NY Times' Cult of Che--Minus the Brutality and Oppression

  • Bookmark and Share

On the 40th anniversary of Che Guevara's death, October 8 New York Times penned a peppy little story about how his well-to-do children feel about their father's legacy as a Communist “revolutionary icon” and the commercialization of his image.

Glaringly absent was any mention of his unpleasant history, especially the nickname he was given when he was Cuba's high executioner, The Butcher of la Cabana.

The NYT lamented that Che's image has fallen prey to the claws of capitalism and his “message” diluted. Too bad there was no description of the brutal way that “message” was delivered (emphasis mine throughout):

Even in Cuba, one of the world’s last Communist bastions, Che is used to both make a buck and a point. “He sells,” acknowledged a Cuban shop clerk, who had Che after Che starring down from a wall full of T-shirts.

But at least here he is also used to inspire the next generation of Cubans, his name brought up in classes dealing with everything from medicine to economics to political science. Schoolchildren invoke his name every morning, declaring with a salute, “We want to be like Che.” His quotations are recited almost as often as those of Fidel Castro.

Che is part of all our thinking,” said Juan Vela Valdés, Cuba’s minister of higher education, who introduced a concentration in Che while he was rector at the University of Havana.

Sure, Cuban schoolchildren admire Che. They don't have a choice. The state-run schools and media determine what is said about him and do not mention the Cubans he killed or the families that were marched in front of the brain-splattered execution wall. It's easy to admire someone when there is no negative information, just ask North Korean schoolchildren.

There is also no mention of the Cubans, many of whom found their way to America after escaping the whims of Che and Fidel's political and financial crackdown, who do not worship the “icon.” What happened to that “balance” in reporting?

Now the Times passed the hero-worship of the Cult of Che to his well-heeled children.

Some of Che’s star power has rubbed off on his four surviving children, one of whom is named Ernesto Guevara and drove to Monday’s memorial on a motorcycle, just like Dad. Cubans hug the Guevaras in the street, and tourists are giddy when they learn who they are.

“I have goose bumps,” said Alfredo Moreno, 32, a Mexican who posed for a picture with Ms. Guevara [Aleida Guevara March, Che's daughter--Ed..], clearly overcome with emotion. “I can’t describe to you what this moment means to me,” he said.

(...)

Though she says her eyes are shaped like her father’s, it can be hard to see his face in hers, mostly because Che’s most distinguishing feature was his beard. Ms. Guevara, a pediatrician and mother of two who favors pantsuits over military fatigues, resembles more a Cuban soccer mom than a revolutionary.

She was six years old when he died but says that since then she has gotten used to all the attention she receives. “I feel richer than the queen of England,” she said of all the love. “It’s better than money.”

 

Che's daughter seems to be the Kevin Federline of the wealthy Marxist set—making a name for herself on someone else's (dubious) achievements.

My favorite part is the description of son, Ernesto as “a Harley Davidson aficionado.” I guess capitalism isn't so bad after all.

 

Lynn is a NewsBusters contributor and can be emailed with tips or even complaints at tvisgoodforyou2 AT yahoo DOT com


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Like him or not (i

Like him or not (i personally think he writes some good pieces) John Ridley has nice blog here discussing who "Che" really was:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-ridley/che-it-aint-so_b_67729.html

Personally i guess the left likes him because he was anti-capitalist and emulated pure communism.  Or maybe the just like him because he was a "rebel".  Liberal scum.

Makes you wonder

When will the puff peices start in the NYT on the poor misunderstood leaders like Pohl Pott and the great medical pioneer Joseph Mengele.



The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Fred08.com

Good point ...

and look: Yesterday (10/8/07), the Los Angeles Times did the same thing as the NYT! There's barely a few sentences that are critical of Che. Unbelievable.

"Che's legacy looms larger than ever" (LAT, 10/8/07)

Ugh!

 

Che and the left coast (LA)

Che and the left coast (LA)..

A sign of living on the left coast is when you personally know at least 6 people who occassionally wear their Che Tees - and so do their kids.

Better Heroes

I missed The NY Times celebration of Columbus Day.

My only thought about this

My only thought about this murdering, blood-thirsty, thug, Che is that his suffering before dieing was not more drawn out and that his death was not more gruesome.

If the people of the world over really knew this worm, you wouldn't see his likeness on all manner of memorabilia.

By the way, while Che was busy torturing, incarcerating, and murdering Cubans, his mainstay was taking a vibrant Latin American economy and thoroughly trashing it.  It remains a basket case to this day.

Even that other murdering, blood-thirsty, thug, Castro realized how imcompetent he was in regards to "running" the Cuban economy.  More importantly, he consider him a rival and a threat and thus, banished him to "start-up" communist revolutions in other parts of Latin America. 

I spit on them and all communist thugs. 

 

My only thought about this

My only thought about this murdering, blood-thirsty, thug, Che is that
his suffering before dieing was not more drawn out and that his death
was not more gruesome.

I couldn't agree more. And why the MSM and the Hollywoodenheads romanticize murder, oppression, and a death-cult personified by the assassin Che is beyond comprehension.

The idiota de maricón, Che was an enemy of freedom and yet he has become the leftist's symbol of freedom and social justice.

I would join you in spitting on them, but it would be a great waste of saliva.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell

Bang bang they shot me down

I am aquainted with a gentleman who was on the team that captured Che. They weren't allowed to assassinate, but fortunately there were people in close proximity who were able to make sure Che didn't miss his meeting with Satan. Viva la killers elite! Che Muerto

Hillary -- the Che of 2047

I doubt if I'm the only one who realizes we're already well on our way down the "slippery slope". With the full court press on the First Amendment beginning with shutting down Talk Radio (then all Conservative mass media), open borders, financial servitude, burying our ethics, language aand culture as things to be ashamed of - and so on and so on. All that is going on today is NOT happening by chance. It is now too late to stop it and scant chance of even slowing it down. George Soros is the Big Brother of 1984 and Hillary is the symbol for all to worship for the next 100 years.


Isn't it a chilling thought to visualize "Hillary" cannonized 40 years from now as "Che" is among Marxists everywhere today? Starring down from billboards as "Mother Hillary" as school children are taught to recite her every word as the new religion of the state and all subjects of the state. Everyone young and old carrying Hillary's equivalent of Mao's "Little Red Book" close to their heart. Mindless zombies everywhere. Subjects of the state all working toward "the greater good".

A crazy outlandish image that could never happen? Who would have predicted in their wildest dreams in 1987 where we are today? No one! Save this prediction and read it again in another twenty years. You'll see that a "wildest dream" of way back in 2007 has become reality. Chilling. Totally chilling.