Though he decided “this was John McCain's best debate,” Democratic operative-turned ABC News journalist George Stephanopoulos made it a “clean sweep for Barack Obama” as he declared on Nightline after Wednesday's third and final presidential debate: “He has won every debate.” Add in the VP debate, which Stephanopoulos gave to Joe Biden over Sarah Palin, and Stephanopoulos has awarded all four debates this year to the more liberal candidate. He justified his latest assessment:
He won tonight by staying cool under pressure. He won tonight by parrying the attacks of John McCain. The only thing that John McCain could have really done tonight to change the tenor of this campaign was to get under Obama's skin, to force him into an error. That did not happen tonight. Another win for Barack Obama.
Anchor Terry Moran predicted “you're going to get some heat for this, George, you called all three presidential debates and the vice presidential debate for Obama-Biden.” But instead of suggesting that just might show some bias on the part of Stephanopoulos, Moran presumed it meant Stephanopoulos' evaluations presage the electorate: “Does that mean this thing is over?” Stephanopoulos replied: “I don't know if it's over. Right now, Barack Obama would win, I think, more than 300 electoral votes, if the election were held today. He's well ahead right now.”
Issuing his “Nightline Report Card,” Stephanopoulos awarded both an A on “strategy,” an A for Obama and an A-minus to McCain on “style” and a B grade for both on “accuracy.”
On “style,” Stephanopoulos chastised McCain:
Barack Obama won the battle of the split screens tonight. You look at those reaction shots for John McCain. The rolling of the eyes, he seemed exasperated by Barack Obama. He seemed on the edge of anger sometimes, a little bit over the top. Obama, on the other hand, remaining cool again under pressure, smiling under the attacks. That's the demeanor he's had through these debates. I think it served him very well tonight. I also think that McCain made a key mistake about halfway through the debate when they were talking about the tone of the campaign. Obama says, "Let's get back to the issues that matter to the people at home," and then, unprompted, McCain brings up the issue of the former member of the Weather Underground, Bill Ayers.
The three previous winner declarations from Stephanopoulos, in date order:
The September 27 NewsBusters item, "In 'Nightline Report Card' Stephanopoulos Gives Obama the Win," recounted:
Awarding Barack Obama two grades of A-minus and one B-minus while presenting John McCain with two grades of B-plus and one B-minus, at the end of his "Nightline Report Card" segment on Friday night, ABC's George Stephanopoulos declared Obama the "winner" -- with a big illustrative check mark on screen: "Bottom line, the winner is Barack Obama. He comes into this race where the country wants change. His number one goal was to show that he belonged on that stage. He was a credible commander-in-chief, that he could hold his own on national security. He did that tonight. He gets the win."
October 3 posting, "Stephanopoulos Again Declares the Liberal the Debate Winner," reported:
Six days after declaring Barack Obama the winner of the first presidential debate, following Thursday's VP debate George Stephanopoulos again decided the liberal Democrat in the debate, this time Joe Biden, was the winner -- but in assigning his "Nightline Report Card" grades he gave both Biden and Sarah Palin the same overall assessments: each got one A, one A-minus and one B. Asked by anchor Terry Moran to name "the winner," Stephanopoulos argued: "Joe Biden, but boy, was this close. I think that Governor Palin did an awful lot to help herself tonight. There is no question that she beat expectations, that she was fluent, that she showed she could stand up there on the stage. She laid a couple of attacks there against Barack Obama, but going back to my first point on overall strategy, right now, this is a race where if John McCain cannot convince the country that he's going to take it in a different direction from President Bush, he simply cannot win..."
October 8 NB item, “Stephanopoulos Goes 3 for 3: Again Declares Democrat the 'Winner,'” reported:
Deciding "Obama is two for two," ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who last Friday called Joe Biden the winner over Sarah Palin, declared Barack Obama "definitely won" over John McCain in the second presidential debate, just as he had determined following the first one -- and that makes it three times out of three debates the Democratic operative turned ABC journalist has picked the liberal Democrat. In Tuesday's "Nightline Report Card," Stephanopoulos trumpeted Obama's performance: "He definitely won tonight. I think, again, he showed over the course of this debate, over the course of the two debates, he is answering the number one question Americans have about him. Does he have the experience it takes to serve effectively as President? Over the course now of three hours of debates, he is answering that question minute by minute."
