NBC's David Gregory, on Wednesday's Today show, downplayed the huge GOP wins in New Jersey and Virginia as merely reflecting the "anti-incumbency mood," and "the change message that Obama" started last year. Gregory, however, did play up Democrat Bill Owens' win over Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman in the New York 23 congressional race, and even more absurdly Bob McDonnell's win in Virginia as evidence that the Republican's path to victory is to go moderate, as the Meet the Press host postulated: "What's striking is you have the results in New York 23, which Democrats will hold up as a great result for them, but then you have McDonnell winning in Virginia, a purple state. He's a social conservative for his political career, yet he runs more as a pragmatist, as more of a centrist and look at the result. He wins big, wins big among independent voters."
The following is the full Gregory segment with Meredith Vieira as it was aired on the November 4, Today show:
MEREDITH VIEIRA: David Gregory is the moderator of Meet the Press. Hey good morning to you, David.
[On screen headline: "Decision 2009, Is This Election A Referendum On Obama?"]
DAVID GREGORY: Good morning, Meredith.
VIEIRA: As Chuck, as Chuck just reported, the President did stump for the two losing gubernatorial candidates in New Jersey and Virginia. Republicans are saying this morning it is a repudiation of the President's administration. Fair statement or overstated?
GREGORY: Well probably unfair when it comes to a repudiation of the President himself, because his own approval numbers in New Jersey and Virginia are still quite high. But as Chuck points out, it's the Obama coalition that was so successful in 2008 that did not show up. Independent voters, younger voters, African-American voters. That was part of a unique coalition that he put together for his presidency. This anti-incumbency mood is significant. It says that, that change message that Obama carried on to victory is still holding true, but now it's being used against Democratic incumbents.
VIEIRA: Yeah, you mentioned the independents. And as you pointed out, they went heavily for Obama in 2008. This time they went with the Republicans. So, what is the lesson that both the Republicans and Democrats should take away from that?
GREGORY: Well, again, it's the anti-incumbency mood, it's the fact that there's less trust of government, that there's a disaffection with both parties, which is why I think this New York 23 race is important, because it's a fight between conservatives and moderates in the Republican Party. For Republicans, they make the argument here that the independent wave is part of a different atmosphere, that there's concern about the debt or health care, some of Obama's policies, some of the Democratic policies. That's the message that they hope to build on and they will try to nationalize that message today and going forward.
VIEIRA: Let's talk a little bit about the congressional race in the 23rd district in New York. It, it sort of pointed out the dissension within the Republican Party between the moderates and those that are, are far more conservative. In the end, it was the Democrat who, who won that particular race, so how does the outcome of that race factor into national politics?
GREGORY: There's still gonna be a big fight in the Republican Party about what the party should be. Should it be a more conservative party that gets back to its smaller government days or should it be a moderate party that can change some positions to get more independent voters to expand that coalition? What's striking is you have the results in New York 23, which Democrats will hold up as a great result for them, but then you have McDonnell winning in Virginia, a purple state. He's a social conservative for his political career, yet he runs more as a pragmatist, as more of a centrist and look at the result. He wins big, wins big among independent voters. So that dynamic within the Republican Party, that fight about what it wants to be is gonna go on.
VIEIRA: And finally David, you know midterm elections are next year, do you think that legislators will be looking at the results from last night and recalculating how they're gonna come down on tough issues like health care reform?
GREGORY: It's gonna be a real fear within the White House that those moderate Democrats are gonna now find it more difficult to cast a difficult vote on health care that could increase the deficit, that may be unpopular with key parts of their constituencies as they face voters next year. That's something that the president is gonna have to really work on.
VIEIRA: Alright. David Gregory, thank you very much.
GREGORY: Thanks Meredith.
VIEIRA: It is 7:08 and for more, here's Matt.
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"anti-incumbency
November 4, 2009 - 10:26 ET by notonmywatch"anti-incumbency mood,"
They're only saying that because the democrats lost!!
Orwell was only 25 years out.
___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...
Oh!
November 4, 2009 - 11:49 ET by heldmywYou didn't hear?
There are now 3 political parties in the U.S.
Republicans, Democrats and Incumbents.
