From that headline alone you can see part one of CNN's ballyhooed "Planet in Peril" program was a mixed bag. More than an hour of the first night focused on the extinction of rare species as a preface to global disaster. Forty-five minutes into the program, I began to envy some of the creatures and wondered what poacher would put me out of my misery and save me from a "planet under assault."
The photography was good, not Discovery Channel quality, but above average and the locales were exotic. But the first hour moved with almost glacial tedium. Only when hour two got going did it get more interesting - exploring Chinese pollution and Anderson Cooper's bloodstream.
The special, called by the network "the story the world can't afford to ignore," was led by Cooper, and also featured Dr. Sanjay Gupta and Animal Planet's Jeff Corwin. As the program went on, it got more interesting. Gupta whipped out typical Malthusian claims of global overpopulation saying there simply aren't enough natural resources to support everyone.
A couple highlights:
- Gupta discovering what communist China is really like as he tried to investigate pollution. Everywhere he went, he encountered government control and was interrogated by police for simply stopping by a polluted river. When he tried to interview a farmer in a rice paddy, the man got a call on his cell phone telling him what to say.
- The program focused on trying to save species in poor places like Madagascar by protecting forests, but ignored the reality that development brings jobs to people who survive whole families on a dollar a day. It didn't offer solutions for humans, just animals.
- While Cooper admitted that reintroducing wolves into Yellowstone National Park was opposed by ranchers who feared the threat, he went on to say that it was one "of the greatest conservation success stories." He didn't follow up with any rancher opinions on that one. Doubtless the ranchers disagree a tad.
- Cooper also had his blood tested for various heavy metals and discovered that he was above the 95th percentile in Phthalates - "the stuff found in cosmetics like the make-up I put on before going in front of the cameras," he told viewers. As the doctor who did the test said, "You probably put a lot of make-up on a lot of the time."
From endangered species to rising seas, this was CNN's "tale of the Earth's trouble." Unless you've been living under a rock for the past month, you have seen or heard one of CNN's many advertisements for the program. The four major ‘perils' that the two-night, four-hour long documentary will cover are species loss, deforestation or habitat loss, overpopulation and global warming.
Advertisements have shown up all over the country, from DrudgeReport.com to NPR News. CNN even put six-foot square poster in each copy of October 16's USA Today.
-- Genevieve Ebel contributed to this post.
—Dan Gainor is director of the Business and Media Institute.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
People are going to get
October 24, 2007 - 01:14 ET by Clearly CalifornianPeople are going to get sick and tired of hearing that the world is going to end from the MSM. Every time a program like this airs, more people are turned off the AGW bandwagon. I have friends who believed in it before turn into Sen. Inhofe fans lately. They are realizing more and more that it is strictly a political issue - purely a scheme to increase taxes and gain control.
Life's a garden, dig it. - Joe Dirt
'Planet in Peril'
October 24, 2007 - 04:47 ET by GbearThanks for watching - so I didn't have to.
I think the worst part of
October 24, 2007 - 05:25 ET by motherbeltI think the worst part of all this it those who don't want third-world nations to develop, and think they should stay dirt-poor, because it is better for the earth. They oppose energy projects in places like Africa.
Paul Driessen, senior policy advisor of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise wrote, after the latest "Live Earth" concert:
But Al Gore, Live Earth rock stars and radical pressure groups like Rainforest Action and Greenpeace constantly battle energy projects in poor countries. They oppose coal and gas-fired power plants because of speculative global warming, hydroelectric projects because they dam up rivers, nuclear power because it generates radioactive wastes. They expect African and other poor nations to base their future on insufficient, expensive, unreliable wind and solar energy. That is a virtual guarantor of perpetual poverty.
But what the hey....the earth will be better off for it. Go read the whole thing.
How many liberals are at
October 24, 2007 - 05:49 ET by NonanonHow many liberals are at this time living life the way they demand everyone else live it to 'save the planet'? I'd venture to say none. It is impossible to exist without leaving a 'carbon footprint'. Just breathing produces CO2, to say nothing of the waste products our bodies produce. They only way to end that is for someone to die (and that doesn't totally stop the contributions, decay surely produces waste). So if environmental wackos are truly concerned with the impact humans cause, why aren't they all commiting suicide to do their part in the fight to save Earth? If they are to be sincere in their quest, that seems to be the next step they need to take. But we know they are only after ways to control the lives of other people, not to solve any problem.
One thing I'm waiting for is when the climate does change again, they will arrogantly take credit for it even though we know they had nothing to do with it and sadly many will believe them and ratchet up the grip on us.
They only way to end that
October 24, 2007 - 05:55 ET by motherbeltThey only way to end that is for someone to die
nonanon, some of the extremists in the environmental movement actually do believe the eart would be better off without humans on it.
Time
October 24, 2007 - 06:37 ET by allanfOver the summer, the girls of CNN's sister propaganda factory Time Magazine suggested in a piece that office's raise their thermostat settings during summer to save energy and reduce Global Warming
I never received word if the Time Warner center in New York City had raised the thermostat settings. It certainly did not seem that way, judging by the lobby.
But I bet the girls felt better (you know like they were really contributing) when they wrote that suggestion.
Environmental whackos should
October 24, 2007 - 09:04 ET by Senior ChiefEnvironmental whackos should be in China's case. As NBs posters noted here before that US is the most responsible of all countries to police our environment. Algore, as an environment guru, along with UN should be pinging on China and India for their lack of environmental programs.
A lot of makeup? That's
October 24, 2007 - 10:23 ET by Chris NormanA lot of makeup? That's hilarious. On a related note, Nancy Grace had Anderson Cooper on her show the other night, who she introduced as "a very special guest", in a most reverent tone of voice. From reality tv show host to a very special apostle to the savior of the planet, Al Gore, in just a few short years...
Anderson Cooper
October 24, 2007 - 11:08 ET by PShannon"... the stuff found in cosmetics like the make-up I put on before going in front of the cameras,"
C'mon Anderson! It's the stuff you wear on weekends that is affecting you.
No No Nanette
October 24, 2007 - 12:36 ET by okiehawk44They say that the 1st time you're duped it's their bad and the 2nd time it's yours -- well the MSM got me with the Global Cooling scare in the '70s -- they won't get me this time.
the planet is in peril
February 14, 2008 - 15:00 ET by mbuelI agree with them.... The planet is in peril from environmentalists.