HBO's 'Recount' Movie: Favors Democrats, Harris as Cruella De Vil

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

An early review is in for HBO's upcoming movie, Recount, about the Bush-Gore battle in Florida after 2000 election. Gillian Flynn in Entertainment Weekly, which like HBO is part of the Time-Warner family, has described the film, to premiere next Sunday night, as tilted against the Republican characters.

In her review in the May 23 edition of the magazine, Flynn asserted: “Recount may not be downright blue, but it's not as purply as it wants to appear.” Saying “Recount is an underdog story, and thus a Democrat story,” Flynn reported that the “Republican players here are coolly calculating -- Tom Wilkinson's James Baker III, the Bush team quarterback -- or they teeter on the edge of madness, like Laura Dern's Katherine Harris.” In fact, in an interview elsewhere, the writer of the movie slammed Harris as “a fraud.” [Screen shot is of Dern as Harris]

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Flynn awarded the film an A-, but concluded with caution about its imbalance:

Recount may not be downright blue, but it's not as purply as it wants to appear. Despite its ''equal time'' approach, Recount is an underdog story, and thus a Democrat story. While George W. Bush, like Gore, is only vaguely glimpsed, the remaining Republican players here are coolly calculating -- Tom Wilkinson's James Baker III, the Bush team quarterback -- or they teeter on the edge of madness, like Laura Dern's Katherine Harris. With flaming lipstick and helmet hair, Dern nails the Florida secretary of state's looks, cadence, and carriage to a disturbing degree, and she runs with Harris' Cruella De Vil vibe: At one point, before a press conference, Dern morphs her face from that of a human being into Harris' crazy-cuckoo public mask, and the moment is absolutely chilling. Fair? Debatable, but like Recount, it's a gorgeous bit of political theater.

That portrayal is not so surprising if you read an interview with the writer of the movie, Danny Strong, posted by HBO. Strong declared he “didn't understand why there wasn't a state-wide hand recount of the ballots in an election this close, in which there were uncounted ballots,” called the U.S. Supreme Court's eventual decision a “shame” because it was 5-4 and insisted that “like a lot of people, I felt that Katherine Harris appeared to be somewhat of a fraud at the time.”

Excerpts from Strong's comments:

....I was really frustrated and disgusted with the whole thing because I didn't understand why there wasn't a state-wide hand recount of the ballots in an election this close, in which there were uncounted ballots. It still makes no sense to me, and I know as much about the recount as a person can know. It's very obvious what needs to happen if it's down to 327 votes and there are 175,000 ballots that the machines have registered as non-votes. The laws of Florida say that you do a hand recount. In most states in the union, that's the law. That was the law in Texas; George Bush himself signed that into law. I didn't understand why Al Gore had only requested recounts in four counties. And I didn't understand the Republicans trying to do everything they could to block the recounts....

I had heard that the Florida Supreme Court was going to count the whole state and I thought, "Well finally!" And then I heard that the U.S. Supreme Court had shut it down! And I thought, "Well, maybe there's a reason, and I really hope it's a unanimous decision." And then when the decision was five-four, I remember thinking, "God, what a shame this is." I wasn't particularly suspicious of anyone. Like a lot of people, I felt that Katherine Harris appeared to be somewhat of a fraud at the time. But then I moved on with my life, like the rest of the country....

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wow, they just cannot let this go, can they?

I wonder if the HBO movie includes the fact that Al Gore had bus loads of lawyers down there trying to prevent the military absentee ballots from being counted.

Somehow I doubt it.

 

R D...

Do you think there's a chance we might win this time?

Jer

name

Why do you always end your posts with your name when it is plainly noted at the beginning?

Just to annoy you, cheesegrater.

Just to annoy you, cheesegrater.

Jer

ah, cheese, Jerry and I may disagree on much. However,

it would probably be to your everlasting benefit to ask intelligent guestions of him, as he certainly asks intelligent questions of us.