(The fact that the majority of the Incumbent Party are Democrats is immaterial and not mentioned in polite society, shhhh.)
The GOP can't get no
November 4, 2009 - 10:33 ET by wiwfThe GOP can't get no respect
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Respect?
November 4, 2009 - 10:49 ET by allanfExpect Democrats like Gregory and Shieffer to piffle on about Republicans. Their complaints are a sign that Republicans are doing something right.
Gregory
November 4, 2009 - 10:33 ET by iveseenitallAccording to my survey, Gregory is wrong on the facts 98.6 % of the time. Don't listen to this fool.
NEVER, NEVER trust a "liberal"
real fear within the White House
November 4, 2009 - 10:46 ET by CarlosSNothing to fear, two state governerships lost, there are, what, 55 state governerships to go?
What a surprise....not
November 4, 2009 - 10:50 ET by Blue State PrisonerNBC is a joke. Chuck Todd, the man who said McCain may lose Arizona last year, said Corzine outspent Christie "nearly 2 to 1." Um try 3 to 1 easy. Of course Gregory played up the NY 23 race. All I know is I slept well last night in NJ and woke up with a big smile and whistled all the way to work! Maybe I have to change my screen name!
more "positive" news from NJ
November 4, 2009 - 11:30 ET by SouthJersey1953Can't express how thrilled and happy I am that my fellow NJ voters got their heads out of their behinds and dumped the arrogant Corzine!!!!!
On top of that, the Dem Assemblymen were quoted in the local paper this morning as saying that, even though they "survivied" and got re-elected, it was a wakeup call that voters are not happy! It was the closest in a long time to them actually losing. They said they "heard" the voice of the people and they will do something...... Now, if they actually do something, that will be great, but I consider it a HUGE first step for them to even acknowledge that something needs to be done.
You can fix a lot of things, but, you can't fix STUPID! - Joe Murray
Yes, thankfully Corzine will soon vacate Drumthwacket...
November 4, 2009 - 11:34 ET by SickofLibs...but he won't fade away quietly into the night. The rumor mill is already postulating he will be going after Senator Ramses II's (aka Lautenberg) senate seat. "C'mon Frank, do the right thing for your party... you're pushing 90, old timer!"
Failing that, Obama could appoint Corzine "Tomato Czar".
tarnished goods?
November 4, 2009 - 11:48 ET by SouthJersey1953Hopefully, Corzine is too tarnished and left a bad taste in enough people's mouths that he will not get back into the Senate. I just hope the Republicans in the state can find someone to put up against the senile Laughingstock. That might be asking too much since their track record of finding half-decent candidates has not been good.
You can fix a lot of things, but, you can't fix STUPID! - Joe Murray
The problem is the GOP buys
November 4, 2009 - 10:50 ET by mattmThe problem is the GOP buys into this crap. They'll probably look at NY 23 and say, "eh' hyuh, duuuhhhh I guess we shud of run Dede after all, hyuk." They never look beyond the current election and they pay too much heed to the DNC spin machine.
What needs to happen is for the GOP to get the right message; and it's so simple even a GOP party boss can understand it: stick to the platform.
Matt...
November 4, 2009 - 11:24 ET by PA ConservativeThis was my point on an earlier post on NB. Unfortunately, the RINO's in the party listen to Gregory prattle on and truly believe that the way for themselves to be admired is to be "moderate". I love how toolboxes like David Gregory try to dictate what the Republican party ought to look like and think. Hmmm, let's see. What is David's political tilt? Liberal, you say? Well, then I am so glad he is giving us advice on the direction of the party. An analogy that might make it more clear:
Charlie Manual gets to pick what lineup the Yankees will bat tonite. Gee, do you think A-Rod, Texeira, and Matsui would be in that lineup? Of course not! Same thing Gregory and his liberal comrades in the SRM try to pull on a daily basis with the Republican party. The sad thing is, it has worked in the past. Hopefully, we are at a turning point. A Hoffman win yesterday would have gone a loooong way to making a difference for conservatives.
PAC
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends,it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and toinstitute new government...
"A Hoffman win yesterday
November 4, 2009 - 11:34 ET by mattm"A Hoffman win yesterday would have gone a loooong way to making a difference for conservatives."