Transcript of the “Nightline Report Card” segment on the Wednesday, October 15 Nightline, as provided by the MRC's Brad Wilmouth who corrected the closed-captioning against the video:
TERRY MORAN: So this third and final presidential debate is in the books. So who came out on top? Our chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos joins us once again for the “Nightline Report Card.” All right, George, this was a scrap, a real good one. Let's start with the main issue here, strategy. What's the grade there?
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Both candidates did well. “A” for Barack Obama, “A” for John McCain. This was John McCain's best debate. He was pressing the issues, as you said. He was putting Barack Obama on the defensive, especially on the issue of taxes right at the beginning. He had a clear break from President Bush when he said, “If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have done that four years ago.” But probably the most interesting move he made was when he introduced this new character, Joe Wurzelbacher the plumber, into the debate.
JOHN MCCAIN CLIP #1: Of course, I’ve talked to people like Joe the plumber.
MCCAIN CLIP #2: Now, my old buddy Joe the plumber is out there.
MCCAIN CLIP #3: I want Joe, you, to do the job.
MCCAIN CLIP #4: Hey, Joe, you're rich. Congratulations.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Joe Wurzelbacher is not only rich, he’s also famous now, and he's going to basically become John McCain's chief surrogate out on the campaign trail in these final couple of weeks. But, look, Barack Obama handled this all very, very well. He was cool under attack. He explained away every attack, responded well, and again, on the issues where he has, I think, a big advantage over John McCain right now, on the economy, overall, on health care, on education, he did especially well explaining his positions and connecting, I think, with voters back home.
MORAN: So “A”s on strategy. This was a different format tonight, the two men sitting inches away from each other, trading those accusations. Style, what are the grades on style?
STEPHANOPOULOS: “A” for Barack Obama, “A minus” for John McCain. And I think that's because Barack Obama won the battle of the split screens tonight. You look at those reaction shots for John McCain. The rolling of the eyes, he seemed exasperated by Barack Obama. He seemed on the edge of anger sometimes, a little bit over the top. Obama, on the other hand, remaining cool again under pressure, smiling under the attacks. That's the demeanor he's had through these debates. I think it served him very well tonight. I also think that McCain made a key mistake about halfway through the debate when they were talking about the tone of the campaign. Obama says, “Let's get back to the issues that matter to the people at home,” and then, unprompted, McCain brings up the issue of the former member of the Weather Underground, Bill Ayers.
MCCAIN: Mr. Ayers, I don't care about an old washed up terrorist, but, as Senator Clinton said in her debates with you, we need to know the full extent of that relationship.
STEPHANOPOULOS: There were dial groups done by many organizations, having undecided voters watching the debate. When John McCain did that, brought up Bill Ayers on his own, they went south very, very quickly.
MORAN: That Bill Ayers attack just hasn't seemed to work for him at all. And, finally, accuracy. What are the grades?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Two “B”s. “B” for Barack Obama, “B” for John McCain. For McCain, I think he misstated Barack Obama's position on health care when he said people like Joe Wurzelbacher would be fined, small businesses would be fined. He also misstated how extensive the McCain, the Obama tax cuts would be, how many small businesses would be affected by the tax increases, excuse me. Barack Obama, wrong when he said that all of John McCain's ads have been negative. Also wrong when he underplayed his connections to the community organizing voter registration group ACORN. Both within the bounds of normal behavior for politicians, but not “A”s.
MORAN: All right, so, bottom line, who won the third and final debate here, George?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Clean sweep for Barack Obama. He has won every debate. He won tonight by staying cool under pressure. He won tonight by parrying the attacks of John McCain. The only thing that John McCain could have really done tonight to change the tenor of this campaign was to get under Obama's skin, to force him into an error. That did not happen tonight. Another win for Barack Obama.