Many members here use their initials, if not their full names, in their sigs.

So what if it is the same as their SN?

Jezz sayin'.

Jer,

Honestly, I really don't know.

Personally, given the gravity of the situation I would like to have seen the entire state recounted, with neutral observers present at all polling stations during the recount.
As far as I know, the re-count conducted by the media after the fact only checked a small number of counties.

At least it would have removed a lot of questions.

I really don't think this question will ever be fully settled.

I do think the lawyers should have all been kept out of it completely on both sides, as there is something a little sleezy about that.

BTW-If it's any comfort, my guy lost as well, as I voted for Harry Browne in 2000. :-)

 

"We" already won.  If

"We" already won.  If Algore had succeeded in stealing the election, "we" - the American People would have lost.

Algore knew he lost.  He conceded but changed his mind after 'the machine' told him to demand a recount - he lost the recounts.

The only real purpose of the Democrat's actions was to taint the Bush presidency.

scumbags

I really wish someone would HIGHLIGHT this part

Wow, they just cannot let this go, can they?
May 18, 2008 - 16:03 ET by R D Helm

"I wonder if the HBO movie includes the fact that Al Gore had bus loads
of lawyers down there trying to prevent the military absentee ballots
from being counted.


Somehow I doubt it."

 

Amen to that! Will the movie continue to the point where several big time Liberal MSM outlets PAID for extra recounts and guess what? Even when every vote was counted (and recounted) - it was still a win for Bush.

Will the film show the states that the MSM reported as "Gore" on National TV did in fact, when all the votes were counted, go over to BUSH?

Will anyone put out a movie that shows the shady tactics of the Democrats in States like Washinginton State - Voter Fraud in King (Seattle) County? Or Maryland? Or Ohio? Among one that really stand out.

Will someone do a movie about "stealing the votes, and disenfranchising the military? Since the 2000 election it is HARDER for military personnel stationed outside their voting districts TO VOTE.

 

HBO Movie

How about a scene showing Wolf Blitzer on air crying when Gore finally conceded?

Yeah, d*mn those

Yeah, d*mn those Republicans for taking the election results to court...what's that? It was Gore who filed suit?

Well, then, d*mn those Republicans for wanting to stack the deck on the recounting...say what? It was Algore who only wanted to count heavily Democrat counties and precincts and to not count any ballots sent in by soldiers overseas?

Then, d*mn the Republicans for wanting to ignore the Supreme Court's decision to end the endless recounting...uh, you say the Supremes decided 7-2 in favor of Bush in Gore v. Bush?

Well, h*ll, isn't there anything we can blame on the Republicans about that election that won't be disproved by facts? Nothing? Well, let's go ahead and blame them anyway. Surely there are some out there that will parrot our talking points.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan

Mike, D*mn those

Mike,

D*mn those Republicans for making those confusing butterfly ballots... huh? Democrats were responsible for that one too?

D*mn those Republicans for calling the state early for Bush, depressing the vote in the panhandle where polls were still open... what? the Democrat MSM did that and it favored Gore because the panhandle is mostly Republican? No way!

D*mn that Republican controlled state supreme court that tried to change state election laws in midstream to favor Bush... what?? that was Democrats again you say, changing laws to favor Gore??

Well, how about the DISENFRANCHISMENT of Democrats by those evil Republicans... you can't deny that one.... you say there were hearings?? and Democrats could not produce a SINGLE person who was disenfranchised? How is that possible? Why do people think Bush stole the election??

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

A movie favoring

A movie favoring Democrats...who'd of thunked it?

Another thought, why can'y

Another thought, why can'y Hollywood once, just once, make a movie portraying Democrats in a bad light?

 

hahahahahahahahaha

Another example

Of corporate fascist media like Time Warner/HBO, sticking its ass where it doesn't belong. Who produced such propagandistic crap like this...Michael Moore the fat fascist from Flint?

