In the midst of a campaign in which conservatives fret John McCain is missing opportunities by staying to the left on too many issues, Chrystia Freeland, the U.S. Managing Editor of the Financial Times based in London, declared “extremely imprudent” the conservative desire for John McCain to make a commitment against raising taxes. On Tuesday's Hardball she saw the “hard right,” not politicians unwilling to stick to a pledge, as the problem:
The first President Bush did not fare very well when he made that absolutely firm, clear campaign pledge not to raise taxes. So, you know, I think that in a way, the biggest problem John McCain is facing in this campaign is the hard right of his own party, which is trying to pin him into positions that are not really very realistic right now.
Her comment came after fill-in host Mike Barnicle read a statement from the Club for Growth rebuking McCain for saying that raising the Social Security tax is not “off the table.” Barnicle posed this leading question to her: “Can any sane politician, Chrystia, make an adamant, set in stone statement given the fact that we're a country at war with an energy crisis -- about never raising any tax under any circumstances?” She agreed “it would be extremely imprudent” to do so given the “dire economic situation the United States is facing right now.”
Freeland isn't always out there on the left. She once scolded Eleanor Clift for channeling hard left hate speech. My July 17, 2006 NewsBusters item, “Clift Raises Ire of Canadian Journalist When She Calls Bush 'Dictator Who's Ineffective,'” reported:
When, on the McLaughlin Group over the weekend, Newsweek's Eleanor Clift charged that President Bush is “a dictator who's ineffective,” an incensed Chrystia Freeland, a Canadian native who is the Managing Editor in the U.S. of London's Financial Times, scolded Clift for using the dictator label “so loosely” and inaccurately.
Clift opined that of those attending the G-8 summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin is “the only one of those leaders who goes in there with a commanding popularity among his own people, because he is perceived to be an effective dictator. What we have in this country is a dictator who's ineffective." Freeland, shouting over panelists who were trying to move on to other points, retorted: "But he's not a dictator! I mean we can't use, no we can't use these terms so loosely." Clift backtracked a bit: “Well we have an authoritarian President who is ineffective." But Freeland stood her ground, pointing out: "You guys can elect your Presidents and there can be a free choice. That's not the case in Russia."
From near the end of the Tuesday, July 29 Hardball on MSNBC, picking up after a clip of McCain on ABC's This Week declaring of a payroll tax hike that “nothing is off the table.”
MIKE BARNICLE: Chrystia, Pat Toomey, the President for the Club for Growth wrote an open letter to McCain after that statement, reading: “This statement was particularly shocking, because you have been adamant in your opposition to raising taxes under any circumstances. Your comments yesterday send American taxpayers and businesses a mixed message about where you stand on this issue. We hope you will clarify where you stand on this important issue and reaffirm your commitment to eschew all tax increases.”
Can any sane politician, Chrystia, make an adamant, set in stone statement given the fact that we're a country at war with an energy crisis -- about never raising any tax under any circumstances?
CHRYSTIA FREELAND: Well, I think it would be extremely imprudent and I would add to your point about war and energy, the fact that the American government is in the red. This is a dire economic situation the United States is facing right now. And we see more bills coming in every day. We've had Fannie and Freddie. We don't know how many regional banks the government is going to end up bailing out. Remember the savings and loan crisis.
So I think that John McCain, you know, perhaps made the mistake of political candor in saying he can't take anything off the table. That is absolutely true and we should also remember that the first President Bush did not fare very well when he made that absolutely firm, clear campaign pledge not to raise taxes. So, you know, I think that in a way, the biggest problem John McCain is facing in this campaign is the hard right of his own party, which is trying to pin him into positions that are not really very realistic right now.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





When, on the McLaughlin Group over the weekend, Newsweek's Eleanor Clift charged that President Bush is “a dictator who's ineffective,” an incensed Chrystia Freeland, a Canadian native who is the Managing Editor in the U.S. of London's Financial Times, scolded Clift for using the dictator label “so loosely” and inaccurately.
