CNN Reveals Anti-Abstinence Bias in Report on Palin's Daughter

Photo of Colleen Raezler.

CNN correspondent Kyra Phillips used a report on the "hometown reaction" to the news of Sarah Palin's pregnant teenaged daughter during today's "American Morning" to highlight the need for sex-education in schools.   Phillips noted, "But to some, the 17-year-old's pregnancy is a political issue. Her mother supports strong family values and teaching abstinence, but not sex education in schools. Abortion rights activists say they won't comment on Bristol's case, but it does underscore the need for teaching teenagers about sex."

After a positive sound bite from Barack Obama and another from a Republican Alaskan state senator, Phillips allowed the anti-abstinence bias to shine through.

When asked by Phillips, "why not support abstinence-only?" Geran Tarr of the Alliance for Reproductive Justice stated, "It doesn't educate teenagers about how to prevent STD transmission."  No proponents of abstinence-only education appeared during the segment to counter Tarr's claim and Phillips herself failed to challenge Tarr on his assertion. Instead, Phillips again stressed the need for sex education by stating, "Alaska has one of the highest teenage rates of sexually transmitted diseases in the country although the rate of teenage pregnancies has dropped sharply." 

The transcript of the segment that aired at 6:18 AM appears below:

KIRAN CHETRY: Well, personal news blending with presidential politics. Senator John McCain's running mate announcing that her teenage daughter is pregnant. Sarah Palin says that her daughter has their family's unconditional love and support in her decision to keep the baby and marry the father. The Obama camp says the matter is off the table as a campaign issue. CNN's Kyra Phillips is in Anchorage, Alaska with hometown reaction and what if anything it could mean for the Republican ticket.

KYRA PHILLIPS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: John and Kiran, we were sent here to investigate the background of Governor Sarah Palin. And I can tell you in less than a day on the ground, politics turned personal. 17-year-old Bristol is Governor Palin's oldest daughter -- a high school senior. She's been seen at campaign events in the last few days holding her baby brother, Trig. What we didn't know then, she's five months pregnant.

The father's name is Levi and they intend to marry. The parents issued this statement. "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support." Prominent Republicans in Alaska and beyond have been just as supportive.

FRED DYSON (R), ALASKA STATE SENATE: She's a human being like everybody else and it certainly doesn't mean that your kids are. To me it makes them more human. And my guess is that's how the public is going to react.

PHILLIPS: Aides to Senator John McCain say he was aware of Bristol's pregnancy even before he chose her mother for his running mate and didn't even consider it relevant. Nor does Democratic nominee Barack Obama.

SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I said before and I will repeat again, I think people's families are off limits. And people's children are especially off limits.

PHILLIPS: But to some, the 17-year-old's pregnancy is a political issue. Her mother supports strong family values and teaching abstinence, but not sex education in schools. Abortion rights activists say they won't comment on Bristol's case, but it does underscore the need for teaching teenagers about sex.

GERAN TARR, ALLIANCE FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: Even in the best of circumstances with the best family and a loving family where they've probably had the conversation that this type of thing can happen unexpectedly.

PHILLIPS: Why not support abstinence only?

TARR: It doesn't educate teenagers about how to prevent STD transmission.

PHILLIPS: According to Tarr, Alaska has one of the highest teenage rates of sexually transmitted diseases in the country although the rate of teenage pregnancies has dropped sharply. We asked a man who knows Governor Palin well. Can she juggle being a mom and vice president of the United States?

DYSON: She's a very capable person and very bright and tough, and without being abrasive. And I don't know whether she can do it or not. Time will tell.

PHILLIPS: Now the unknown. Will the revelation of Bristol's pregnancy impact the McCain campaign, if at all? And investigation number two, "Troopergate." Did Governor Palin use her political power to try and fire her former brother-in-law? The McCain camp is still adamant that she's done nothing wrong. John, Kiran.

ROBERTS: Kyra Phillips reporting for us this morning from Anchorage, Alaska. Kyra, thanks so much.