MORAN: Now, you called, you're going to get some heat for this, George, you called all three presidential debates and the vice presidential debate for Obama/Biden. Does that mean this thing is over?
STEPHANOPOULOS: I don't know if it's over. Right now, Barack Obama would win, I think, more than 300 electoral votes, if the election were held today. He's well ahead right now. There are about 2 1/2 weeks left. We'll see what happens in those final 2 1/2 weeks. You know, if you look back at these debates, though, I think you will see, and this is a judgment that's pretty much been confirmed by every poll, both on the debate nights, but also in subsequent polling. People have come away from these debates, voters both undecided and Democrats, have come from these debates saying they are more reassured by Barack Obama. I think he may look back and say this is where he sealed the deal, but, of course, we still have 2 1/2 weeks left.
MORAN: George Stephanopoulos, grading the debates for us throughout, calling for the Democrats. Thanks very much for that, George.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





Awarding Barack Obama two grades of A-minus and one B-minus while presenting John McCain with two grades of B-plus and one B-minus, at the end of his "Nightline Report Card" segment on Friday night, ABC's George Stephanopoulos declared Obama the "winner" -- with a big illustrative check mark on screen: "Bottom line, the winner is Barack Obama. He comes into this race where the country wants change. His number one goal was to show that he belonged on that stage. He was a credible commander-in-chief, that he could hold his own on national security. He did that tonight. He gets the win."
Six days after declaring Barack Obama the winner of the first presidential debate, following Thursday's VP debate George Stephanopoulos again decided the liberal Democrat in the debate, this time Joe Biden, was the winner -- but in assigning his "Nightline Report Card" grades he gave both Biden and Sarah Palin the same overall assessments: each got one A, one A-minus and one B. Asked by anchor Terry Moran to name "the winner," Stephanopoulos argued: "Joe Biden, but boy, was this close. I think that Governor Palin did an awful lot to help herself tonight. There is no question that she beat expectations, that she was fluent, that she showed she could stand up there on the stage. She laid a couple of attacks there against Barack Obama, but going back to my first point on overall strategy, right now, this is a race where if John McCain cannot convince the country that he's going to take it in a different direction from President Bush, he simply cannot win..."
Deciding "Obama is two for two," ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who last Friday called Joe Biden the winner over Sarah Palin, declared Barack Obama "definitely won" over John McCain in the second presidential debate, just as he had determined following the first one -- and that makes it three times out of three debates the Democratic operative turned ABC journalist has picked the liberal Democrat. In Tuesday's "Nightline Report Card," Stephanopoulos trumpeted Obama's performance: "He definitely won tonight. I think, again, he showed over the course of this debate, over the course of the two debates, he is answering the number one question Americans have about him. Does he have the experience it takes to serve effectively as President? Over the course now of three hours of debates, he is answering that question minute by minute."
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Both candidates did well. “A” for Barack Obama, “A” for John McCain. This was John McCain's best debate. He was pressing the issues, as you said. He was putting Barack Obama on the defensive, especially on the issue of taxes right at the beginning. He had a clear break from President Bush when he said, “If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have done that four years ago.” But probably the most interesting move he made was when he introduced this new character, Joe Wurzelbacher the plumber, into the debate.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Clean sweep for Barack Obama. He has won every debate. He won tonight by staying cool under pressure. He won tonight by parrying the attacks of John McCain. The only thing that John McCain could have really done tonight to change the tenor of this campaign was to get under Obama's skin, to force him into an error. That did not happen tonight. Another win for Barack Obama.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This last debate...
October 16, 2008 - 06:50 ET by Tom DesrosierI thought this was the best of the three debates and well moderated with more revealing questions. I also think it really didnt matter. Legacy media has already chosen our president for us.
Here's a picture that summed it up for me: http://www.dare2believe.com
Tom
http://www.dare2believe.com
And thus folks...
October 16, 2008 - 07:06 ET by HeavyChevywhy I always set my watch by STEPHANOPOULOS time "predictably predictable."
