CBS’s Smith Scoffs at Giuliani Suggestion of Media Bias...Again

Photo of Kyle Drennen.

Harry Smith and Rudy Giuliani, CBS On Tuesday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith talked to former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and asked about negative attacks in the campaign: "Alright, one of the things that's happened in the McCain campaign over the last couple of days is the personal attacks seem to have at least subsided or quieted down a little bit. Do you think, in the long run, this might actually have been a fatal wound to the McCain-Palin campaign?" Giuliani responded: "I think there's a tendency on the media to blame it more on John McCain and Sarah Palin than on Barack Obama and his campaign but, to me, it's -- you know it's been coming from both sides." To that, Smith sarcastically replied: "Yeah, it's got to be the media's fault." Giuliani laughed and added: "Don't be defensive, Harry."

This is the not the first time Smith has denied Giuliani’s charges of media bias. On September 12, Giuliani criticized the media for attacking Sarah Palin’s experience but not applying similar scrutiny to Barack Obama: "The whole issue of whether she knows world affairs or not, these are questions that were never asked of Barack Obama, never asked of him to this day." Smith angrily denied any such bias: "That's not true. That's not true...That's not true. That is absolutely not true...That is absolutely not true. Those -- all those questions have been asked over the last 19 months." However, Smith himself conducted eight interviews with Obama and only asked two foreign policy questions of the inexperienced Senator.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Not only did Smith find Giuliani’s charge of media bias ridiculous, but also Giuliani’s characterization of Obama’s economic proposals. Earlier in the segment, Smith asked: "This infusion of cash into these banks, as much as $250 billion, did the Fed get there? Is this too little too late and along with this, why should, in three weeks, the American people entrust the economy to another Republican administration?" In response, Giuliani pointed out: "He's [John McCain’s] not going to raise taxes. He's not going to cut off -- he's not going to cut off trade with high tariffs, the way Barack Obama wants to do. Barack Obama is talking about the kinds of things Herbert Hoover did and I know, you know people see him as change but this is like retrogression. High taxes, high tariffs, would be a disaster." Smith simply laughed at that legitimate criticism of Obama’s policies.

In contrast, Smith was abundantly respectful to left-wing commentator and economist Paul Krugman, whom he spoke to prior to the Giuliani interview: "Joining us now is Paul Krugman, who was just awarded the Nobel Prize in economics. He's a professor at Princeton University and a columnist and blogger for the New York Times. Good morning and congratulations." Smith later observed to Krugman: "We've been listening for all of these years to all these free marketeers, who are saying get the regulation out, keep the government away, yet now, all of a sudden, these banks and the government are literally going to be business partners." Apparently, Giuliani was one of those discredited "free marketeers."

Immediately preceding Smith’s interview with Giuliani, correspondent Jeff Glor reported: "Though his lead in the polls may be clear, Barack Obama has been criticized for having an economic plan that's not. His response? This four-part middle class rescue." A clip of University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato was played: "I think deep down, both McCain and Obama understand that there isn't a whole lot that a presidential candidate can do to change the current fiscal meltdown." Despite that analysis, Glor declared Obama the winner: "But it appeared the relentless Obama campaign has at least won the first round in this week's economic rescue race."

Here is the full transcript of the Giuliani segment:

7:10AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: With three weeks to go until election day, Barack Obama is out with a new economic plan and John McCain's following up with his own. Early Show correspondent Jeff Glor is in Philadelphia with more. Good morning, Jeff.

JEFF GLOR: Hey, good morning to you, Harry. John McCain will be talking about those new plans just outside of Philadelphia here today. Barack Obama will stay in Ohio, preparing for tomorrow's third and final presidential debate. Now with just 21 days left.

BARACK OBAMA: You got to be quicker than that, man.

GLOR: Though his lead in the polls may be clear, Barack Obama has been criticized for having an economic plan that's not. His response? This four-part middle class rescue.

OBAMA: Right now, we face an immediate economic emergency and that requires urgent action.

GLOR: Tax credits for small businesses that create new jobs. Penalty free withdrawals from I.R.A.S or 401(k)s. A 90-day moratorium on home foreclosures. And a federal program to get more credit for struggling local governments. There are serious questions about how he'd pay for all this and how much of a difference it would really make.

LARRY SABATO: I think deep down, both McCain and Obama understand that there isn't a whole lot that a presidential candidate can do to change the current fiscal meltdown.

GLOR: But it appeared the relentless Obama campaign has at least won the first round in this week's economic rescue race.