 

 

—Colleen Raezler is a research assistant at the Culture and Media Institute


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ummmm...

The young woman made a decision to have unprotected intercourse with her boyfriend. She made the decision on her own according to her own interpretation of family values taught by her parents. She has done nothing wrong nor should it be considered a mistake. She had a choice as a young woman to have unprotected intercourse with her boyfriend forgoing all conversations by her parents on pregnancy at a young age and the transmission of venereal diseases.I'm sure from the statements they probably were fully aware of there daughter's love for her boyfriend and promoted the idea of having a family with him. It's obvious this is part of God's plan for this family and no one should question it.

Gosh, from some of the statements I hope she has the support of her family...isn't that a given as a conservative with strong family values? Why would Sarah have to state her support of this pregnancy? Is there any doubt in her support?

Go McCain/Palin!

Congrats on becoming the hottest granny in the GOP!

Ubercon

Ignorance

This whole issue with the media and young Bristol makes me very sick and I feel bad for the young lady but you are wrong in saying that God's plan has to do with the sin of fornication. Not only that you are making false judgements. Every Christian knows sex before marriage is sin and to assume that Sarah and Todd promoted the idea of having sex before marriage and starting a family with her boyfriend is beyond your correct judgement.

Bristol did do something wrong and she did make a mistake but we all makes mistakes and we all fall short of the people God wants us to be.

To even try to imagine how the topic of Bristol's pregnancy has anything to do with politics would stupify me. I have very religous family members that teach their teens heavily about God and family values and they still make huge mistakes and get into trouble all the time.

The libs can call this a "skeleton in the closet" but there is no sane person in this country that would think anything less of Sarah Palin because of her daughter's pregnancy. I hope young Bristol is handling all of this ok and I think we should all keep her in our prayers as she is a victim of this media abuse.

I think sex education should be abolished all together as it is a parental responsibility to teach your kids about sex and what is right and wrong about it.

"Push back the liberal hordes!!" - Mark Levin

I'm not to judge anyone...

usbeef,

correct or incorrect judgment? Not for me to say...I will opine on my take of the situation. 

your statement is judgmental..."Bristol did do something wrong and she did make a mistake but we all
makes mistakes and we all fall short of the people God wants us to be.
"

You do not know, nor do I, God's plan for the creation of this child. To say the creation of human life is a mistake is appalling. Human life is precious no matter how you may judge the procreation of it. Young men & women are having sex. Some have sex for pleasure, some are brought up in believing it is their God given right to procreate and produce more people to serve God. I've been reading through the threads and I am taken back by the hypocrisy of the statements.How can it be a mistake if she has the full support of her family. She was raised in believing her family would always be there for her. If she decided to produce a chil, she obviously felt her family would support her in her decision.

The problem I have is Gov. Sarah Palin's omission of her daughter's pregnancy to McCain's campaign. Her omission speaks volumes of her hidden ambition for power. I think it would be wise for her to withdraw as soon as possible.

She lied and she calls herself an evangelical christian. Lying is sinning. I'm having a harder time accepting her as a viable VP, she would be better as a mother taking care of her children and her soon to be grandchild. Her Family is in need of her more than the country is in need of a distraction. It's time for McCain to vet Pawlenty or Thompson for VP.

Ubercon

no bias, no bull

Still the funniest line in Television. 

CNN:  The most busted name in news.

Note to Kyra

Abstinence works 100% of the time Kyra.  Pregancy can only ahppen when  abstinence is rejected.

Be sure to turn your mike off next time you babble in the girls room with other ladies.

But teaching abstinence

But teaching abstinence doesn't work 100% of the time.

neither does telling kids

neither does telling kids to wear a condom work 100%.

In fact, I'm pissed off that media try to say that people that are for abstinence do not want anything else taught. I'm all for teaching kids all about STD's Yet, the media trys to claim that my version of sex ed should be : "just say no" and that's it, go home.