No HBO For Me

I cancelled my HBO subscription a long time ago when they started airing Bill Maher. I refused to pay his salary.

Congratulations - I did the same

I too cancelled my HBO (the entertainment division of the DNC) subscription because of the slime and smear Mahr the moron and many of the other pornographic programs which seem to give the HBO staff much more erotic pleasure than it does to their viewers.

Unfortunately, my tactic didn't seem to work, as they are still on the cable channel. Mahr will stay on the air until he gets nailed with a couple of bags of crack and a pretty young boy, and the other porn shows simply re-enforce the immoral behavior taught our children by the 42nd president.

Maybe your cancellation along with mine will be enough to force them off the air.On second thought, there are about 150,000,000 democrats who seem to feed on this crap so I guess they have a pretty big audience base.

 

I wouldn't know about anything HBO

I cancelled as soon as the Sopranos ended. Too much Bill S%$^head Maher and nothing interesting. All of their shows are liberal. I don't support liberals!

Ditto... The Soparano's was

Ditto... The Soparano's was the only thing HBO had going for it... I proudly cancelled when the show ended.

http://politicsofdes...

You don't support liberals?

You don't support liberals? So you don't watch anything that has liberals involved?

I hate to say it but I will

I hate to say it but I will wait for the new Indian Jones movie to come to me video store to see it, all because of harrison ford's chest waxing add ( I finaly saw it last night when i went to see Iron Man)

 

A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
 -Thomas Jefferson

How about these two titles instead:

Florida

Michigan 

Gosh, one would almost

Gosh, one would almost think, due to the timing and all, that they're trying to stir up the angry Democrat base in time for the November elections. But it just couldn't be, could it?

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

A Side Observation

Laura Dern could also play Mary Matalin in a movie called "I Married an Alien".

Thinly Veiled Rage

Meet the real catalyst for the "Hate Bush" mantra. The left has never gotten over Florida 2000.

And of course Entertainment "Weakly" is fawning over it...

Drill ANWAR

-

 Strong declared he “didn't understand why there wasn't a state-wide hand recount of the ballots in an election this close

Catch up, friend.  There was.  After the fact.  Gore definitely lost.

And for the record, Gore did not want a state-wide recount.  His team deliberately called for a recount only in the four counties they thought he had a shot at winning.  Please also see the comment about the Gore team's exclusion of military ballots.  Now clarify:  who exactly is in favor of democracy?

<edit>  MikeB made the point about Gore not desiring to count military ballots.

<2nd edit>  Also, R D Helm.

It's part of the Democrat

It's part of the Democrat mythology now and actual facts don't matter. This will forever be the The Stolen Election to the liberals.

-

Ah.  Better to cling to a tragic myth than face cruel reality.  I see.

Other notable Democrat

Other notable Democrat myths:

The H-Bomb (The Rosenberg's were innocent victims)

McCarthyism (There were no communists in Hollywood or the State Department)

The Spanish Civil War (supposedly a fight between Democracy and Facism)

Anthropogenic Global warming (still up for grabs)

Found this I saved on my computer!

This IS NOT mine, I copied it from another source

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN NOV 19, 2000
19:31:42 ET XXXXX

RELEASED: DEMOCRAT MEMO ON HOW TO DISQUALIFY MILITARY VOTES

**World Exclusive**

The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained -- and is now releasing worldwide -- a memo
circulated to Democrats throughout Florida detailing how to disqualify overseas
military ballots!

MORE

It's been talked about. It's been flashed on TV. But now only the DRUDGE REPORT
can bring you the full text.

Mark Herron, a Tallahassee lawyer helping shepherd Democratic presidential election
lawsuits through the local courts, sent the five-page letter to Democratic
attorneys across Florida
giving them tips on how to lodge protests against the ballots which heavily
favored Republican George W. Bush.