MCCAIN: I won't raise taxes on small businesses.

GLOR: The McCain camp, following mixed signals about the release of new economic plans, was pushing the message of a comeback kid.

JOHN MCCAIN: We're six points down. The national media has written us off. Senator Obama is measuring the drapes.

GLOR: Which is not without precedent. The media has been close to saying good-bye and McCain has come back.

MCCAIN: You know, I'm past the age when I can claim the noun 'kid,' no matter what adjective precedes it, but, tonight, we sure showed them what a comeback looks like.

GLOR: The question is whether his primary wins can be replicated when 130 million vote in a general election.

SABATO: If John McCain manages to win, he'll be compared to Harry Truman and Richard Nixon. Both of them came back from political oblivion to win the presidency.

GLOR: With chances to change this race dwindling right now, McCain will embrace any opportunity he can, which includes this new economic plan out today, which is supposed to target homeowners and seniors. Those, he says, need help the most. Harry.

SMITH: Jeff Glor in Philadelphia, thanks. Joining us now from Washington, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a supporter of the McCain-Palin ticket. Good morning, Mr. Mayor.

RUDY GIULIANI: Good morning, Harry. How are you?

SMITH: Very well. Three weeks to the day to election day. Some polls show McCain's opponent six points, seven points, even ten points ahead. If John McCain were to pick up the phone this very second and say, 'Rudy, give me the best advice you've got for this home stretch,' what would it be?

GIULIANI: Well, I think he's doing it without having to call me. I mean, John has outlined a plan to help get people through this crisis. With what the president is doing today, putting $250 billion into the -- into the banks, John McCain is also making sure that Americans who can't afford their mortgage, Americans who are seniors, who have to take some money out of their 401(k) or I.R.A. or are forced to do it, that they're all going to get relief as well. So I think the plan that he's announcing today reaches right to the core of the people who are the most concerned about our economy, the people who, you know, are really stretched.

SMITH: This infusion of cash into these banks, as much as $250 billion, did the Fed get there? Is this too little too late and along with this, why should, in three weeks, the American people entrust the economy to another Republican administration?

GIULIANI: Well, I mean the reality is John McCain is John McCain. We're not voting for a Republican or Democrat, we're voting for John McCain or Barack Obama. John McCain has the experience. John McCain has led people, led our country through crisis before. Barack Obama never has. John McCain has a much clearer vision of the economy. He's not going to raise taxes. He's not going to cut off -- he's not going to cut off trade with high tariffs, the way Barack Obama wants to do. Barack Obama is talking about the kinds of things Herbert Hoover did and I know, you know people see him as change but this is like retrogression. High taxes, high tariffs, would be a disaster.

SMITH: Okay [Laughter]. Alright, one of the things that's happened in the McCain campaign over the last couple of days is the personal attacks seem to have at least subsided or quieted down a little bit. Do you think, in the long run, this might actually have been a fatal wound to the McCain-Palin campaign?

GIULIANI: No. I mean, unfortunately, you've got examples on all sides of people making horrible attacks. I mean, I don't want to mention names, but there were some pretty horrible attacks on John McCain and Sarah Palin just this weekend by very prominent Democrats very close to Barack Obama. And you know, there have been some on our side, too. So, I think it's a good thing that it's subsided. I think there's a tendency on the media to blame it more on John McCain and Sarah Palin than on Barack Obama and his campaign but, to me, it's -- you know it's been coming from both sides.

SMITH: Yeah, it's got to be the media's fault. Alright, well Mr. Mayor, thank you very much for your time this morning.

GIULIANI: [Laughter] Don't be defensive, Harry.

SMITH: Alright, take care. Thanks for your time. Do appreciate it. Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

 

Here is the full transcript of the Krugman segment:

7:00AM TEASE:

HARRY SMITH: As markets soar around the world, the government's set to buy stakes in America's banks. Will it work? We'll ask new Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman.

7:04AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: Joining us now is Paul Krugman, who was just awarded the Nobel Prize in economics. He's a professor at Princeton University and a columnist and blogger for the New York Times. Good morning and congratulations.

PAUL KRUGMAN: Good morning and thank you.

SMITH: First off, this infusion of $250 billion, some of it straight into America's biggest banks, is this a good idea?

KRUGMAN: Yes, it is. I mean, we're following the lead of the British who did this. Actually, on a -- relative to the size of their economy -- on an even bigger scale yesterday. So this is -- this is what a lot of economists have been calling for. The problem is the banks don't have enough capital to do their business. People don't trust them. This is what the doctor ordered as far as we can tell.

