Hillary Sidesteps Social Security Questions to ‘Not Spook’ Americans

Photo of Jeff Poor.

Hillary could have saved CNBC “Street Signs” viewers about 10 minutes of their lives by just saying “Trust me,” when CNBC Washington correspondent John Harwood pressed her on economic issues.

Clinton appeared on the October 11 show with Harwood and “Street Signs” anchor Erin Burnett.

Harwood asked Clinton to respond to a comment made by GOP presidential nominee frontrunner Rudy Giuliani: “Hillary Clinton … wants to put a lid on us. She wants to put a lid on our growth. We want to give people freedom.”

“Well, obviously I disagree profoundly,” Clinton said. “What I have proposed would be fiscally responsible. I have put forth the way I would pay for everything that I believe we need to do in our country. I am concerned that our great economic engine that is the heart and soul of the American dream is under stress and even under attack.”

However, Clinton’s proposed a bizarre solution – she’s said wants to roll back Bush’s tax cuts for those in the top two tax brackets to fund entitlements, primarily her $110-billion “Hillarycare” boondoggle, and try to make Social Security solvent with what’s left.

Harwood asked her if those tax increases would hurt the economy.

“Well, I don’t believe that’s the case,” Clinton said. “We hear a lot from the other side about taxes, but as I recall in the 1990s when my husband did raise taxes on the upper-income Americans who are the most well off, we got 22 million new jobs. President Bush has tried to slash taxes as much as he could over the last six-and-a-half years. We haven’t seen jobs increase the way we should have if cutting taxes is supposed to be a job generator.”

However, in a time of war, the Bush economy has created 8.1 million new jobs and the post-tax cut IRS has seen double-digit increases in tax receipts.

Harwood also asked her to comment on an idea put forth by Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson – to index Social Security benefits to inflation instead of wages.

“[W]e do have to get back to fiscal responsibility to replenish the Social Security trust fund. I want people committed to that first before we start talking about what will or will not be done. And then, I want a bi-partisan commission so everyone agrees on what steps have to be taken.”

But, Harwood pressed on for a specific answer. “But don’t you owe it, as someone with a very good chance at becoming president, seeking the votes of Americans, don’t you owe it to the American people to tell them what you think about some of these specific ideas while you’re running?” Harwood asked.

“I think what I owe the American people is to tell them I will not spook them and sound the alarm over Social Security because that’s not merited,” Clinton said. “We have time to deal with this problem. I will deal with it in a responsible fashion.”


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Need, want, gotta' have...

"We haven’t seen jobs increase the way we should have if cutting taxes is supposed to be a job generator.”

Well if you haven't seen the jobs increase like most Americans, then perhaps you (sometimes Ms. Rodham, Sometimes Mrs. Clinton) should stop using ONLY liberal media sources to obtain your information.

“[W]e do have to get back to fiscal responsibility to replenish the Social Security trust fund."

Isn't that the job of Congress?  And for how many years now as a Senator have you been damaging the Social Security trust fund by ignoring fiscal responsibility?

Which means?

 

“I think what I owe the American people is to tell them I will not spook them and sound the alarm over Social Security because that’s not merited,” Clinton said. “We have time to deal with this problem. I will deal with it in a responsible fashion.”

Which means that she won't tell the American people the truth, until after it goes insolvent and there's no possible solution except to tax the hell out of everyone.

Democrats: Specializing in "high tech lynching" since 1987.

Interesting.

Which means that she won't tell the American people the truth, until after it goes insolvent and there's no possible solution except to tax the hell out of everyone.

A great example of this is currently underway as Governor Jennifer Granholm here in Michigan has done exactly that.  When she ran for re-election last year, everything was rosy here in Michigan  (She claimed, as unemployment rose and people fled the state).  As soon as she won re-election, she discovered things were in a fiscal mess, and she's raised taxes AND started a new GST tax to boot.  Be grateful, America, that Jennifer Granholm, the flaxen savior to the DNC, will never run for President.  She was born in Canada.  Whew....

Scout... I have been glad

Scout...

I have been glad for quite awhile that she is from Canada.

I too have been one that noticed msm political leftist fav's and she is one.

Yes, Hillary is wise to

Yes, Hillary is wise to keep her mouth shut and claim nothing is wong with Social Security... we have to keep that PONZI scheme going long enough so Hillary will serve out her term and collect her pension, then the rest of us be screwed.  Why heck, 2017 is just far enough away so Hillary doesn't have to do anything and let the next fool be left holding the bag.

2017: when Social Security annual receipts will not be enough to cover annual pension check obligations.  Hence, Social Security gets to start cashing in those low interest bonds they were forced to purchase instead of proper investments.  What that means is a yearly tax increase or matching spending reduction to offset that increased demand on revenues.  This is why the Dems are busy rearranging the deck chairs on the Titantic, whoever sits last gets the historic name recognition of the fool.  This is why they want to raise taxes now, so the increased revenue will cover the shortfall for several more years before another future dolt gets stuck holding the bag preferably a Repub in 2042.  

Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

I'm already spooked..

Wasn't it her husband, the economic genius, that told the founder of Godfathers Pizza at a townhall forum to "just raise his prices"?

http://www.house.gov...

Her and her

Her and her Side-steps...

Won't last forever.

Rocky Horror Picture

Rocky Horror Picture Show

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Hil•lar•ism (Noun) I want to take those profits

Hil•lar•ism (Noun)

Hillary: 'I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all'...

"individual MANDATE

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices.... Government has to make those choices for people"

"We have to fight and finally bury the idea of privatizing Social Security"

"I want to take those profits." 

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." 

i just threw up a little...

i just threw up a little...

Wishful thinking from John

Wishful thinking from John Harwood: "But don’t you owe it, as someone with a very good chance at becoming president, ...." 

I'll bet my last penny that Harwood has never declared during an interview with a Republican candidate for president: "As someone with a very good chance at becoming president, ...."

I think what I owe the

I think what I owe the American people is to tell them I will not spook them and sound the alarm over Social Security because that’s not merited,” Clinton said."

Yeah, you've been too busy spooking and alarming them about how the Republicans will end social security and put the poor and elderly out on the street...