Newsweek Despairs 'Checks and Balances' Impede ObamaCare

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Penning the lead story for the “Yes He Can (But He Sure Hasn't Yet)” Newsweek cover, “A Liberal's Survival Guide,” Anna Quindlen defended President Obama from liberal complaints he's not enacting liberal policies fast enough as she explained that he's “saddled” by the “incremental” constitutional structure, but she fretted: “Universal health care is the area in which the gap between what's needed and what's likely is most glaring, and the limitations of the president's power most apparent.” Not hesitating to share her opinion, Quindlen despaired:

It is dispiriting to watch the cheerleaders of American exceptionalism pound their chests and insist that our citizens do not need the kind of system that virtually every other developed nation finds workable....

As elected officials posture and temporize, families are bankrupted by health-care costs and forgo treatment they can't afford. Statistical measures of the national health, from life expectancy to infant mortality, continue to be substandard. And because we have that system of checks and balances, in which movement usually happens slowly and sporadically, a great need for sweeping reform may be met with a jury-rigged bill neither sufficiently deep nor broad, which perhaps someday will give way to a better one, and then eventually a truly good one.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Framing her piece in the November 2 edition of the magazine, “Hope Springs Eternal: Assessing a Young Presidency,” Quindlen proposed:

This is a country that often has transformational ambitions but is saddled with an incremental system, a nation built on revolution, then engineered so the revolutionary can rarely take hold.

Checks and balances: that's how we learn about it in social-studies class, and in theory it is meant to guard against a despotic executive, a wild-eyed legislature, an overweening judiciary. And it's also meant to safeguard the rights of the individual...But what our system has meant during the poisonous partisan civil war that has paralyzed Washington in recent years is that very little of the big stuff gets done. It simply can't.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What!!???

When did Obama magazine change it's name to Newsweek?

Darn those pesky "checks and balances"...

They're getting in the way of what the Obamessiah wants...(whine, whine, whine)...

Quindlen's comment that the US is "...saddled with an incremental system...then engineered so the revolutionary can rarely take hold." is just insane...Oh yes dear, by all means...Bring on the revolutionaries!!! Has she forgotten where she lives and how this country works? This is AMERICA...The checks and balances that Ms. Quindlen bemoans are what prevent this country from becoming an authoritarian dictatorship. Doesn't she get that concept?

More unbelieveably outrageous stupidity and hypocrisy from the Left.   

"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan

Every other developed

Every other developed nation finds workable?? Which country that has this so called universal health care is not on the verge of bankrupcy? Which one has no rationing? Oh, and which country is not going to put a stop to suicide tourism? People go to this country to watch the legal suicides.?.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!

"...our citizens do not

"...our citizens do not need the kind of system that virtually every other developed nation finds workable...."

Workable?  Workable??  Hell, communism is workable.  It's also miserable.  The argument 'but golly! other countries do it' is as juvenile as it is tired.

"...families are bankrupted by health-care costs and forgo treatment they can't afford."

Well there's a dishonest argument there.  I dare her to put up the numbers on that one!  This BS argument screams for quanitification, but none will be forthcoming.  Instead we get the pseudo-emotional plea to 'just save our families from the poor house!'

"Statistical measures of the national health, from life expectancy to infant mortality, continue to be substandard."

Well, since prominent liberals actually in power aren't really concerned about our elderly receiving life-extending care (old folks just aren't that productive you know!), I'd say our life-expectancy isn't going to be going up anytime soon.  That infant mortality stat is so debunked it's to the point of glurge.  This woman is so pathetically misinformed that it's no wonder she got a job at Newsweek.

"...then engineered so the revolutionary can rarely take hold."

No, it's engineered to be a Constitutional Republic.  It's engineered so the government can't be tyrannical.  Go ahead, screw democracy, pick up a gun and start your little revolution.  I'll pick up a gun and protect our Democratic Constitutional Republic and the ideals of our Founding Fathers. 

Just be careful my little "revolutionary" - I know how to use a gun really, really well.

The end---

G.,

Your end paragraph, and end sentence, I believe (however unfortunately) are indeed an accurate portrayal of our future.

These stupid, stupid, stupid people just keep pushing and pushing and pushing.

MD

"I may not agree with what your bumper sticker says, but I will defend to the death your right to stick it." (Unknown, but derived from Voltaire) 

"...the kind of system that

"...the kind of system that virtually every other developed nation finds workable..."

The kind of "developed nations" that have permanent high unemployment and virtually no growth...

You just...

You just described the US from now on out...Over at the NYT, the news that the recession is over is being met with an amazing number of jeers, not cheers. People are emerging from their trance. I honestly think so.

Anna Quindlan

The checks and balances were intentionally designed to be an anchor. That way a single segment of government can't move the Republic too far off it's steady course into the future.

another liberal...

Holeinthehull

Quindlen and her ilk would like to do away with parts of the Constitution that seem to get in their way in their attempt to destroys what works in this country.

Quindlen doesn't understand the Constitution with 2 eyes, a brain and a flashlight.

No he can't!!

NO HE CAN'T!  and he never will, this do nothing joke spent a year and a half voting "present"  how in the H is this clown going to ever make a decision?     Impeach him!!!!