SMITH: Right. We've been listening for all of these years to all these free marketeers, who are saying get the regulation out, keep the government away, yet now, all of a sudden, these banks and the government are literally going to be business partners.

KRUGMAN: Well it's -- it's an amazing thing, you know? The -- the Bush Administration has seized the commanding heights of the economy. Whoever thought that would happen. But it's necessary. You know, there are times, the free markets are great, but sometimes you got to step in and, right now, you know, we're on the edge of precipice and you need to do this.

SMITH: Yeah. Do you have a sense that in the days and weeks to come the markets will as volatile as we've seen in the last month?

KRUGMAN: Sure, because the truth is no one, although most economists that I know think this is the right thing to do, no one is sure it will work and there's going to be manic depressive markets as people wonder and we don't have the evidence in yet about whether it will really work. So this was a leap of faith, literally, by the Dow yesterday and there may be moments of depression coming along, too.

SMITH: So there's a band-aid now. Maybe it proves to be that maybe the cure on the end, though, we're starting to see mounting job loss. This is going to be passed on down the economy in the months to come. How bad do you foresee this recession going?

KRUGMAN: It looks like a nasty recession, even if this works. Right, what we're talking about here is preventing the collapse of the banking system, which is -- collapse of the banking system is what turned a recession in the 1930s into the Great Depression. So we're trying -- but the recession is still, you know, barreling along. There's a lot of momentum behind it. This is not -- these are not going to be good times. We're just trying to prevent them from being terrible times.

SMITH: You get a prize of more than $1 million when you win the Nobel. I'm just very curious, if, once you get that check, how will you invest it?

KRUGMAN: People are -- that probably depends on where the markets are. I mean -- as of -- before the markets opened yesterday, I was thinking maybe stocks are looking cheap. I'm not sure anymore.

SMITH: Paul Krugman, thank you very, very much for taking the time to speak with us and, again, congratulations.

KRUGMAN: Thanks so much.

SMITH: Do appreciate it.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Typical fallback argument

Typical fallback argument that proves nothing "oh yeah, blame the media."

Well Harry, it IS the media.  They are the ones transferring the information from the sources to the people.  What they emphasize and what they bury; what they sensationalize and what they ignore determines the tenor of the message delivered to the consumer of news.  They damned well know it, and they are actively using it.

Harry Smith

How can anyone take Harry Smith as a serious journalist/reporter ?  He is better suited for Entertainment Tonight.  I cringe, really cringe when I hear them calling themselves "journalists". 

I would rather be a Conservative nut job, than a Liberal with no nuts and no job

Hard to Beat Harry

For pure bias and tendentiousness it is hard to beat Harry Smith. He has some elite competition in the morning for sure, with Diane Sawyer, Chris Cuomo and Ann Curry. But Harry comes out on top.

Ted Baxter is alive and well

Just because Harry Smith thinks he's intelligent and takes himself seriously doesn't mean that I have to consider him intelligent. And as a matter of fact, I don't take him very seriously.

A lovely example is: "[W]hy should, in three weeks, the American people entrust the economy to another Republican administration?" In foreign policy, the president can dramatically influence affairs, but not so in the economy. It's important to pay attention to what Sabato said - there ain't a lot the president can do anyway. The president can damage the economy by meddling, but in general, the economy moves collectively, ignoring top-down direction. However, the media lays the blame (never the credit) exclusively with the president (and only when he's Republican). Either Smith tried to make it a "when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife?" question deliberately, or more likely, he did it without knowing the difference.

We don't entrust the economy to anyone. They only use that formula because it allows them to blame the administration.

Harry Smith is a tool

I find it interesting to juxtapose the Giuliani interview with the "report" from Jeff Glor. Obama's campaign is "relentless." His lead in the polls is "clear." Glor made sure to illuminate Obama's plan. It was like a campaign press release in it's detailing of the "four points." Whereas when he mentioned McCain, it was "chances are... dwindling," and "mixed signals," with no details of McCain's plan.

Also, funny how they used clips that came after the part where Obama said "relief... not next year, but now!" I heard that part yesterday, and was wondering; if it needs done now, why hasn't Obama proposed it in the Senate? You know, his current job?

Smith was falling all over himself to get rid of Rudy after "bias" came up. Maybe he realized that Glor's report was a great example of just what Rudy was talking about.

 

Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."