Yet to hear the media: the liberal version of sex ed is: "here, put this on"

Obviously this girl was taught sex ed.........

PHILLIPS: Now the unknown.

PHILLIPS: Now the unknown. Will the revelation of Bristol's pregnancy impact the McCain campaign, if at all?

Phillips...yep...wait and watch...there is going to be such a backlash to all of you in the msm you aren't going to know what hit you...

It's called the voters...you know...the real people out here.

 "America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Nothing better than abstinence to avoid STDs

When asked by Phillips, "why not support abstinence-only?" Geran Tarr
of the Alliance for Reproductive Justice stated, "It doesn't educate
teenagers about how to prevent STD transmission."

Mr. Tarr, if you abstain from sex until marriage and then remain faithful to a spouse who is equally faithful, your chances of getting an STD are practically nil.  If it happens, it wouldn't come about through sex.  (For example, a nurse accidentally stuck by a needle used on an AIDS patient.)  If practiced consistently, abstinence is practically insures that a teen won't get an STD.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

GMTA, nkviking

Is that a riot or what? This had me laughing hysterically. That's like opposing anti-drunk-driving programs because they don't mention breath mints.

Condescending

"but it does underscore the need for teaching teenagers about sex."

Because, of course, Christian parents never teach their children anything about sex?  This is an extremely smug attitude.  The idea that young Miss Palin knows nothing about sexual function, condoms, etc, is ridiculous.  This is the cooky thinking of the left: if only she had been taught by liberals instead of brainwashed by those Christian cultists, this would never have happened.  These people are nuts.

Abstinence & "Sex Education"

Point One - It is infallible. Unlike "birth control" components, abstinence  works 100%, every time.

Point Two - We've had "sex education" now for what - 30 years? Considering the teen pregnacy numbers, even in their dimished sense, it appears, that like all Liberalite "education" measures - the program is a dismal failure.  Fire the Teachers Unions - take back our schools - nullify the Marxist maxim - "Go for the robes."

But to some?

"But to some, the 17-year-old's pregnancy is a political issue."

And, to everyone else, the 17-year-old's pregnancy is NOT a political issue but is, instead, a personal family matter.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

Unbelievable callousness in the GOP

Here we have a child - 17 years old, unwed and pregnant.  Her OWN mother has knowingly allowed her to be made a spectacle in the global media.  She knew she couldn't keep the girl's condition secret, no matter what, if she accepted the VP offer.  Yet she, her husband AND that paragon of character and virtue, McCain, allowed her to be dragged through the media, adding unspeakably to the trauma she was already in.

And the GOP, at the convention, calls that good.  Her mother has "principles."  She sure does - bornagain, judgmental principles, and that poor child is probably being subjected to hell on earth in the privacy of her home.  It can't be any other way.  Their faith requires brutal castigation of a "fallen woman."

But that wasn't all they did.  They then got up before the whole world, saying how "forgiving and tolerant" they were and how much "family solidarity" they had.  They first subjected this CHILD to horrific media exposure of her embarrassment on a VERY intimate and personal matter, they then USED it, actually exploited it, for the sake of "public image."  And the GOP is raving with praise of Sarah Palin.

This is exploitation of the worst kind.  Callous and cruel to this child - beyond belief!

They're USING her plight for a "public image" that pleases the religious right.  THOSE people know full well how their religion requires Palin and her husband to treat this child - in private - and they applaud it.  But they, too, support the image of a family with "strong solidarity, tolerance and forgiveness."  In a pig's eye.

This was pure, extremely public, CHILD ABUSE!  Bristol is a minor; she can't give "permission" to her mom to accept the VP slot.  What she needed was her parents' protection.  It was her mother's duty, the PRIME DIRECTIVE of any parent, to protect her.  Even if it meant refusing the VP slot.  Her child either comes first or she doesn't.  Seems she doesn't.

Instead, the people she knew, loved, trusted and needed most betrayed and abandoned her needs at a time when she needed THEM the most.  It's despicable.

Cruelty.