Brain Dead Liberals

Brain dead liberals neither undertand, appreciate, or wish to follow the system wisely laid out by our Founding Fathers.

OMO

Is this REALLY the new Newsweek cover and featured article??

I'm speechless.

PEOPLE... LIBERAL BIAS IN OUR MAIN STREAM MEDIA IS REAL !!!!!!! (arrrrg!)

 

This is par for the course with Newsweak

Alas, it's par for the course with Newsweak.

You know the media's gone off the deep end when, earlier this week, a Republican Congressman from Texas (I can't think of his name), came to the House Floor and ridiculed the cover during his speech.

Every other nation finds workable?

Now I know they are joking. 

* Socialized medicine is failing in every country it's been applied.

* Many of the countries that are having the VERY worst time with socialized medicine are trying to introduce PRIVATE healthcare options.

"revolutionary can rarely take hold."

What America had was NOT a REVOLUTION.

Our founding fathers PURPOSELY made a system to keep TYRANT REVOLUTIONARIES from taking over and enslaving the people.

http://clearthehaze.blogspot.com

The parable of the two bears

Two bears were walking in the woods [yes, yes, they do]  and spotted a clutch of Newsweek editors and a few other people in a clearing. The bears stopped at the edge of the open space. The editors kept talking about things, which the bears could hardly hear. Every now and then, they'd hear about "hope" and "change" and "progress" and a few other words whose meanings were a bit vague.

For a while, the editors didn't seem to notice the bears, but then several people on the edge--apparently outside the inner group--spotted them and pointed. The editors kept on talking, and the, to the bears' surprise, the actually started to inch closer to them!

"What's this?" one bear said to the other. "I'm not sure," said the other.

The editors came closer, and the bears could hear them telling each other that there was a lot of room between them and the bears, and that the fear of bears was overrated, and that those stupid "wing nuts" or something (they weren't sure what that word was) were just getting hysterical about nothing with all their over-the-top warning about bears.

"What are they talking about?" the first bear asked.

"Let's wait. Don't scare them off. They're still walking this way."  

"Oh great! How long will we be stuck here?"

"Ssshhhh. Wait ... wait ... " Swoosh! "Got one! You can have the other one with the smelly pants."

Newspeak rag/mag &

Newspeak rag/mag & Quindlen obviously have no appreciation, nor understanding of the Constitution of the United States of America.  

Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.

A while back I remember Baz

A while back I remember Baz saying that the country is out of money.

Isn't addmitting the country is broke to it's constituents an impeachable offence?

Didn't you listen to mother Pelosi

The healthcare bill will "reduce" the deficit while providing health insurance to millions who are currently uninsured and making insurance affordable to millions who are currently un- and under-insured.  Congress must have stolen the magic from Disney!

Let's talk hyperbole, Anna

What did you say has "paralyzed Washingon" in recent years. A "poisonous partisan civil war"? Civil war? Really?

It's not a civil war at all. We had one of them, remember, and it was truly bad.

This is small beer, just a partisan fracas, political tug-of-war, a few caustic remarks and verbal elbows thrown--that's by the politicians themselves. We're not even talking about the vitriol from the bleachers filled with overpaid, overmade up, over-wardrobed media yappers. Left and right alike, but on the sheer numbers, the left has the right by a factor of 8 or 10, easy. And in the cheap seats are the academics, too, all bedecked in their tweed coats (the old guys) or black crewnecked shirts (young 'uns) mixed in with the Birkenstockers and bra-less halterers.

Take your metaphors down a notch or two, or, like Spinal Tap, pretty soon you'll need to dial it up to 11 just to think you've made an insight. 

Argumentum ad headlinea

Quindlen writes: "Statistical measures of the national health, from life expectancy to infant mortality, continue to be substandard." I read elsewhere (forget where, maybe Townhall) that some of the poor statistical rankings of the U.S. in health categories need to be examined more closely to see whether our heathcare is really all that bad. For example, we measure up poorly in infant mortality against other countries because we count the deaths differently. Some countries do not count an infant's death in the first 24 hours as infant mortality, but rather as dead at birth (equivalent to a stillbirth). Some do not count the death of extremely premature infants who survive for birth among the cases of infant mortality, because the preemie was expected to die, and this is akin to a stillbirth. 

Many years ago, I worked as a courtroom artist for both a local TV station and a few gigs with CBS News. I saw first hand how abbreviated a story became under the requirement to squeeze the "narrative" into 90 seconds or three minutes.

This kind of analysis takes the product of compressed thinking and runs with it.  

Newsweek

When I received this publication, I found it very appropriate.......for wrapping my garbage. 

"Look Ma.....I'm the King of the World."  B. H. Obama

 

And they wonder why nobody subscribes

Newsweek is delivered to my house every week even though my subscription ran out at least a year ago.  They keep sending me bills, telling me if I don't pay something like $19.99 for a 2-year's subscription, my subscription will run out.  I respond everytime with some insults in their postage paid envelope.  I also return all of their packaging.  They just won't stop.  I admit I always read the "Conventional Wisdom" because Obama always gets and up arrow.  Actually sometimes he gets a side-to-side because he wasn't tough enough with his oppositon.