Bush comfortably won Florida's overseas absentee vote by 1,380 votes to
Vice-President Al Gore's 750 but, after vigorous challenges by Gore canvassers,
1,527 of the postal ballots, many of them from soldiers and sailors on active
service, were rejected using Herron's blueprint.

Gen Norman Schwarzkopf led Republican condemnation of a five-page guide which
advised Democratic tellers how to raise objections to the postal votes.

He said: "It is a very sad day in our country when the men and women of
the armed forces are serving abroad and facing danger of a daily basis . . .
and are denied the right to vote for the president of the United States
who will be their commander in chief."

The 5-page memo as obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT:

Date: November 15, 2000
To: FDP Lawyer
From: Mark Herron
Subject: Overseas Absentee Ballot Review and Protest

State and Federal law
provides for the counting of "absentee qualified electors overseas"
ballots for 10 days after the day of the election or until November 17, 2000.
Sections 101.62(7)(a), Florida Statutes defines as "absentee qualified
elector overseas" to mean members of the Armed Forces while in the
service, members of the merchant marine of the United States and other citizens
of the United States, who are permanent residents of the states and are temporarily
residing outside of the territories of the United States and the Districts of
Columbia. These "absent qualified electors overseas" must also be
qualified and registered as provided by law.

You are being asked to review these overseas absentee ballots to make a
determination whether acceptance by the supervisor of elections and/or the
county canvassing board is legal under Florida
law. A challenge to these ballots must be made prior to the time that the
ballot is removed from the mailing envelope. The specific statutory requirement
for processing the canvass of an absentee ballot including of overseas absentee
ballot, are set forth in Section 101.62(2) (c)2. Florida Statutes:

If any elector or candidate present believes that an absentee
ballot is illegal due to a defect apparent on the voter's certificate, he or
she may at anytime before the ballot is removed from the envelope, file with
the canvassing board a protest against the canvass of the ballot specifying the
precinct, the ballot, and the reason he or she believes the ballot to be
illegal. A challenge based upon a defect in the voter’s certificate may not be
accepted after the ballot has been removed from the mailing envelope.

The form of the voter's certificates on the absentee ballot is set forth in
section 101.64(1), Florida
Statutes. By statutory provisions, only overseas absentee ballots mailed with
an APO, PPO, or foreign postmark shall be
considered a ballot. See Section 101.62(7)(c). Florida Statutes.

In reviewing these ballots you should focus on the following:

1. Request for overseas ballots: Determine that the voter
affirmatively requested an overseas ballot, and that the signature on the
request for an overseas ballot matches the signature of the elector on the
registration books to determine that the elector who requested the overseas
ballot is the elector registered. See Section 101.62(4)(a), Florida Statutes.

2. The voter's signature: The ballot envelope must be signed by the voter. The
signature of the elector as the voter's certificate should be compared with the
signature of the elector of the signature on the registration books to
determine that the elector who voted by ballot is the elector registered. See
Section 101.68(c)x, Florida
Statutes.

3. The ballot is properly witnessed: The absentee ballot envelope must be
witnessed by a notary or an attesting witness over the age of eighteen years.
You may note that these requirements vary from the statutory language from the
Section 101.68(2)(c)1, Florida
Statutes. Certain statutory requirements in that section were not proclaimed by
the Justice Department pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, Sec. DE
98-13.

4. The ballot is postmarked: With respect to absentee ballots mailed by
absolute qualified electors overseas only those ballots mailed with an APO,
PPO, or foreign postmark shall be considered valid. See Section101.62(7)(c), Florida Statutes. This
statutory provision varies from rule 15-2.013(7), Florida Administrative Code,
which provides overseas absentee ballots may be accepted if "postmarked or
signed and dated no later than the date of the federal election."

5. The elector has not already voted (duplicate ballot). In some instances, an
absent qualified elector overseas may have received two absentee ballots and
previously submitted another ballot. No elector is entitled to vote twice.
(Please insert appropriate Fl. xxx.)