I don't care what method people choose to try avoiding teen pregnancies - NONE of them works well at all.  Short of total sequestration, there will always be some.  Full information is the best anyone can do.  But I don't need to diss Sarah Palin for keeping her child in ignorance, or for demanding that an innocent child know and accept this kind of ADULT consequence - and refrain, on religious values alone.  It isn't necessary.  Because she did something vastly worse.

She was deliberately cruel to her child.  Publicly.

I can't even imagine Obama considering such behavior.  His family, his fatherhood, comes first.  And he is fiercely protective of his two little girls.  Sarah Palin threw HER little girl to the media wolves, and for what?  Her ambition.

This is what she calls "family values"?   This is what the GOP regards as "character"?  Yeah, she has principles all right, and she walks the talk - of abuse to her own child because her vile, judgmental GOD, and her ambition, made it expedient.

Having "principles" only means something when you know what those principles ARE.  Palin's are pro-ambition (hers), anti-women's rights (including her daughter's), and twisted, sick integrity (using a child for political collateral).

Even animals protect their young.  It is supposed to be a strong basic instinct in us, too, to protect our own - particularly children.

Sarah Palin, her husband and John McCain USED a child's torment and trauma for their own ends.  None of them is fit to rule a kitten, much less run a nation.  We already have a consummately cruel president.  We do NOT need another, either McCain or, if he dies, Palin.

I've never heard of such unspseakable - public - cruelty to an innocent child.  Poor little kid.  I'm just glad she wasn't MY mother when this same thing happened to ME.  After having my condition broadcast around the world, I'm not sure I could have emerged from it with my mind still laced together.  I hope Bristol will survive this with her mind intact.

On another forum even a 12-year-old girl wrote that she hurts for Bristol and thinks her parents STINK.  She's right.  Good for her.  She knows how another child must feel, and she got online and TOLD us adults so.  She defended another vulnerable child, magnificently.

These people knew it would come out, knew what it could do to the girl, and PLANNED a strategy to use it for Palin's "public image!"  And, to the mindblown of the GOP, whose own morality leaves everything to be desired, they are now heroes!

I think I'm going to be sick.  Unprincipled as the GOP is, even though they Swiftboat people, launch cheats and smears, fix elections and lie like rugs, even I didn't think them capable of sinking this low.  I'm beyond shocked and appalled.  There IS no word for what I feel.

Poor little kid.

the secret was no secret....only to you.

Your passionate attempt to discredit her falls way short...

1.  A Secret:   This wasnt a secret in Alaska.  NYDaily News, among others, ran the story stating it was no secret back home...google it.  The fact that you personally didnt know is not her fault.  She is the sitting Governor.  She's already in the public eye and this wasnt a secret.  Your entire rant is based on faulty info.  but I'll continue on as long as I can stomach it....

2. Scrutiny:  while you're right she is being hounded by the press, she, the white house, Barack Obama and plenty of others agree - this is not a campaign issue and she should be left alone.  Since the Republican party and Sarah Palin dont control the press, I think you're off base claiming Palin responsible-especially given #1.

3.  Governor Exploited it:  It is the press and DailyKos, not Palin, who forced her hand on this.  The ugly stories about a cover up of the actual mother of Trig - REPEATED IN THE NATIONAL MEDIA - forced her to clarify and say, not true...but given #1 above, she simply continued onward and told the press (who hadnt spent the time to do their homework) that the daughter was pregnant. 

4.   Child abuse:  Wrong.  Is it child abuse on Obama's kids that he is running for President?  answer:  no.  they are minors and dont get a say, but surely the fact that he put them on Access Hollywood as an accelerator to his campaign should be even more disturbing to you.  You go on to say he is fiercly protective of his kids...dude, please.  HE actively put them on TV as part of his campaign...he later told us he regretted it...in the words of David Shuster, he 'pimped' his own kids. 

5.  You have NEVER seen such cruelty to children....really? i dont even know where to start...you live in disneyland.  wake up.