AP Laments Maine Marriage Victory

Photo of Colleen Raezler.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Nov. 3, 53 percent of Maine voters rejected a six-month-old law redefining the state's definition of marriage to include same-sex couples. The next day, an AP article about the vote read more like a direct mail appeal for the Human Rights Campaign than a news piece.

Headlined "Maine Voters Repeal Law Allowing Gay Marriage," the article called the repeal of the legislation that granted marriage for same-sex couples a "stinging defeat" for the gay rights movement and focused almost exclusively on the reactions of gays and lesbians. Framed around the thwarted wedding plans of a lesbian couple, the article contained three quotes from supporters of same sex-marriage and only one from an advocate for traditional marriage.

"Cecelia Burnett and Ann Swanson had already set their wedding date," began the article. "When they joined about 1,000 other gay marriage supporters for an election night party in a Holiday Inn ballroom, they hoped to celebrate the vote that would make it possible."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The conclusion of the article read, "For Burnett and Swanson, the July 10 wedding date - and a reception cruise on Casco Bay - is off."

AP reporters filled out the story with choice quotes from Burnett and other supporters - including one from Sarah Holman, who, "despite her conservative upbringing" voted to allow marriage between two men or two women.

"They love and they have the right to love. And we can't tell somebody how to love," Holman told the AP.

"I'm ready to start crying," Burnett told the AP. "I don't understand what the fear is, why people are so afraid of this change." She insisted, "It's a personal rejection of us and our relationship, and I don't understand what the fear is."

Jesse Connolly, the campaign manager for No on 1/Protect Maine Equality, told supporters, "We're not short-timers. We're here for the long haul and whether it's just all night and into the morning, or it's next week or next month or next year. We will be here. We'll be here fighting. We'll be working. We will regroup."

Frank Schubert, the chief organizer for Stand for Marriage Maine, provided the lone quote from the winning side.

"The institution of marriage has been preserved in Maine and across the nation," he told the AP.

But as biased as this AP story was, at least the agency explored the story.

ABC and CBS gave brief mention to the victory for traditional values in their morning news reads, while NBC ignored the story.

Their reticence is strange, considering ABC and NBC both thought the Maine referendum important enough to discuss last weekend. NBC ran a segment about it on the Oct. 31 broadcast of "Today," and ABC covered it the next night during "World News Sunday."

It's a compelling story. Maine is the 31st state to hold up the definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Maine voters are the first in New England to put same-sex marriage to a state-wide vote after having it forced upon them by the state governments or courts as it was in Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Connecticut.

At the very least it's worth a discussion about the proper relationship between state government and the judiciary versus the people.

—Colleen Raezler is a research assistant at the Culture and Media Institute


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Gay Marriage.

The voters in Maine havc spoken. Every time this stupid resolution comes up, it loses. The AP can stick this story up their asses.

They are sooo objective. 

They are sooo objective.  Fair and balanced like NPR...

There you go again, bringing

There you go again, bringing up something so irrelevant as the voters.

They don't get the institutionalizing part of this

If you want to call me homophobic go ahead.  I have no problems with homosexual couples doing what they do. 

But I am tired of the leftist agenda trying to tell me that a homosexual marriage would be on par with heterosexual marriage.  Our biology alone tells us that in order to procreate, there has to be a male and a female.  Under no natural method can a homosexual couple reproduce.  Even if you don't believe in God, the concept of separate sex organs in the male and female tells you that homosexuality is not/nor was it ever biologically intended.  That it happens, yes, it happens but it was never the intended order of things. 

"Timothy, guard what God has entrusted to you.  Avoid godless, foolish discussions with those who oppose you with their so-called knowledge."

Timothy 6:20

These people aren't trying to get a license to procreate...

The whole concept of a state sanctioning a marriage is ludicrous anyway. The state and federal governments have absolutely no business making laws concerning marriage either way; these are contracts between two consenting adults and the state need not get involved.

If you want to be free...

You've got to be willing to allow others to be free as well.

~Tell us more, Plugs

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

 

Plugs?

Do you wish to know more about liberty, and what liberty really means?

~I'm all ears

Oh wait, that's your hero.

We're listening, Bubba. Expound. Elucidate. Pontificate.

Speak boy, speak!

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

 

A greater irony for Colleen who....

wrote this column, and all of us who read and comment on it is this:

If all of our parents were exclusively homosexual, and married to their gay partners, WE WOULDN'T BE HAVING THIS DISCUSSION TODAY BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T EXIST !

Doesn't that fact alone speak to anyone here?

 

Remember in November 2010

Involved

As a resident of Maine, I was very invovled in this campaign. I tell you, the tactics of the homosexuals exceeded even my low expectations. The campaign director for same-sex marriage, Jesse Connolly, who in his spare time serves as chief of staff to the dRat House Leader Pingree, made a not-so-veiled threat in his remarks when it was obvious they had lost (carefully NOT a concession speech, as they promised to fight until they win counterfeit marriage) - From the Portland Press Herald: "In a defiant speech to several hundred lingering supporters, No on 1 campaign manager Jesse Connolly pledged that his side “will not quit until we know where every single one of these votes lives."

Many great threads on the entire campaign at forum As Maine Goes...

"Modern man is staggering and losing his balance because he is being pelted with little pieces of alleged fact which are native to the newspapers; and, if they turn out not to be facts, that is still more native to newspapers." -GKC

I've thought about that

I've thought about that threat this week.  So wouldn't we now be protected by the HATE CRIME bill?  If there were another attack on the majority public, they obviously do it out of hate plus it is due to our (normal) sexual orientation.  That would be funny and just to see them prosecuted with it.  M-B

Terroristic Threats

will not quit until we know where every single one of these votes lives."  Is this not a terroristic threat? Yes, but they will not act on an arrest because he is gay.

In FL

we have the Castle Doctrine (law) to protect you and your family from threats of death or harm. You have the right to protect yourself and use whatever means necessary and no longer required to retreat. Nuff said.

Maine has no Castle

Maine has no Castle Doctrine, and what was said constitutes a threat and should be treated as such and an arrest should be made. I whish this castle doctrine was a national law we'd all be safer and crime lower.

Not to say it is right but

Not to say it is right but wiki lists the following which seems to include Maine:

snip "Alabama,[9]Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky,Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio,Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah[10] West Virginia and Wyoming have adopted Castle Doctrine statutes, and other states (Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington) are currently considering "Stand Your Ground" laws of their own"

http://en.wikipedia....

This seems to confirm it: http://www.protected...

 

 

FYI I was in a gun store Monday & they had the Ruger LCP in stock ($299).  These had been on a waiting list due to demand for a long time & now seem more available.

M-B

Homosexuals Rejected Again

Once again the homosexual lifestyle is rejected and all we hear is the whining of the MSM.

I cannot wait to see Anderson "Tea Bagging" Cooper's expression on his face when he covers this story. 

When are they going to get it, homosexuality is AbbyNormal