"Yeah, it's got to be the

"Yeah, it's got to be the media's fault"

This is a typical left wing strategy of presenting an argument.  Make a smarmy, dismissive comment and let it stand on its own as evidence of a position.  The left believes this is what constitutes a valid debate.  Notice earlier on that Smith offered no examples of what exactly Obama has been asked about his background or international affairs; he merely stated that he has, that it's all been handled.  And we're supposed to accept that and move on.  Notice Smith did not counter Giuliani's statement that people close to Obama have been throwing attacks against the wall as well.  That doesn't matter; it garners no rebuttal at all.  Again, we're supposed to forget it and get back to the point of why McCain is attacking Obama and will it hurt McCain in the election.  It really does turn my stomach to listen to these people.

I love Gulianni's little

I love Gulianni's little zinger, "Don't be defencive Harry." Harry is a real dolt if he thinks that many Americans don't recognize his and the media's bias. 

Smith = Bias

Smith is the best example of media bias... says he's neutral and then bias' everything left.

More dangerous than the Matthews' and Olbermaniacs.

Oh, and have we experienced the two consecutive quarters of negative growth yet?  If not, then this nobel prize winner forgot his econ101 when he said,  "the recession is still, you know, barreling along."

Hmm... guess he's right there on the genius scale as that other nobel prize winner, AlGore.

Hey...hack!

Don't point your finger at me, you hack!

Drill ANWAR

Defensive? Offensive? Both?

SMITH: ....why should, in three weeks, the American people entrust the economy to another Republican administration?

Because this Republican administration along with fellow Republicans MeCain, Dole and others were the only pollitical leaders bold enough to question the corrupt relationship existing between the leadership of Fannie, Freddie and their Democrat counterparts in Congress including Obama among others.

If the Democrats in Congress had heeded this warning from Republicans when first issued instead of covering for their partners in crime at Fannie and Freddie, America might not be in this financial mess now. 

Or is Harry suggesting the very people responsible for the American mortgage meltdown are the same people Americans should rely on in the next four years to fix the problem?

In addition to finding Harry defensive, I equally find him offensive.

Rudy should've asked Smith...

...who Tim Mahoney was.

 If Smith said he had never heard of him, Giuliani could've explained the situation to him and then asked him to compare the situation with Foley's.  

If Smith said he did know who he was, Giulani could've asked him where all the non-stop reports were on his affair.

Either way Rudy makes the point.

Either way Rudy makes the point.

I have been thinking that what needs to be done in these interviews with these leftie "journalist", is to ask them more questions, expose them(like when McCain prefaced his reply to Mica M. that he knows she is a O'Bama supporter) and pin them done.

Kinda like verbal  judo moves.

 

And most importantly...

...they just need to laugh at the "reporters" just like Rudy does just to show them we're on to them. 

Nothing will get under their skin more.

Why, oh, why, do

Why, oh, why, do Republicans continue to do these MSM network interviews (or more like debates)? It just helps them in their attempts to create an illusion of "balance". Leave these leftist propaganda machines to interview other leftists and reveal them as being what they actually are.  

McNotObama '08

"But it appeared the

"But it appeared the relentless Obama campaign has at least won the first round in this week's economic rescue race."

This is the slogan of the liberal media: "We report, we decide for you." 

"Don't you dare lie to me, mister"

Could you guys put together a little gallery of Harriet Smith's greatest finger wags?

SoL... Harriet

SoL...

Harriet Smith...lol...that's rich!

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

The Repubs should go for the jugular

When ever a Repub is scheduled to go on one of these so-called news organizations they should be ready and prepared to lay down the law and rip into them with well prepared arguments about how the media are nothing more than left wing hacks. Ambush the talking heads! Expose them for what they are. Going on these shows and expecting a reasonable and impartial interview is not going to happen.

 

I posted a very similar

I posted a very similar post on another thread .. I dont want to be accused of a Biden

 but your point is exactly right .. conservatives should go on these shows prepared to show the bias and put these folks on their heels

Harry Smith says that,

Harry Smith says that, MSM would do no such a thing as to be biased in our discussions. Then he immediately gives a glowing interview to the left.

 

Harry,

What more do you need to see/hear? It's right in front of you.

I saw this....

Smith's condescension was pretty thick. He had a condescending grin on his face every time Rudy was speaking.

Give 'em hell Rudy!

Give 'em hell (for me) Rudy!

Harry Smith, CBS is so in the tank for obama. Pitiful.  A grown man like Harry knows better.  Doesn't care.

sorry.

tired tonite.

whew.