To assist your review, we have attached the following:

1. A review Federal Postal regulations relating to FPO's and PPO's.

2. A protest form to be completed with respect to each absentee ballot
challenged.

3. Overseas Ballot Summary of Definitions.

Revised
Overseas Ballot Summary of Definitions

There are 3 different types of overseas ballots that are valid for return at
the counties provided they are postmarked on or before November 7th.

1. Federal Write-In ballot

Must be an overseas voter and must be eligible to vote and be
registered under State law.
Must have affirmatively requested an absentee ballot in writing and completely
filled out request (including signature)
Must comply with State laws applying to regular absentee ballots (such as
registration requirements, notification requirements, etc.)
Ballot contains only Federal races, and is considered to be a "backup"
system if the regular state absentee ballot fails to arrive.
The intent of the voter in casting the ballot should govern. In other words,
minor variations in spelling candidate or party names should be disregarded in
ballot counting so long as the intention of the voter can be ascertained.
Must be postmarked as an APO, FPO, or MPO in a
foreign country or at a foreign post office.

2. Florida
Advance Ballot

Sent out in advance of a regular General Election ballot with
state and Federal candidates listed. Must be an overseas voter and must be
eligible to vote and be registered under State law.
Must comply with State laws applying to regular absentee ballots (such as
registration requirements, notarization requirements, etc.)
Must have affirmatively requested an absentee ballot in writing and completely
filled out request (including signature)
Sent prior to the second (or October) primary elections to all permanent
overseas registered voters.
Must comply with all State laws regarding signatures, witness requirements,
etc.
Must be postmarked at the APO, FPO or MPO in a foreign country or at a foreign
post office.

3. Regular Overseas Ballot

Sent after the second (or October) primary elections to all
permanent overseas registered voters and voters requesting an overseas ballot
from the county.
Must be an overseas voter and must be eligible to vote and be registered under
State law.
Must comply with State laws applying to regular absentee ballots (such as
registration requirements, notarization requirements, etc.)
Must have affirmatively requested an absentee ballot in writing and completely
filled out request (including signature)
Full ballot with all candidates listed.
Likely would take precedence over any advance or federal ballot also returned.
Must comply with all State laws regarding signatures, witness requirements,
etc. Ballot is designed by the county.
Must be postmarked at an APO, FPO, or MPO in a foreign country or at a foreign
post office.

Below are the definitions for points of origin and postmark that are valid for
military overseas ballots:

1. APO (Army Post Office) -- A branch of the designated USPS civilian post
office, which falls under the jurisdiction of the postmaster of either New York
City or San Francisco, that serves either Army or Airforce personnel.

2. FPO (Fleet Post Office) -- A branch of the designated USPS civilian post
office, which falls under the jurisdiction of the postmaster of either New York
City or San Francisco, that serves Coast Guard, Navy, or Marine Corps
personnel.

3. MPO (Military Post Office) -- A branch of a U.S. civil post office, operated
by the Army, Navy, Airforce, or Marine Corps to serve military personnel
overseas or aboard ships.

4. Military Post Office Cancellation -- A postmark that contains the post
office name, state, ZIP Code, and month, day, and year that the mail xxx was
cancelled.

Protest of Overseas Absentee Ballot

As provided in Section 101.68(2)(c)(2), Florida Statutes. I, as an elector in
__________ County, Florida, hereby protest against the canvass of the overseas
absentee ballot described below:

County: ____________________________________________________

Precinct: __________________________________________________

The Ballot: ________________________________________________

Name of Voter: _____________________________________________

Address of Voter: __________________________________________

Reason for rejection: ______________________________________

___ Lack of voter signature

___ Lack of affirmative request for absentee ballot

___ Request for absentee ballot not fully filled out

___ Signature on absentee ballot request does not match signature on
registration card or on ballot

___ Voter signature on envelope does not match signature on registration card

___ Inadequate witness certification

___ Late postmark (indicate date of actual postmark)

___ Domestic postmark (including Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.)

___ No postmark

___ Voter had previously voted in this election

___ Other

__________________________________

Signature of Person Filing Protest

__________________________________

Print Name

11/15/00

-----------------------------------------------------------
Filed By Matt Drudge
Reports are moved when circumstances warrant
http://www.drudgerep... for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2000
Not for reproduction without permission of the author