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
Come on, Brent, I can't
October 16, 2008 - 07:11 ET by motherbeltCome on, Brent, I can't take such shocking news this early in the morning!!
Face it, Stephanopoulos is a shill
October 16, 2008 - 07:23 ET by c5thenObama could have come out stuttering and drooling from the corner of his mouth, and Georgie boy would have declared him the winner.
I had to laugh at the Obama campaign whinning that FOX was costing them a few points in the polls. This is a tacit admission that the other networks are shilling for his campaign. Imagine, if the other networks were all as ballanced as FOX, he'd be down a couple of points in the polls per each one. Let's see...CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS... By his own admission he'd be at least 12 points lower in the polls if the other networks were doing their jobs instead of campaigning for him.
Doing their job??? You
October 16, 2008 - 07:49 ET by motherbeltDoing their job???
You mean campaigning for him isn't their job???? They do it as if it is!
I guess he really credits Fox with a lot of power, because with the other nets acting as his PR arm, he should be up 20 in the polls!
BTW, if you haven't seen it already, take a look at Ann Coulter's rundown of some previous late polls....and how things turned out.
Stephanopoulos is 20 for 20
October 16, 2008 - 08:47 ET by kgStephanopoulos is 20 for 20 if you look at his record.
Obama whines he would be 2-3 points higher if it wasn't for Fox News. But he would also be 10-11 points lower if it wasn't for the Big 3. And even more astonishing is he would be 20-25 points lower if he only spent what McCain has spent.
He should be on his knees kissing the MSM's feet and the fools that have spent good money on him.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
McCain Won
October 16, 2008 - 07:51 ET by SmartypantsAnybody who watched that debate last night and felt that Obama won was simply not paying attention, or has another agenda. I'm not saying it was a complete blowout--McCain still held back on some things he could have said--but McCain was direct, on point and even looked more presidential than Obama (for the first time). Obama seemed kind of drawn. In the whole scheme of things, it may not make a difference, but if we're looking at just last night's debate, McCain won going away. That was not the case in the first two debates.
allow me to love
October 16, 2008 - 08:01 ET by JIMMY1660allow me to love America
joe the plumber or just joe American. we can not afford BHO tax increases, his affiliation with extreme left wing America Haters.
BHO is not JOHN McCain.
If Obama attacks, he wins
October 16, 2008 - 08:20 ET by motherbeltIf Obama attacks, he wins by attacking. If McCain attacks, Obama wins by withstanding the attacks.
If Obama attacks, he gets credit for being "tough." If McCain attacks, he loses for being "angry and aggressive."
I McCain is quiet, he's "beaten down." If Obama is quiet, he's "sober and thoughtful."
If Obama disputes McCain, he's "assertive." If McCain disputes Obama, he's "argumentative."
In short, if Obama shows up, he wins.
Right on, mother. I agree
October 16, 2008 - 10:23 ET by SmartypantsRight on, mother. I agree with one exception. If Obama didn't show up, the press would still declare him the winner. They would say that McCain hogged the microphone.
Not very shocked and surprised
October 16, 2008 - 08:13 ET by BigLiberty--at the way McCain was graded. I think a "win" for a conservative candidate is one where the MSM grades him slightly below the liberal candidate, instead of far below. They're still going to propagandize their Golden Obamboy with all they've got, but they've got to give the conservative candidate grudging points, or else their ruse won't be subtle enough to go over the heads of the general public.
Stephan's only hope for a new job is a BHO win
October 16, 2008 - 08:21 ET by JayTeeWith FOXs view of the Debate it is now a 100% disconnect of Media to Joe Plumber !
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
Let's face it
October 16, 2008 - 08:22 ET by bschoomLet's face it, the left sites are declaring obama a winner, the rest, the more accurately perspectively speaking sites, have Mr. McCain up on this one.
We're going to have to take care of our own. All there is to it. We can't expect these hollywood influenced, oprah sweetened commentators and reporters to see things any other way. they're not capable.