Can any sane politician, Chrystia, make an adamant, set in stone statement given the fact that we're a country at war with an energy crisis -- about never raising any tax under any circumstances? 









Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Gee, and I thought Matthews was MSNBC's biggest Problem
July 29, 2008 - 22:27 ET by JayTeeWhere does MSNBC get these Squirrels ?
Obama's biggest Problem is the Far Left.
MSNBC"s biggest Problem is the Far Left Talking Heads and their Ratings. IF they don't solve the Ratings problem, Matthews and this Lady Leftist will be asking for Un-employment compensation to be Raised, not Taxes.
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
Ninety Degrees to Starboard!
July 29, 2008 - 22:39 ET by Copperhead RidgeI'm so proud to be a problem.
Me too, Copperhead
July 30, 2008 - 00:07 ET by jefflebowskiI am proud to withhold my vote from McPain since he has continually sided with DemonRats and given the finger to conservatives over the years. Oh, and now the media doesn't like the "maverick?" My heart bleeds for the Democrat from Arizona.
Do better Republicans!
Jeff Lebowski
www.angrywhitedude.c...
as Reagan would say... WE
July 30, 2008 - 14:05 ET by TruthMongeras Reagan would say...
WE ARE THE SOLUTION
RINO's are "the problem"
Of course, the Dem Big Lie
July 29, 2008 - 23:03 ET by robert108Of course, the Dem Big Lie here is that taxes are the cure for any problem other than giving more of our money to greedy govt.
They keep trying to sell that one, even though it never works.
its always the 'cure'
July 30, 2008 - 11:59 ET by wizardjrIf the economy is booming then we have to 'tax the rich' because it's not fair they have more.
If the economy is in the tank then we have to raise taxes to redistribute it according to (insert pet theory of Marxist command economy).
Apparently all the money really belongs to the smart people like ObaMarx to work wonders with, so lets make it official - vote for The Obamesiah!
uuhh... McCain can't
July 29, 2008 - 23:08 ET by MidAmericauuhh... McCain can't raise taxes as President. He would have the option of allowing the democrat led House to raise taxes.
Hard right?
July 30, 2008 - 10:26 ET by Joe C.Who's the "hard right"? I don't think McCain has to worry about the anarchist vote. On the other hand, he may have a problem with conservatives - i.e. the center-right. Obama, conversely, has to keep the ultraleftists happy - i.e. "mainstream" Democrats - in that the more he tries to get to the center, the madder his base gets. Right now, the Media are keeping him afloat. If he wasn't biracial, he'd be polling in the 20s. As it is, if he set a priest on fire live on MSNBC, he'd still get 40% of the vote.
B. Hussein's reached his ceiling at 46-48% nationally, so once again, this will be a turnout election - that's McCain's problem. Getting enough of his base - the apolitical, disengaged moderates to get to the polls. Conservatives' sense of patriotism will get them to the polls to save the country (again!) from the Marxists. The Libertarians, I'm not so sure.
"The first President Bush
July 30, 2008 - 10:59 ET by Chris Norman"The first President Bush did not fair very well when he made that absolutely firm, clear campaign pledge not to raise taxes."
A typical disingenuous rewriting of history by a leftist reporter. Actually, Bush did "fair very well" when he made that pledge not to raise taxes - it's that he didn't fare very well when he broke it.
McNotObama '08
Exactly right.
July 31, 2008 - 05:49 ET by sarcasmoAnd tax cut fans should count themselves lucky -- at least y'all get promises to be broken later. Spending-hawks like me don't even get promises anymore. We know the mindless "choice" these days is between a tax & spend socialist and a borrow & spend statist.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I noticed, once again
July 31, 2008 - 03:19 ET by sarcasmoPromises only on taxes, and not on spending levels. Graphs like this scary one aren't injecting enough (read: "any") fiscal reality into the media managed 'debate' between the socialist tax and spend party vs the statist borrow and spend party because the news media, in their antilibertarian bias, aren't doing their jobs. Again.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.