This IS NOT mine, I copied it from another source

I don't subscribe to HBO

I won't get to see this but I'll bet they don't get into the discussions at the Florida Supreme Court. There were some dissenting votes after the US Supreme Court got involved and I would love to know what their discussions were about.

 

Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000. and Still Stuck

Balboa, no I don't

No, not if I can help it. I haven't seen a movie by any of the Hollywood big mouth idiots....in fact, I can't remember the last time I went to a movie. I will not support Alec Baldwin, Danny Glover, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Barbra Streisand, Sean Penn and the other leftist ilk.

If musicians make their leftist views known at concerts and I find out about it beforehand, I do not go. I am consistent with my values....I won't vote for McPain in the upcoming election because of my dislike of him and his past record.

So there, Balboa.

Election

At least they got the movie out before the election...

Maybe the public media elite will get lucky one day soon. Maybe a scientist will invent a more highly efficient way to control the human brain, and then they won't have to waste so much money convincing us what to think and who to vote for, and they can go back to making entertainment entertaining.

If he "moved on with his life"....

..then why was this made in the first place?

 I saw the promo for this last night and thought to myself "oh God, here we go with this crap again"

I also noticed right away how it would make Harris out to be evil personified and tilted towards Gore the whole way through. Predictable.

The Party of Hindsight, Coulda Beens and Do Overs

Welcome to the world of LET IT GO!!! You sad sad people.

And Danny, you appear to be somewhat of a fraud.

5 to 4 vote-- more like 7 to 2.

Justice Scalia said this to 60 Minutes and Leslie Stahl as reported by the Washington Times.

"The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn't even close. The vote was SEVEN to TWO" that the Supreme Court of Florida's method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional.

The 5-4 vote was on the remedy.

And he said it was Al Gore who ultimately put the issue into the courts. "It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question. ... It was he who said, 'I want this to be decided by the courts.'

That's Not Why I Dislike Katherine Harris...

Look, I could care less about what Harris did during the Florida recount because that's all in the past. What does concern me about her is some of the comments she made during a US Senate race in Florida in 2006. I first heard about this on the Michael Medved show, which is usually a reliable conservative source for information about current events. That said, she did a interview with the Florida Baptist Witness, where the offending comments were made. Suffice it to say, as an agnostic Jew, I was offended somewhat, if not feeling a little bit threatened. You'll see why...

From: Florida Baptist Witness, Aug. 24th, 2006(http://www.floridabaptistwitness.com/6298.article) Comments highlighted in bold.

Why should Florida Baptists care about this primary election? They should care about this election period. I will tell you that everywhere I go throughout the state and even the nation, people say the pollsters, the politicians and spiritually—that Florida is the forerunner state. That what happens in Florida sets the trend for what happens nationally. And with this election, if Bill Nelson wins, it’s going to be a very frightening proposition in 2008 in the presidential elections because whoever wins Florida will win the presidency. And he’ll be in a position to largely influence. No other candidate can beat Bill Nelson except for me. No one even has a chance because of name identification and fund raising abilities and things like that. But the real issue is why should Baptists care, why should people care? If you are not electing Christians, tried and true, under public scrutiny and pressure, if you’re not electing Christians then in essence you are going to legislate sin. They can legislate sin. They can say that abortion is alright. They can vote to sustain gay marriage. And that will take western civilization, indeed other nations because people look to our country as one nation as under God and whenever we legislate sin and we say abortion is permissible and we say gay unions are permissible, then average citizens who are not Christians, because they don’t know better, we are leading them astray and it’s wrong. ...

Any comments about that?