I think what's frustrating
October 16, 2008 - 08:25 ET by BigLibertyI think what's frustrating is that the MSM is such a powerful propaganda machine. Seriously, what do we have? Talk radio? Fox News? The Wall Street Journal? And, if Obama is president, kiss goodbye to talk radio. :P
Remember, the election is
October 16, 2008 - 08:52 ET by Indiana JoeRemember, the election is the only poll that matters. I don't believe, nor care about, all the talk about Obama being "ahead."
"Right now, Barack Obama would win, I think, more than 300 electoral votes, if the election were held today. He's well ahead right now.”
See, I think that's just BS. I know that's what RCP is showing, but I don't buy it. They're giving Obama states that are traditionally Republican, or calling them "toss ups." They keep calling Indiana a "toss-up" when Bush won it by 15% and 20% in his two races. RCP is supposed to be accurate, but it's based on polls, and I've learned not to trust polls. Statements like this and polls both have the same motivation; to create an appearance of the reality for which the left is hoping.
They're pushing too hard for people who really believe they have this race sewn up. When voters close that curtain, it will be the real poll, and their last chance to stop Obama. I think "average America" doesn't trust him. If we can keep the fraud in check, McCain should win.
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
I am shocked, shocked, to
October 16, 2008 - 08:26 ET by Indiana JoeI am shocked, shocked, to find that there is bias going on here!
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
MSM - "McCain won, but he
October 16, 2008 - 08:26 ET by play21cwMSM - "McCain won, but he really lost"
Does it surprise anyone? They say that Obama stayed cool during the attacks, but they didnt talk about the attacks, why not raise that issue.. basically the MSM is saying "Obama was calm and collected when confronted with the truth, and was able to brush it off and look like a winner"
Thats what we need, a leader that can weasel his way out of being accountable, lie & get away with it, and plan to do so much to hurt and keep us from progressing.
Time to get a conceal permit
Why is it that discussing
October 16, 2008 - 08:42 ET by SeashellWhy is it that discussing Obama's past relationships are considered ATTACKS? Bring up the fact that Obama worked with and was friends with a terrorist is just that: a fact, not an attack. McCain is talking about this to distract? No, he is trying to let the American people know what shaped obama's mind since the MSM won't. McCain shouldn't have to be talking about this but has no choice. The American people deserve and need to know the truth. The MSM have failed miserably as journalists.
I agree 100% They
October 16, 2008 - 09:32 ET by play21cwI agree 100%
They are attacks because the MSM doesnt want to hear them, and Obama doesnt want to answer to them. He lies and says everything is not true, like the MSM.
This is an old Clinton stooge - remember?
October 16, 2008 - 08:32 ET by Mary Louise TurnerConsider the source of this pathetic garbage, ladies and gentlemen. This is an old Clinton stooge! You can't expect him to say Mr. McCain won.
Sure, but
October 16, 2008 - 08:37 ET by BigLibertyI think it's less that he's an old Clinton stooge, and more that ABC takes his commentary seriously, and treats it like it's objective. I don't expect George to be anything but biased. ABC is to blame here - for allowing him to be the debate analyzer and grader, when he's clearly anything but objective.
ALERT!!!! OHIO SEC OF STATE APPEALS TO SUPREME COURT!
October 16, 2008 - 08:51 ET by TheSterSHE IS MAKING AN EMERGENCY APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT TO OVERTURN THE FED COURT OF APPEALS!!!
BAD NEWS!!! ONLY THE JUSTICE IN CHARGE OF THE REGION NEEDS TO HEAR THE CASE!!
GUESS WHO THAT IS??? STEVENS!!! THE MOST LIBERAL JUSTICE ON THE COURT!!
Ster.
»→ Ster
October 16, 2008 - 08:57 ET by Cool ArrowThe fix is definitely in.
Can't wait to see the Socialist Party newsreels before those great Socialist Party movies.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
Cool...We are SURROUNDED!!!
October 16, 2008 - 09:06 ET by TheSterI feel like this is Custards Last Stand!!!
