandal is the most intriging, he disappears for five days, then says he was hiking, during nude hikers day, then his family doesn't know where he is at, on fathers day weekend no less, then he come back, holds a press conference, admits to an affair with a woman from South America.
Simple mathmatics bigger name = more coverage.
Speaking of “Simple mathmatics” [sic]...
July 3, 2009 - 10:23 ET by needleHow many people before two weeks ago had ever even heard of Sanford vs. Charlie Rangel?
- Relying upon the MSM for your information is like relying upon an embezzler to manage your portfolio.
Rep vs Dem
July 3, 2009 - 12:47 ET by shuq4Sex, lies and videotape.
Recall Florida Republican
July 4, 2009 - 00:08 ET by RousseRecall Florida Republican Rep. Mark Foley, who played internet footsie with House pages. The MSM televisions stations in my area (Houston TX) led with the Mark Foley story (sorry---I meant SCANDAL) morning, noon, and night for three weeks. And while I make no apologies for Mark Foley (who clearly stepped over the line), did you notice how the story disappeared from sight when the news came out that Foley had been set up?
Basically the same thing
July 4, 2009 - 00:25 ET by bigtimerBasically the same thing that happened to Ted Stevens to gain another Senate seat pronto..
...and it worked...all were calling for him to step down on the 'R' side, with the exception of a few of us, well, me here...yet now what is happening...the prosecutors are facing big time trouble...and nary a word.
Where is the msm on this...where has it been?
If this whole situation had been reversed....do you think there would be such complete silence all of this time?
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart