Bozell Column: A Stomach Ache for Our Sponsor

Photo of Brent Bozell.
  • Bookmark and Share

In the earliest days of television, shows were often supported entirely by one sponsor. There was the "Texaco Star Theater" with Milton Berle. Remember "General Electric Theater" with Ronald Reagan? The corporate patron was held responsible for the content within the program. More to the point, the corporate patron wanted the association with the show it was sponsoring.

Perhaps the best branding of them all was, and is Hallmark, with its Hallmark Hall of Fame movies. When that movie airs you just know it’s a quality movie, because that’s all Hallmark will produce.

On today’s TV shows, it’s all changed. Today's sponsors run in large packs and appear to make no attempt to monitor shows and have no expectation of being held accountable for the "art" they’ve enabled. In fact, they insist they not be held accountable for that which they sponsor. They are the unsponsors.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

So it is refreshing to learn that Microsoft has backed out of a deal to be the sole sponsor of a commercial-free special on November 8 called "Family Guy Presents: Seth & Alex’s Almost Live Comedy Show." For a change, Microsoft executives attended the special’s taping on October 16, where "Family Guy" creator Seth MacFarlane and comedienne Alex Borstein (the voice of "Family Guy" matriarch Lois Griffin) would pitch the debut of Windows 7 software to the audience.

There was only one problem: MacFarlane’s repellent sense of humor and complete lack of taste. Variety reported Microsoft may have walked away since there were "riffs on deaf people, the Holocaust, feminine hygiene, and incest." They added that the animated portions of "Almost Live Comedy Show" were the tamest parts of the show. "It was the live-action segments (such as one in which MacFarlane and Borstein play Latino housekeepers) that probably raised the most eyebrows." The Los Angeles Times said those characters were housekeepers for Miley Cyrus, and they were scorching the Disney teen star.

Microsoft sent MacFarlane and Fox chieftains several notes expressing their concern over the show’s contents, but ultimately decided just to wave a white flag and drop out.

It’s a safe bet that Seth MacFarlane wasn’t going to genuflect for anybody. After all, Fox is so indulgent of this spoiled Peter Pan that his live special and his incessantly vile cartoons are the entire Sunday night lineup. The only thing missing was an entire "Fox News Sunday" devoted to "Family Guy" plugs; maybe also a couple of shamelessly promotional NFL halftime shows, complete with wardrobe malfunctions.

To be sure, Microsoft put out a strange statement: "We initially chose to participate in the Seth and Alex variety show based on the audience composition and creative humor of 'Family Guy,' but after reviewing an early version of the variety show, it became clear that the content was not a fit with the Windows brand."

Variety suggested Microsoft "may have been optimistic" in "believing that MacFarlane and Borstein wouldn't be as raunchy in live performance as their animated alter egos are on ‘Family Guy.’" But Microsoft’s statement embraced the "creative humor" of the cartoon. That’s an understatement: Microsoft has spent close to $5 million on commercials in "Family Guy" both on Fox and on TBS and Cartoon Network, which carry reruns of the show.

So Microsoft is both supportive and offended by the same show?

It’s fair to conclude that Microsoft found it safe to buy ads on "Family Guy" when it was but one of 12 advertisers of the show. Now it would have to stand alone, the sole sponsor.

This doesn’t mean that Microsoft didn’t retain the rest of its deal with Murdoch properties, including Fox Sports, FX, Hulu, FoxSports.com on MSN, even a 12-week college tour sponsored by Fox Licensing and Merchandising -- featuring events such as "Family Guy"-themed movie nights. Microsoft’s statement suggested they didn’t want any hard feelings for stepping away from what the "talent" was producing: "We continue to have a good partnership with Fox, Seth MacFarlane and Alex Borstein and are working with them in other areas. We continue to believe in the value of brand integrations and partnerships between brands, media companies and talent."

As for the live special, with all the incest and Holocaust and Latino-housekeeper-for-Miley-Cyrus jokes presumably intact, Fox did find another sponsor, right there in Hollywood. It’s Warner Brothers, seeking to promote the Christmas Day debut of its new movie version of "Sherlock Holmes."

It’s quite amazing to see how low Warner Brothers can go: from the makers of Bugs Bunny to the enablers of Holocaust and incest jokes on prime-time Sunday night TV.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Complaints of Family guy

The PTC likes to go after Family guy advertisers. Hugo Chavez has banned family guy. Makes ya think.

"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK

MS enables MSNBC - that's

MS enables MSNBC - that's all I need to know to avoid their products entirely.

I would never buy a MS games platform as a gift, and will NEVER buy another copy of Windows. Linux is getting easier to use, and that WILL be my next OS.

I could not in good conscience support a company that enables leftist propaganda to be passed off as news. I would be personally responsible if I did that.

The same goes for Google. I prefer to search with famlisearch.com

___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...

I figure its a business

Lots of Family Guy viewers use Microsoft, they are just intimidated by what folks at the PTC will do to them in a negative light

"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK

Then How Come They Made Fun Of The Zune?

Remember the episode where Carter Putterschimdt was talking to Bill Gates about his Zune and he says "Oh wait, I've got an IPod just like everyone else in the world!" They just about take potshots at everybody. 

I love Family Guy..

...I also love South Park. Unfortunately I don't get a chance to watch either very often because I have a impressionable child. I figure its my responsiblity to tell my child what to watch, not the networks.

"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK

OK, so they made Bill Gates

OK, so they made Bill Gates approachable, and by his own cartoon mouth "just like everyone else in the world". Sounds like good press to me.

___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...

Tums?

Perhaps Tums would be the appropriate sponsor for shows that cause stomach aches. Sometimes I feel like reaching for a Tums when watching Chris Matthews go into his Obama leg thrill routine. Other times I just pop a Tylenol due to the resulting headache.

We're Talking About An Adult Cartoon Here...

You have to have a strong constitution for your stomach to handle any adult cartoon, whether it's South Park or Family Guy. All this says to me is that conservatives are about as thin-skinned as liberals when it comes to humor. That's why I stick it to both of 'em, especially when it comes to my adult cartoons.

-Rocky: "Gee, an unhappy ending."

-Bullwinkle: "Yeah. Must be one of them adult cartoons." 

I would not say that 7sticks

Whenever a Family Guy, Gossip Girl or South Park  or anti marijuana thread comes up, I have heard the fair share of Libertarian conservatives speak up on the issue. Which makes me happy that not all members here pander to the more outspoken social conservatives on this site.

"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK

Double Standard

Well, firstly, I like Family Guy. Yeah, it's got raunch but that fits well with me. Sometimes they go just slighty too far but for the most part the shows are mostly funny for me.

But, if Microsoft is going to step away from the special, which probably isn't any worse than some of the Family Guy episodes, then they should step away from MSNBC.

MSNBC has a fair level of disgusting programming of it's own draped in the cloth of so-called news reporting.

MSNBC's news reporting and opinion is actually more offensive to me that anything I've seen on Family Guy.

I agree.

MSNBC has a fair level of disgusting programming of it's own draped in the cloth of so-called news reporting. 

I agree.

I guess they think no one knows what the MS in MSNBC stands for.

They are joined at the hip to that network.  Apparently Family Guy concerns them, but not the  ooze of slime that emanates from their "news" people  on a daily basis.

(Example: David Shuster's description of "Teabagging"...just listen to the first 25 seconds)

Stay classy, MSNBC!

lol - This is the first

lol - This is the first time I've ever saw the word "fair" and MSNBC 2 words apart that didn't involve the word "not" as well...

 

That opens a big can of worms

The premise your article raises ( one I agree with) opens up a big can of worms - corporate citizenship.

You mentioned Taxaco Star Theater and Hallmark presentations. Both of these are are fine examples of corporations striving to reflect social norms and create an homogeny. Those were the days when businesses' reputation was weighted to the point they would protect it at all costs. The customer was always right and refrigerators were built to outlast their warranty by 10 years.

Now, business are less intimate with their customers. Now, instead of "the customer is always right," its whatever the market will bear. Products are designed to fail in its lifespan or shortly after. That's the new corporate citizenship, and it has no problem resolving the double standard you mentioned -  "So Microsoft is both supportive and offended by the same show?"

Yes! They are supportive when its profitable and offended when its profitable. The market bears this hypocrisy.  It bears it when Ford say's "Ford tough" and you know the truck won't last 10 years. You can't look at American society and its ills, and not consider the effect that corporate citizenship has on it. We are a consumer society, bombarded by advertising on a daily basis. This corporate hypocrisy doesn't reflect the ills, it drives the ills. It drives the hypocrisy.

And there are the worms. When are conservatives going to demand corporations become better citizens? To most conservatives, the only responsibility corporations have is to make a profit. Your article introduces a different premise. Perhaps corporations should have integrity? What happens when most corporations don't have integrity, does it change society or social norms?

Strange, I wrote about this in one of my first posts on NewsBusters. When Imus was fired for his remark, everyone was reluctant to name the corporations that made his firing possible. I was pleased to see that change some during the Glenn Beck boycott. Even then, the corporations involved weren't named in the body of the blog.

When are conservatives

When are conservatives going to demand corporations become better citizens?

You'll have to define "better citizens." 

Are you talking about profits and what they do with them, or the kind of garbage they help to put on the air?

 

What they put on the air,

 Are you talking about profits and what they do with them, or the kind of garbage they help to put on the air?

What they put on the air, what they sell to the public, and what bandwagon they jump on.

Al Sharpton has no power on his own. When he threatens to boycott a corporation and they cave, corporations give him power. When Color of Change threatens to boycott a corporation and the corporation caves, they give Color of Change a disproportionate amount of power. Corporations could have easily handled boycotts from these very small groups.

The consequences for doing the wrong thing in the American market place are not severe enough, and few conservatives are willing to hold corporations to the same standards as they hold individuals. To a lot of conservatives, a corporation's only duty is survive and make a profit. That only makes sense if corporations were a benign entity. The concept behind this article is that corporations are not a benign entity, and do play a part in shaping culture.

Brett, no offense.  I

Brett, no offense.  I love the work you're doing and I appreciate your opinion of Seth's work.  Let's not forget though that we're here to defend personal freedom. 

Seth and team have every right to make this content if there is an audience that wishes to view it.  That you're against it is perfectly fine, so long as you don't activily go after this show to try to force your views of what's right/wrong onto others (myself included).  Should this show be in a later time slot, away from kids?  Sure.  Maybe only on FX?  Why not.  But trying to silence this show and their creative team will only serve to put you into the same group as the Van Jones-Color of Change (?) group trying to silence Glenn Beck. 

There's been a number of assaults on this show here and as fan of the site, I wanted to put in my two cents.  Use your remote, switch off the show if you're offended.  And I agree, I'm 1000 times more offended by Hardball than Family Guy. 

 

We MUST stop this man before he does this again!

2006: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcP9pXj-0Ao

Coldsnap

After reading your post I thought you were a new poster, but I checked and you have been almost as long as I have.

I would assume being a long time member that  you realize by now, Brent Bozell and the majority of social conservatives on this site only support  personal freedoms  for  political speech and being able to voice ones opinion. Yes that is important.  However when it comes to things like Family Guy, South Park and other forms of freedom of expression, that for of personal freedom should not be allowed because it violates their moral standards.

"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK

Hmm, why not try thinking a

Hmm, why not try thinking a bit more about it and you may see that this article is only against things going contrary to traditional family values. 

******************************************************************************
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."                    (Edmund Burke)                                                 

traditional family values

You might be right Rowane, but just because of the show is named Family Guy, it is not meant to be viewed for people looking for traditional family values.

The show has a pretty big audience and obviously very successful considering how much they are paying McFarland. Capitalism at its best I say.

"I think we're kindred spirits."~Mr Shy to Sergeant ROCK

I Sense Some Jealousy Here...

Let's see: The spoiled, pampered nephew of William F. Buckley wastes his talents trashing a former Hanna-Barbera animator who struck it rich by offering the public something they like but you don't like and try to slander him. Sort of sounds like the plot to The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand. That, or it sounds just like those liberals who tried to slander Rush Limbaugh for wanting to buy the Rams football team. Nice, what a really lame effort. And I'll be waiting for the Rush Limbaugh episode he's guest-staring on very soon. At least he had fun doing it, unlike you.

Hmm, Family Guy must be doing something right: They manage to get Keith Olberfuher and Rush Limbaugh to guest-star on the series. Even The Simpsons hasn't done something like that (They've only had Keith Olberfuher make a cameo, but no Rush.)

 

-"Your bird intelligence is no match for my people intelligence."

-Peter Griffin, from Family Guy 

Personally, I'm a committed

Personally, I'm a committed South Park guy- and staunch Conservative. My brother, also a Conservative, prefers Family Guy. I guess some of us still know "funny."

Me 2. I can watch South Park

Me 2. I can watch South Park all day. But Family Guy only a few epeisodes at a time, because they are repetitive in the way they format the show, and it gets old.

7 IQ...

Do you even come close to knowing what the hell you're talking about?

I say...lighten up a bit

I have always enjoyed Family Guy, as it is actually quite funny. I DO agree, though, that it should be considered an ADULT show.

In the past, such shows never came on before 10:00 pm. But around the 80's, they started around 9:00, and now there is no "Family Hour" anymore. While society may have regressed in general, the plain fact is that cable and satellite, and not the Internet, has erased any sense of boundaries that exist for time-sensitive productions.

Hogan's Heroes was considered a very dark topic to many WWII veterans. They did NOT see the humor and glee in the German army depictions in real life, so was that show any less destructive (not to mention German citizens themselves)? 

But we are talking rank humor here. In addition, one of the things I like most about Family Guy is not the story line itself, but the frequent use of asides to joke about contemporary (and past) Americana. Vulgarity and tremendous sexual innuendo (and nudity) aside, the show IS for adults. 

If you want a good family-oriented show, King of the Hill probably is the best of the lot. Ironically, it was a spinoff (kinda) of the notoriously UN-funny Beavis and Butthead show on MTV back in the early 90's. To each his / her own, I suppose.

______________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.