And NB is Custard!!! No help form FOX, Kristol, MSM, and even McCain himself!!!
All we have is Gov. Palin, Gov. Jindal, Rush, Hannity, Levin, Ingraham, and JOE THE PLUMBER!!!
Unfortunately for the LIBERALS...
...when STER gets backed into a corner...STER FIGHTS BACK!!!
Ster.
»→ Gets worse, Ster
October 16, 2008 - 09:24 ET by Cool ArrowNow we have domestic terrorists raised to a level of eminence on the political scene.
We will see others embark on the same path to national fame and fortune that proved so successful to Ayers and Dohrn. It is only natural that others copy success.
Pathetic that a US Senator would heap such love and trust on the forerunners to Timothy McVeigh.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
And the whiner is ...
October 16, 2008 - 08:51 ET by Crash... the objective pundit.
Whoa ... I didn't see that one coming!
ABC
October 16, 2008 - 08:55 ET by cocodrieABC has a Steph infection that that has obviously spread to the reporters of other nutworks. they should be quarantined in a warmer climate like Venezuela where a dose of real life could improve their mental health. For some however, their present condition may be terminal.
Part of the Moran-Stephanopolous Exchange Cut Off
October 16, 2008 - 08:59 ET by ecnirPMORAN: So, George. Now that this is wrapped up, can you give us a sneak peak into the future?
STEPHANOPOULOS: I sure can. I'm calling all of the 2012 Presidential and Vice-presidential debates for the Democrat. I just don't see how there's any chance that a Republican can come in and best a Democrat next time around, either, at least in any way that I would be able to see. So let's call it a clean sweep next time around, too.
It is a look into the future
October 16, 2008 - 09:04 ET by SeashellMore importantly, this is just a preview of how the media will report what Obama does. Whatever happens, these media guys will spin it in Obama's favor and deceive the American people.
Reassurance
October 16, 2008 - 09:02 ET by KC Mulville"People have come away from these debates, voters both undecided and Democrats, have come from these debates saying they are more reassured by Barack Obama."
The economic tidal wave is washing McCain out to sea, and all Obama has to do is not screw up. Obama accomplishes this by doing ... nothing. His campaign is equivalent to how he votes: "present." He takes no risks. He explains nothing. He is never challenged by the media, and he never exposes himself. Has he said anything in the past six weeks? His reassurance is to speak softly and stand still. He has no stick, and wouldn't use it if he had one.
And in the end, McCain is chiefly to blame, probably more than the media. It's frustrating to any conservative. McCain had several chances to dramatically challenge Obama, and he didn't do it. The Ayers case was a classic example. Ayers matters because Ayers represents the subculture of the radical Left, which rejects traditional institutions and values, and instead sees America as repressive, violent, and racist. Ayers may no longer be the terrorist from 40 years ago, but now he's a leftist radical, whose education reforms are nothing but the indoctrination of children into that radical viewpoint. Obama has already expressed an economic viewpoint that prizes the same value as Ayers: namely, extreme egalitarianism. No one can advance until we all advance equally. Ayers is important, not because anyone thinks Obama is smoking pot with him, but because Ayers represents the radical Left.
All McCain had to do is say that Ayers repesents the radical Left, and ask America if they want to elect a man who feels comfortable with the Left, and with whom the radical Left is comfortable in return? But he didn't do it. I suspect it's because he doesn't understand it. McCain probably does think this is just dirt by association, and he sees that as undignified. He doesn't understand it.
Of course George shocked
October 16, 2008 - 09:39 ET by bradbenj5952Of course George shocked even himself at this tally as he fully expected John McCain and Sarah Palin to make clean sweeps of the debates! NOT! George, you are nothing but a barker for Bordello DNC.
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house." Acts 16:31
Wow! What a shocker!
October 16, 2008 - 10:13 ET by mattmWow! What a shocker! Life-long Democrat and Clinton operative declares the Democrat the winner in a debate? Amazing!
Surprise surprise! The
October 16, 2008 - 18:54 ET by wiwfSurprise surprise!
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy