Discussing NBC News reporter Lee Cowan’s admission that “it's almost hard to remain objective” in covering Barack Obama, on Sunday’s Reliable Sources on CNN former CBS and PBS reporter Terence Smith agreed Obama is “absolutely” benefitting from “sympathetic” coverage and ex-Washington Post political editor John Harris revealed Post reporters “needed to go through detox” after coming back to the newsroom enthralled with the liberal Democratic presidential candidate. Recalling his days at the Post before helping to launch The Politico a year ago, Harris told ex-Post colleague and Reliable Sources host Howard Kurtz:
Almost a couple years ago, you would send a reporter out with Obama, and it was like they needed to go through detox when they came back: “Oh, he's so impressive, he's so charismatic,” and we're kind of like, “Down Boy.”
Harris, however, held his journalistic colleagues accountable: “What Lee Cowan said is it's hard. Okay, it's hard. Do it. Detach yourself. Nobody cares about our opinions.”
Earlier, Kurtz noted how “Obama was riding a huge media wave out of Iowa. Comparisons to JFK. He is an inspiring speaker, a man who can heal racial divisions. Newsweek this week says ‘Was he a media-created savior?’ So, my question is, is he benefitting, at least at the margins, from sympathetic coverage?” Terence Smith, a former reporter for the New York Times, CBS News and PBS, where he covered the media for the NewsHousr, replied: “Oh, absolutely. I mean, he is a charismatic figure, there's no question about it....and so people are somewhat swept up in that.”
My Friday MRC CyberAlert item, “Williams Calls Claim of Pro-Obama Bias 'Ridiculous,' But...” recounted:
Barely 24 hours after Brian Williams devoted a Monday NBC Nightly News story to a glowing look at Barack Obama in which Williams showed Obama the Newsweek with the Democratic candidate on the cover and wondered, "How does this feel, of all the honors that have come your way....Who does it make you think of? Is there a loved one?", Williams took to his blog to call "ridiculous" the suggestion, fueled by an NBC News reporter's admission "it's almost hard to remain objective" in covering Obama, that NBC has any "bias." But NBC and MSNBC have been actively promoting Obama's candidacy. Back in 2006, Today co-host Meredith Vieira called him "electrifying" and a "a rock star in politics" who has "touched people" and pushed him to run: "If your party says to you, 'We need you,' and, and there's already a drumbeat out there, will you respond?" Last summer, the Today show uniquely showcased a union's stunt with Obama playing a health care worker. Reporter Lee Cowan served up this softball: "What does it say about the state of our health care that you've got a 86-year-old man being taken care of by a 61-year-old woman and you put the two of them together and they probably don't have a living wage?"
Check that January 11 CyberAlert article for a rundown of many more examples of the infatuation with Obama displayed by NBC and MSNBC on-air staff.
The relevant exchange on the January 13 Reliable Sources, picking up after Kurtz played MSNBC.com’s Web video of Cowan, backstage at an Obama event in New Hampshire early last week, telling Brian Williams: “From a reporter's point of view it's almost hard to remain objective because it's infectious, the energy, I think. It sort of goes against your core to say that as a reporter...”
HOWARD KURTZ: Kate Snow, I give Lee Cowan credit for raising that issue. Is it hard to remain objective in the face of this Obama phenomenon?KATE SNOW, ABC News: Well, you know, I don't cover Obama, full disclosure. I cover Clinton. And I've been to a couple of Obama events. And I will say the contrast between his events and hers is striking. I mean, his events -- he is like a rock star. You go to these events and the crowds are enormous, there's an energy in the room. And I have written about that on our Web site. I wrote a piece once comparing and contrasting just the style and this sort of presentation difference between the two of them, so I can see his point.
I mean, it's easy to kind of get swept up in that, but, you know, I think we're all -- we're trying to be good journalists here. We're trying to cover these stories with fairness. And, you know, we have to do due diligence and be just as critical, look at them with just as critical eye as we would at any candidate, no matter how large their crowds are.
KURTZ: Obama was riding a huge media wave out of Iowa. Comparisons to JFK. He is an inspiring speaker, a man who can heal racial divisions. Newsweek this week says "Was he a media-created savior?" So, my question is, is he benefitting, at least at the margins, from sympathetic coverage?
TERENCE SMITH: Oh, absolutely. I mean, he is a charismatic figure, there's no question about it, as Kate suggests. And so people are somewhat swept up in that. There is a feel good emotion around the Obama campaign that -- as though it's bringing out the best in us, the very idea that an African-American could be treated equally, and well, and even be a promising candidate for president. So-
KURTZ: And I've heard some conservatives say that, people who ordinarily would not be a sympathetic to Democratic candidates.
SMITH: David Brooks has written to that effect. So people want to -- want this to work, and yet I hope and believe they are asking questions not about how he's saying things, but about what he's saying as well.
KURTZ: Hillary’s been on the national stage for 16 years. Obama is a new and exciting, and, as Terry says, inspirational figure. To some degree, are journalists rooting for the Obama story?
JOHN HARRIS: It wouldn't surprise me that there's some of that. You know, even when we were colleagues, when I was at the Washington Post, Howie, this is when I first noticed this. Almost a couple years ago, you would send a reporter out with Obama, and it was like they needed to go through detox when they came back -- "Oh, he's so impressive, he's so charismatic," and we're kind of like, "Down Boy." And so-
KURTZ: You're going to talk reporters down?
HARRIS: I felt that I did. And I didn't quite get what they were saying. Like, well, what's so great about it? In any event, what Lee Cowan said, is it's hard. Okay, it's hard. Do it. Detach yourself. Nobody cares about our opinions.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center



KURTZ: Hillary’s been on the national stage for 16 years. Obama is a new and exciting, and, as Terry says, inspirational figure. To some degree, are journalists rooting for the Obama story?












Editor at Large
Comments Policy
All aboard the Obama love
January 14, 2008 - 07:32 ET by BlazerAll aboard the Obama love train, next stop, no where. Obviously Obama is the media's Golden Child so look for a 24-7 infomercial media blitz until the general election on what a great product he is, buy him.
No matter how you spin it though, the media's empty, slobbering, infatuation of him is just ghey.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
" I think we're all --
January 14, 2008 - 07:35 ET by Nortonalec" I think we're all -- we're trying to be good journalists here. We're trying to cover these stories with fairness. And, you know, we have to do due diligence and be just as critical, look at them with just as critical eye as we would at any candidate, no matter how large their crowds are." Sure you are Kate. I did a time-check on the Chris Matthews show yesterday. The opening segment which focused on the Dems was 13 minutes long, while the next segment on the GOP was 5 minutes. I know Matthews doesn't try to be objective, but c'mon Kate, you guys are just trying to convince yourselves that you aren't slobbering all over Obama and Clinton, because it is too obvious to clear-thinking people hao full of it you are. Nortonalec
These guys have already lost
January 14, 2008 - 07:59 ET by motherbeltThese guys have already lost all their credibility on covering Obama. Good luck trying to get some of it back.
What the media is saying is
January 14, 2008 - 08:10 ET by MudhenWhat the media is saying is don't bore us with the details as we're not interested. We'd rather hear wonderful, meaningless platitudes about how you're all about "change." The sad part is it's the same way 75% of this country thinks.
The fact Obama is/was part of the corrupt Illinois political system doesn't seem to interest the MSM one bit says it all.
I agree, mudhen. Every
January 14, 2008 - 08:43 ET by motherbeltI agree, mudhen. Every time I hear Obama speak, it's all about flowery language: start a conversation, fulfill the promise, a new kind of politics, yeah, yeah, we know, a new day.....LOL
what does all that rhetoric actually mean?????
It sounds like he's already giving his inaugural address.
Agreed
January 14, 2008 - 10:44 ET by KC MulvilleObama speaks about compromise and new directions, and yet his voting record is as partisan as they come. He calls for compromise ... from his opponents, but none from himself. He just wants you to give up your ideals and your convictions so we can all be united ... under him.
Maybe the enthralled crowds will eat that up. Try to see him sitting across the table from Putin. Flowery words lose something in translation.
"Untouchables" For a
January 14, 2008 - 14:05 ET by stratman"Untouchables"
For a moment I thought you were referring to the bottom dwellers of the Indian caste system.
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
mb,Once again, I compare
January 14, 2008 - 12:00 ET by Chris Normanmb,
Once again, I compare Obama to Chance, the Gardener in Being There - vague phrases spoken by both are imbued with whatever meaning the enthralled listener wants to hear.
Ask Obama the monster on
January 14, 2008 - 09:23 ET by ConservativeRexAsk Obama the monster on the "Born Alive Infant " bill. That we would even need a bill for this is just unbelievable. This monster has consistently voted against making sure that babies bore premature with some difficulties do not live to see the light of day.
I am talking Downs Syndrome babies and such. If the mother had induced labor to have the baby and it survived outside the womb then Doctors would have had no obligation to try and keep this baby alive. The "Born Alive Infant" bill made sure the doctors tried their damnedest to keep these babies alive. Obama consistently voted no or "present" (which is a no) on passing this bill every time it came up in the Illinois legislature and tried to kill it on the federal level. He is a monster, there is no other word for him!
Perhaps a better term for Obama
January 14, 2008 - 09:35 ET by c5thenInstead of "monster", which is good, might I suggest "beast" as more nuanced?
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
How's Hillary Taking This???
January 14, 2008 - 09:30 ET by planetrepublicanThis must be driving Hillary nuts! She expected to be a shoe-in and now this.
Libs
January 14, 2008 - 11:34 ET by iveseenitallI'm not suprised the media love B.O. so much. He is they. Raise the taxes, kill the babies, pacify the terrorists, blame America and "change"it, encourage the welfare state, ...on and on it goes. B.O. is for unfettered socialism and communism. He's a lefty, as left as Hillary. Unfortunately, millions of apathetic, fuzzy-thinking American citizens believe in this mountebank who, like the Pied Piper, will play his flute until we all fall off the cliff. Sad!
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
The Danger in Obama
January 14, 2008 - 12:24 ET by CaringwhiteguyThis my friends is the danger of the Obama candidacy. He'll receive fawning love from the media. They would have fawned over Hillary because they want to see the Republicans defeated. They'll doubly fawn over Obama because in addition to defeating Republicans the media actually like the guy as compared to Hillary. They will triply fawn because of the race angle. Just look what's happening as the race card is played over and over in the Democrat primaries. If someone merely sneezes at Obama he will play the race card. The fawning press, wanting to encourage a "fair and diverse" America will march blindly along. Perish the thought of being considered a racist. The only way for the Republican candidate to handle it head on. Keep challenging. Keep calling attention to the direct and subtle race-baiting, and hope enough Americans see through the charade. When a candidate has to say "I'm not a racist" he has ceded the field of battle.