I believe he was hurt because the DOP ran Dede Scofflaw in the first place. If they had never put that Democrat infiltrator on the ballot, and had put a real Republican like Hoffman on it at first, he would have had a much better chance.
BTW- Nice baseball anology. If the Phillies were the GOP they would put their worst pitcher on the mound tonight and bench all their best players - and toss meatballs to the Yankees.
It's Time for some Rino-plasty in the Republican Party
November 4, 2009 - 12:03 ET by allanfPA Conservative wrote:
Well said!!!
It's time for some rino-plasty in the Republican Party.
While Bush was in office I
November 4, 2009 - 10:51 ET by ForeverOnTheRightWhile Bush was in office I noticed any time there was "bad" news to report for Bush, Gregory always had that slight smirk on his face like he was enjoying reporting on it. I have not seen a video of him reporting on this but I am sure that there is no smirk or anything near it. He knows the truth but does not want to admit to it, liar.
If you watched CNN or
November 4, 2009 - 11:26 ET by krendlerIf you watched CNN or MS-NBC last night, the mood and tone was extremely somber, like someone had died. Palpable.
Very telling.
I suspect that they know
November 4, 2009 - 12:17 ET by ForeverOnTheRightI suspect that they know their dream is dying, and their messiah can't walk on water because he is human not divine.
exqueeze me??
November 4, 2009 - 10:56 ET by MrShy"This anti-incumbency mood is significant. It says that, that change message that Obama carried on to victory *is still holding true*, but now it's being used against Democratic incumbents."
Huh?
Who is this make-crap-up hack? I think it's time for my MSDNC Hack/Not A Hack list now...
Hey, Gregory. Your side
November 4, 2009 - 10:56 ET by celatorHey, Gregory. Your side lost big time. Deal with it. It's telling to watch you spin, spin spin.
Or as Jim Croce sang:
You look out on the city from your penthouse so high
Spin around
But your pedestal's your prison and so is your high
Spin around
But where are you spinnin'
When will you know
That life is for livin'
That it isn't a show?
Lyrics by Jim Croce
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
CNN's "news" crawl this morning - LOL
November 4, 2009 - 11:24 ET by krendlerWas watching CNN this morning, glancing down occasionally at the news crawl (which is now more of a news "popup" on CNN instead of the traditional, slowly-scrolling crawl). Anyway, one of the "news" items that appeared momentarily - with no further explanation - read:
"Analysis: Election results not a referendum on Obama"
That was it! Like it was important to get that in there, intermixed with actual news items (fires, arrests, this an that), in order to prevent the ignorant viewer from thinking that all these Republican victories were somehow a slap in the face to Obama.
It didn't say who the analysis was done by (Roland Martin, perhaps?). Nothing. "Just keep in mind folks: This was NOT a referendum on Obama. Don't even think about going there"
Maybe we should start calling it the "analysis crawl".
2010 and 2012
November 4, 2009 - 11:34 ET by SouthJersey1953...and in 2010 when Dems lose control of House and Senate it will not be a referendum on Obama and in 2012 when he loses re-election it will not be a referendum on Obama!
You can fix a lot of things, but, you can't fix STUPID! - Joe Murray
HURRAY !
November 4, 2009 - 12:43 ET by billbHurry, we won! But those of us who live in NJ are already aware of how much wreckage Corzine will leave behind. Between now and January 2010 he plant more land mines than Al Quida! Just like Bill Clinton did to George Bush
Caught Christie's
November 4, 2009 - 13:23 ET by BuffNBoneCaught Christie's acceptance speech last night. It sounded like he won't waste much time lamenting Corzine's legacy to the state. Rather he'll do an assessment and get on with business.
Here's hoping the rats in government jump ship on their own instead of having to be rooted out. Might be a good idea to offer clemency for self-identified crimes and double penalties (or at least the full letter of the law) for those who hide them.
Would be nice if he lost some weight because his health could become a problem for him and I'd like to see him stick around for a second or third term.
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
Exactly as Rush predicted...
November 4, 2009 - 15:06 ET by Jarhead68This is so comical.